The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 845 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
innRoad 表现出色 在 客户支持质量 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
Profitroom 表现出色 在 onboarding 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Urgency messaging.
基于 HTR 上 845 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 244 | 601 |
在分析了 845 条经验证的评价后,innRoad 用户最看重其 客户支持质量, 定制和灵活性, 预订仪表板和报告,而 Profitroom 用户则强调 预订引擎和集成, customer support and response time, 新手引导和易用性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持质量
▾
|
+
预订引擎和集成
▾
|
|
+
定制和灵活性
▾
|
+
Customer Support and Response Time
▾
|
|
+
预订仪表板和报告
▾
|
+
新手引导和易用性
▾
|
|
+
胶带图表和颜色编码
▾
|
+
定制和品牌推广
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
费率和付款管理
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
用户界面故障
▾
|
−
语言和货币支持
▾
|
|
−
移动可访问性和应用程序功能
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 预订引擎 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #4 150 条评价 | #3 176 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #13 41 条评价 | #3 323 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #15 7 条评价 | #2 54 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #16 3 条评价 | #4 21 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 86 条评价 | #2 227 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #13 37 条评价 | #3 217 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #12 33 条评价 | #3 137 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #7 18 条评价 | #2 81 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #1 229 条评价 | #9 26 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #29 6 条评价 | #1 491 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #26 1 条评价 | #13 13 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #25 0 条评价 | #10 5 条评价 |
When choosing a booking engine for your hotel, you need a system that increases direct bookings, simplifies management, and enhances guest experience. InnRoad Booking Engine and Profitroom Booking Engine 360 both aim to meet these needs but diverge significantly in features, scale, and user satisfaction. While innRoad offers a more accessible entry point with solid basic features, Profitroom’s platform appears more comprehensive and current, especially given its larger review base and recent positive feedback. How do these differences impact your decision?
InnRoad and Profitroom both solve the core problem of managing online bookings and reducing reliance on OTAs. InnRoad emphasizes ease of use, with a user-friendly interface and straightforward integration, but recent reviews highlight issues with glitches and slower performance. Profitroom, on the other hand, provides a more extensive feature set, including upselling, dynamic pricing, and marketing automation, backed by a larger and more recent review base. Does your hotel prioritize operational simplicity or feature depth?
While innRoad's core strengths lie in its intuitive design and basic reservation management, Profitroom excels in its marketing automation and guest engagement tools. InnRoad has fewer recent reviews, with no feedback in the last six months, which weakens current confidence. Profitroom’s 505 reviews, 21 of which are recent, suggest a more active user community and ongoing product evolution. Which approach aligns better with your hotel’s growth strategy?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, easy-to-implement booking engine that integrates seamlessly with OTAs and offers essential features, innRoad is a solid choice. Its high user ratings for ease of use (4.44/5) and onboarding (4.2/5) indicate a smoother initial experience, especially for small teams or properties new to digital management.
If your hotel focuses on increasing direct bookings, upselling, and advanced guest marketing, Profitroom’s platform should be your pick. Its higher overall ratings, more recent reviews, and broader feature set—like social media integration, loyalty programs, and A/B testing—make it suitable for hotels seeking to optimize revenue and guest satisfaction.
InnRoad’s user interface scores 4.44/5, with reviews praising its intuitive design and simple reservation management. However, users also report glitches and slow load times, which can hinder daily operations. Its onboarding process is rated at 4.2/5, indicating some room for improvement in training and initial setup.
Profitroom’s interface scores slightly higher at 4.73/5, with reviews emphasizing its ease of learning, clear navigation, and helpful support. Hotels mention that the platform’s design reduces the learning curve and speeds up adoption. Edge: Profitroom.
innRoad boasts 24 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-currency support, channel management, property management system, and native email marketing—features that significantly enhance operational control. Its total of 30 shared features with Profitroom includes core booking engine functionalities like group reservations and online support.
Profitroom, however, offers 13 features unique to its platform, such as urgency messaging, booking abandonment recapture, and social media integration, which can directly influence guest conversion. Its total of 30 shared features also includes dynamic pricing and upselling tools. Edge: innRoad, due to its broader feature set tailored for operational flexibility.
InnRoad’s support scores 4.44/5, with reviews indicating helpfulness but also frustration over slow response times and system glitches. Some users feel the support team often takes time to resolve issues, impacting daily operations.
Profitroom’s support is rated 4.6/5, with reviews emphasizing prompt, professional assistance and ongoing help. Customers appreciate their responsiveness, especially during onboarding, which reduces downtime. Edge: Profitroom.
InnRoad integrates with 34 verified partners, including major OTAs like Airbnb and Expedia, and specialized systems like Quickbooks and Revinate. Its partner network supports a wide range of operational and marketing tools, though fewer than Profitroom.
Profitroom boasts 66 verified integrations, including industry-standard systems like Mirai, HotelTime, and Cendyn, along with OTAs and marketing platforms. This larger network facilitates more comprehensive automation and data sharing. Edge: Profitroom.
Profitroom’s review count (505) surpasses innRoad’s (200), and its recent reviews—21 in the last six months—confirm ongoing product development and customer satisfaction. Its current ratings (4.76/5 overall) reflect a higher level of user approval, especially among larger hotels and resorts.
InnRoad’s ratings (4.68/5 overall) are slightly lower, partly due to recent complaints about glitches and limited updates. Smaller properties and boutique hotels tend to rate innRoad higher, but overall, Profitroom’s recent feedback indicates stronger performance. Edge: Profitroom.
innRoad does not publicly list pricing details, but it is known for flexible, contract-free arrangements targeted at small to mid-sized hotels. Its approach often involves custom quotes based on property size and needs.
Profitroom charges a base fee of $600 and does not offer a freemium or free trial, which suggests a more premium positioning. Its pricing reflects its extensive features and global reach, making it more suitable for hotels investing in comprehensive revenue management.
innRoad offers a more accessible, straightforward booking engine with essential features, which makes it ideal for small properties and boutique hotels looking for simplicity. Its lower review count and recent feedback, however, suggest it may lack the continuous innovation seen in Profitroom.
Profitroom provides a more advanced, feature-rich platform supported by a larger, more recent user base. Its strengths in marketing automation, integrations, and guest engagement make it the better choice for hotels aiming to grow their direct bookings and revenue.
If your hotel needs a simple, cost-effective solution with quick onboarding, innRoad could suffice. But if you're serious about increasing direct sales, optimizing marketing, and utilizing cutting-edge tools, Profitroom is the clearer choice.
Edge: Profitroom.
预订引擎 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $600/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,innRoad Booking Engine 和 Profitroom Booking Engine 360 共享 30 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 人工智能优化 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 替代住宿建议(没有空房时) | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 社交媒体整合/预订 | ||
| 紧急信息 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 预订放弃重新获得 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 25 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 12 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
"We love how keen Profitroom are to adopt feedback. We needed an ‘out of the box’ solution so ultimately chose Profitroom as they’re always evolving the system to our changing indus..."
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We chose to cooperate with Profitroom because you are absolutely the best in Poland, and there is no other company that matches your technological prowess. Indeed, working with you..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
客户支持服务通常因响应迅速、知识渊博、及时解决问题而受到称赞。然而,也有人提到响应速度慢,以及与英语不流利的支持人员沟通不畅,这可能会让用户感到沮丧。
用户经常提到 InnRoad 提供的高度定制和灵活性,特别是在房间外观、计费功能和报告方面。这使酒店能够根据其特定需求定制软件,从而提高运营效率和客人满意度。
预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明... 预订仪表板和综合报告功能因其提供可操作见解和简化数据管理的能力而备受瞩目。这些工具可帮助酒店经理跟踪入住率、收入和其他关键绩效指标,从而更轻松地做出明智的决策并提高整体酒店绩效。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户对该系统管理费率和付款(包括费率变更和分期付款)的能力表示赞赏。然而,有些人认为这些功能复杂且耗时,这表明需要更精简的流程来提高效率和客户满意度。
一些用户报告称,用户界面出现故障且加载速度缓慢,这可能会扰乱日常操作。系统冻结和功能错误等问题表明需要增强稳定性和速度。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Profitroom预订引擎的集成能力普遍受到好评,能够提升与其他系统(如PMS和RMS)的用户体验。然而,一些评论指出,这些集成的无缝性和配置过程仍有改进空间,表明... Profitroom预订引擎的集成能力普遍受到好评,能够提升与其他系统(如PMS和RMS)的用户体验。然而,一些评论指出,这些集成的无缝性和配置过程仍有改进空间,表明需要加快实施速度并增强端到端的系统连接性。
While users generally find Profitroom's customer support team helpful and resourceful, there are recurring mentions of delays in response times, parti... While users generally find Profitroom's customer support team helpful and resourceful, there are recurring mentions of delays in response times, particularly concerning ticket resolutions. Some users have suggested the need for an improved phone support line and faster issue resolution to enhance the user experience.
该平台的注册流程和易用性经常受到好评。客户认为该系统直观易懂,有助于酒店不同员工快速上手。有效的培训资源也进一步促进了系统的顺利过渡和易用性。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Profitroom 的报告和分析功能褒贬不一。用户赞赏其为决策和营销活动提供的洞察,但他们也希望获得更高级、更易用的报告功能,并建议改进报告的自定义和即时性。
Profitroom 以其多语言和多币种支持而闻名,尤其适合服务国际用户。这一特性增强了平台的易用性,使其成为拥有多元化客户群体的酒店的理想选择。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad Booking Engine 和 Profitroom Booking Engine 360 共享许多核心 Booking Engine 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad Booking Engine 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Profitroom Booking Engine 360 提供 66 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Profitroom Booking Engine 360 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad Booking Engine:否。Profitroom Booking Engine 360:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Booking Engine 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 34,Profitroom 的为 96。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问