The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 886 条经验证的评价后,Hotelgest 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, 入职和支持体验。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Hotelgest |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持体验
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
计费复杂性和报告局限性
▾
|
|
|
−
收益管理
▾
|
|
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Hotelgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Hotelgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Hotelgest |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | — | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is a pivotal decision for your hotel’s operational and guest experience success. Both Hotelgest by Hotelgest and Mews PMS aim to streamline hotel management, but their approach and maturity diverge sharply. How do they compare on core metrics like usability, features, customer support, and market presence? And ultimately, which one will empower your team most effectively?
Hotelgest is a niche, smaller-scale PMS with limited reviews and no recent data, suggesting it may lack the robustness needed for modern hotel operations. Mews, on the other hand, boasts nearly 760 reviews, with 98 recent ones from the last six months, giving it a clear advantage in credibility and current performance.
Both products aim to improve operational efficiency and guest experience, yet Mews's extensive feature set and larger user base illustrate a more developed, versatile platform. Do you want a system with proven contemporary capabilities, or are you leaning toward a less-known option with limited data? The choice largely hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and digital ambitions.
If your hotel needs a scalable, feature-rich PMS with a large support ecosystem and proven customer satisfaction, go with Mews. It’s suited for hoteliers seeking automation, integrations, and a platform that adapts across property types, from boutique hotels to large chains.
If your hotel primarily requires a very basic system for minimal operations, and you are comfortable with limited support and fewer features, Hotelgest might suffice. However, given the absence of recent reviews and the lack of detailed features, Mews’s broader capabilities and current user satisfaction make it the more reliable choice for most modern hotels.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, backed by many recent reviews praising its modern, intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Reviewers highlight that staff adoption is quick and training is minimal, with some calling it the “most user-friendly hospitality cloud on the market.”
Hotelgest, however, has no recent ratings or reviews available, making it impossible to assess its usability. Its lack of current user feedback indicates it might not match Mews’s contemporary design or user-centric approach. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 59 features, including multi-language, multi-currency capabilities, revenue management, online booking engine, guest CRM, integrated POS, automated night audit, and real-time reporting—many absent from Hotelgest. Hotelgest’s feature set appears limited and does not specify unique tools, suggesting minimal functionality beyond basic PMS features.
With Mews’s extensive ecosystem—covering automation, integrations, guest engagement, and revenue optimization—it’s clear that Mews’s feature depth surpasses Hotelgest, which lacks detailed feature documentation. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support scores 4.27/5, with recent reviews mentioning prompt responses, onboarding help, and a helpful support team, despite occasional bugs that are quickly resolved. Customers report that support staff are responsive and knowledgeable, essential for a platform with complex integrations.
Hotelgest provides no recent review data, leaving its support quality unverified. This absence, combined with the high support ratings for Mews, favors Mews as the more reliable, well-supported PMS. Edge: Mews.
Mews connects with 336 verified partners, including over 1,000 apps via its marketplace, offering seamless integration with revenue management, POS, channel managers, and other solutions. Hotelgest, with zero verified partners listed, demonstrates a clear gap in integration capability and ecosystem maturity.
This extensive connectivity enables your hotel to build a flexible, efficient tech stack, whereas Hotelgest’s limited integrations restrict scalability. Edge: Mews.
With 758 reviews and recent feedback, Mews consistently scores above 4.6/5 across various segments, including boutique, city center, and hostels. Hotels of all sizes and types commend its ease of use, automation, and support, making it a trusted choice.
Hotelgest has no recent reviews or ratings, so it cannot compete on user satisfaction. Given the current data, Mews’s high ratings make it the preferred platform for most hoteliers seeking proven performance. Edge: Mews.
Hotelgest does not publicly disclose pricing, but its lack of reviews and feature details suggests it may be a less comprehensive or less actively marketed option. Mews charges a base fee of $900 per month, with a clear, subscription-based model and no implementation fee.
While pricing transparency is limited, Mews’s established pricing structure aligns with its extensive features and support, providing clarity for budget planning. The absence of data for Hotelgest makes Mews the more predictable investment.
Not ideal if your hotel plans to scale, require advanced automation, or seek extensive integrations and support. Hotelgest’s limited recent data makes it better suited for very small or basic hotel operations.
Not ideal if your property is very small with minimal needs or if you prefer a system with limited features and no recent user feedback. Mews’s broad capabilities make it suitable for modern, growth-oriented hotels.
Mews’s biggest strength lies in its extensive feature set, proven user satisfaction, and large, active ecosystem. It provides the automation, support, and flexibility that modern hotels need to thrive amid evolving guest expectations.
Choose Mews if you want a scalable, current platform with a track record of positive reviews, integrations, and ongoing innovation. Hotelgest, lacking recent data and features, is unlikely to meet the demands of a dynamic, growth-driven hotel.
For hotels seeking a reliable, well-supported PMS that can handle complex operations and future growth, Mews is the clear choice. Hotelgest might suit very small properties with minimal digital ambitions but isn’t recommended for most hotels aiming to modernize and expand.
In conclusion, Mews offers a more comprehensive, well-reviewed, and future-proof solution compared to Hotelgest. Its robust feature set, extensive integrations, and active support ensure your hotel stays competitive and efficient—making it the smarter, safer investment for most hoteliers today.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了... Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了问题解决率和用户满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Mews 可以自动计费,但用户反映其复杂性以及报告和分析方面的局限性造成了困扰。改进这些方面可以为管理财务运营的用户提供更深入的洞察和更大的灵活性。
Mews 凭借其集成功能为收益管理提供了强大的基础,但用户指出,动态定价工具和高级分析方面还有改进的空间,尤其是在多物业运营方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Hotelgest 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Hotelgest 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Hotelgest:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Hotelgest 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 100。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问