The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 904 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
HotelRunner 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Mobile Device Notes & Tasks (Voice-to-Text).
Mews 表现出色 在 ease of use 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 904 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $100/mo | From $900/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 17 | 887 |
在分析了 904 条经验证的评价后,HotelRunner 用户最看重其 ,而 Mews 用户则强调 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #38 5 条评价 | #3 329 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #44 3 条评价 | #1 397 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #34 1 条评价 | #3 45 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #41 0 条评价 | #3 49 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #36 8 条评价 | #1 483 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #38 3 条评价 | #5 220 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #47 1 条评价 | #2 170 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #49 0 条评价 | #1 130 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #36 2 条评价 | #8 106 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #35 3 条评价 | #1 660 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #25 0 条评价 | #10 17 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #4 6 条评价 | #28 8 条评价 |
Choosing between HotelRunner PMS and Mews PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline operations, but they diverge significantly in scope, features, and support at scale. HotelRunner offers a straightforward, highly-rated solution with a focus on ease and value, while Mews provides a broader, more integrated platform backed by extensive reviews and recent positive feedback. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s current and future goals?
Are you looking for a user-friendly, cost-effective platform with a dedicated support team, or a comprehensive operating system that can scale across multiple properties and integrate with hundreds of third-party tools? Let’s compare these two contenders in detail.
HotelRunner PMS and Mews PMS both address core hospitality management issues—reservation handling, guest management, and operational automation—but their approaches differ. HotelRunner emphasizes simplicity and ease of use, making it ideal for small hotels or boutique properties that want a straightforward solution. Mews, on the other hand, offers a cloud-native, scalable platform with a vast ecosystem of integrations and advanced features, suited for growing or multi-property management.
When it comes to recent reviews, Mews outperforms HotelRunner by a considerable margin, with 758 reviews in the last six months compared to HotelRunner's zero. This indicates a more active user base and a product that continues to evolve rapidly. Do you want a proven system with a large, recent user community, or a smaller, highly-rated platform that may be better for basic operations?
If your hotel needs a flexible, scalable system capable of managing multiple properties and complex operations, Mews is the clear choice. It’s particularly suited for hotels that require extensive integrations, automation, and a modern guest experience. Conversely, if your property prioritizes simplicity, immediate value, and lower costs, HotelRunner’s straightforward interface and highly-rated customer support make it a better fit.
For boutique hotels or properties with limited tech needs, HotelRunner’s $100/month fee and focus on core PMS functions are attractive. However, for hotels aiming for digital transformation, dynamic pricing, and extensive third-party integrations, Mews’ robust feature set and expansive ecosystem justify its $900/month price.
HotelRunner boasts an impressive ease-of-use rating of 4.81/5, with users emphasizing its user-friendly interface, quick onboarding, and ongoing support. Its mobile app, however, is noted as limited, with customers wanting more functionalities like reservations and edits on the go.
Mews also scores highly at 4.7/5, with users citing its intuitive modern interface, straightforward setup, and clear workflows. While both platforms are easy to adopt, HotelRunner’s smaller feature set and simpler design make it slightly easier for small teams to learn quickly.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner offers 27 shared features plus 2 unique ones: on-premise management and voice-to-text notes & tasks on mobile devices. Its unique features cater to basic operational needs and mobile note-taking but lack advanced automation or guest engagement tools.
Mews stands out with 32 unique features—guest CRM, online check-in, automated reminders, real-time reporting, employee messaging, shift planning, and more—adding significant value for larger or tech-savvy hotels. Its comprehensive suite supports complex operations and enhances guest experiences, giving it a clear edge.
Edge: Mews.
HotelRunner receives perfect support ratings of 5/5, with reviews praising their ongoing training, responsiveness, and relationship-building. Customers appreciate their dedicated support team and proactive assistance, particularly during onboarding.
Mews’ support ratings are solid at 4.27/5, with users noting that issues are usually quickly addressed but some experience occasional bugs or delays. Although Mews is known for continuous innovation, HotelRunner’s support consistently receives higher praise.
Edge: HotelRunner.
HotelRunner integrates with 17 verified partners, including key OTAs and channel managers like Airbnb, Expedia, and Booking.com, focusing on core distribution needs. Its fewer integrations mean less flexibility but easier management for smaller properties.
Mews boasts 336 verified integrations, including industry giants like Oracle Hospitality, Stripe, and Sage, and thousands of third-party tools via the Mews Marketplace. This extensive ecosystem allows hotels to customize and expand their tech stack significantly.
Edge: Mews.
HotelRunner’s reviews are limited to 16, all very recent, with a perfect rating of 5/5, primarily from boutique and small hotels. The reviews highlight ease of use, support, and operational improvements, especially among smaller properties.
Mews has 758 reviews in the last six months, with an overall rating of 4.62/5. Its reviews span various hotel segments, including independent, boutique, and branded hotels, with many praising automation and scalability. The recent reviews reinforce its reputation as a reliable, innovative platform.
Edge: Mews.
HotelRunner charges $100 monthly per property with no implementation fees or free trial. Its straightforward pricing makes it accessible for small hotels with limited budgets.
Mews’ pricing starts at $900 per month, with no free trial or implementation fees. Its higher cost reflects its broader feature set and scalability options, making it suitable for larger or multi-property operations.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Mews is a comprehensive, scalable platform with a vast feature set and active user community, ideal for hotels seeking growth and advanced automation. HotelRunner excels at providing a simple, cost-effective solution with high support quality, perfect for small properties prioritizing ease and value.
If your hotel needs to streamline operations across multiple locations, automate guest interactions, and integrate with a broad ecosystem, Mews is the clear choice. Conversely, if your focus is on managing a single boutique or small hotel efficiently without the complexity or cost, HotelRunner offers a reliable, straightforward option.
For hotels with ambitious growth plans, Mews’ extensive features and recent reviews make it the stronger candidate. Small, boutique properties or those new to PMS technology should consider HotelRunner’s simplicity and support, which have earned it a near-perfect reputation.
In conclusion, prioritize Mews if your hotel aims to scale, automate, and innovate—its recent reviews and extensive ecosystem support this. If your needs are more basic, cost-conscious, and focused on ease, HotelRunner provides a proven, well-supported platform that can meet your immediate operational goals.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $900/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,HotelRunner PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享 27 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 22 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。HotelRunner PMS 和 Mews PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。HotelRunner PMS 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Mews PMS 提供 336 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。HotelRunner PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
HotelRunner PMS:否。Mews PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。HotelRunner 的 HT Score 为 0,Mews 的为 99。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问