The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Enola Labs 表现出色 .
STAY 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Guest Messaging.
基于 HTR 上 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 215 |
在分析了 215 条经验证的评价后,Enola Labs 用户最看重其 ,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户体验优化
▾
|
|
|
+
移动和用户体验
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
支持和服务
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
CMS 和定制
▾
|
|
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
|
−
分析和报告
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right guest app for your hotel can significantly influence guest satisfaction, operational efficiency, and your bottom line. Both Enola Labs and STAY aim to improve guest interactions through digital solutions, but they differ substantially in scope, user experience, and market presence. Your decision hinges on what your hotel needs most: a tailored digital product or a comprehensive guest experience platform.
Enola Labs offers a custom app development approach focused on complex business requirements, while STAY provides a ready-made, feature-rich guest app trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide. Which aligns better with your hotel’s growth stage and digital strategy?
Enola Labs specializes in creating bespoke digital solutions, addressing unique business challenges with tailored mobile and web apps. Its focus lies in integrating latest technologies into custom products, catering to clients from startups to Fortune 500 companies. Conversely, STAY offers a pre-built guest app platform with extensive features, designed specifically for hotels to deploy quickly and see immediate benefits.
While Enola Labs's offerings are flexible, they lack a predefined feature set, making implementation longer and more expensive. STAY, with over 200 recent reviews and a high 9.59/10 NPS score, demonstrates widespread user satisfaction and continuous improvement. Do you prefer a customized app or a ready-to-go guest experience platform?
If your hotel needs a custom solution that integrates deeply with your existing systems or addresses highly specific operational challenges, Enola Labs is the better option. It’s ideal for hotels with complex workflows requiring tailored interfaces and functionalities.
For hotels seeking a proven, feature-rich guest app that improves operational efficiency and guest satisfaction immediately, STAY is the clear choice. Its 20 verified integrations, large market presence across 31 countries, and over 200 recent reviews demonstrate its reliability and ongoing support—making it suitable for both independent hotels and large chains.
Enola Labs’s user experience depends on the custom app designed for your hotel, which can vary widely based on your specifications. Its onboarding process is project-specific, often requiring significant collaboration and a longer ramp-up time. In contrast, STAY’s platform scores 4.78/5 for ease of use, with a straightforward CMS and user-friendly interface.
Guests and staff find STAY’s app intuitive, with many reviews highlighting how simple it is to navigate and update information. Staff can quickly adapt to the platform without extensive training. Edge: STAY.
Enola Labs does not list specific features, as it builds bespoke solutions to meet client needs. Its value lies in tailored development that can include any feature your hotel requests, but it lacks a predefined feature catalog. STAY, however, offers 14 distinct features, including mobile app access, chatbot, room service ordering, request management, local recommendations, automatic translations, mobile checkout, and guest profiles.
STAY’s extensive feature set directly addresses multiple guest touchpoints, reducing manual tasks and increasing satisfaction. Its package ensures quick deployment and immediate benefits. Edge: STAY.
Enola Labs has no publicly available customer support ratings or recent reviews, making it difficult to assess its support quality. Its focus on custom development implies ongoing support depends on contractual arrangements, which can vary in responsiveness. STAY, with a 4.83/5 support rating and recent reviews praising prompt, helpful assistance, offers consistent, accessible support.
Many users mention how STAY’s support team quickly resolves issues and guides through onboarding, enhancing confidence in the product’s reliability. Support quality is crucial for smooth operation, making STAY the stronger choice here. Edge: STAY.
Enola Labs has no verified partner integrations listed, indicating its solutions are typically custom integrations built specifically for each hotel. This can lead to longer setup times and higher costs for integrations. STAY boasts 20 verified partners, including hotelkit, Winhotel, SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and Mews, facilitating seamless integration with PMS, CRM, and other systems.
The breadth of integrations in STAY allows for a more unified hotel operation and faster deployment. For hotels seeking a plug-and-play solution with extensive system compatibility, STAY again leads. Edge: STAY.
Enola Labs has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Without feedback, its reputation remains uncertain. Conversely, STAY has amassed over 200 recent reviews in the last six months, averaging a 4/5 overall rating and a remarkable 9.59/10 NPS score.
Hotels across market segments, especially large chains and resorts, praise STAY’s impact on operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. The large volume of recent reviews indicates ongoing customer satisfaction and product stability. Edge: STAY.
Enola Labs’s pricing is not publicly available; as a custom developer, costs vary based on project scope, features, and integration complexity. Expect higher upfront costs and longer timelines. STAY charges a fixed base price of $300 per month, with no additional implementation, setup, or hidden fees, making it predictable and accessible for many hotels.
While STAY’s transparency simplifies budgeting, Enola Labs’s custom approach may be more expensive initially but tailored precisely to your needs. Your choice depends on whether you prefer certainty or customization.
Enola Labs is best for hotels with the resources to invest in custom development and a clear vision for their digital tools.
STAY suits properties committed to enhancing guest experience through a flexible, scalable platform with proven results.
Enola Labs provides tailored mobile and web applications designed to meet complex, specific business needs, making it ideal for hotels with unique operational models. Its bespoke approach allows for deep system integration and custom user interfaces but comes with longer timelines and higher costs.
STAY is a feature-rich, ready-made guest app platform trusted worldwide, especially by large chains and resorts. Its extensive integrations, ease of use, and high user satisfaction make it the choice for hotels seeking quick deployment, proven results, and ongoing support.
If your hotel needs a fast, reliable guest app that improves operational flow and guest satisfaction immediately, STAY is the clear winner. For hotels with complex workflows, specific customization needs, or a long-term digital vision, Enola Labs offers a flexible, tailored solution.
In conclusion, for most hotels looking for a tested, scalable, and well-supported guest app, STAY stands out as the safer, more reliable choice. Enola Labs remains a strong contender for those with unique requirements and the resources to develop a custom solution.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Enola Labs 和 STAY Guest App 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 消息路由 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 自动回复 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Enola Labs 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Enola Labs 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Enola Labs:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Enola Labs 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问