The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 500 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
eviivo 表现出色 在 响应式客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 Vacation Rentals & Villas 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Guest App.
innRoad 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
在分析了 500 条经验证的评价后,eviivo 用户最看重其 响应式客户支持, 入职专业知识, 技术效率,而 innRoad 用户则强调 客户支持, 报告和收入管理, 预订引擎和 ota 集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
响应式客户支持
▾
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
+
入职专业知识
▾
|
+
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
+
技术效率
▾
|
+
预订引擎和 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
+
预订和预约效率
▾
|
+
磁带图
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
改进建议
▾
|
−
系统故障
▾
|
|
−
定制和功能开发
▾
|
−
信用卡处理
▾
|
|
−
移动兼容性和应用程序
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #15 54 条评价 | #6 179 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #23 23 条评价 | #16 47 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #20 8 条评价 | #13 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #18 2 条评价 | #9 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #19 41 条评价 | #12 96 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #16 38 条评价 | #15 45 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #19 21 条评价 | #16 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #10 18 条评价 | #13 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #15 39 条评价 | #3 275 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 142 条评价 | #34 5 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #33 2 条评价 | #39 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | #29 1 条评价 | #34 0 条评价 |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ PMS and innRoad hinges on your hotel’s size, operational needs, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline bookings and manage reservations but diverge significantly in scope, features, and regional presence. While eviivo boasts a high user rating and extensive review base, innRoad’s newer reviews and higher recent ratings demand attention. Which one will support your hotel’s future best?
eviivo Suite™ is designed for a broad spectrum of accommodations, especially independent hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals, with a strong presence in Europe and the UK. innRoad, meanwhile, emphasizes scalability for larger properties and chains primarily in North America, making it more suitable for properties looking to expand rapidly.
eviivo’s platform is recognized for its ease of use, with a 4.43/5 rating and 191 reviews, yet it suffers from a low overall rating of 0.93/5, mainly due to recent negative experiences and low review recency. innRoad enjoys a 4.7/5 rating based on 238 reviews, with a much more recent data set, highlighting improved customer satisfaction and stability.
The key difference? eviivo’s extensive integrations, automation, and global reach contrast with innRoad’s focus on operational simplicity, direct revenue increase, and North American dominance. If your hotel relies heavily on international channels and diverse property types, eviivo may be more fitting. But if you’re seeking a straightforward, growing solution with strong support, innRoad’s recent data speaks louder. Which will better serve your hotel’s niche?
If your hotel is a boutique or independent property, especially in the UK or Europe, and values multi-channel integrations alongside automation, eviivo is the way to go. Its native email marketing, payment requests, and guest app are tailored for smaller, guest-centric operations seeking broad distribution.
Conversely, if your hotel or chain needs to boost direct bookings, streamline operations, and prioritize ease of use, innRoad is preferable. Its user-friendly interface, high-quality support, and robust reservation management are ideal for properties in North America aiming for growth, with a focus on revenue uplift and operational efficiency.
Hotels that prioritize extensive integrations, automation, and multi-lingual capabilities in diverse markets should lean toward eviivo. Those seeking a straightforward, scalable solution with a proven track record of increasing bookings and revenue in North America should opt for innRoad.
eviivo’s interface scores 4.43/5 with 191 reviews, reflecting a generally intuitive experience, though some users mention that the design could be more user-friendly; initial onboarding is rated 4.38/5, with many praising the support staff. Its mobile app is appreciated for on-the-go management, but some users find it still has room for mobile-specific improvements.
innRoad boasts a similar ease-of-use score of 4.49/5 based on 238 reviews, with many users highlighting its straightforward Tape Chart and reservation management. Support is rated slightly higher at 4.54/5, with recent reviews emphasizing quick, helpful responses and overall smoother onboarding.
Edge: innRoad.
eviivo offers 51 features, with notable exclusives like a guest app, centralized messaging, automated reminders, and native email marketing, tailored for small to medium properties seeking automation. Its 9 features unique to eviivo cater to owners who want a highly integrated, guest-focused experience.
innRoad provides 42 shared features and 14 exclusive ones, including multi-currency support, property management, booking engine, revenue management, and integrated ID scanning—features critical for larger or growing hotel portfolios. It also offers a native booking engine and a channel manager with connections to hundreds of OTAs.
While eviivo excels in communication and automation, innRoad’s strength lies in its comprehensive PMS and booking tools. For property owners needing advanced revenue and group management, innRoad is the clear choice. For those prioritizing guest communication and multi-lingual support, eviivo leads.
Edge: innRoad.
eviivo’s customer support scores 4.42/5 based on 191 reviews, with users praising its responsiveness and onboarding assistance. Support staff, like Xavier and Joseph, are frequently commended for their professionalism, though some users report room for quicker resolution times.
innRoad beats slightly with a 4.54/5 support rating from 238 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its 24/7 availability and proactive communication. Support is seen as reliable, with users noting the support team’s patience and effectiveness, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Edge: innRoad.
eviivo integrates with 32 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, Airbnb, and specialized partners such as Hotelchamp and PriceLabs. Its integrations are especially suited for independent hotels and vacation rentals, providing extensive distribution options.
innRoad offers slightly more, with 34 verified partners, including well-known platforms like QuickBooks, Revinate, and RateGain. Its integrations support a broad range of operational needs, from revenue management to credit card processing.
Both systems excel in connection breadth, but innRoad’s slightly higher partner count and direct integration with financial tools make it a versatile choice for larger operations.
Edge: innRoad.
Despite eviivo’s large review volume, its overall score is 0.93/5, largely driven by recent poor reviews and user frustration. The more recent reviews favor innRoad, which boasts a 4.7/5 and high satisfaction from North American hotels of all sizes—particularly in the hospitality segment.
innRoad’s reviews highlight its ease of use, support, and measurable revenue increases, especially among small and boutique hotels. eviivo’s older reviews include praises for integrations but also severe complaints about system outages and poor support during critical moments.
Given the recent feedback, innRoad’s ratings reflect genuine current satisfaction.
Edge: innRoad.
eviivo’s pricing starts at $700/month, with no free tier or trial options, reflecting its enterprise-grade offerings and extensive features. Pricing may be a barrier for smaller properties or those seeking leaner budgets.
innRoad begins at $300/month, with no hidden fees or additional charges, making it more accessible for small to medium-sized properties. Its transparent pricing, combined with free data migration, offers strong value for hotels aiming for growth without surprise costs.
For hotels with limited budgets, innRoad provides a more budget-friendly entry point, while eviivo’s premium pricing aligns with its broader feature set.
Not ideal if your hotel is primarily North American-focused, requires highly customizable reporting, or is looking for a cost-effective solution.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on international channels without a local presence, or if mobile app functionality is a top priority.
eviivo Suite™ is a feature-rich, highly automated PMS that excels in multi-channel distribution, especially for small to medium European and UK properties. Its strong integrations and guest communication tools make it ideal for independent, guest-focused hotels that want broad reach.
innRoad is better suited for North American hotels and chains prioritizing simple, reliable management, revenue growth, and strong support. Its higher recent ratings and ease of use make it the safer, more proven choice for properties seeking expansion and operational efficiency.
If your hotel’s main goal is broad distribution and automation, eviivo is your pick. But if you need a straightforward, growth-oriented PMS with excellent support, innRoad is the better option.
Final note: innRoad’s recent review count and higher ratings make it the stronger choice right now. Its focus on operational simplicity and support aligns with most hotels seeking growth and stability today.
我们分析了 12 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而... Eviivo 的客户支持因其响应速度和效率而备受赞誉。Guetif 先生、Joseph 和 Xavier 等支持人员提供了卓越的帮助,这在用户入职阶段以及出现问题时至关重要,从而提升了整体用户体验。
该平台在入职流程中提供专业知识,帮助酒店无缝集成系统。该指导确保信息集成的一致性和PMS功能的最佳利用,从而提高物业管理效率。
Eviivo 因其高效的技术而备受认可,它使用户能够更快、更少地完成任务。这减少了停机时间并改善了运营工作流程,确保了酒店管理的流畅体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些用户建议进行改进,特别是扩展移动应用程序开发等功能以及更具体的日常使用技巧,以进一步优化业务运营并利用平台的功能。
虽然用户总体上感到满意,但仍要求提供更多定制选项,包括网络和移动应用程序增强功能,以进一步满足特定的运营需求并提供额外的价值。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。eviivo Suite™ PMS 和 innRoad 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。eviivo Suite™ PMS 提供 32 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。eviivo Suite™ PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
eviivo Suite™ PMS:否。innRoad:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。eviivo 的 HT Score 为 87,innRoad 的为 31。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问