The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 179 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 47 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 11 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 5 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #12 96 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 45 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 33 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 17 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Modotel |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 275 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #34 5 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #39 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #34 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can dramatically impact your hotel’s operations, revenue, and guest satisfaction. innRoad and Modotel PMS both aim to streamline management, but their approaches and strengths differ significantly. innRoad, with its extensive feature set and strong user reviews, clearly stands out for hotels seeking a reliable, well-supported solution. Modotel, meanwhile, offers a less proven presence, lacking recent reviews and detailed feature info. Your choice hinges on what your hotel needs most.
innRoad offers a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS that integrates reservations, channel management, booking engine, revenue tools, and more, boasting a 4.7/5 overall rating from 238 recent reviews. In contrast, Modotel has no recent reviews or a publicly available overall rating, making it difficult to gauge its market standing or reliability. innRoad’s current active user base and recent feedback demonstrate a proven track record, whereas Modotel’s data is limited to no reviews in the last six months.
Both products aim to improve operational efficiency and revenue. innRoad’s strengths lie in its rich feature set, ease of use, and dedicated support, while Modotel’s offerings and real-world performance are less transparent. Given the absence of recent customer feedback for Modotel, innRoad’s established reputation and recent reviews provide a clearer picture of what you can expect. Are you comfortable choosing a less tested system for your property?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, robust PMS with strong integration capabilities, innRoad is the clear winner. It suits properties that prioritize revenue growth, operational efficiency, and reliable support—especially if you operate in North America or Europe. If your hotel is a small or boutique property looking for a straightforward, perhaps less complex solution, Modotel's limited information suggests it may not meet your needs as effectively.
innRoad’s extensive features, including multi-currency, channel manager, booking engine, and revenue management, make it ideal for hotels aiming to optimize bookings and operational control. Conversely, without verified features or recent reviews, Modotel appears less suited for hotels seeking proven performance or support. For your hotel, choice hinges on proven reliability and comprehensive capabilities.
innRoad scores a 4.49/5 in ease of use, supported by positive reviews praising its intuitive interface, especially its Tape Chart, and straightforward onboarding process. Customers highlight its mobile optimization and real-time updates, though some mention occasional glitches and slower system performance affecting usability.
Modotel offers no recent user ratings or detailed user feedback, making it impossible to compare its usability directly. Without evidence of user-friendliness or recent reviews, innRoad’s established ease of use and positive support ratings give it a decisive edge. If a smooth user experience on multiple devices is crucial, innRoad is the safer choice.
innRoad boasts an impressive 56 unique features, including multi-currency support, channel management, booking engine, revenue management, guest messaging, online check-in/out, automated night audit, and integrated CRS. These features are absent from Modotel, which provides no publicly documented feature set, making it difficult to compare capabilities.
innRoad’s broad functionality caters to a wide range of hotel types, especially those seeking automation and revenue tools. The absence of comparable features in Modotel suggests it may lack the depth needed for more complex operations or revenue optimization. For feature depth and variety, innRoad has a clear lead.
innRoad’s support scores a 4.54/5, with recent reviews praising its 24/7 live customer support, dedicated onboarding, and helpful technical assistance. Reviewers mention prompt responses, with some noting the support team resolves issues professionally and reliably.
Modotel’s customer support details are unavailable, with no recent reviews or ratings to assess its responsiveness or quality. innRoad’s strong support reputation, especially from recent feedback, makes it the more dependable choice. If ongoing, responsive support is a priority, innRoad is the clear leader.
innRoad integrates with 34 verified partners, including top names like QuickBooks, Revinate, and RateGain, covering accounting, marketing, revenue, and channel management tools. These integrations facilitate seamless operations and data sharing, critical for scaling and automation.
Modotel provides no publicly documented integrations or verified partner connections, limiting its ability to connect with other essential systems. innRoad’s extensive integration options give it a substantial advantage, enabling your hotel to customize and automate workflows effectively. For maximum flexibility, innRoad dominates.
innRoad’s recent reviews show a 4.7/5 overall rating from 238 reviewers, with a likelihood to recommend at 89%. Hotels of various sizes, especially independent and boutique properties, praise its ease of use, support, and revenue impacts.
Modotel, with no recent reviews or publicly available ratings, cannot be assessed on user satisfaction. InnRoad’s high review volume and recent feedback provide a clear, favorable consensus. For a hotel looking for proven satisfaction and reliability, innRoad is the better-rated choice.
innRoad’s pricing starts at $300/month, with no hidden fees, implementation charges, or freemium options. The all-in-one fee covers a comprehensive feature set, making budgeting predictable.
Modotel’s pricing details are not publicly available, suggesting it may require direct inquiry and possibly custom quotes. Without clear pricing transparency, innRoad’s fixed rate offers better clarity and value. If budget predictability matters, innRoad provides a straightforward, transparent pricing model.
innRoad provides a comprehensive, well-supported PMS with a proven track record, especially in North America and Europe. Its extensive feature set, recent positive reviews, and high user ratings make it suitable for hotels aiming to grow and optimize operations.
Modotel, lacking recent reviews, detailed features, and transparent pricing, appears less reliable as a PMS choice. It might serve very small or simple properties temporarily, but without proven customer satisfaction or integration options, it’s a risky investment.
If your hotel values a dependable, feature-rich system with active support and industry recognition, innRoad is the clear choice. For hotels seeking a more basic, less tested solution, Modotel might suffice but comes with significant unknowns.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad 和 Modotel PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Modotel PMS 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad:否。Modotel PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 31,Modotel 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问