The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
The Hotel Communication Network (HCN) 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Checkin and Payments.
STAY 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App.
基于 HTR 上 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 215 |
在分析了 215 条经验证的评价后,The Hotel Communication Network (HCN) 用户最看重其 ,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户体验优化
▾
|
|
|
+
移动和用户体验
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
支持和服务
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
CMS 和定制
▾
|
|
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
|
−
分析和报告
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing between The Hotel Communication Network (HCN) and STAY Guest App involves evaluating how each platform addresses your hotel’s guest communication needs. Both aim to improve guest experience through digital self-service, but they target different operational aspects and user experiences. HCN emphasizes mission-critical in-room automation under your brand, while STAY focuses on mobile access to hotel services and operational efficiency. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s current priorities?
Your team needs to consider the core problem you want to solve—whether it's in-room automation, guest communication, or operational digitization—and how each platform fits into your existing technology ecosystem. Can both meet your needs equally well, or is one inherently more suitable for your hotel’s size and segment?
HCN specializes in delivering mission-critical guest self-service, primarily through in-room voice and automation features, with a strong emphasis on self-service under your brand. Its focus on in-room automation might be ideal if your hotel prioritizes in-room guest interactions and real-time voice support.
STAY, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive mobile guest app that provides access to hotel services, reservations, and real-time updates, making it more versatile for hotels that want to digitize multiple touchpoints across the guest journey.
If your hotel needs to deploy in-room voice and automation under your brand, HCN could be the better fit; if you want a mobile-centric platform with broader service integration, STAY is the stronger choice. Are you seeking in-room automation or guest-facing mobile convenience?
For hotels that need a mobile app to improve guest communication, increase service efficiency, and reduce front desk queues, STAY is clearly the better choice with over 200 recent reviews and a 4/5 rating. Its user-friendly interface and extensive integration capabilities make it suitable for both large chains like NH Hotels and independent resorts.
If your hotel requires mission-critical, in-room automation with voice features and direct self-service controls, HCN's focus on in-room guest self-service might be more aligned. However, with no recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, HCN's support and usability are less proven.
In summary, choose STAY if your priority is a mobile-based guest experience platform, and consider HCN only if in-room automation under your brand is mission-critical. Which operational areas are your top priority?
STAY’s ease of use is evident with a 4.78/5 rating, praise from users for its intuitive design, simple content management, and quick onboarding. Its mobile app is designed for staff and guests, simplifying content updates and service requests.
HCN received a 0/5 score, with no recent reviews or feedback on usability. Its lack of recent data makes assessing its user experience challenging, but the absence of support and reviews suggests potential difficulty in staff adoption.
Edge: STAY.
STAY offers 4 exclusive features—mobile app, chatbot, automated replies, and message routing—that support a flexible, multi-channel guest experience. Its 20 verified integrations with PMS, CRM, and other systems make it highly adaptable for various hotel tech stacks.
HCN provides only 2 features unique to its platform: mobile check-in and payments. With only 10 shared features, HCN's offerings seem limited compared to STAY’s broader functionality.
Edge: STAY.
STAY’s customer support receives a 4.83/5 rating, with reviews emphasizing quick, helpful assistance, although some mention limited hours and no phone support. Its onboarding process is rated 4.63/5, indicating a smooth implementation.
HCN has no recent reviews or ratings, making support quality impossible to assess. Its lack of recent data suggests weaker customer support and user engagement.
Edge: STAY.
STAY boasts 20 verified partners, including major systems like Hotelkit, SiteMinder, and Mews, allowing extensive integration options. Its ability to connect with current hotel management systems provides a seamless experience.
HCN has only 3 verified partners, with Stayntouch and Oracle Hospitality among them. Its limited integration options constrain its flexibility in complex hotel environments.
Edge: STAY.
STAY’s average rating of 3/5 is based on 206 reviews, mostly recent, with hoteliers praising operational improvements and guest satisfaction. Its reviews cover a range of hotel segments, from luxury to resorts, and emphasize ease of use and support.
HCN, with zero reviews and a 0/5 score, cannot be rated by hoteliers. The absence of recent feedback indicates less user satisfaction or market presence.
Edge: STAY.
STAY charges a straightforward base price of $300 per month, with no implementation or hidden fees. Pricing details for HCN are unavailable, and no trial options are offered.
Given the transparent pricing and positive value ratings, STAY appears to be a predictable investment; HCN’s costs remain unclear.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
HCN primarily offers in-room automation, ideal for hotels seeking to enhance guest self-service at the room level with voice capabilities. However, with no recent reviews, support, or clear pricing, its market viability is questionable.
STAY delivers a mobile guest experience platform rated highly by users, with extensive integrations, proven support, and recent reviews. It’s better suited for hotels aiming to digitize their guest services across multiple touchpoints.
Choose HCN if your hotel’s focus is in-room automation and voice-controlled self-service under your brand, and you are willing to navigate limited recent data. Opt for STAY if your priority is a versatile, widely adopted mobile app that improves operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. For most hotels, STAY offers a safer, more proven path to enhancing guest experience.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,The Hotel Communication Network (HCN) 和 STAY Guest App 共享 10 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 消息路由 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 自动回复 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。The Hotel Communication Network (HCN) 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。The Hotel Communication Network (HCN) 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
The Hotel Communication Network (HCN):否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。The Hotel Communication Network (HCN) 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问