The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) | #14 1 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #6 19 条评价 | #24 2 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 7 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #10 2 条评价 | #9 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #8 17 条评价 | #28 2 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #9 13 条评价 | #21 3 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #5 14 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 | #8 3 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | #16 2 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #6 21 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #15 0 条评价 | #3 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | #6 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Hub OS Guest in Touch and innOrder hinges on your hotel’s core operational needs. While both serve the hotel guest app category, they tackle different aspects of guest interaction: Hub OS focuses on internal communication and operational efficiency, whereas innOrder centers on in-room ordering and revenue generation. Which solution aligns more with your current priorities: improving operational workflows or enhancing guest amenities?
Both platforms aim to elevate guest experiences, but their features, support, and market presence diverge significantly. Your choice depends on whether you need a comprehensive communication tool or a streamlined ordering system. Are you ready to see which product better fits your hotel’s goals?
Hub OS Guest in Touch and innOrder are designed to enhance different parts of your hotel operation. Hub OS aims to improve internal communication, maintenance, and service management by enabling staff to respond quickly to guest requests and operational issues. Conversely, innOrder specializes in simplifying in-room food and beverage orders, focusing on boosting ancillary revenue and guest convenience.
The key distinction is that Hub OS is a multi-functional management platform with a focus on operational efficiency, boasting a 4.69/5 overall rating from 27 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use and support. innOrder, with only 6 reviews and no recent data, primarily targets in-room ordering, with a user-friendly web app and a 5/5 ease of use rating, but limited overall support or integration data.
If your hotel prioritizes streamlining operational workflows—maintenance, inter-department communication, housekeeping—Hub OS clearly leads with more recent reviews, higher overall ratings, and a broader feature set. If instead, you seek to optimize in-room dining with quick, contactless ordering, innOrder may seem appealing. But given the limited review base and recent feedback, is innOrder truly reliable for your needs?
If your hotel needs to enhance internal communication and operational workflows, go with Hub OS Guest in Touch. Its ability to manage maintenance requests, improve inter-department collaboration, and monitor KPIs makes it suitable for mid-sized to large hotels seeking efficiency improvements. Plus, with 27 reviews and a strong 4.69/5 rating, it demonstrates consistent performance and recent positive feedback.
On the other hand, innOrder is best for hotels focused on elevating guest experience through in-room food and beverage ordering. Its simple QR code system and flexible web app appeal to hotels prioritizing ancillary revenue and contactless service, especially in North America or regions where in-room dining is a revenue focus. However, its limited reviews and no recent data suggest less proven reliability.
Your decision should hinge on your hotel’s primary priorities: choose Hub OS for operational control and communication, innOrder for guest-facing ordering convenience. Which set of features aligns better with your strategic goals?
Hub OS boasts a high 4.87/5 onboarding rating from 27 reviews, with users noting its intuitive interface and ease of staff adoption. Despite some occasional crashes and synchronization issues, many describe it as straightforward and accessible for all hotel departments, including housekeeping and maintenance teams.
innOrder, despite having a perfect 5/5 ease of use rating from 6 reviews, is praised for its simple QR code scanning and quick order process. Its web app is straightforward, requiring no downloads, but some users wish for real-time order tracking and chat features, which are absent.
Edge: Hub OS — due to its higher review count, recent feedback, and broad usability across hotel departments, it offers better confidence in its user experience and onboarding.
Hub OS provides a comprehensive set of features aimed at internal operations, including maintenance management, incident reporting, and guest communication, with 3 shared features and none exclusive to it. InnOrder offers 3 unique features: automatic translations for multi-lingual guests, a hotel directory, and an app download, which are tailored to in-room guest engagement.
However, innOrder’s features are narrowly focused on guest service, lacking the broader operational tools present in Hub OS. Conversely, Hub OS’s features support multiple hotel functions but lack dedicated in-room ordering or translation tools.
Edge: Hub OS — because it offers more varied, operationally relevant functionalities, especially for larger hotels seeking integrated management tools.
Hub OS scores 4.74/5 in customer support from 27 reviews, with many hoteliers highlighting its responsive and proactive team. Review excerpts commend their quick issue resolution and attentive service, although some mention occasional technical glitches.
innOrder, rated slightly higher at 4.83/5 from 6 reviews, is praised for its excellent after-sales support and a responsive team that resolves minor glitches efficiently. Still, the limited review count makes it harder to gauge overall support consistency.
Edge: innOrder — due to its marginally higher recent support rating and positive feedback, though the limited review base makes this less definitive.
Despite its small review count, innOrder has a slightly higher overall NPS score of 9.83/10 compared to Hub OS’s 9.67/10, reflecting strong user satisfaction. However, the bulk of recent reviews favor Hub OS, with many praising its operational impact and ease of deployment.
In terms of hotel segments, Hub OS enjoys higher ratings across different categories, notably in boutique, luxury, and resort hotels, with some reviews giving it perfect scores. innOrder’s rating data is limited, but its reviews indicate high satisfaction among North American hotels focused on guest experience.
Given the more extensive and recent review data, Hub OS’s ratings are more reliable.
Edge: Hub OS — because of its larger, more recent review base and consistently high scores.
Hub OS does not publicly list its pricing, suggesting a customized quote based on hotel size and needs. InnOrder’s pricing starts at $300 per month, with no mention of discounts or tiered plans.
If budget transparency is critical, innOrder’s predictable flat-rate model might appeal. However, the lack of detailed pricing for Hub OS makes it harder to compare value directly. Consider the comprehensive features of Hub OS and its support when evaluating ROI.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily seeks a guest-facing app solely for in-room orders or entertainment, or if you operate on a very tight budget.
Not ideal if your hotel needs a robust operational management system or extensive integrations. Also, not recommended for hotels requiring multi-language support or advanced guest engagement features.
Hub OS offers a broad suite of operational tools designed to improve internal workflows, reduce response times, and increase staff coordination. Its higher review volume, recent positive feedback, and extensive feature set make it a strong choice for larger or mid-sized hotels seeking to optimize backend processes.
InnOrder excels at simplifying in-room F&B and guest service, making it ideal for hotels where guest experience and revenue from room service are top priorities. Its user-friendly interface and positive reviews suggest it’s well-suited for properties that want an easy, contactless ordering system without complex backend needs.
If your hotel’s focus is on operational control, Hub OS provides the more proven, comprehensive solution. If guest-facing dining is your main goal, innOrder offers a straightforward, effective platform.
In summary: For most hotels aiming for operational excellence backed by recent, extensive reviews, Hub OS Guest in Touch is the recommended choice. For hotels prioritizing in-room ordering and guest experience, innOrder remains a viable, albeit less proven, option.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Hub OS 在促进酒店各部门之间的沟通方面表现出色。评论强调了报告问题和在团队之间分配任务的便利性,从而促进了协调努力并改善了服务交付。此功能极大地增强了... Hub OS 在促进酒店各部门之间的沟通方面表现出色。评论强调了报告问题和在团队之间分配任务的便利性,从而促进了协调努力并改善了服务交付。此功能极大地增强了整体运营流程。
用户对 Hub OS 简化维护操作的能力表示赞赏。它提供快速报告和解决故障的功能,从而减少停机时间和运营效率低下。该软件允许团队实时跟踪和传达维护问题,从而更... 用户对 Hub OS 简化维护操作的能力表示赞赏。它提供快速报告和解决故障的功能,从而减少停机时间和运营效率低下。该软件允许团队实时跟踪和传达维护问题,从而更快地解决问题。
虽然许多用户认为 Hub OS 界面友好且外观精美,但有些人在使用过程中遇到了一些问题,例如偶尔崩溃或延迟。尽管存在这些问题,但用户仍然欣赏该软件如何简化复杂... 虽然许多用户认为 Hub OS 界面友好且外观精美,但有些人在使用过程中遇到了一些问题,例如偶尔崩溃或延迟。尽管存在这些问题,但用户仍然欣赏该软件如何简化复杂的任务。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户经常提到的一个问题是存在技术故障。这些包括同步延迟、偶尔崩溃和界面错误。虽然这些问题通常可以很快得到解决,但它们仍然会扰乱酒店运营。
Hub OS 的移动可访问性值得称赞,它使酒店员工能够随时随地管理运营。此功能对于报告问题和快速访问重要数据特别有用,从而节省时间并提高整体效率。
排名更高的方面
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hub OS Guest in Touch 和 innOrder 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hub OS Guest in Touch 提供 23 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innOrder 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innOrder 在易用性方面领先,评分为 5.0/5 对比 4.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hub OS Guest in Touch:否。innOrder:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。hub OS 的 HT Score 为 22,innOrder 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问