The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right guest app platform is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both I am MAX and STAY aim to digitize guest interactions, but they serve different needs and hotel profiles. I am MAX emphasizes AI-driven engagement and personalized assistance, whereas STAY offers a broader suite of features with proven success across large hotel chains. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s specific priorities: personalized AI support or comprehensive service digitization.
Which platform aligns better with your hotel’s size, segment, and digital strategy? To make an informed choice, let's compare them across key aspects.
Both I am MAX and STAY provide ways to improve guest engagement and streamline services, but they diverge significantly in scope and maturity. I am MAX is an AI-centric platform that offers a mobile app with a smart assistant, focusing on personalized guest interactions. STAY, on the other hand, delivers a full-fledged Guest Experience OS with extensive features aimed at large hotel chains, including real-time updates, service ordering, and analytics.
Given I am MAX’s lack of recent reviews and a very limited feature set—mainly its mobile check-in—it falls behind in market presence and proven usability. STAY boasts over 200 recent reviews, high overall ratings, and an extensive feature library. Are you prepared to prioritize AI-driven personalized support, or do you need a robust, multi-feature platform with a broad integration network?
Edge: STAY Guest App.
If your hotel needs simple, AI-powered guest interaction to enhance personalization and direct communication, I am MAX might seem appealing. However, with only 0/5 ratings and no recent reviews, it lacks the credibility and proven track record of STAY. Conversely, if your hotel is a mid-sized or large property seeking to digitize multiple services, reduce queues, and improve operational efficiency, STAY is the safer choice.
Hotels in large hotel chains, resorts, or properties prioritizing extensive integrations and analytics will benefit more from STAY’s proven success. Smaller boutique hotels or those exploring AI-driven engagement might consider I am MAX, but its limited features and review data make it a risky option.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Ease of use is critical for staff adoption and guest satisfaction. I am MAX’s interface and onboarding are undocumented in reviews, but its minimal features suggest a straightforward, if limited, experience. STAY’s platform, rated 4.78/5 for ease of use with over 200 recent reviews, has a highly intuitive CMS, streamlined content management, and simple integration processes.
Customers highlight STAY’s user-friendly interface, making it easy for staff to manage content and for guests to navigate. Given the volume of recent, positive reviews and high support ratings, STAY clearly leads here.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
I am MAX offers only one feature — Mobile Check-in — which is useful but limited. STAY provides 14 features, including Guest Messaging, Room Service Ordering, Local Recommendations, Hotel Directory, App Download, Automatic Translations, and Guest Profiles, covering nearly all guest interaction points.
No other guest app matches STAY’s feature breadth, especially its multilingual support, request management, and comprehensive guest profiles. For a hotel aiming to digitize full guest journeys and offer a broad range of services, STAY’s feature set is well ahead.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Customer support quality heavily influences platform success. I am MAX has no documented support ratings or recent reviews, making assessment difficult. STAY, rated 4.83/5 for support with over 200 recent reviews, demonstrates strong, responsive customer service.
Users praise the STAY team for quick responses, helpful onboarding, and ongoing support. The high review count and recent feedback make STAY the clear winner here.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Integration breadth significantly impacts platform flexibility. I am MAX features only one verified partner, Mews, limiting its connectivity. STAY boasts 20 verified partners, including Mews, hotelkit, SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and more.
This extensive network allows STAY to connect with various PMS, CRM, and channel management systems, streamlining data flow and enhancing functionality. If integrations are vital, STAY’s network is the obvious advantage.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Based on recent reviews, STAY’s overall rating is 3/5, but with 206 reviews and a 96% likelihood to recommend, it indicates strong user satisfaction. I am MAX has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment.
STAY’s predominantly positive feedback from large hotel chains and independent hotels alike suggests higher guest and hotelier approval. Its proven track record and recent reviews affirm its superior reputation.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
I am MAX’s pricing details are unavailable, which suggests it may be a custom or less transparent model. STAY charges $300 per month, with no implementation or setup fees, providing clarity for budgeting.
Given the extensive features and proven success, STAY’s pricing appears reasonable for mid-sized and large hotels seeking comprehensive digital solutions. The absence of transparent pricing for I am MAX complicates direct cost comparisons.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in scope: STAY is a full-featured, well-reviewed platform trusted by large hotel groups, while I am MAX offers a limited, AI-centric solution with no recent reviews. For most mid-to-large hotels, STAY’s proven effectiveness, extensive features, and support make it the better choice.
Choose I am MAX if your hotel’s focus is on AI-driven personalization and you’re willing to accept limited features and market data. Opt for STAY if you want a reliable, scalable platform with a track record of enhancing guest experiences and operational efficiency.
In conclusion, for hotels seeking a comprehensive guest app with proven results, STAY stands out as the superior choice. I am MAX may appeal to those exploring AI-driven guest engagement, but its limited recent feedback and features make it a riskier option.
This completes your guide to choosing between I am MAX and STAY. Consider your hotel’s size, priorities, and digital strategy to pick the platform that best aligns with your goals.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。I am MAX 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。I am MAX 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
I am MAX:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。I am MAX 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问