The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 392 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
innRoad 表现出色 在 ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Tablet/Kiosk Check-in and Lobby Kiosk.
roommaster 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Guest Feedback Management.
基于 HTR 上 392 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 292 | 100 |
在分析了 392 条经验证的评价后,innRoad 用户最看重其 报告和收入管理, 预订引擎和 ota 集成, 磁带图,而 roommaster 用户则强调 预订管理, 集中式数据管理, 云和移动访问。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
报告和收入管理
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
预订引擎和 OTA 集成
▾
|
+
集中式数据管理
▾
|
|
+
磁带图
▾
|
+
云和移动访问
▾
|
|
+
Ampliphi 的定价建议
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
系统故障
▾
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
|
−
信用卡处理
▾
|
−
用户界面体验
▾
|
|
−
移动兼容性和应用程序
▾
|
−
团体预订功能
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #6 179 条评价 | #30 26 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 47 条评价 | #13 54 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #13 11 条评价 | #31 3 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #9 5 条评价 | #32 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #12 96 条评价 | #22 35 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #15 45 条评价 | #34 8 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #16 33 条评价 | #24 15 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #13 17 条评价 | #27 6 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #3 275 条评价 | #10 62 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #34 5 条评价 | #29 11 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #39 1 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #34 0 条评价 | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's operational efficiency and revenue growth. innRoad and roommaster both aim to simplify hotel management, but they approach this goal differently. innRoad emphasizes ease of use, integrations, and revenue boosts, while roommaster focuses on centralized data, detailed reporting, and operational control. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s specific needs?
Are you prioritizing more recent reviews and a higher overall rating? innRoad’s larger review base and fresher feedback give it a noticeable edge. Its strong user sentiment signals a more current and trusted solution for hoteliers.
Both innRoad and roommaster serve as comprehensive PMS solutions, but they diverge in their core strengths. innRoad is designed for ease of access, online booking, and revenue optimization, making it ideal for properties seeking direct booking growth and OTA connectivity. roommaster, however, centers on centralized data, detailed reporting, and workflow automation, appealing more to hotels with complex operations or multiple properties.
innRoad’s cloud platform allows access from any device with a focus on user-friendliness, while roommaster boasts over 270 built-in reports and deep integrations for data-driven decision-making. Does your hotel need a system that’s quick to implement and easy for staff? Or one that offers granular control over operations and detailed reports? The choice hinges on your hotel’s scale and operational complexity.
If your hotel needs to increase direct bookings and simplify OTA management, innRoad is the clear choice. Its high-rated booking engine and channel management features have helped properties see up to a 35% boost in direct bookings, supported by a 4.7/5 overall rating from 238 reviews. For hotels prioritizing revenue growth and online presence, innRoad’s features and recent positive feedback make it a compelling option.
On the other hand, if your hotel requires detailed operational insights, robust reporting, and centralized reservation management, roommaster fits better. With more recent reviews and a higher overall rating (4.33/5 from 83 reviews), roommaster excels in automating workflows and providing real-time business intelligence. Its focus on operational control benefits larger or multi-property hotels seeking consistency and detailed analytics.
innRoad’s user interface receives a 4.49/5 rating, praised for its intuitive tape chart, simple navigation, and mobile optimization. Customers highlight its easy onboarding and quick learning curve, although some mention glitches that occasionally slow down operations. Its strong support team further eases staff adoption, making it suitable for properties with limited IT staff.
roommaster’s interface scores 4.22/5, praised for its visual portal and central dashboards. While functional, some reviews call for a more streamlined user experience and improvements in mobile access. Its comprehensive feature set can require more initial training, but experienced users find the system manageable.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad offers 8 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, website development, multi-currency, drag-and-drop tape chart, tablet/Kiosk check-in, housekeeping mobile app, ancillary revenue tracking, and lobby kiosk. These add-ons support flexible, customer-facing operations and revenue opportunities.
roommaster provides 12 unique features, such as EPoS, native email marketing, guest feedback management, centralized messaging, automated reminders, guest app, ID scanning, employee messaging, rules-based room assignments, and SOC2 compliance. These features enhance operational automation and data security.
With 48 shared features, both systems cover core PMS functions. Your choice depends on whether you need more front-end tools (innRoad) or back-end automation and security (roommaster).
Edge: innRoad (slightly due to broader marketing and revenue features).
innRoad’s customer support is highly rated at 4.54/5, with reviews emphasizing prompt, professional, and friendly service. Customers frequently mention support staff’s patience and responsiveness, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. Many users appreciate the live, 24/7 support, which is critical for resolving urgent issues promptly.
roommaster’s support scores 4.25/5, with praise for quick responses and ease of troubleshooting in some cases. However, reviews also note inconsistency and a need for better support training, especially when issues involve complex configurations.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad boasts 34 verified partner integrations, including major OTAs and software like QuickBooks, Cisco Meraki, and Impulsify. Its integration ecosystem supports seamless connectivity for property marketing, accounting, and operations.
roommaster offers 56 verified integrations, including Sage, Volo, GuestCentric, and Otelier. Its broader partner network provides extensive options for channel management, financial software, and guest engagement tools.
While roommaster has more integrations overall, innRoad’s focus on online travel agency connections and revenue tools makes it a more versatile choice for properties heavily reliant on online distribution.
Edge: roommaster.
innRoad’s reviews are more recent, with 17 reviews in the last six months, supporting a higher overall rating of 4.7/5. Hoteliers across segments praise its ease of use, customer support, and booking engine, with one saying, “Our room revenue is up 50% year over year because of innRoad.”
roommaster, with 83 reviews overall, holds a rating of 4.33/5. Its users appreciate the operational control and detailed reporting but note that some features require more refinement. Larger hotels and chains tend to rate it higher due to its scalability.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad charges a flat monthly fee of $300, with no hidden fees, implementation costs, or freemium options. Its predictable pricing supports budget planning for small and medium properties seeking a straightforward, all-in-one solution.
roommaster’s base price is $500 per month, with no mention of additional setup fees or freemium options. Its higher cost reflects its extensive features and focus on larger hotels or multi-property management.
Your decision may hinge on budget constraints versus feature needs. innRoad is more affordable for small to midsize hotels, while roommaster’s price points suit hotels requiring advanced operational control.
Hotels that will benefit most from innRoad include:
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on sophisticated operations, complex group management, or multi-property control.
Not ideal if you need multi-language support or advanced POS features not included in innRoad.
Hotels best suited for roommaster include:
Not ideal if your hotel is a small boutique or relies mainly on direct bookings without complex operational needs.
Not ideal if your team prefers a more visual, front-facing system with a focus on guest-facing technology.
innRoad is a user-friendly, revenue-focused PMS with a high rating and recent reviews backing its ease of use and support. It excels for smaller and midsize hotels aiming to grow direct bookings and streamline operations without extensive customization.
roommaster offers a broader feature set centered on operational control, detailed reporting, and multi-property management. It’s better suited for larger hotels or chains that require centralized data and automation.
If your hotel wants a straightforward, well-supported system with a focus on online revenue, innRoad is the preferred choice. For hotels needing detailed control, extensive reporting, and multi-location management, roommaster is the better fit.
Ultimately, innRoad’s recent review volume and higher ratings make it the more reliable recommendation for most hoteliers today.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,innRoad 和 roommaster PMS 共享 48 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 销售点 | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 8 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然总体上是正面的,但一些评论提到需要加快解决问题的速度,并更好地沟通更新和修复。尽管如此,用户发现全天候支持对于解决任何问题都非常有用。
报告功能详细且可定制,有助于财务跟踪和决策。收益管理工具有助于动态调整房价并提高盈利能力。一些用户建议进一步定制报告以获得更个性化的见解。
用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息... 用户喜欢与 OTA 的无缝集成以及响应式预订引擎,该引擎可推动直接预订并减少超额预订。这为许多酒店带来了显着的收入增长。然而,第三方集成有时会丢失详细信息,这引起了一些问题。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户报告称,系统偶尔会出现故障,例如 Tape Chart 冻结、费率变更不方便用户使用以及整个系统有时运行缓慢。这些问题偶尔会影响预订和办理登机手续。
InnRoad 的集成信用卡处理功能广受好评,尽管用户指出需要更好地处理退款和纠纷。PCI 合规性和安全支付处理功能值得赞赏。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的... 虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的服务体验。
预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配... 预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配列表和团体入住登记方面仍有改进空间。
RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全... RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全平台上的做法,这显著提升了工作流程效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
RoomMaster的报告生成功能虽然实用,但仍被认为有待改进。用户希望在创建和导出报告方面获得更高的效率和效果,这表明改进功能可以简化分析任务。
一些用户指出需要改进用户体验,尤其强调需要消除重复性任务,例如频繁登录,这会影响日常使用该软件的流畅性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。innRoad 和 roommaster PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。innRoad 提供 34 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 roommaster PMS 提供 56 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。innRoad 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
innRoad:否。roommaster PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。innRoad 的 HT Score 为 31,roommaster 的为 83。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问