Gofryday vs. STAY Guest App: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 217 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 217 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Gofryday 表现出色 在 ROI and onboarding 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payments and Mobile Checkin.

STAY 表现出色 在 客户体验优化 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Gofryday 与 STAY Guest App 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 217 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
47
推荐可能性
100%
96%
易用性
5.0/5
4.8/5
客户支持
5.0/5
4.8/5
性价比
5.0/5
4.6/5
起始价格 From $400/mo From $300/mo
经验证的评价 2 215

Gofryday 与 STAY Guest App 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 217 条经验证的评价后,Gofryday 用户最看重其 ,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Gofryday Gofryday STAY STAY
优点
+ 客户体验优化
+ 移动和用户体验
+ 运营效率
+ 支持和服务
缺点
CMS 和定制
集成能力
分析和报告

Gofryday 对比 STAY:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Gofryday Gofryday STAY STAY
小型(10-24 间客房) #18 2 条评价 #9 10 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #4 83 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #2 89 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #2 24 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Gofryday Gofryday STAY STAY
精品酒店 #2 77 条评价
豪华酒店 #26 2 条评价 #2 88 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #3 91 条评价
长住酒店 #6 7 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Gofryday Gofryday STAY STAY
北美 #5 27 条评价
欧洲 #3 112 条评价
亚太 #7 2 条评价 #6 3 条评价
中东 #7 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing the right guest app for your hotel can significantly influence guest satisfaction, operational efficiency, and revenue. Gofryday by Gofryday and STAY Guest App are both designed to enhance your guests' experience through digital solutions, but they differ markedly in features, reviews, and market presence. Your decision hinges on which product aligns best with your property's size, segment, and operational priorities.

Gofryday offers a streamlined, easy-to-navigate platform with a focus on internal management and automation, while STAY provides a broader suite of guest-facing features backed by a larger user base and more comprehensive integrations. Which one will meet your hotel’s specific needs?

Is Gofryday or STAY Better for Hotels?

Gofryday and STAY aim to improve guest satisfaction and streamline hotel operations, but they tackle these goals differently. Gofryday emphasizes internal management tools such as guest journey tracking, staff notifications, and additional automation features like payments and mobile check-in—yet it lacks verified integrations and has only two recent reviews. STAY, meanwhile, focuses on digitizing guest interactions, reducing queues, and offering real-time updates, supported by over 200 recent reviews and 20 verified integrations.

Gofryday's limited review count and absence of recent feedback make it less reliable for predicting future performance, especially in diverse hotel environments. In contrast, STAY’s extensive recent reviews and broad integration ecosystem suggest a more mature and adaptable product. Do you prioritize internal management or guest engagement?

Gofryday vs STAY: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a simple, easy-to-adopt platform that helps track the guest journey and manage staff notifications, Gofryday is a solid choice. Its user-friendly interface and high ease-of-use rating (5/5) make onboarding straightforward, especially for small or boutique hotels seeking basic automation.

However, if your hotel prioritizes extensive guest-facing features like reservations, real-time updates, and integrations with PMS or CRM systems, STAY is the better fit. With over 200 recent reviews and a 4.78/5 ease-of-use score, STAY is proven to improve operational efficiency and guest satisfaction at mid-sized to large properties with complex service needs.

Is Gofryday or STAY Easier to Use?

Gofryday’s UI scores a perfect 5/5, reflecting its straightforward design and simple onboarding process, as echoed by reviews praising its "end-to-end product" and "all details under one window." Its minimal feature set and focus on internal management make staff adoption less complex. However, its lack of recent reviews introduces uncertainty about ongoing user experience.

STAY’s interface scores 4.78/5, praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate by users across a broad spectrum of hotel types. Its onboarding process is smooth, with many reviews emphasizing the platform’s adaptability and user-friendliness. Edge: Gofryday.

Which Has Better Features: Gofryday or STAY?

Gofryday offers 10 shared features with STAY, including core functionalities like messaging and guest data management, with two unique features: payments and mobile check-in. Its feature suite is tailored for operational management and automation within small to mid-sized hotels.

STAY boasts 10 shared features plus four exclusive ones, including a mobile app, chatbot, automated replies, and message routing—covering more digital guest engagement tools. Its ability to integrate with numerous systems (20 verified partners) provides more flexibility for larger, tech-forward hotels. Edge: STAY.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Gofryday or STAY?

Gofryday maintains a perfect 5/5 in customer support but is based on only two reviews, with no recent feedback available. The reviews highlight its responsive and proactive support, yet the limited data makes it difficult to gauge long-term reliability.

STAY has a high support rating of 4.83/5 based on over 200 recent reviews, with many guests praising their quick, helpful assistance. Some reviews note the absence of phone support and slower reporting, but overall, STAY’s support team is considered highly reliable. Edge: STAY.

Which Has More Integrations: Gofryday or STAY?

Gofryday currently shows zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel systems. Its lack of integrations restricts its usefulness for larger properties needing seamless PMS, CRM, or revenue management links.

STAY integrates with 20 verified partners, including hotelkit, Winhotel, SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and Mews, covering a wide array of hotel management systems. This extensive integration ecosystem makes STAY a more versatile tool for connecting your existing infrastructure. Edge: STAY.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Gofryday or STAY?

Gofryday’s review count is minimal—just two reviews—and both are non-quantitative, providing little insight into hotel satisfaction. Its performance and user satisfaction remain uncertain due to the absence of recent feedback.

STAY’s 206 reviews over the past six months reveal an average rating of 3/5, with properties ranging from luxury hotels to resorts. Larger chains like NH Hotels and Riu have expressed satisfaction, especially regarding operational improvements and guest engagement. Its recent reviews and higher rating make it the clearer choice. Edge: STAY.

How Much Do Gofryday and STAY Cost?

Gofryday charges $400 upfront, with no free tier, monthly fees, or trial options. Its fixed pricing could be limiting for smaller properties or those seeking flexibility.

STAY’s base price is $300, also without a trial, but its lower entry point and broader feature set suggest better value for money, especially considering its extensive integrations and proven track record. Pricing transparency is limited, but STAY presents a more accessible option for mid-sized hotels.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Gofryday?

  • Hotels that prioritize internal management over guest interaction.
  • Small boutique hotels or villas aiming for simple automation.
  • Teams seeking straightforward, easy-to-implement solutions.
  • Hotels that want to track guest requests and staff tasks.
  • Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced guest engagement features or integrations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use STAY?

  • Large hotels and hotel chains seeking extensive guest engagement tools.
  • Properties that need integration with PMS, CRM, or revenue systems.
  • Hotels aiming to reduce front desk queues and improve operational efficiency.
  • Resorts or properties with a high volume of reservations.
  • Teams looking for an app with proven ROI in increasing revenue.
  • Not ideal if your hotel prefers a basic, management-only platform with minimal guest-facing features.

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Gofryday is an easy-to-use management tool with strong internal tracking, suitable for small hotels seeking simplicity. Its limited recent reviews and lack of integrations mean it’s less suited for larger or tech-heavy properties.

STAY stands out through its extensive features, integrations, and positive user feedback, making it the best choice for mid-sized to large hotels aiming to digitize guest experiences and increase operational efficiency. Its proven track record with major hotel chains underscores its reliability and scalability.

If your hotel needs a straightforward internal management system, Gofryday might suffice, but if you want a comprehensive guest experience platform with wide-ranging integrations, STAY is the clear winner.

Final Recommendation: For most hotels evaluating two products, STAY’s more recent reviews, broader feature set, and extensive integrations position it as the better option overall.

Gofryday 和 STAY Guest App 的价格是多少?

酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Gofryday Gofryday STAY STAY
Starting Price From $400/mo From $300/mo

Gofryday 有哪些 STAY Guest App 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Gofryday 和 STAY Guest App 共享 10 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Gofryday Gofryday STAY STAY
付款
手机值机
消息路由
移动应用
聊天机器人
自动回复

实际成果:Gofryday 对比 STAY(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
Gofryday Gofryday

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

STAY Barceló Hoteles 大型
+ Room Service is faster. It's more comfortable. For the guests. And for the staff too
+ Barceló can make better decisions in real time
+ Through live surveys, Barceló can detect pain points more easily and streamline processes

"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."

Álvaro Montalvo
Álvaro Montalvo
Project Manager Innovation
改善宾客体验
Gofryday Gofryday

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

STAY AMR Collection 中型
+ The app pays for itself according to AMR's Product Manager. "Spa services, gourmet dinners, wine sales, and other premium services have seen significant increases since we implemented the app.
+ The implementation of STAY skyrocketed the number of users of AMR's app. Increasing them by 50% was their goal. However, they "far exceeded that goal.
+ AMR's users rate the app 4.7 out of 5 on average. The app has been downloaded tens of thousands of times in 50 AMR hotels.

"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."

Yudy Mora
Yudy Mora
Product Owner Manager

Gofryday 对比 STAY:总结

Gofryday
Gofryday
5.0/5 来自 2 条评价

独特功能

付款 手机值机
5.0/5 易用性 5.0/5 客户支持 0 个集成
查看资料
STAY
STAY
4.8/5 来自 215 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

客户体验优化 97% 正面

多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。

移动和用户体验 90% 正面

该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。

运营效率 96% 正面

STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

CMS 和定制 41% 负面

CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。

集成能力 50% 负面

用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。

排名更高的方面

小型(10-24 间客房) #9 vs #18
住宿加早餐与客栈 #4 vs #28
豪华酒店 #2 vs #26
度假酒店 #2 vs #38

独特功能

移动应用 聊天机器人 自动回复 消息路由
4.8/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 20 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 STAY 3.0 vs 0.0 (+3)
性价比 Gofryday 5.0 vs 4.6 (+0.4)
入职培训 Gofryday 5.0 vs 4.6 (+0.4)

关于 Gofryday 与 STAY Guest App 的常见问题

Gofryday 能否替代 STAY Guest App?

这取决于您的需求。Gofryday 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Gofryday 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Gofryday 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Gofryday 或 STAY Guest App 是否提供免费方案?

Gofryday:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Gofryday 和 STAY Guest App?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Gofryday 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息