The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
GuestU
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
GuestU
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
GuestU
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
When choosing a hotel guest app, your primary concern is enhancing guest satisfaction while streamlining operations. GuestU and STAY both aim to serve this purpose, but they differ significantly in their scope, feature set, and market presence. GuestU offers basic guest engagement through a branded smartphone experience, primarily in Europe, with no recent reviews and a very limited feature set. STAY, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive guest experience platform with a strong global footprint, extensive features, and over 200 recent reviews. Which is the better fit for your hotel?
Both GuestU and STAY aim to improve guest engagement and operational efficiency, but they approach these goals differently. GuestU's core product is a branded guest smartphone offering internet, voice calls, and internal services requests, mainly tailored for hotels looking for a simple, branded device experience. STAY, however, offers an all-in-one guest experience OS, digitizing services like room reservations, messaging, room service, and local recommendations, with a robust integration ecosystem. GuestU’s limited feature list and regional focus contrast sharply with STAY’s extensive feature set and global reach.
GuestU’s last review was years ago, with no recent customer feedback, making its effectiveness and support less certain. Conversely, STAY boasts 206 recent reviews, with a high Net Promoter Score of 9.59/10, indicating strong, current customer satisfaction. If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich platform with proven recent user approval, STAY is clearly the stronger choice.
If your hotel needs to provide a personalized guest device, like a branded smartphone with basic services, GuestU could suffice, especially if operating mainly in Europe. It’s suited for hotels seeking a simple, branded in-room device experience with minimal digital service offerings. However, if your hotel aims to digitize a wide range of guest services—from messaging and reservations to local recommendations and mobile checkout—STAY’s broader capabilities make it the better fit.
For hotel chains or properties prioritizing operational efficiency, guest engagement, and data insights, STAY’s extensive feature set and proven track record with large hotel groups should guide your decision. GuestU’s narrow focus and limited recent reviews mean it’s best for very specific needs, not comprehensive guest experience enhancement.
GuestU’s user interface and onboarding process are not well-documented, and the absence of recent reviews makes assessment difficult. Conversely, STAY consistently receives praise for its intuitive, user-friendly app interface, scoring 4.78/5 for ease of use and 4.63/5 for onboarding. Hotel staff report that STAY’s CMS is straightforward to learn, and guests find the app easy to navigate, with many reviews highlighting its simplicity.
Given the current feedback, the clear edge goes to STAY, which demonstrates a proven, smooth user experience for both staff and guests.
GuestU offers only the GuestU Phone, a personalized device with basic internet and internal request features. STAY, however, provides a suite of 14 features including a mobile app, chatbots, automated replies, message routing, guest messaging, web app, room service ordering, local recommendations, hotel directory, app download, multi-lingual translations, mobile checkout, and guest profiles.
STAY’s extensive features cover almost every aspect of guest engagement and hotel operation digitization, whereas GuestU’s core offering is limited to a branded device. The feature count and functional depth clearly favor STAY, making it the more versatile platform.
GuestU’s support and onboarding ratings are unavailable, indicating a lack of recent customer feedback. STAY’s support scores are high at 4.83/5, with reviews praising the team’s helpfulness and responsiveness. Multiple hotel clients, including Barceló and NH Hotels, commend STAY’s support team for their proactive, efficient assistance, especially during rapid rollouts.
Given the recent positive reviews and high satisfaction ratings, STAY’s support is the clear leader, especially for hotels needing reliable, ongoing assistance.
GuestU has only one verified partner, Nonius, limiting its integration capabilities. In contrast, STAY integrates with 20 partners, including hotel systems like hotelkit, apaleo, Winhotel, SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and others, facilitating a seamless flow of data and operations.
This extensive integration network makes STAY a more adaptable and scalable solution, capable of fitting into diverse hotel tech stacks. Edge: STAY.
GuestU’s reviews are nonexistent in recent data, indicating very limited or no active hotel feedback. STAY, however, has 206 recent reviews with an overall rating of 3/5, and a remarkable NPS score of 9.59/10. Hotels across segments—especially major chains like NH Hotels and Riu—highlight how STAY improves operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and sustainability.
The strong, recent review activity and high ratings clearly favor STAY, especially among large and premium properties.
GuestU’s pricing details are unavailable, which suggests it may have a customized or less transparent pricing model. STAY charges $300 per month, with no implementation fee or trial period, making its costs predictable and straightforward.
For hotels seeking budget clarity, STAY’s transparent pricing provides confidence in ongoing costs and ROI expectations. The absence of current GuestU pricing data makes it less accessible for budget-conscious hoteliers.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
GuestU offers a niche solution focused on a branded device experience, best suited for hotels needing a simple guest engagement tool within Europe or North America. Its limited features, lack of recent reviews, and regional focus make it less compelling for hotels aiming for comprehensive guest experience management.
STAY provides a broad, feature-rich platform with proven success across multiple regions, large hotel chains, and independent hotels. With extensive integrations, high customer satisfaction, and active recent reviews, STAY is well-positioned to meet the needs of hotels seeking to modernize and digitize their guest services.
If your hotel needs a scalable, full-featured guest experience OS that improves operational flow and guest satisfaction, STAY is the clear leader. For a minimal, device-based solution, GuestU might suffice—though it comes with fewer features and less recent support.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
GuestU
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
GuestU
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。GuestU 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。GuestU 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
GuestU:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。GuestU 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问