The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Dack |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Dack |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Dack |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right guest app can significantly impact your hotel's operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Dack by Dack and STAY Guest App aim to improve guest communication and streamline services, but they approach these goals differently. Dack appears more suited for short-term rental businesses with a focus on operational management, while STAY offers a broader suite of guest-facing features tailored for hotels. Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s specific needs?
Dack presents itself as a property management solution optimized for short-term rentals, emphasizing AI-generated insights and operational management. Conversely, STAY is a comprehensive guest experience OS designed to digitize hotel services, enhance communication, and reduce friction points during a guest’s stay. The stark contrast lies in their focus: Dack targets operational efficiency through AI, while STAY centers on elevating the guest experience via digital services.
Dack’s lack of recent reviews and zero review count suggest limited market presence and confidence, especially compared to STAY, which boasts 206 recent reviews and a high overall rating of 3/5. The absence of verified integrations and regional coverage further points to its narrower scope. Does your hotel prioritize operational management or guest experience? If guest interaction is a priority, STAY likely offers more immediate value.
If your hotel mainly needs a tool to handle short-term rental operations, focus on AI-driven reviews, or streamline property management, Dack might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews and a zero score on HotelTechReport, it’s hard to justify its effectiveness at this stage.
For hotels aiming to enhance guest engagement, reduce queue times, and digitize services like room service and local recommendations, STAY is clearly the stronger choice. Its 206 recent reviews with a 3/5 rating, along with high customer support scores, demonstrate proven success in the field. If you want a platform that’s tested, well-supported, and widely adopted, STAY is the more reliable pick.
Since Dack has no recent reviews or user ratings, its ease of use remains unverified. On the other hand, STAY scores a robust 4.78/5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward CMS. Hoteliers comment that STAY’s mobile app is “simple to implement” and “easy to navigate,” which helps staff adopt it faster.
Given the current data, STAY’s user experience is clearly superior, and its onboarding process is rated at 4.63/5. Without recent feedback for Dack, the edge goes to STAY for ease of use.
Dack offers no unique features explicitly listed, focusing primarily on AI-based summaries for property management. In contrast, STAY provides 14 distinct features, including guest messaging, chatbots, room service ordering, local recommendations, multilingual support, and mobile checkout.
These features directly impact guest satisfaction and operational efficiency, giving STAY an undeniable edge. Its feature set is tailored for large-scale hotel operations, filling gaps that Dack does not address. For hotel teams seeking a feature-rich platform, STAY is the clear winner.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for Dack’s customer support, which raises concerns about its responsiveness and reliability. Conversely, STAY scores a high 4.83/5 for customer support, with reviews praising its “helpful,” “responsive,” and “professional” team.
Many users highlight how STAY’s support team quickly resolves issues and provides ongoing assistance, which is crucial for smooth implementation and daily operations. The support experience alone strongly favors STAY for hotels seeking dependable vendor backing.
Dack has no verified partners or integrations listed, limiting its ability to connect with existing hotel systems. STAY, on the other hand, boasts 20 verified integrations with systems like Hotelkit, Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and SiteMinder, covering PMS, CRM, and distribution platforms.
This extensive integration network simplifies back-end workflows and data sharing, making STAY more adaptable to your hotel’s existing tech stack. For hotels prioritizing connectivity, STAY offers a clear advantage.
Dack’s absence of recent reviews and a zero overall rating make it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. STAY, with 206 recent reviews and an overall rating of 3/5, indicates moderate but positive feedback, especially considering the high support ratings and feature count.
Property types like large chains and resorts tend to rate STAY higher due to its scalability and feature set. Given the recent reviews and high support scores, STAY’s rating reflects a more reliable and trusted solution for hotels.
Dack does not publicly list pricing details, which suggests it may have custom quotes or is less transparent. STAY charges a flat $300 monthly fee, with no implementation or additional charges, offering predictable costs for hotels.
The transparency and straightforward pricing of STAY make it easier for your team to evaluate ROI and budget accordingly, whereas Dack’s unclear pricing may pose challenges.
Not ideal if your hotel requires robust guest engagement tools, integrations, or regional coverage. Dack is best suited for niche operational management, not full guest experience enhancement.
Not ideal if your hotel’s primary focus is property management without the need for a guest-facing app or if regional support is limited. STAY is ideal for hotels prioritizing guest engagement and operational digitization.
Dack positions itself as an AI-driven property management tool, with a focus on operational insights, but its current lack of recent reviews and features makes it a risky choice. STAY, with its 206 recent reviews, high customer support rating, and extensive feature set, proves to be a more reliable and comprehensive solution for hotels.
If your priority is guest experience, operational streamlining, and integrations, STAY is the clear winner. For niche management needs in the short-term rental space, Dack could be considered, but only with further validation of its capabilities.
For now, STAY’s proven track record, broad feature set, and recent positive reviews make it the recommended choice for most hotels looking to enhance guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Dack 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Dack 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Dack:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Dack 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问