The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 292 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD 表现出色 .
innRoad 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
基于 HTR 上 292 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 292 |
在分析了 292 条经验证的评价后,Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD 用户最看重其 ,而 innRoad 用户则强调 客户支持, 报告和收入管理, 预订引擎和 ota 集成。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
| Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
|
+
报告和收入管理
▾
|
|
|
+
预订引擎和 OTA 集成
▾
|
|
|
+
磁带图
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
系统故障
▾
|
|
|
−
信用卡处理
▾
|
|
|
−
移动兼容性和应用程序
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #6 179 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #16 47 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #13 11 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 5 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #12 96 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #15 45 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #16 33 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #13 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 275 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #34 5 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #39 1 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #34 0 条评价 |
Choosing between IDB PMS by Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD and innRoad hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and budget. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management but diverge sharply in market presence, features, and user experience. IDB PMS offers minimal reviews and no recent data, indicating a lack of current customer feedback. innRoad, by contrast, boasts over 238 reviews and recent positive feedback, making it a more reliable choice today.
Both products claim to optimize hotel operations, but innRoad’s extensive review base and recent ratings clearly favor it as the more proven and supported platform. Are you ready to pick the solution that has been tested and validated by more hoteliers?
IDB PMS promises a comprehensive property management approach, but it has zero reviews and no recent activity, which raises questions about its current viability. innRoad, with a 4.7-star rating from 238 reviews and recent feedback, demonstrates consistent customer satisfaction.
innRoad’s reviews highlight its ease of use, strong customer support, and notable revenue increases. In contrast, IDB PMS lacks recent feedback, making it difficult to assess its current performance. Would you prefer a system backed by active user validation or an obscure platform with no recent customer insights?
If your hotel needs an established, user-friendly PMS with proven impact on revenue and extensive support, innRoad is the clear choice. Its broad feature set, strong customer support, and positive reviews make it suitable for properties ranging from boutique hotels to resorts.
If, however, your hotel is looking for a highly customizable, perhaps locally developed system with no current review data, IDB PMS might appeal—though this is a gamble given the lack of recent customer feedback. For most hoteliers, innRoad’s proven track record and active community make it the safer option.
innRoad scores a 4.49/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users frequently mention how the Tape Chart simplifies reservations and room management, alongside helpful customer support.
IDB PMS, with a zero rating and no recent reviews, offers no data to assess its usability. Without user feedback, it’s impossible to judge how intuitive or staff-friendly it is. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad offers 56 features, including multi-currency, channel management, booking engine, revenue management, guest communication, and online check-in. Its extensive feature set directly addresses operational needs, especially for properties aiming to boost bookings and streamline guest relations.
IDB PMS, with no documented features, offers no competitive advantages. While it might have core functionalities, the lack of information and recent reviews makes it impossible to compare. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s support ratings (4.54/5) and positive reviews underscore its commitment to customer success. Hoteliers praise their 24/7 live support and effective onboarding, with some noting their support team resolves issues promptly.
IDB PMS has no recent reviews or support ratings, leaving its customer service quality unknown. Without evidence of support quality, innRoad’s proven positive support experience makes it the clear choice. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad boasts 34 verified integrations, including popular tools like QuickBooks, Revinate, and RateGain, along with extensive OTA connectivity. Its ability to connect with various third-party systems enhances operational flexibility and revenue management.
IDB PMS reports zero verified integrations, indicating limited or no connectivity options. Without integration support, it risks siloed operations. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s recent reviews consistently highlight high satisfaction, with an 8.82/10 NPS score and 89% likelihood to recommend. Hotels ranging from small inns to resorts report revenue boosts and ease of use.
IDB PMS has no reviews or recent feedback, so its user satisfaction is unverified. Given innRoad’s active, positive community, it is clearly the preferred choice for most hoteliers today. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad charges a base fee of $300 per month, with no hidden charges or additional fees, offering transparency and predictable costs. Pricing details for IDB PMS are unavailable, suggesting it may be a bespoke or custom-priced solution.
Without clear pricing for IDB PMS, innRoad’s straightforward model favors budget planning and transparency. Edge: innRoad.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in market presence and proven customer satisfaction. innRoad’s active reviews, extensive features, and high ratings make it the more reliable choice for today’s hoteliers.
Choose innRoad if you prioritize a platform with proven impact, active support, and broad integrations. It suits properties of all sizes that want to grow revenue, streamline operations, and have confidence in ongoing vendor support.
IDB PMS remains a less visible candidate, lacking recent feedback and documented features. It might appeal to niche users or those seeking a highly customized or local solution, but for most hotels, innRoad offers a safer, more tested path forward.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
| Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,IDB PMS 和 innRoad 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 | Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD |
|
|---|---|---|
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 44 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。IDB PMS 和 innRoad 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。IDB PMS 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 innRoad 提供 34 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
IDB PMS:否。innRoad:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Integrated Design & Build SDN BHD 的 HT Score 为 0,innRoad 的为 31。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问