The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 256 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Infor 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 On premise.
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.1/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader and Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc).
基于 HTR 上 256 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 47 | 209 |
在分析了 256 条经验证的评价后,Infor 用户最看重其 易于使用, 报告, 一体化,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 用户界面和体验, 一体化系统, 自动发送电子邮件和文档。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
用户界面和体验
▾
|
|
+
报告
▾
|
+
一体化系统
▾
|
|
+
一体化
▾
|
+
自动发送电子邮件和文档
▾
|
|
+
家政模块
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持
▾
|
−
服务和支持
▾
|
|
−
易于使用
▾
|
−
集成限制
▾
|
|
−
更新问题
▾
|
−
系统错误和稳定性问题
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #44 8 条评价 | #10 90 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #25 24 条评价 | #17 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #19 9 条评价 | #14 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #24 2 条评价 | #19 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #28 24 条评价 | #9 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #23 26 条评价 | #9 64 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #29 8 条评价 | #14 29 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #31 6 条评价 | #7 28 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #22 20 条评价 | #24 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #24 17 条评价 | #5 123 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #28 1 条评价 | #31 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #31 1 条评价 |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both Infor HMS and RoomRaccoon aim to streamline your workflows, but they serve different hotel types and operational needs. Infor HMS, with its extensive enterprise features and global reach, is tailored for larger or more complex properties. RoomRaccoon, built primarily for independent hotels and small operators, centers on simplicity and automation. How do these differences influence your decision?
Infor HMS and RoomRaccoon both solve core hospitality management problems like reservations, guest communication, and revenue tracking. Infor HMS excels with its deep customization, extensive integrations, and scalability, making it suitable for larger or multi-property groups. RoomRaccoon simplifies these tasks through an all-in-one platform designed for ease of use, fast onboarding, and automation, especially for smaller hotels or independents. Do you need a flexible enterprise solution or a straightforward, efficient system?
While Infor HMS offers advanced features like customizable reports and extensive third-party integrations, RoomRaccoon’s strength lies in its intuitive interface and automation tools that reduce manual work. Both platforms aim to improve operational efficiency, but Infor’s complexity can require a steeper learning curve, whereas RoomRaccoon prioritizes user-friendliness. Are you seeking a system that scales with growth or one that gets the job done quickly with minimal fuss?
If your hotel needs a robust, customizable platform capable of managing multiple properties, complex workflows, and extensive integrations, go with Infor HMS. Its advanced reporting, on-premise options, and global presence make it suitable for larger, branded, or luxury hotels aiming for enterprise-level control.
If your hotel is a small or independent operation prioritizing ease of use, fast onboarding, and automated management, RoomRaccoon is the better choice. Its all-in-one system, with integrated booking engine, channel manager, and automation features, helps smaller teams grow revenue and streamline daily tasks without complexity.
For hotels seeking scalability, Infor HMS’s tailored solutions and broad regional reach make it ideal. Conversely, if rapid deployment, simplicity, and automation are critical, RoomRaccoon will serve your needs more effectively.
RoomRaccoon outshines Infor HMS on ease of use, with a review-based score of 4.74/5 versus Infor’s 3.88/5. Hoteliers find RoomRaccoon’s interface modern, straightforward, and quick to learn, with many reviews praising its intuitive design and minimal training requirements.
Infor HMS’s interface, while functional and customizable, is often described as less visually appealing and more complex, which can slow staff adoption. Onboarding for Infor tends to be more involved, and some users report a steeper learning curve due to its extensive feature set.
Support responsiveness is generally rated higher for RoomRaccoon, and its user interface is often highlighted as a key factor in rapid staff adoption. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers a broader set of features—33 unique features compared to Infor’s 2—focusing on automation, guest engagement, and ease of reservation management. Its standout features include a built-in channel manager, booking engine, guest communication tools, yield management, and integrated POS.
Infor HMS provides 18 shared features with RoomRaccoon, plus two exclusive ones: online 24/7 support and on-premise deployment. Its unique capabilities include customizable reports, dataspy features, and advanced revenue management, but it lacks the extensive automation seen in RoomRaccoon.
If feature richness and automation are your priorities, especially for small to medium hotels, RoomRaccoon is the better choice. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Infor HMS’s support scores 4.04/5, with reviews often mentioning prompt professional assistance. Users appreciate the responsiveness, especially during onboarding, but some report delays or bugs during system updates that impact operations.
RoomRaccoon scores higher at 4.53/5, with many reviews highlighting friendly, fast, and effective support, particularly during critical periods. Hotelers frequently mention that support teams are eager to implement feedback and resolve issues quickly, though some still note occasional delays.
Given the more recent reviews and higher ratings, RoomRaccoon’s support is more consistently praised. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Infor HMS boasts 113 verified partners, including major brands like SiteMinder, Revinate, and RateGain, with 25 shared partners with RoomRaccoon. Its integration set is extensive, especially suited for larger properties needing complex system connectivity.
RoomRaccoon has 88 verified partners, including key integrations like TrustYou, IVvy, and Upsellguru. It offers seamless connection to OTAs, payment systems, and property systems, with many integrations designed for smaller hotels.
For broader, enterprise-level integrations, Infor leads. But for flexible, hotel-specific integrations, RoomRaccoon’s platform is sufficiently versatile. Edge: Infor HMS.
RoomRaccoon’s overall rating of 4.88/5, with 169 reviews, indicates higher user satisfaction than Infor’s 4.04/5 from 46 reviews. Recent reviews for RoomRaccoon describe it as “extremely intuitive,” “saving us hours daily,” and “helping us grow RevPAR by 60%,” reflecting strong current user sentiment.
Infor’s ratings are lower and more mixed, with some praising its customization but others frustrated by bugs, server downtimes, and less engaging UI. Larger hotels and boutique properties tend to prefer Infor’s extensive features, but smaller operators favor RoomRaccoon’s simplicity.
Given the volume and recency, RoomRaccoon’s higher ratings make it the more trusted choice among hoteliers today. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Infor HMS does not publicly list its pricing, often providing custom quotes based on hotel size and needs, which can be expensive for smaller hotels. It typically targets larger or multi-property operators with higher budgets.
RoomRaccoon charges a flat fee of $1,000 per month, with no additional setup or hidden fees, making it transparent and affordable for small hotels and independents. Its pricing structure is designed to be accessible without sacrificing core functionality.
If budget and transparency are priorities, RoomRaccoon offers an easier path with predictable costs. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Hotels that should consider Infor HMS include:
Not ideal if your hotel is small, independent, or prioritizes ease of use and quick setup. Infor’s extensive features may be overwhelming for smaller teams seeking straightforward management.
Hotels that will benefit from RoomRaccoon include:
Not ideal if your hotel needs advanced enterprise features, extensive customization, or multi-property management at a large scale. Its strength is in supporting smaller, growth-oriented operations.
Infor HMS is a comprehensive, enterprise-level PMS suited for larger hotels and chains that need extensive customization, global support, and deep integrations. Its strengths lie in scalability and tailored control but come with a steeper learning curve and higher costs.
RoomRaccoon shines as a user-friendly, all-in-one solution for small to medium-sized independent hotels. It offers rapid setup, automation, and recent high satisfaction ratings, helping hoteliers grow revenue and improve guest experiences with less effort.
If your hotel prioritizes detailed customization and multi-property management, Infor HMS is the right fit. For small operators seeking simplicity, automation, and quick results, RoomRaccoon is the clearer choice.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Infor HMS 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享 18 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| PMS 连接性 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 23 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
报告功能经常被强调。用户喜欢标准报告和创建自定义报告的功能,这有助于进行详细的性能跟踪。然而,有些人发现更新会破坏报告格式和功能。
Infor HMS 因其与 Booking.com、HRS 和 Expedia 等预订平台的无缝集成而受到称赞。这大大减少了手动输入错误并提高了管理预订的效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Infor HMS 的支持团队因其响应能力和专业性而备受赞誉,这对于快速解决问题至关重要。用户对支持代表如何指导他们解决问题表示赞赏。
Infor HMS 普遍被认为易于导航,具有直观的多方面搜索选项。然而,一些用户发现用户界面缺乏美感,并认为它可以更直观。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用... 许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用性。
RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强... RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强调此功能如何节省时间并使管理更加轻松。
酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞... 酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞这些自动化功能的自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉... 虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉。
一些评论指出,RoomRaccoon 与其他系统(如支付网关(Stripe、会计软件)和 OTA)的集成存在局限性。用户表示希望实现更无缝的集成,以避免手动工作和额外费用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Infor HMS 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Infor HMS 提供 113 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon PMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 3.9/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Infor HMS:否。RoomRaccoon PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Infor 的 HT Score 为 22,RoomRaccoon 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问