The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 69 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Crave Interactive 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Payments and Mobile Checkout.
The Digital Hotelier 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 69 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $400/mo | From $100/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 67 | 2 |
在分析了 69 条经验证的评价后,Crave Interactive 用户最看重其 客户服务, 用户界面, 定制,而 The Digital Hotelier 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户服务
▾
|
|
|
+
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
+
定制
▾
|
|
|
+
宾客沟通
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
硬件问题
▾
|
|
|
−
无缝系统集成
▾
|
|
|
−
后端系统
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 13 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #9 26 条评价 | #33 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #4 14 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 7 条评价 | #18 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 26 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 31 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #4 27 条评价 | #28 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #10 2 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 26 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #8 31 条评价 | #27 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #8 2 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #8 1 条评价 | #10 1 条评价 |
Both Crave Mobile Platform by Crave Interactive and The Digital Hotelier aim to enhance guest engagement through digital solutions. They solve the core challenge of providing contactless, mobile access to hotel services, but they diverge significantly in scope and sophistication. Crave offers a broad, feature-rich platform with substantial integration capabilities, while The Digital Hotelier focuses on a web-based, multilingual guest experience. Are you prioritizing a comprehensive in-house system or a simple, scalable web app?
Crave has amassed a strong user base with 48 reviews, all recent within the last six months, and an overall rating of 4.75/5. In contrast, The Digital Hotelier has only 2 reviews, with no recent feedback, and does not currently have an overall rating. Given the recency and volume of reviews, Crave’s data provides a more reliable picture of performance.
Crave is designed for hotels seeking a high-functionality, customizable guest engagement platform, especially those with complex or multi-service needs. Its extensive feature set—ranging from contactless ordering to NFC and mobile payments—caters to hotels that want to automate and streamline multiple guest touchpoints. In contrast, The Digital Hotelier serves hotels that prefer a web-first, no-download interface primarily for simple service requests and upsells, often suitable for properties with a minimal tech footprint.
Crave’s integration with 17 hotel systems and its presence across six continents demonstrate its scalability and robustness, making it ideal for properties that want a deeper, more connected guest experience. Meanwhile, The Digital Hotelier’s core strength lies in its ease of access and multilingual support, which might appeal to hotels with international guests wanting quick, contactless interactions. Do you need a feature-rich platform or a straightforward, accessible guest interface?
If your hotel needs a highly customizable, multi-feature guest engagement platform with extensive integrations, go with Crave. Its high review count and recent positive feedback affirm its reputation among hotels that value detailed reporting, contactless payments, and in-venue ordering, especially in luxury and branded hotel segments.
If your hotel focuses on providing a simple, web-based experience without the need for extensive system integrations, The Digital Hotelier might be better. It suits vacation rentals, villas, or boutique hotels that prioritize ease of access and multilingual support over deep feature sets, although its limited reviews and absence of recent feedback make it less proven at scale.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s user interface is rated 4.61/5, with many reviewers citing its intuitiveness and helpful onboarding process. Users praise Crave for its straightforward setup, especially for staff training, and mention that guests find it easy to navigate, even during busy periods.
The Digital Hotelier receives a slightly lower rating of 4.5/5, with reviews highlighting its web-based simplicity and multi-language support as strengths. However, users note that its onboarding can be inconsistent, and some report needing additional support to maximize its features.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave boasts 18 unique features, including mobile checkout, QR codes, Apple Pay, digital menus, in-venue ordering, contactless payments, and NFC. These features enable a hotel to automate multiple touchpoints, from ordering to payments, directly impacting revenue and guest satisfaction.
The Digital Hotelier offers 7 core features mainly centered around guest requests—ordering food, booking services, and requesting housekeeping—plus built-in upsell tools and external service management. It lacks the broad set of in-venue ordering and payment features Crave provides.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s support team scores 4.79/5, with reviews emphasizing quick, polite responses and proactive assistance. Hoteliers report that Crave’s technical team resolves issues swiftly, often going above expectations.
The Digital Hotelier’s support scores 3.5/5, with reviews suggesting that service can be inconsistent, and some users express frustration over slow responses and unresolved issues. Given its limited review volume, the support experience remains less validated.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave integrates with 17 verified partners, including major systems like Oracle Hospitality, Infor, and Amadeus, covering a broad range of hotel operations. Its extensive integrations enable real-time data sharing and automation across property management, POS, and other systems.
The Digital Hotelier has only 3 verified integrations, including Shiji Group and its own platform, limiting its ability to connect with broader hotel systems. Its narrower scope may restrict advanced automation for larger or more complex properties.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s overall rating of 4.75/5 is supported by recent reviews from diverse hotel segments, including luxury and branded hotels, which rate it highly for usability and support. Hoteliers in these segments appreciate its customizable features and reliable support.
The Digital Hotelier has no recent reviews or overall ratings, making it difficult to gauge satisfaction. Its limited feedback suggests a lack of widespread trust or proven performance at scale.
Edge: Crave Mobile Platform.
Crave’s base price is $400 per month, with no free tier, trial, or implementation fees. Its higher cost reflects its extensive feature set and broad integrations.
The Digital Hotelier charges a $100 monthly base fee, with no mention of setup or additional costs. However, the lack of recent reviews and fewer features suggest it may be more suitable for smaller properties or those with limited budgets.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Crave’s platform excels in delivering a feature-rich, deeply integrated, and well-supported solution, making it suitable for larger, upscale, or tech-savvy hotels. Its recent reviews and high ratings make it a reliable choice for properties seeking to elevate guest experiences through automation.
The Digital Hotelier offers a straightforward, web-based interface ideal for smaller hotels or vacation rentals that need simple, multilingual interactions. Its limited features and support history suggest it’s less suitable for properties with complex operational needs or larger guest volumes.
Choose Crave if you want a comprehensive, scalable system that can evolve with your hotel’s needs. Opt for The Digital Hotelier if you prefer an easy-to-deploy, basic guest engagement tool with minimal setup.
This comparison aims to clarify your decision based on current data, reviews, and your specific property needs. Whichever you choose, ensure it aligns with your hotel’s operational scale, guest expectations, and growth plans.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | From $100/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Crave Mobile Platform 和 The Digital Hotelier 共享 7 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 二维码 | ||
| 付款 | ||
| 基于网络(无应用程序) | ||
| 数字菜单 | ||
| 移动结帐 | ||
| 苹果支付 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 6 项功能存在差异。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Crave Interactive 提供卓越的客户服务,响应时间快,支持人员乐于助人。酒店经营者欣赏高效、主动的支持,这有助于迅速解决问题。
虽然用户界面因其对客人友好和直观而受到赞赏,但一些反馈表明它可以更加现代化和可定制,以更好地满足个别酒店的需求。
自定义选项(尤其是菜单更新和访客界面)有限,而且通常需要 Crave Interactive 团队的支持。用户表示希望对自定义有更多控制权。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到了对硬件的担忧,特别是平板电脑的耐用性和充电困难。这些问题会影响使用系统时的整体效率和客户满意度。
该系统与其他酒店管理系统(如 Simphony 和 PMS)的集成,使操作更加顺畅,减少了手动输入。这在大型活动期间以及高效管理客房服务时尤其有用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Crave Mobile Platform 和 The Digital Hotelier 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Crave Mobile Platform 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 The Digital Hotelier 提供 3 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Crave Mobile Platform 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Crave Mobile Platform:否。The Digital Hotelier:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Crave Interactive 的 HT Score 为 75,The Digital Hotelier 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问