The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
LasoExperience 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Checkin.
STAY 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App.
基于 HTR 上 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 215 |
在分析了 215 条经验证的评价后,LasoExperience 用户最看重其 ,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户体验优化
▾
|
|
|
+
移动和用户体验
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
支持和服务
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
CMS 和定制
▾
|
|
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
|
−
分析和报告
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right guest app for your hotel is essential to elevate the guest experience and streamline operations. Both LasoExperience and STAY aim to improve guest engagement and operational efficiency, but they diverge significantly in features, user feedback, and market presence. Understanding these differences can help you make a confident decision aligned with your hotel’s needs.
LasoExperience offers a broad set of tools focused on personalized guest relationships and revenue growth, but it lacks recent review data and has a very low rating. STAY, on the other hand, boasts a strong recent review base, high satisfaction scores, and extensive integrations, making it a more reliable choice for most hoteliers today.
Are you ready to see which product better suits your hotel’s priorities?
LasoExperience and STAY serve the same core purpose—enhancing guest communication and operational efficiency—but their approach and maturity differ markedly. LasoExperience is marketed as a comprehensive guest relationship platform, offering hyper-personalized experiences and automation tools. However, it has zero ratings or recent reviews, indicating limited current user feedback, which raises questions about its ongoing support and development.
STAY, by contrast, has accumulated over 200 reviews in the past six months alone, with a 4.83/5 customer support rating and a 9.59/10 net promoter score. These recent reviews highlight real-world success stories, such as reducing queues and increasing revenue at large chains like NH Hotels and Riu, making the platform a more tangible choice for hotels prioritizing proven performance.
Given the lack of recent data and user feedback for LasoExperience, do you want a product with current, verified hotel experiences or are you open to exploring a less tested solution?
If your hotel needs a guest relationship platform that emphasizes personalized marketing, automation, and revenue opportunities, LasoExperience might seem appealing. Its unique features include AI-driven guest recommendations and a CRM/CDP system designed to deepen guest engagement. However, with no recent reviews and a current 0/5 rating, its performance and support remain unverified.
STAY is the clear choice if your hotel prioritizes operational efficiency and proven guest satisfaction. It has extensive integrations (20 verified partners, including major PMS and CRM systems), a 4.78/5 ease of use rating, and over 200 recent reviews with a 96% likelihood to recommend. Large chains like NH Hotels and Riu have successfully implemented STAY to improve services and reduce costs, reflecting its reliability.
For most hotels seeking a tested, well-supported platform, STAY's recent data and high user ratings make it the definitive choice. Do you prefer a platform with proven results or one that lacks current user validation?
LasoExperience’s user interface and onboarding process are not rated or reviewed, which makes assessing ease of use difficult. Its minimal presence in recent reviews suggests limited deployment or awareness among current users, leaving questions about staff adoption and daily usability.
STAY has a well-documented ease of use rating of 4.78/5, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward CMS, and quick onboarding. Hotels like NH and Dolce Sitges highlight how simple it is to implement and manage, with minimal training needed.
Edge: STAY.
LasoExperience offers 10 shared features and one unique feature: Mobile Check-in. Its AI-driven tools for guest profiling and marketing automation are notable but not extensively reviewed or validated.
STAY provides 10 shared features plus 4 exclusive features—Mobile App, Chatbot, Automated Replies, and Message Routing—that enhance communication and operational automation. Its features are well-integrated, tested across large hotel groups, and backed by positive recent reviews.
The breadth and depth of STAY’s features, especially its chat and automation capabilities, give it a significant advantage. Edge: STAY.
LasoExperience’s support ratings are unavailable, and reviews provide no recent feedback, which suggests limited current support activity or hotel experience.
STAY’s support scores of 4.83/5 and recent positive reviews emphasize responsive, helpful assistance. Hotels like VIVA Wyndham and NH Hotels mention how support helped them optimize implementation and resolve issues quickly, reinforcing confidence in STAY’s service.
Edge: STAY.
LasoExperience integrates with only 3 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Maestro PMS, and Book4Time, limiting its connectivity options. This restricts seamless data flow across your hotel’s existing systems.
STAY boasts 20 verified integrations, including major PMS, CRM, and channel management systems like Hotelkit, Mews, SiteMinder, and Unifocus. Its extensive ecosystem supports smoother data exchange, automation, and operational cohesion.
Edge: STAY.
LasoExperience has zero reviews, making it impossible to gauge user sentiment or satisfaction levels.
STAY has accumulated over 200 recent reviews, with an average rating of 4.61/5 and a likelihood to recommend of 96%. Hoteliers specifically praise its role in improving guest satisfaction, operational efficiency, and revenue. Large chains and independent hotels alike have reported tangible benefits.
Edge: STAY.
LasoExperience does not disclose pricing details, and no trial or demo information is available, making budgeting difficult.
STAY charges a flat $300 monthly fee with no implementation or setup costs, and no trial info is provided. While not the cheapest option, its proven value and extensive features justify the cost.
If budget is a concern, STAY’s transparent pricing provides clarity; if you need detailed cost comparisons for LasoExperience, that information is lacking.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
LasoExperience presents itself as a comprehensive guest relationship tool, emphasizing personalization and automation, but it currently lacks recent, verified reviews. Its absence of current user feedback and low rating cast doubt on its ability to deliver consistent results for hotels today.
STAY offers a well-supported, highly rated platform with extensive integrations and proven success stories across large hotel chains. Its recent reviews, high satisfaction scores, and diverse feature set make it the more dependable choice for hoteliers aiming to improve guest experience and operational efficiency efficiently.
For most hotels seeking a reliable, well-rated guest app with tangible results, STAY stands out as the superior option. If you need a proven platform with recent user validation, STAY is the clear winner.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Laso Experience 和 STAY Guest App 共享 10 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 手机值机 | ||
| 消息路由 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 自动回复 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Laso Experience 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Laso Experience 提供 3 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Laso Experience:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。LasoExperience 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问