The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 887 条经验证的评价后,Mews 用户最看重其 ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility,而 Uplisting 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
入职和支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 329 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 397 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 45 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #3 49 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 483 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 220 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 170 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 130 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Uplisting |
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 106 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 660 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 17 条评价 | — |
| 中东 ▾ | #28 8 条评价 | — |
You’re choosing between Mews PMS and Uplisting for your hotel’s property management needs. Both aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences, but they serve different segments and offer contrasting features. Mews, with its extensive reviews and recent data, is the clear leader, demonstrating a proven track record in hospitality.
Are you looking for a versatile, scalable platform with a vast ecosystem, or a specialized tool tailored for short-term rentals? The choice hinges on your property type and operational priorities.
Mews is a cloud-based platform designed for a wide range of accommodations, including boutique hotels, resorts, and branded properties. It offers over 750 reviews—98 in the last six months—indicating active, recent user engagement. Its overall rating of 4.62/5 and a 93% likelihood to recommend highlight strong hotelier satisfaction.
Uplisting, on the other hand, caters primarily to short-term rental operators and has no publicly available reviews or ratings. Its focus is narrower, lacking the extensive user feedback and proven track record that Mews demonstrates. Given the recent surge of positive reviews for Mews, it clearly has the more established reputation.
Does Uplisting’s niche focus make it suitable for small rental operations? The answer is no; without recent reviews or ratings, its reliability remains unverified compared to Mews’ proven performance in the hotel industry.
If your hotel needs a robust, adaptable property management system that can handle diverse property types, automation, and integrations, go with Mews. Its extensive feature set and unmatched third-party ecosystem are ideal for mid-sized to large hotels seeking scalability.
If your operation is purely short-term rentals or vacation homes, and you prioritize simplicity over advanced features, Uplisting might seem appealing. However, the absence of recent reviews and a small user base make it a less reliable choice for hotels that require proven, comprehensive PMS capabilities.
Ultimately, for hotels seeking a reliable, enterprise-grade system with proven support and a large ecosystem, Mews is the better option. Uplisting’s limited data and niche focus make it less suitable for traditional hotel operations.
Mews scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with a modern, intuitive interface praised by 758 reviewers, including many recent ones. Users report quick onboarding—averaging 4.39/5—and highlight how staff adopt the system smoothly, citing features like mobile apps and user-friendly dashboards.
Uplisting offers a simpler, less feature-rich interface tailored to short-term rental hosts, but lacks extensive user ratings or detailed feedback on usability. Its minimal public data makes it difficult to assess how easy it is for teams to adopt at scale.
Edge: Mews.
Mews provides over 59 features exclusive to its platform, including multi-language, multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, direct billing, integrated CRS, automated night audits, and extensive reporting tools. Its 336 verified integrations also enable extensive customization.
Uplisting offers core management functions suitable for small rental portfolios but lacks the breadth of features found in Mews. It does not have a comparable ecosystem or advanced modules like revenue management, guest profiles, or automation tools.
Edge: Mews.
Mews is rated 4.27/5 for customer support, with recent reviews praising its responsiveness and availability, including 98 recent reviews in the last six months. Users appreciate the proactive onboarding, quick bug resolutions, and comprehensive assistance.
Uplisting offers no public support ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge its support quality. Its small user base suggests limited support resources, especially compared to Mews’ established global presence.
Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including critical integrations like Duve, PriceLabs, Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing. Its extensive API and marketplace enable hoteliers to connect a wide array of third-party tools.
Uplisting has only 2 verified partners, which severely limits its integration capabilities. For hotels relying on a broad tech ecosystem, this stark difference makes Mews the clear leader.
Edge: Mews.
Mews, with over 750 reviews—98 recent—has a 4.62/5 overall rating, with 93% likelihood to recommend. Hotelier feedback covers diverse segments, including boutique, city center, and hostels, all expressing satisfaction with its functionality and support.
Uplisting lacks publicly available reviews or ratings, preventing a similar assessment. Its unverified reputation means hotel managers cannot confidently rely on its performance or support.
Edge: Mews.
Mews costs a base fee of $900 per month, with no freemium or trial options publicly listed. Its pricing model is transparent, reflecting its comprehensive feature set.
Uplisting offers no publicly disclosed pricing, but as a smaller platform, it likely charges less for basic management. However, the lack of clear pricing details hampers direct comparison and confidence.
Overall, Mews’ transparent pricing aligns with its proven, extensive capabilities.
Not ideal if your operation is purely short-term rentals with minimal complexity or if you prioritize a niche platform.
Not ideal if you manage diverse properties, need advanced features, or require proven hotel-specific support and scalability.
Mews excels as a flexible, feature-rich PMS with a proven track record, extensive integrations, and active hotelier support. Its recent reviews and high ratings make it the trusted choice for most hotel operations, especially those seeking growth and scalability.
Uplisting may appeal to small, niche rental operators prioritizing simplicity, but its lack of recent reviews and small ecosystem make it less reliable for hotels. For properties that need a dependable, comprehensive solution, Mews remains the clear winner.
If your hotel requires a proven, adaptable PMS with robust features, support, and integrations—choose Mews. If you operate a small vacation rental and prefer a minimal management system, Uplisting could suffice, but be cautious about its unverified support and capabilities.
Edge: Mews.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
虽然 Mews 提供了可靠的报表和分析功能,但一些评论指出,它需要更多可定制和灵活的报表功能。用户希望获得更细致的数据洞察,尤其是在预订和收入分析方面。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mews PMS 和 Uplisting 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mews PMS 提供 336 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Uplisting 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mews PMS:否。Uplisting:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Mews 的 HT Score 为 100,Uplisting 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问