The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 243 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Guest Service 表现出色 在 宾客参与度和满意度 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Checkin and Payments.
STAY 表现出色 在 客户体验优化 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Mobile Checkout.
基于 HTR 上 243 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 28 | 215 |
在分析了 243 条经验证的评价后,Guest Service 用户最看重其 宾客参与度和满意度, 实时反馈和调查, 个性化服务和建议,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 支持和服务。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
宾客参与度和满意度
▾
|
+
客户体验优化
▾
|
|
+
实时反馈和调查
▾
|
+
移动和用户体验
▾
|
|
+
个性化服务和建议
▾
|
+
支持和服务
▾
|
|
+
自动化和节省时间
▾
|
+
灵活性和适应性
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
集成挑战
▾
|
−
CMS 和定制
▾
|
|
−
功能请求
▾
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
−
学习曲线
▾
|
−
分析和报告
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #22 1 条评价 | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #17 7 条评价 | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 13 条评价 | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #8 6 条评价 | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #18 7 条评价 | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #12 17 条评价 | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #11 10 条评价 | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 2 条评价 | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #24 0 条评价 | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #23 2 条评价 | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #2 26 条评价 | #7 2 条评价 |
When choosing a guest engagement platform, your hotel needs a solution that improves guest satisfaction, streamlines operations, and integrates seamlessly with existing systems. Guest Service by Guest Service and STAY Guest App both aim to fulfill these needs but approach them differently. While Guest Service emphasizes end-to-end guest management with robust features like mobile check-in and payments, STAY focuses heavily on operational efficiency and real-time service updates. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s priorities?
Both platforms aim to elevate your guest experience and optimize workflows, yet their strengths and target segments differ significantly. Guest Service, with its more extensive reviews and recent data, appears more established in the market, especially among luxury hotels and resorts. But does that mean it’s the better choice for your property? Let’s examine their core differences.
Guest Service and STAY both serve to digitize guest interactions but tackle different aspects of the hotel experience. Guest Service excels in guest engagement, offering features like mobile check-in, payments, and multi-language interfaces, aiming to increase guest loyalty and satisfaction. STAY, on the other hand, concentrates on operational efficiencies such as reducing front desk queues, streamlining staff workflows, and providing real-time updates for services like room service and reservations.
While Guest Service has a smaller review base (26 reviews, no recent data), it boasts a high NPS score of 9.77/10, indicating strong customer loyalty and satisfaction. Conversely, STAY, with over 200 reviews and more recent feedback, has a slightly lower overall rating of 3/5 but demonstrates widespread adoption across major hotel chains. Does your hotel prioritize guest-facing features or operational automation? Which approach aligns with your strategic goals?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive guest engagement system that enhances direct guest communication, personalized services, and upselling, Guest Service is the superior choice. Its features like mobile check-in, payments, and multi-platform support make it ideal for luxury properties, resorts, and hotels aiming for high guest satisfaction and loyalty.
If operational efficiency, reducing wait times, and digitizing internal processes are your priority—especially for large-scale chains—STAY is the better fit. Its strengths lie in streamlining staff workflows, providing real-time service updates, and integrating with numerous property management systems. Consider your property type and your primary objectives when choosing.
Guest Service scores a near-perfect 4.85/5 for ease of use, reflecting its intuitive interface and seamless onboarding process. Many users praise its guest-oriented UI, noting that staff adoption is straightforward after initial training. Support ratings are also high, with a 4.65/5 for customer support, and reviews highlight its quick adaptation and reliable service.
STAY also scores well, with a 4.78/5 ease of use rating. Its user-friendly CMS and mobile app have been praised for simplicity, enabling staff to manage content and updates with minimal training. Customer support is slightly higher at 4.83/5, and users mention its straightforward implementation and helpful team.
Edge: Guest Service.
Guest Service offers unique features like mobile check-in and integrated payments, which STAY lacks. It provides two exclusive functionalities that cater directly to guest interactions, simplifying the check-in process and enabling secure transactions from mobile devices.
STAY, meanwhile, boasts five features exclusive to its platform: mobile app, chatbot, automated replies, message routing, and mobile checkout. These features enhance operational communication, automate routine tasks, and support 24/7 guest engagement.
Both platforms share nine core features, including real-time updates and multi-channel communication. However, if your focus is on self-service check-in and payment processing, Guest Service has an edge. Conversely, if automation and messaging are paramount, STAY’s additional features make it more comprehensive.
Edge: STAY.
Guest Service’s support ratings are solid, with a 4.65/5, and reviews mention its responsiveness and helpfulness. Hoteliers appreciate the quick issue resolution, especially when implementing complex integrations, though some note a learning curve with extensive features.
STAY’s customer support scores slightly higher at 4.83/5. Many reviewers praise their promptness, especially in onboarding and troubleshooting. Some hotels report occasional delays in report updates but generally find STAY’s support reliable.
Given the recent reviews and larger customer base, STAY’s support appears more consistent and responsive.
Edge: STAY.
STAY integrates with 20 verified partners, including major systems like Hotelkit, Apaleo, and Winhotel, offering more flexibility for complex hotel ecosystems. It also shares key integrations with Guest Service, such as Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and Vingcard.
Guest Service has five verified partner integrations, including Oracle Hospitality and Mews, but fewer options overall. If your hotel relies on a broader or more specific set of systems, STAY’s extensive integration network provides a distinct advantage.
Edge: STAY.
Despite Guest Service’s high NPS score of 9.77/10, the limited number of reviews (26, with no recent feedback) makes it less representative. Luxury hotels and resorts that have used Guest Service praise its guest engagement, but newer reviews are absent.
STAY, with over 200 reviews and a 3/5 rating, receives mixed feedback. However, recent reviews highlight its ease of use, operational benefits, and support, especially among large hotel chains.
Given the volume and recency of reviews, STAY’s ratings are more reliable and reflective of current user satisfaction.
Edge: STAY.
Both platforms are priced at a base rate of $300 per month without additional implementation fees or trial options. Neither offers freemium models or tiered pricing, so costs are straightforward but may vary based on specific hotel needs or additional integrations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Guest Service is a comprehensive guest engagement platform that excels in personalized guest interactions, mobile check-in, and payments. Its smaller review base and lack of recent feedback make it a less current choice, but its high satisfaction scores among early adopters highlight its strengths.
STAY, with more recent reviews, a broader feature set, and extensive integrations, is better suited for large hotels and chains focused on operational efficiency and real-time service management. Its ease of use and support also stand out, making it a reliable choice for hotels seeking scalable solutions.
If your hotel prioritizes high-touch guest engagement, especially in luxury or resort settings, Guest Service offers targeted features that can boost loyalty. For properties seeking to streamline internal processes, reduce wait times, and enhance staff workflows, STAY provides a more comprehensive, integrated platform.
In conclusion, the decision hinges on your hotel’s primary goal: elevating guest engagement or optimizing operations. Given the larger, more recent review footprint, STAY is the stronger overall choice for most hotels today, especially those with complex systems and larger portfolios.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Guest Service 和 STAY Guest App 共享 9 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 消息路由 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 移动结帐 | ||
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 自动回复 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客人很欣赏该应用通过实时反馈、移动登记和个性化服务等功能提高参与度的能力。这些功能带来了更高的满意度评级和更多正面评价。
该应用程序的操作工具(如入住和客房服务自动化)可节省大量时间并简化工作流程。这使工作人员能够更加专注于个性化的客人互动,从而进一步提升客人体验。
实时反馈和调查使酒店能够快速解决任何问题并改善服务。此功能有助于提高客人满意度和优化服务交付。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
一些评论提到需要更广泛的定制集成以满足特定的运营需求,特别是在定制服务至关重要的豪华酒店。
用户表示希望集成更多功能,包括人工智能驱动的个性化推荐、交通服务以及与客人互动的进一步自动化功能。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Guest Service 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Guest Service 提供 5 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Guest Service 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Guest Service:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Guest Service 的 HT Score 为 26,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问