项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 268 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Maestro PMS 在客户支持方面表现出色,尤其适合机场与会议住宿设施(4.5/5),并拥有在前提以及访客通信(短信)等独家功能。
RoomRaccoon 在易用性以及性价比方面表现出色,尤其适合机场与会议住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有客人资料等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 268 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $1,000/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 58 | 210 |
在分析了 268 条经验证的评价后,Maestro PMS 用户最看重其 客户支持, 报告灵活性, 可定制的功能,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 客户成功与售后支持, 易用性和入门指南, 人工智能助手和聊天机器人自动化。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
客户成功与售后支持
▾
|
|
+
报告灵活性
▾
|
+
易用性和入门指南
▾
|
|
+
可定制的功能
▾
|
+
人工智能助手和聊天机器人自动化
▾
|
|
+
培训和文档
▾
|
+
设置、集成和实施经验
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
用户界面
▾
|
−
客户成功与售后支持
▾
|
|
−
安全功能
▾
|
−
预订和房间分配工作流程
▾
|
|
−
渠道经理和分销
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #42 7 条评价 | #10 94 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #17 34 条评价 | #18 22 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 12 条评价 | #15 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #10 4 条评价 | #17 0 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #26 26 条评价 | #9 101 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #21 31 条评价 | #9 66 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #40 5 条评价 | #16 29 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #39 2 条评价 | #7 29 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #12 53 条评价 | #24 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #6 126 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #34 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #31 1 条评价 |
Maestro PMS and RoomRaccoon PMS target different hotel profiles through distinct strengths. Maestro is best suited for larger, complex properties such as luxury resorts, conference centers, and multi-property groups, where its extensive modular architecture and on-premise option support diverse operational needs. RoomRaccoon is geared toward independent hotels and smaller properties, particularly boutique hotels and bed & breakfasts, emphasizing ease of use, integrated revenue management, and channel management.
Both systems solve the core problem of unifying reservation management, guest communication, and operational workflows into a single platform. Maestro excels in customizable, multi-departmental environments requiring deep integration and extensive reporting. RoomRaccoon focuses on simplifying day-to-day operations with a user-friendly interface and revenue optimization tools, delivering a streamlined guest journey and automated upselling.
If your property is a luxury resort, multi-property group, or conference center seeking a scalable, enterprise-grade PMS with 20+ integrated modules and 24/7 support, Maestro PMS is the better choice. Its 58 reviews averaging 4.4/5, with strong customer support ratings (4.8/5), confirm its fit for complex operations requiring tailored workflows and extensive reporting.
If you operate a small to mid-sized independent hotel, boutique, or bed & breakfast, especially in Europe where RoomRaccoon has broad market presence, RoomRaccoon PMS suits your needs better. Its 210 reviews averaging 4.7/5—with high ease of use (4.7/5) and onboarding scores (4.6/5)—reflect its popularity among these segments. RoomRaccoon’s built-in dynamic pricing, multi-currency support, and unlimited channels at no extra cost provide operational revenue advantages for smaller properties.
Data is thinner for properties such as casinos or airport hotels, where Maestro’s limited review counts suggest stronger evidence; RoomRaccoon’s ratings remain high but with fewer users in those niches. For properties with complex group bookings and multi-departmental needs, Maestro’s feature set is more comprehensive.
RoomRaccoon leads on ease of use with an average rating of 4.7/5 across 210 reviews, compared to Maestro’s 4.1/5 from 58 reviews. RoomRaccoon’s users consistently highlight its intuitive calendar, clear guest and booking status color coding, and simple workflows that reduce the learning curve for front desk and revenue staff. One reviewer noted “The system is so easy to use that I don’t have to spend hours a day training staff,” illustrating fast adoption.
Maestro PMS users appreciate the system’s flexibility but mention a steeper learning curve and a somewhat dated user interface that can challenge new employees. This is reflected in lower ease of use scores and comments about needing more detailed help menus.
Onboarding ratings also favor RoomRaccoon (4.6/5 vs. Maestro’s 4.4/5), supported by structured training and guided sessions. Maestro’s onboarding is solid but more suited to properties with dedicated IT or management resources.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Maestro PMS offers 19 unique hotel-relevant features beyond the 39 shared with RoomRaccoon. Key differentiators include a Spa & Wellness Module, on-premise deployment, 24/7 online support, digital registration, voice-to-text mobile notes and tasks, native email marketing, rules-based room assignments, and SOC2 compliance. These features enable complex operations like integrated spa bookings, secure data handling, and detailed task management, supporting luxury and resort workflows.
RoomRaccoon’s 12 unique features focus on revenue and distribution optimization: guest profiles, PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, multi-currency support, 2-way real-time integrations, unlimited distribution channels at no extra cost, multi-lingual capability, centralized user and role management, bulk updates, derived rates, and yield rules. These features automate pricing strategies and channel management, critical for independent hotels optimizing revenue.
Operationally, Maestro’s digital registration and tablet/kiosk check-in streamline guest arrival, reducing front desk workload in high-volume environments. RoomRaccoon’s unlimited channels and dynamic pricing automate inventory and rate management, maximizing revenue without manual intervention.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Maestro PMS holds a customer support rating of 4.8/5 from 58 reviews, exceeding RoomRaccoon’s 4.5/5 from 210 reviews. Users praise Maestro’s 24/7 availability, responsiveness, and knowledgeable staff. One reviewer called Maestro’s support “a dream compared to others we have worked with,” highlighting quick resolution and consistent follow-through.
RoomRaccoon’s support experience is mixed. While many users commend the customer success team’s expertise and training during implementation, several reviews report slow or unavailable support outside business hours, with no weekend availability and delayed ticket responses. For example, one reviewer cited “terrible customer support” during peak weekend periods, a critical weakness for hospitality operations.
Onboarding support ratings also favor Maestro slightly (4.4/5 vs. 4.6/5), but the advantage is not enough to offset RoomRaccoon’s inconsistent ongoing support.
Edge: Maestro PMS.
Both systems offer 87 verified integrations, including 20 shared partners such as SiteMinder, TrustYou, Revinate, and RateGain, covering core channel management, reputation, and revenue tools. This parity means either platform can connect with major hotel tech ecosystems.
Maestro PMS integrates uniquely with Criton, Curacity, Hotel Investor Apps, For-Sight, PhoneSuite, and Zaplox, supporting guest engagement, investor relations, and mobile key systems suited for large-scale resorts and multi-property groups.
RoomRaccoon adds integrations with Sage accounting, FLEXIPASS keyless mobile access, HQ revenue management, Becurious digital marketing, Paxxio payment solutions, and Customer Alliance, enhancing financial control, guest self-service, and marketing automation for independent hotels.
For properties needing advanced guest-facing apps and investor tools, Maestro’s integrations provide a broader ecosystem. For small hotels prioritizing financial and marketing integrations, RoomRaccoon covers critical bases.
Edge: Even.
RoomRaccoon PMS has a higher overall rating of 4.7/5 across 210 reviews, compared to Maestro PMS’s 4.4/5 from 58 reviews. RoomRaccoon’s extensive review volume across diverse segments—101 reviews for boutique hotels at 4.7/5, 90 reviews for bed & breakfasts at 4.8/5, and 66 reviews for luxury hotels at 4.8/5—demonstrates strong satisfaction in independent and small property markets.
Maestro’s strengths appear in resorts (44% of users), luxury hotels, and conference hotels, with segment ratings mostly between 4.3 and 4.5/5, supported by fewer, older reviews (no reviews in the last 6 months). The lack of recent reviews for Maestro means its ratings may not fully reflect the current product state.
RoomRaccoon’s recent review volume (1 in the last 6 months vs. 6 per 6 months average prior) is low but overall volume and recency remain stronger, suggesting more current feedback.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Maestro PMS pricing starts at a base price of $900 with no trial, monthly flat fee, or per-room pricing disclosed. This suggests a custom pricing model likely tailored to property size and deployment complexity.
RoomRaccoon lists a base price of $1,000 without trial, monthly flat fees, or per-room pricing, indicating a similarly bespoke pricing approach.
Neither vendor publishes detailed or transparent pricing tiers, making direct cost comparison difficult. Both lack freemium or trial options, so buyers must engage vendors for exact quotes.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Maestro PMS and RoomRaccoon PMS diverge fundamentally in target user and operational complexity. Maestro suits large, multi-faceted properties demanding deep customization, on-premise options, and robust 24/7 support. RoomRaccoon serves independent, smaller hotels with a focus on usability, revenue management automation, and integrated distribution.
Choose Maestro PMS if your property benefits from its extensive modules like Spa & Wellness, tablet/kiosk check-in, and rules-based room assignments, alongside a security-conscious environment with PCI and SOC2 compliance. Its 24/7 support and ability to handle multi-property groups provide operational continuity for complex hotels.
Opt for RoomRaccoon PMS if you prioritize ease of use, rapid onboarding, and native dynamic pricing with unlimited channels, especially in boutique or independent hotel segments. RoomRaccoon’s integrated booking engine and channel manager simplify operations while driving direct bookings and ancillary revenue.
The data supports a clear segmentation: Maestro is the enterprise-ready PMS with comprehensive features and heavyweight support; RoomRaccoon is the accessible, revenue-focused platform ideal for smaller properties and independent hoteliers.
酒店运营软件(PMS) 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $900/月 | 起价 $1,000/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Maestro PMS 提供出色的客户支持,许多用户都称赞其通过各种渠道提供的快速有效的帮助。这种支持文化有利于迅速解决问题。
用户对 Maestro PMS 生成自定义报告的灵活性表示赞赏,这有助于做出数据驱动的决策。然而,一些人指出,需要更详细的帮助菜单和更方便地访问特定类型的报告。
定制化是一大优势,无论是报告、特定物业需求模块还是运营灵活性。Maestro PMS 允许进行大量定制,这有助于高效满足独特的业务需求。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
虽然该系统提供了强大的功能,但一些用户指出,其用户界面略显过时,可以通过现代化来改善用户体验,特别是对于新员工而言。
安全性是一项强大的功能,具有本地解决方案选项并遵守 GDPR 等法规。用户还建议使用 2FA 和反向代理等增强功能来提高在线安全性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
一些评论强调了客户成功团队提供的强有力的、切实有效的支持,他们会安排培训、会议和实际指导。然而,也有评论指出情况恰恰相反:设置完成后跟进缓慢甚至缺失,... 一些评论强调了客户成功团队提供的强有力的、切实有效的支持,他们会安排培训、会议和实际指导。然而,也有评论指出情况恰恰相反:设置完成后跟进缓慢甚至缺失,工单无人解决,售后服务差强人意,这些都可能造成实际的运营和财务损失。
用户反复表示 RoomRaccoon 易于学习和操作,界面清晰明了,无需任何技术背景。培训视频和指导课程可帮助团队快速上手该平台,并轻松将其融入日常使用。
RoomRaccoon 的人工智能功能被认为前景可期,用户表示聊天机器人仍需训练才能更高效地完成日常操作任务。另一些用户则称赞人工智能助手是一项重要的辅助工具,表... RoomRaccoon 的人工智能功能被认为前景可期,用户表示聊天机器人仍需训练才能更高效地完成日常操作任务。另一些用户则称赞人工智能助手是一项重要的辅助工具,表明自动化正成为该产品价值的重要组成部分。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
一些评论强调了客户成功团队提供的强有力的、切实有效的支持,他们会安排培训、会议和实际指导。然而,也有评论指出情况恰恰相反:设置完成后跟进缓慢甚至缺失,... 一些评论强调了客户成功团队提供的强有力的、切实有效的支持,他们会安排培训、会议和实际指导。然而,也有评论指出情况恰恰相反:设置完成后跟进缓慢甚至缺失,工单无人解决,售后服务差强人意,这些都可能造成实际的运营和财务损失。
一些评论者提到,在同一房型内管理预订存在局限性,尤其是在需要为客人更换房间时。这表明,对于入住率较高、入住模式更为复杂的酒店而言,需要更顺畅的房间分配... 一些评论者提到,在同一房型内管理预订存在局限性,尤其是在需要为客人更换房间时。这表明,对于入住率较高、入住模式更为复杂的酒店而言,需要更顺畅的房间分配流程。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Maestro PMS 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Maestro PMS 提供 87 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon PMS 提供 87 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。RoomRaccoon PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Maestro PMS:否。RoomRaccoon PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Maestro PMS 的 HT Score 为 74,RoomRaccoon 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐