The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 75 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
HotelRunner 表现出色 在 ease of use and ROI 方面 .
Maestro PMS 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (3.8/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Centralized Messaging.
基于 HTR 上 75 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 17 | 58 |
在分析了 75 条经验证的评价后,HotelRunner 用户最看重其 ,而 Maestro PMS 用户则强调 客户支持, 报告灵活性, 可定制的功能。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
报告灵活性
▾
|
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
|
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
|
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #38 5 条评价 | #41 7 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #44 3 条评价 | #18 35 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #34 1 条评价 | #12 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #41 0 条评价 | #10 4 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #36 8 条评价 | #25 26 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #38 3 条评价 | #20 31 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #47 1 条评价 | #38 5 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 | #49 0 条评价 | #38 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #36 2 条评价 | #12 53 条评价 |
| 欧洲 | #35 3 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #25 0 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #4 6 条评价 | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s daily operations and long-term growth. HotelRunner PMS and Maestro PMS are two options, each promising to streamline tasks and boost revenue, but they differ significantly in approach and capabilities. HotelRunner is newer, with a smaller but highly positive review footprint, while Maestro has a longer history, a broader feature set, and more recent, detailed user feedback. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
HotelRunner PMS and Maestro PMS are designed to centralize and automate hotel operations, yet they approach this goal differently. HotelRunner is a cloud-based platform focused on simplicity and ease of use, with a high user rating of 4.81/5 and only 16 reviews, all recent. Maestro PMS, on the other hand, offers a comprehensive suite of over 20 modules, with a user rating of 4.36/5 based on 56 reviews, most recent within the last six months.
HotelRunner’s standout is its user-friendly interface, rated at 4.81/5, and its support and onboarding are both rated perfect at 5/5. Conversely, Maestro’s extensive features and modules cater to complex, multi-property operations, but its UI is considered somewhat dated, rated at 4.04/5, with comments about navigation being cumbersome for newer staff. Both products solve reservation management, check-ins, and guest data centralization, but HotelRunner emphasizes simplicity, while Maestro leans toward customization and depth. Which approach suits your hotel’s operational style?
If your property is a boutique, city-center hotel, or boutique hotel, and your team prioritizes ease of use, quick onboarding, and excellent support, HotelRunner is the better fit. Its high ease-of-use score and recent reviews emphasize its intuitive interface and user-friendly workflows suitable for small to mid-sized hotels.
If your hotel requires a wider range of modules, such as spa, EPoS, guest messaging, or advanced reporting, and you have a team capable of managing a complex system, Maestro PMS is advisable. It caters well to resorts, large conference centers, and multi-property groups needing deep customization and extensive integrations.
For properties with limited IT support or staff less familiar with technology, HotelRunner’s straightforward setup and high support ratings make it the safer choice. Conversely, if your operational needs are complex and involve multiple departments or locations, Maestro’s extensive modules and multi-property support are advantageous.
HotelRunner scores 4.81/5 for ease of use, reflecting its modern, clean UI and straightforward onboarding process. Users highlight its intuitive interface, fast training, and minimal learning curve, with support rated at perfect 5/5, and onboarding also rated 5/5, making staff adoption smooth.
Maestro’s UI is rated at 4.04/5, with many users describing it as functional but somewhat outdated. Common feedback notes that navigation can be cumbersome, requiring multiple clicks, especially for new staff. The support team is praised for responsiveness, but some reviews mention that system complexity demands more training.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Maestro PMS offers a significantly broader set of features, with 29 unique modules, compared to HotelRunner’s zero exclusive features. Notable additions include Spa & Wellness, EPoS, online check-in, guest messaging, shift planning, real-time reporting, automated space optimization, and mobile check-in/out—all absent in HotelRunner.
HotelRunner’s feature set is simpler, focusing on core reservation management, channel integration, and basic reporting. While its core functionalities are strong, it does not currently offer advanced modules like guest apps, mobile check-in, or integrated spa management.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
HotelRunner’s support is rated a perfect 5/5, with reviews emphasizing ongoing training, quick responses, and strong relationships. Users appreciate the proactive support and training that facilitate rapid implementation and adoption.
Maestro PMS also has high support ratings at 4.78/5, with reviews praising its 24/7 availability, quick issue resolution, and support team’s professionalism. Some users mention that Maestro’s support is reliable, but the complexity of the system sometimes requires more extensive training.
Edge: HotelRunner.
Maestro PMS boasts 89 verified integrations, including major partners like Oracle Hospitality, Inntopia, and Criton, offering extensive compatibility across the hospitality tech stack. It shares three integrations with HotelRunner (Oracle, IDeaS, Easyway), but the total number favors Maestro by a wide margin.
HotelRunner’s 17 verified partners include Airbnb, Expedia, Stripe, and Agoda, with a focus on online travel agencies and channel management, but it lacks the depth of Maestro’s third-party integrations.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
HotelRunner’s reviews are newer, with 16 recent reviews in the last six months, and all rate it 5/5, reflecting high satisfaction. Its NPS score is 9.88/10, with a 99% likelihood to recommend, indicating strong user confidence, especially among boutique and city hotels.
Maestro’s reviews, though more numerous, average 4.36/5. with many highlighting its extensive capabilities but also noting some usability challenges. Its NPS score is 8.8/10, still high but slightly lower, and reviews suggest a more complex user experience.
Given recent data, HotelRunner’s ratings are more current and more positive overall.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner charges $100 monthly with no implementation or setup fees, making it a transparent, affordable option for small to mid-sized hotels seeking a straightforward PMS.
Maestro’s pricing starts at $900, with a higher initial cost reflecting its extensive modules and customization, but no additional implementation or setup fees are listed. Its higher price may be justified for large properties or multi-property groups needing advanced features.
Not ideal if your property requires extensive modules like spa, POS, or detailed reporting—these are not available in HotelRunner.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or prioritizes ease of use over extensive features.
HotelRunner and Maestro PMS serve different hotel segments and operational needs. HotelRunner excels in simplicity, support, and quick deployment, making it ideal for boutique hotels, city hotels, or properties seeking a straightforward solution.
Maestro offers a comprehensive suite of modules, ideal for larger or more complex properties requiring deep customization, extensive integrations, and broad operational control. Its longer history and feature depth make it a better choice for resorts and multi-property groups.
If your hotel values ease of use, support, and rapid onboarding, HotelRunner is the clear choice. For hotels with complex needs, multiple departments, or a multi-property portfolio, Maestro’s extensive features give it the edge.
In summary, choose HotelRunner if you want a user-friendly, support-focused platform that covers your basics well. Opt for Maestro if you require a feature-rich, customizable system capable of managing a complex, multi-faceted operation.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,HotelRunner PMS 和 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 共享 29 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 水疗和健康模块 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 17 项功能存在差异。
排名更高的方面
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Maestro PMS 提供出色的客户支持,许多用户都称赞其通过各种渠道提供的快速有效的帮助。这种支持文化有利于迅速解决问题。
用户对 Maestro PMS 生成自定义报告的灵活性表示赞赏,这有助于做出数据驱动的决策。然而,一些人指出,需要更详细的帮助菜单和更方便地访问特定类型的报告。
定制化是一大优势,无论是报告、特定物业需求模块还是运营灵活性。Maestro PMS 允许进行大量定制,这有助于高效满足独特的业务需求。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统提供了强大的功能,但一些用户指出,其用户界面略显过时,可以通过现代化来改善用户体验,特别是对于新员工而言。
安全性是一项强大的功能,具有本地解决方案选项并遵守 GDPR 等法规。用户还建议使用 2FA 和反向代理等增强功能来提高在线安全性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。HotelRunner PMS 和 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HotelRunner PMS 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Maestro PMS (Northwind) 提供 89 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。HotelRunner PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HotelRunner PMS:否。Maestro PMS (Northwind):否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HotelRunner 的 HT Score 为 0,Maestro PMS 的为 70。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问