项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 370 条经验证的评价后,Exely 用户最看重其 支持团队的响应速度与合作关系, 预订引擎的易用性和宾客体验, 直接预订与收入增长,而 ROIBACK 用户则强调 预订引擎和预订管理, 直销业绩与转化优化, 账户管理与主动支持。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
支持团队的响应速度与合作关系
▾
|
+
预订引擎和预订管理
▾
|
|
+
预订引擎的易用性和宾客体验
▾
|
+
直销业绩与转化优化
▾
|
|
+
直接预订与收入增长
▾
|
+
账户管理与主动支持
▾
|
|
+
价格、库存和促销管理
▾
|
+
专业的、专注于酒店业的服务
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告与分析深度
▾
|
−
多单元酒店的多房预订逻辑
▾
|
|
−
定制和品牌灵活性
▾
|
−
按酒店类型展示忠诚度福利
▾
|
|
−
支付、发票和取消流程问题
▾
|
−
价格一致性与竞争性定价控制
▾
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #7 110 条评价 | #29 8 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #7 125 条评价 | #22 18 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 68 条评价 | #15 9 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #5 14 条评价 | #9 7 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 94 条评价 | #23 16 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #10 60 条评价 | #22 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #10 48 条评价 | #19 13 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 12 条评价 | #22 4 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #21 3 条评价 | #19 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #16 24 条评价 | #19 13 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 219 条评价 | #10 14 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #1 73 条评价 | #14 3 条评价 |
Exely Booking Engine and Roiback | Booking Engine both address the critical hotel challenge of increasing direct bookings and minimizing reliance on OTAs, but they diverge sharply in user satisfaction, support, and operational fit. Exely excels in ease of use, customer support, and direct booking growth, favored by a larger, more active user base and stronger recent ratings. Roiback offers richer feature variety and more integrations but suffers from slower support and less recent feedback, limiting confidence in its current performance.
Both products embed booking capabilities into hotel websites to keep guests in-brand and reduce booking drop-offs. They synchronize rates and availability with OTAs and PMS, aiming to improve revenue by capturing more direct sales. However, the choice depends on the property’s size, technical needs, and priority between support responsiveness and feature breadth.
If your hotel is seeking a booking engine proven to boost direct bookings with exceptional ease of use and rapid onboarding, Exely Booking Engine is the clearly superior choice based on 325 reviews, including 166 in the last six months averaging 4.9/5 overall. Properties with medium to large portfolios, especially branded hotels, city center hotels, and resorts, report consistent revenue growth and operational simplicity with Exely. This is supported by multiple case studies showing substantial direct booking increases, such as MetroStar Kuala Lumpur’s 72% uplift.
Conversely, if your property values a feature-rich platform with native integrations to 28 partners, including loyalty programs, social media booking, and alternative accommodation recommendations, Roiback may better serve hotels needing those specific capabilities. Roiback’s user base includes luxury hotels and branded chains. However, Roiback’s 45 reviews, none recent, average 4.5/5 overall with a lower onboarding rating, suggesting slower adaptation and less current validation. Roiback’s pricing at $500 base per month doubles Exely’s $200, which may deter smaller or budget-conscious hotels.
For small independents or properties in emerging markets where support speed and simplicity are critical, Exely’s high customer support rating and active review volume provide a safer bet. Where multi-channel marketing integration and complex upselling tools are more important, Roiback’s unique features might justify the trade-off.
Exely leads clearly on ease of use and onboarding with ratings of 4.9/5 for both, compared to Roiback’s 4.5/5 ease of use and 4.3/5 onboarding. Reviewers praise Exely’s intuitive interface, simple booking flow, and fast guest conversion, describing it as "incredibly easy to use" and "intuitive for guests." Front desk and revenue managers report less training time and smoother daily operations with Exely’s platform.
In contrast, Roiback users comment on a less modern interface and note the need for improvements such as default language settings and dashboard usability. Some reviewers report duplicated fields and slower adaptation, which can increase staff errors or require additional training. The lack of recent reviews raises questions about ongoing usability enhancements.
Edge: Exely.
Roiback offers 10 unique hotel-specific features that Exely lacks, including urgency messaging, room substitutions, conversion rate reports, Facebook conversion tracking, flexible date search, social media booking integration, alternative accommodation recommendations, loyalty program integration, and Apple Pay and Google Pay support. These features support advanced marketing tactics, guest engagement, and payment flexibility, appealing to hotels focused on digital sales expansion and multi-channel campaigns.
Exely provides 4 exclusive features: flat, floating, and discounted rates management, automated reporting, PayU payment support, and pooled inventory control. These features facilitate centralized rate strategy execution and real-time inventory pooling across multiple properties or sales channels, improving revenue management efficiency. Reviewers confirm Exely’s rate and inventory controls reduce manual errors and speed up rate updates across OTAs and direct channels.
Both platforms share 26 features, covering core booking engine functionality such as embedded booking, multi-currency support, and channel manager integration.
Given Roiback’s broader feature set tailored to marketing and guest engagement, it fits hotels prioritizing direct sales growth through advanced digital tools. Exely’s strengths lie in rate management automation and operational simplicity.
Edge: Roiback.
Exely scores a perfect 5/5 on customer support and 4.9/5 on onboarding, backed by 166 recent reviews praising its fast, responsive, and partnership-oriented service. Users highlight the support team’s ability to quickly resolve issues, guide complex setups, and assist in maximizing platform benefits. The partnership model reduces downtime and accelerates hotel staff confidence.
Roiback rates 4.7/5 on support and 4.3/5 on onboarding from 45 older reviews. While some reviews commend account managers and direct channel specialists for personalized consulting, several negative reviews describe frustrating delays in resolving issues, communication barriers, and inefficient support workflows, with problem resolution sometimes taking 1 to 2 months. The transition to ticket-based help has reportedly weakened direct, proactive engagement.
Edge: Exely.
Roiback leads with 28 verified integrations, almost triple Exely’s 10. Both support Oracle Hospitality, a critical channel manager and PMS for many hotels. Roiback’s unique partners include RoomRaccoon, GuestCentric, HiJiffy, Sojern, yieldPlanet, and Triptease, reflecting strong ties to digital marketing and distribution platforms valuable for larger hotels and chains seeking complex tech ecosystems.
Exely’s exclusive integrations cover PMS and channel managers like hotellab, Clock, Bakuun.com, IDeaS, Mews, Booking.com, Hotelogix, and HyperGuest, focusing on core hotel operations and revenue management.
Hotels with advanced multi-system environments or who rely heavily on digital marketing integrations will find Roiback’s ecosystem more comprehensive. Properties with simpler tech stacks or requiring strong PMS and OTA synchronization may prefer Exely’s targeted integration set.
Edge: Roiback.
Exely’s overall rating is 4.9/5 across 325 reviews, including 166 in the last six months maintaining a 4.9 score, confirming excellent recent performance and customer satisfaction. Roiback holds a 4.5/5 rating from 45 reviews but has no reviews in the last six months, leaving current quality uncertain.
Segment analysis shows Exely rated 4.9/5 or higher by branded hotels (49 reviews), city center hotels (93), airport/conference hotels (76), resorts (72), boutique hotels (96), and luxury hotels (60). Roiback’s ratings peak at 4.7/5 for boutique hotels (16) and city center hotels (17) but fall to 4.4/5 for resorts (21) and 4.1/5 for extended stay (4), with limited sample sizes.
This data indicates Exely’s stronger reputation across a broader hotel spectrum and more recent validation, while Roiback’s rating is respectable but based on fewer and older reviews.
Edge: Exely.
Exely lists a base price of $200 per month with no implementation fee or trial. Roiback’s base price is $500 per month, also without implementation fees or trials. Neither offers freemium or monthly flat/room-based pricing models publicly.
Exely’s pricing is less than half Roiback’s, which may influence decisions for budget-conscious hotels or smaller properties. Roiback’s higher price may be justified by its broader feature set and integrations but requires careful ROI consideration.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference between Exely and Roiback lies in operational simplicity and customer support versus feature breadth and integration scale. Exely offers a streamlined, user-friendly booking engine with outstanding customer support and rapid onboarding that drives direct booking growth and reduces OTA dependence, proven by 325 reviews averaging 4.9/5 and strong recent activity. Roiback provides a richer feature set and nearly triple the integrations, catering to hotels with complex marketing and distribution needs but struggles with slower support and fewer recent validations.
Choose Exely Booking Engine if you want a cost-effective, highly rated solution that quickly improves your direct booking channel with minimal staff training and fast issue resolution. Its centralized rate and inventory controls and stable OTA synchronization make it ideal for branded hotels, resorts, and city center properties focused on operational efficiency and revenue growth.
Choose Roiback | Booking Engine if your hotel demands advanced marketing tools, extensive integrations, and loyalty program support, and you are prepared for a longer onboarding and higher monthly cost. This suits luxury and branded hotels pursuing aggressive direct sales through multiple digital channels, provided you can accommodate slower support response times.
The data supports a definitive verdict: for most hotels prioritizing ease, support, and proven revenue impact, Exely Booking Engine is the better fit. Roiback fits hotels with specialized feature needs and integration complexity that justify its higher cost and support trade-offs.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
商品和包装
|
|
|
| 房间替换 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 固定费率、浮动费率和折扣率 | ||
| 合并库存 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 网站整合 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
|
▾
追加销售和交叉销售
|
|
|
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 可定制的附加组件 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 膳食计划 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 忠诚度计划整合 | ||
|
▾
转换
|
|
|
| 移动优化/响应式 | ||
| 特别优惠和折扣 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 多房间和多费率计划预订 | ||
| 房间替换 | ||
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 价格对比 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| Facebook 转化跟踪 | ||
| 可定制的退出意图模式 | ||
| 表单自动填充 | ||
| 灵活日期 | ||
| 费率计划比较 | ||
| Google 酒店广告预订 | ||
| Tripadvisor 预订 | ||
|
▾
支付
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 苹果支付 | ||
| Google Pay | ||
| 贝宝 | ||
| PCI合规性 | ||
| PayU | ||
| 条纹 | ||
|
▾
通知
|
|
|
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 入住后电子邮件 | ||
| 入住前电子邮件 | ||
| 确认电子邮件 | ||
|
▾
团体预订
|
|
|
| 婚礼和企业预订模块 | ||
| 可用性块 | ||
|
▾
报告与分析
|
|
|
| 自动报告 | ||
| 转化率报告 | ||
| 推荐报告 | ||
| Google Analytics 跟踪 | ||
|
▾
税务合规
|
|
|
| PCI合规性 | ||
| 符合 ADA 标准 | ||
| 关税 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 |
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"We took a proactive approach and collaborated with Exely, implementing various strategies, such as a loyalty program. The outcome has been outstanding — not only have we been able..."
"Partnering with Roiback has been a game-changer, as their innovative solutions and close support by our Direct Channel Specialist have empowered Jasmine City Group to reach new h..."
"Once we switched to Exely, we immediately noticed a significant increase in reservations from online travel agencies. We discovered that our previous system had blocked some availa..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
大量评论赞扬Exely的支持和客户成功团队,因其快速响应、实操设置帮助和以解决方案为导向的指导。酒店通常将这种关系描述为真正的合作伙伴关系,帮助他们更快上... 大量评论赞扬Exely的支持和客户成功团队,因其快速响应、实操设置帮助和以解决方案为导向的指导。酒店通常将这种关系描述为真正的合作伙伴关系,帮助他们更快上线、迅速解决问题,并更有效地使用平台。
预订引擎被反复描述为直观、快速,宾客可以以最小的摩擦完成预订。评论者表示,简洁的流程、移动端友好的表现和简便的导航改善了宾客体验,有助于提高完成的预订... 预订引擎被反复描述为直观、快速,宾客可以以最小的摩擦完成预订。评论者表示,简洁的流程、移动端友好的表现和简便的导航改善了宾客体验,有助于提高完成的预订数量。
评论者普遍认为 Exely 有助于将销售从 OTA 转移到酒店官网,提升直接预订转化率和整体收入。许多人指出,预订引擎带来更有利润的直销,降低佣金成本,并帮助酒店... 评论者普遍认为 Exely 有助于将销售从 OTA 转移到酒店官网,提升直接预订转化率和整体收入。许多人指出,预订引擎带来更有利润的直销,降低佣金成本,并帮助酒店更好地掌控客人关系。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
许多评测者希望获得更高级的报告功能、更深入的筛选以及更可定制的仪表盘,以更好地跟踪预订、收入、渠道和转化表现。虽然基础报告很有用,但买家明显认为分析功... 许多评测者希望获得更高级的报告功能、更深入的筛选以及更可定制的仪表盘,以更好地跟踪预订、收入、渠道和转化表现。虽然基础报告很有用,但买家明显认为分析功能是 Exely 可以成为收入团队更强决策工具的一个领域。
酒店经常希望对预订小部件、网站设计、配色方案、发票、邮件和确认页面拥有更多控制权,以使体验更好地符合其品牌。这很重要,因为许多评论者希望 Exely 看起来... 酒店经常希望对预订小部件、网站设计、配色方案、发票、邮件和确认页面拥有更多控制权,以使体验更好地符合其品牌。这很重要,因为许多评论者希望 Exely 看起来不那么模板化,而是为每个酒店提供更具差异化的体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Roiback 的核心预订引擎是评论的重点,用户称其为直销分销体系中的关键组成部分。它因帮助高效管理预订并支持提升客人预订体验而受到重视。
用户反复表示,Roiback通过使预订流程高效、协调且注重转化,帮助提升直订量。该平台被视为一款业务工具,通过从网站访问到完成预订的更顺畅路径,支持更强的收... 用户反复表示,Roiback通过使预订流程高效、协调且注重转化,帮助提升直订量。该平台被视为一款业务工具,通过从网站访问到完成预订的更顺畅路径,支持更强的收入表现。
评论强调了强有力的日常合作支持,特别是来自客户经理的支持,客户经理被描述为响应迅速、随时可用且积极主动。用户赞赏持续的跟进和洞察,这些帮助他们更有效地... 评论强调了强有力的日常合作支持,特别是来自客户经理的支持,客户经理被描述为响应迅速、随时可用且积极主动。用户赞赏持续的跟进和洞察,这些帮助他们更有效地管理绩效和运营。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
一位评论者指出需要更好地处理多房或多单元预订,特别是为了避免重叠和可用性错误。这表明当前的逻辑对于库存需求更复杂的酒店可能不够完善。
一位评论者指出,忠诚度福利可以更清晰地展示或按酒店类型区分。该评论暗示,更清晰的展示有助于提升客人理解,并使忠诚度优惠在不同酒店类型中更具针对性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Exely Booking Engine 和 Roiback | Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。Exely Booking Engine 提供 10 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Roiback | Booking Engine 提供 28 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Exely Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Exely Booking Engine:否。Roiback | Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Exely 的 HT Score 为 96,ROIBACK 的为 73。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐