The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
DJUBO 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
GuestCentric 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 43 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 20 | 23 |
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店预订软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 5 条评价 | #3 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 0 条评价 | #7 5 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) | — | #9 0 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #12 0 条评价 | #6 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #10 3 条评价 | #4 11 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #11 2 条评价 | #7 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #13 0 条评价 | #7 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 0 条评价 | #3 5 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #13 0 条评价 | #15 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #14 17 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #2 5 条评价 | #12 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | #11 0 条评价 | #10 0 条评价 |
Choosing between DJUBO and GuestCentric for your hotel’s reservations and management needs hinges on your operational complexity, regional focus, and feature priorities. Both products aim to streamline reservations, inventory, and revenue, but they do so differently. DJUBO offers an all-in-one platform with extensive features and a strong global presence, while GuestCentric emphasizes a user-friendly CRS with a focus on direct booking growth. Which aligns better with your hotel’s specific needs?
Both DJUBO and GuestCentric cater to hotels seeking to centralize reservations and operational management. DJUBO’s platform integrates PMS, channel management, POS, revenue, and guest feedback modules—effectively replacing several systems with one. GuestCentric, on the other hand, specializes in a CRS and booking engine designed to maximize direct bookings and simplify inventory management.
While DJUBO boasts a wide-ranging feature set—30 unique features—GuestCentric offers a streamlined interface with fewer features but a focus on conversion-driven reservations. DJUBO’s platform is more suited for hotels needing an all-in-one solution across multiple operational facets, especially if regional coverage in Asia, Africa, or North America is critical. GuestCentric excels in providing a highly rated CRS with strong customer support and is preferred by boutique and city center hotels.
The core divergence lies in scope versus specialization. DJUBO’s broad feature set makes it an ideal choice for hotels seeking comprehensive management under one roof. GuestCentric’s targeted reservation system is better if your hotel prioritizes direct bookings and ease of use.
Are you looking for a complete management platform or a focused CRS to boost direct reservations?
If your hotel needs a full-stack hospitality platform that combines PMS, channel management, POS, revenue management, and guest feedback, DJUBO is the clear choice. Its 20 reviews in the last six months, with a 5/5 overall rating, reflect a high level of satisfaction among users of various property types, especially independent hotels in Asia Pacific and North America.
Conversely, if you require a user-friendly CRS and booking engine primarily for increasing direct reservations, GuestCentric’s platform, with 19 recent reviews and a 4.75/5 rating, is preferable. It is particularly favored by boutique hotels and city center properties, emphasizing ease of use and customer support.
For multi-property operations or hotels needing integrated management, DJUBO’s extensive features and regional coverage make it the better fit. For smaller properties or those emphasizing direct bookings with a simple interface, GuestCentric is a more targeted solution.
Would your hotel benefit from a complete operational system or a focused reservation engine?
Both products score nearly identically on ease of use—DJUBO at 4.65/5 and GuestCentric at 4.66/5—indicating that users find both platforms intuitive. DJUBO’s interface is praised for its look and feel, particularly its mobile app, with reviews highlighting its practicality for multi-property management.
GuestCentric’s platform is lauded for being highly user-friendly, reducing clicks and simplifying the reservation process, especially appreciated by smaller teams or boutique hotels. Training and onboarding are rated similarly, at approximately 4.57/5, with some reviewers noting a need for clearer communication during setup.
Edge: GuestCentric.
DJUBO’s platform includes 30 unique features, covering channel management, multi-currency, PMS, POS, revenue management, guest feedback, and advanced rate shopping. It offers modules that support group bookings, housecleaning, metasearch connectivity, and mobile apps—making it a robust, all-in-one solution.
GuestCentric’s CRS does not list additional features beyond its core reservation and booking engine, focusing on direct reservation conversion and inventory management. Its core strength is the booking engine and website integration, but it doesn’t provide the extensive modules DJUBO offers.
Edge: DJUBO.
GuestCentric’s support scores 4.76/5, with reviews emphasizing its responsiveness and helpfulness, especially for larger properties or those needing quick resolutions. Users frequently praise its friendly and competent team, with consistent praise for solving issues promptly.
DJUBO’s support, rated at 4.63/5, is also well-reviewed, with comments noting responsive, helpful service. However, some reviews suggest reporting could be more robust, and additional customization options would be beneficial.
Edge: GuestCentric.
GuestCentric integrates with 44 verified partners, including third-party booking engines, payment gateways, and distribution channels—making it highly flexible for larger, complex properties. Its integrations include platforms like Omnibees, WebRezPro, and yieldPlanet, alongside shared partners like Tripadvisor.
DJUBO’s integration pool is narrower, with 3 verified partners, including Tripadvisor and Simplotel, but it covers core needs like channel management and PMS connectivity. Its fewer integrations may limit flexibility for properties relying on diverse third-party tools.
Edge: GuestCentric.
DJUBO has a 5/5 overall rating from 20 recent reviews, primarily from independent hotels and properties across Asia Pacific and North America. Reviewers praise its comprehensive management features and cost-effectiveness, with many emphasizing its suitability for multi-property operations.
GuestCentric boasts a 4.75/5 rating from 19 recent reviews, with a majority from boutique and city center hotels. Customers commend its ease of use, customer support, and effective reservation system.
Overall, DJUBO’s higher review count and recent ratings tilt the scales in its favor, indicating broader hotel satisfaction across segments.
Edge: DJUBO.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly available, and neither offers a freemium or subscription model. They operate on custom quotes based on hotel size and feature needs, so costs can vary significantly.
Your team should request personalized quotes to compare total costs, considering the scope of features needed and support levels.
Not ideal if your hotel only requires a simple booking engine or minimal operational management.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive management modules or operates across multiple regions with complex distribution needs.
DJUBO offers a comprehensive, all-in-one hospitality platform with a broad feature set, suited for hotels seeking operational integration and multi-property management. Its higher review count and recent ratings confirm its strong position in the market, especially for independently operated properties.
GuestCentric excels as a CRS with a focus on direct reservations, high customer support ratings, and ease of use, making it ideal for boutique hotels and properties emphasizing online booking growth. Its extensive integrations are advantageous if your hotel relies on multiple third-party partners.
If your property needs a robust, full-featured management system with regional coverage, DJUBO is the better choice. For hotels focused on boosting direct reservations with minimal operational fuss, GuestCentric remains a compelling option.
In conclusion, for most hotels evaluating between these two, DJUBO’s broader capabilities and recent review momentum tip the scales in its favor.
酒店预订软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|---|
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Djubo (CRS) 和 GuestCentric CRS 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 渠道管理和OTA分销 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 18 项功能存在差异。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
这取决于您的需求。Djubo (CRS) 和 GuestCentric CRS 共享许多核心 Hotel Reservations Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Djubo (CRS) 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 GuestCentric CRS 提供 44 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Djubo (CRS) 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Djubo (CRS):否。GuestCentric CRS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Reservations Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。DJUBO 的 HT Score 为 0,GuestCentric 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问