The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #4 150 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #13 41 条评价 | #39 1 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #15 7 条评价 | #36 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #16 3 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 86 条评价 | #40 1 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #13 37 条评价 | #41 1 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #12 33 条评价 | #41 1 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #7 18 条评价 | #38 0 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #1 229 条评价 | #31 1 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #29 6 条评价 | #38 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #26 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #25 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right booking engine can significantly impact your hotel's revenue and guest experience. Both innRoad and Planet aim to streamline reservations, but their strengths and weaknesses diverge considerably. innRoad offers a comprehensive property management system with a focus on increasing direct bookings and operational efficiency, while Planet emphasizes a straightforward, easy-to-use online booking platform. Which aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
innRoad and Planet both target hotels looking to improve their booking processes, but their approaches differ. innRoad combines a booking engine with a broad property management system, offering features like multi-currency, channel management, and group bookings. Planet, on the other hand, centers solely on its online reservation interface, designed to reduce booking abandonment and accommodate international guests.
innRoad’s ratings reflect a mature, feature-rich platform with 200 reviews in the last six months, including 0 recent reviews, and an overall score of 4.68/5. In contrast, Planet’s reviews are scarce, with only three reviews total and no recent feedback, making it difficult to gauge current performance. innRoad’s high review volume and recent activity lend it a stronger reputation, while Planet’s limited recent reviews suggest less confidence in ongoing support and development.
If your hotel seeks a comprehensive solution that integrates reservations with PMS, revenue management, and guest communication, innRoad stands out. Conversely, if your focus is solely on a simple, web-based booking tool without extensive management features, Planet might seem appealing—though its limited recent reviews weaken its case.
Do you need a full property management solution or a dedicated booking engine?
If your hotel operates across multiple channels, manages a diverse property portfolio, or needs detailed reporting and group management, innRoad is your better choice. Its extensive feature set, including a channel manager, flexible rates, and native email marketing, makes it suitable for small to mid-sized hotels aiming to grow direct bookings and streamline operations.
Planet suits hotels with a straightforward online booking need—single properties or small boutique hotels with limited room types and no requirement for PMS integration. It’s ideal if you want an easy, quick-to-implement booking widget to increase direct bookings without the complexity of managing extra systems.
For hoteliers prioritizing a mature, highly-rated platform with proven growth, innRoad’s 4.68/5 rating and 200 recent reviews make it the safer pick. If your hotel only needs a basic reservation tool and your staff are tech-savvy, Planet’s minimalistic approach might suffice, but its unproven support history is a concern.
innRoad’s user interface is rated 4.44/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive dashboard, color-coded tape chart, and customizable reservation management. Implementation is rated 4.2/5, and clients note that staff adoption is smooth with proper training, though some mention glitches and occasional slow loading times.
Planet scores only 1.67/5 for ease of use, with users describing its interface as limited and inconsistent. The few reviews highlight difficulties navigating the platform and a steep learning curve, compounded by limited support responsiveness.
Edge: innRoad. Its higher ratings and extensive positive feedback demonstrate that your team will likely find innRoad more manageable, especially for daily operations and training.
innRoad boasts an impressive 54 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-currency, channel manager, property management system, group booking capabilities, native email marketing, and integrated payment processing. It also offers advanced tools like housekeeper modules, booking engine, flexible rate plans, and detailed reports—covering most needs of hotel operations.
Planet offers no unique features beyond its core booking engine. Its focus is solely on the reservation process, lacking the integrated management tools innRoad provides. With only 0 additional features, Planet’s simplicity is its weakness when considering hotel-specific functionalities.
Edge: innRoad. Its extensive feature set makes it a more versatile solution, capable of supporting your hotel’s growth and operational complexity.
innRoad’s support scores 4.44/5, with many users praising their responsiveness and knowledgeable staff. Clients mention that support is accessible 24/7, and onboarding is generally smooth despite some reports of glitches and slow responses to minor issues.
Planet’s customer support scores only 1/5, with reviews describing it as practically non-existent. Users report delays, unanswered inquiries, and frustration with unresolved issues, especially after switching from their previous system.
Edge: innRoad. Its higher ratings, recent active reviews, and dedicated support team indicate your hotel will receive more reliable assistance with innRoad.
innRoad has 34 verified partners, including popular integrations like QuickBooks, Airbnb, and Expedia. Its extensive list covers essential systems such as channel management, payment gateways, and property management integrations, with 15 shared partners.
Planet outpaces innRoad with 195 verified partners, including major OTAs and revenue management tools like Omnibees and HotelRunner. However, a significant portion of these are niche or less relevant to daily hotel operations, and many integrations are untested or less mature.
Edge: Planet. Its broader partner network offers more options for connecting external systems, although innRoad’s integrations are more proven and hotel-centric.
innRoad’s overall score of 4.68/5 is backed by 200 recent reviews, with an 88% likelihood to recommend. Hoteliers praise its intuitive interface, 20% increase in direct bookings, and strong customer support, especially for small to mid-sized properties and boutique hotels.
Planet’s reviews are limited, with only three comments and no recent feedback. Its few users—mostly small, simple setups—expressed dissatisfaction with stability and support, giving no meaningful data on overall satisfaction.
Thus, innRoad’s higher review count and recent positive feedback make it the better-rated platform by a significant margin.
Edge: innRoad.
Pricing details for both platforms are not publicly disclosed. innRoad operates on a no-hidden-fee model, emphasizing that there are no hidden charges, and it typically charges a monthly fee per property, but specifics vary. Planet also does not publish prices; it is presumed to have a similar subscription-based model with no trial offers.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, your best approach is to request quotes based on your hotel’s size and needs.
Not ideal if you operate a very small property with only a single room type or want a lightweight, standalone booking widget with minimal management tools.
Not ideal if your hotel requires integrated PMS, detailed reporting, group management, or multi-channel distribution.
innRoad offers a full-featured property management system paired with a high-converting booking engine, suited for hotels that want growth and operational efficiency. Its extensive reviews, recent activity, and broad integration reach make it a reliable choice for mid-sized and boutique hotels aiming to boost direct bookings.
Planet provides a simple, web-based reservation platform optimized for small properties with uncomplicated needs. Its broad partner network may appeal to properties seeking external integrations, but the lack of recent reviews and limited features suggest it isn’t a robust solution for hotels with bigger ambitions.
If your hotel values a well-supported, feature-rich platform with proven results, innRoad is the clear choice. For basic reservation needs with minimal complexity, Planet might suffice, but proceed cautiously given its limited recent feedback.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持服务通常因响应迅速、知识渊博、及时解决问题而受到称赞。然而,也有人提到响应速度慢,以及与英语不流利的支持人员沟通不畅,这可能会让用户感到沮丧。
用户经常提到 InnRoad 提供的高度定制和灵活性,特别是在房间外观、计费功能和报告方面。这使酒店能够根据其特定需求定制软件,从而提高运营效率和客人满意度。
预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明... 预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明智的决策并提高整体酒店绩效。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对该系统管理费率和付款(包括费率变更和分期付款)的能力表示赞赏。然而,有些人认为这些功能复杂且耗时,这表明需要更精简的流程来提高效率和客户满意度。
一些用户报告称,用户界面出现故障且加载速度缓慢,这可能会扰乱日常操作。系统冻结和功能错误等问题表明需要增强稳定性和速度。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad Booking Engine 和 Planet Booking Engine 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad Booking Engine 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Planet Booking Engine 提供 194 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad Booking Engine 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 1.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad Booking Engine:否。Planet Booking Engine:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 34,Planet 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问