The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right guest app for your hotel depends on your specific needs, operational goals, and guest experience strategy. Both iPortal by TigerTMS and STAY Guest App aim to enhance guest engagement and streamline hotel services, but they do so quite differently. Your choice hinges on whether you prioritize a comprehensive, integrated platform or a feature-rich, user-friendly app with extensive functionalities.
TigerTMS’s iPortal is a mobile guest services solution with a focus on integrating with PMS systems and boosting hotel revenues. STAY, on the other hand, offers a highly rated guest experience OS known for its ease of use and broad feature set. Which aligns better with your property’s priorities?
Both products aim to improve guest satisfaction and operational efficiency, but their approaches vary. iPortal emphasizes integration with existing PMS systems, providing a centralized hub for services like guest chat, bill viewing, and HVAC control, ideal for hotels seeking a seamless tech ecosystem. STAY focuses on digitizing hotel services for both staff and guests, with a suite of features designed for straightforward implementation and high guest engagement.
TigerTMS has a long-standing presence since 1979 but has no recent review data, making its current relevance uncertain. STAY, founded in 2012, boasts over 200 recent reviews, with a 3/5 overall rating and a highly impressive 96% likelihood to recommend. Its recent reviews highlight rapid onboarding, intuitive design, and strong customer support, making it the more credible choice today. Considering the recent reviews and high user recommendation, STAY is the clearer choice for most hoteliers. Would your hotel benefit from a more integrated or more feature-rich solution?
If your hotel needs a quick-to-implement, easy-to-use guest app that enhances operational efficiency and guest satisfaction, STAY is the better option. Its 4.78/5 ease of use score and over 200 recent reviews indicate high adoption success, especially for hotels aiming to digitize services like room orders, local recommendations, and multilingual support.
If, however, your hotel requires deep PMS integration and a platform focused mainly on guest communication, bill management, HVAC, and auto check-out, iPortal’s integration capabilities might be advantageous. Yet, with no recent reviews or clear user satisfaction data, STAY’s proven track record makes it the safer pick for most properties.
STAY’s UI/UX rating stands at an impressive 4.78/5, supported by a straightforward CMS and easy onboarding process. Users praise its intuitive design, quick setup, and minimal staff training. In contrast, TigerTMS’s lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 ease of use score suggest limited real-world feedback, leaving its usability unverified.
Given the high review count and recent positive comments, edge: STAY. Your team will likely find STAY’s interface more accessible, reducing resistance and speeding up staff adoption.
STAY offers 14 distinct features, including chatbot, automated replies, message routing, room service ordering, local recommendations, multilingual support, mobile checkout, and guest profiles. These features are designed to enhance operational capacity and guest satisfaction directly. TigerTMS’s iPortal, by comparison, provides no additional features beyond basic integration functions, which are not detailed or recent.
In terms of feature depth and variety, edge: STAY. Its comprehensive suite supports diverse guest interactions and operational needs, making it more versatile.
STAY’s recent reviews consistently highlight excellent customer support, with ratings around 4.83/5 and comments emphasizing quick, helpful responses. Users mention that support is “efficient and friendly” even without 24/7 phone support, with many appreciating the onboarding process.
TigerTMS’s support ratings are unavailable, and reviews are nonexistent in recent months. Without recent positive feedback, the edge goes to STAY, ensuring your hotel will likely receive prompt, effective support.
TigerTMS integrates with 28 verified partners, including major PMS, POS, and revenue systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, RMS, and Protel. STAY connects with 20 verified partners, including PMS systems like hotelkit, Vingcard, and Amadeus, plus notable integrations like SiteMinder.
While TigerTMS has a slight edge in total integrations, STAY’s partner list covers key systems used by most hotels. Given the importance of reliable integrations, edge: TigerTMS, but only if your existing systems are supported.
STAY’s recent reviews demonstrate a strong preference among hoteliers, with a 9.59/5 NPS score and 96% likelihood to recommend. Hotels of various sizes, including chains like NH Hotels and Riu, praise its ease of use, operational impact, and guest satisfaction.
In contrast, TigerTMS has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current hotel sentiment. The clear choice: STAY, with proven positive feedback and high satisfaction among recent users.
STAY charges a straightforward base price of $300 per month, with no free tier, implementation fees, or hidden charges noted. TigerTMS does not list any pricing details or trial options, which raises concerns about transparency and affordability.
Given the transparent pricing and proven value, edge: STAY. Your hotel can budget with confidence and evaluate ROI effectively.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference: STAY offers an easy-to-use, feature-rich guest app with high recent satisfaction and a proven track record. iPortal, while comprehensive in theory, lacks recent user feedback and reviews, making its effectiveness uncertain today.
Choose STAY if you want a reliable, well-rated solution that enhances operational efficiency and guest experience through a broad feature set. Opt for iPortal only if your hotel requires deep PMS integration and you’re prepared to navigate unverified support and usability claims.
For most properties, especially those new to digital guest services or seeking rapid results, STAY is the safer, more confident decision. Its recent reviews, high satisfaction scores, and extensive functionalities make it the recommended choice to elevate your hotel’s guest experience now.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。iPortal (by Tiger TMS) 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。iPortal (by Tiger TMS) 提供 28 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
iPortal (by Tiger TMS):否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。TigerTMS 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问