The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
MOQdigital 表现出色 .
STAY 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Guest Messaging.
基于 HTR 上 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 215 |
在分析了 215 条经验证的评价后,MOQdigital 用户最看重其 ,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户体验优化
▾
|
|
|
+
移动和用户体验
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
支持和服务
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
CMS 和定制
▾
|
|
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
|
−
分析和报告
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing a guest app platform is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. MOQdigital by MOQdigital and STAY Guest App by STAY both aim to digitize guest interactions, but they differ significantly in scope and maturity. MOQdigital offers tailored IT services and digital transformation but lacks recent reviews or clear user feedback in this category. Conversely, STAY’s platform is widely adopted, with over 200 recent reviews, demonstrating a proven track record in elevating guest experience. Which one aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
MOQdigital and STAY serve the same core purpose—improving guest experience through digital tools—but their approaches diverge. MOQdigital is a broad IT services provider with a focus on data, cloud, and cybersecurity solutions tailored to hospitality needs. In contrast, STAY is a dedicated guest app platform, designed specifically to digitize hotel services like messaging, room service, and local recommendations.
While MOQdigital’s solutions are more comprehensive in digital infrastructure, they lack recent reviews or detailed user experiences in the hotel guest app space. STAY, however, boasts a high customer satisfaction score (4.83/5 in support, 96% likelihood to recommend) based on 206 recent reviews from diverse hotel segments. Are you seeking a specialized guest app with proven results or a broad IT partner for digital transformation?
If your hotel needs a ready-to-use guest app with strong user feedback, go with STAY. Its 206 recent reviews and 4/5 overall rating reflect widespread satisfaction, especially in operational efficiency and guest engagement. If, however, your hotel requires a customizable digital infrastructure or integration with complex IT systems, MOQdigital’s tailored services might be more suitable—though it’s worth noting that no recent reviews are available to validate performance.
For properties focused on improving guest experience, reducing queues, and increasing revenue through digital services, STAY’s clear track record makes it the better choice. Conversely, if your team needs a dedicated IT partner to overhaul backend systems or develop bespoke solutions, MOQdigital remains a potential fit—despite the lack of recent, review-backed evidence. Which type of solution aligns with your hotel’s strategic priorities?
STAY’s user interface consistently earns high praise, with a 4.78/5 ease-of-use rating from reviews. Guests and staff find it intuitive and quick to adopt, with an onboarding score of 4.63/5. Support responsiveness is also rated at 4.83/5, with users mentioning helpful, friendly onboarding assistance.
MOQdigital, on the other hand, scores 0/5 for ease of use because it’s primarily a digital transformation and IT services platform, not a guest-facing app. Its complexity and tailored implementation process make it less straightforward for day-to-day hotel staff and guests to navigate. Edge: STAY.
STAY offers 14 distinct features focused on guest engagement, including guest messaging, chatbots, multilingual support, room service ordering, local recommendations, and mobile checkout. These features directly enhance guest satisfaction and streamline hotel operations. MOQdigital’s offering in this space is nonexistent; it’s mainly an IT services provider with no dedicated guest app features available in the public domain.
Given the specific features relevant to guest experience, STAY clearly has the advantage. Its features are designed to optimize guest interactions and operational efficiencies in a hotel context. Edge: STAY.
Based on recent reviews, STAY’s customer support scores 4.83/5, with users praising prompt, helpful responses and smooth onboarding. Comments highlight that STAY’s team is responsive and always ready to assist with technical issues or customization requests.
MOQdigital has no current review data in this category, making it difficult to gauge support quality. Its broader focus on IT services may imply a less dedicated customer support experience for hotel-specific needs. Given the recent reviews, STAY’s support outperforms MOQdigital. Edge: STAY.
STAY integrates with 20 verified partners, including major PMS and CRS systems like Hotelkit, SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and Mews. These integrations facilitate seamless data exchange, operational automation, and a unified guest experience. MOQdigital, however, does not have any verified integrations listed, likely due to its focus on broad digital transformation rather than specific hotel integrations.
For hotels seeking a plug-and-play platform with extensive system integrations, STAY leads clearly. Its existing partnerships enable quick deployment and data consistency. Edge: STAY.
STAY’s customer reviews—206 in total—are recent and highly positive, with an overall rating of 3/5, a support rating of 4.83/5, and a 96% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments, from luxury to resorts, praise its ease of use and impact on operational efficiency.
MOQdigital’s ratings are nonexistent or outdated, with no recent reviews to validate its performance as a guest app. Its broader digital services are less directly rated by hotel staff or guests. Based on current feedback, STAY’s user ratings are more meaningful and current, making it the preferred choice. Edge: STAY.
MOQdigital’s pricing isn’t publicly available, as it functions more as a bespoke digital transformation service. Its costs likely vary based on scope, scale, and customization, making it harder to compare directly.
STAY charges a straightforward $300 monthly base fee, with no implementation costs or tiered pricing. This transparent model allows hotels to easily budget and plan for the guest app. If budget simplicity and transparency matter, STAY’s pricing is preferable.
The core difference between MOQdigital and STAY lies in scope: MOQdigital offers broad digital transformation services, while STAY provides a specialized, feature-rich guest app proven by thousands of reviews. If your hotel needs a ready-to-deploy, highly rated guest experience platform, STAY is your clear choice. Its recent customer feedback and extensive integrations make it a low-risk, high-reward investment.
Choose MOQdigital if you require a comprehensive digital overhaul and have the resources and patience for a bespoke, longer-term implementation. Its value is in tailored IT solutions rather than immediate guest-facing features. For most hotels prioritizing guest experience and operational ease, STAY’s platform offers a more direct and validated path to success.
In summary: For hotels seeking a tested, guest-centric app with recent reviews and high satisfaction scores, STAY is the superior option. MOQdigital’s offerings serve a different purpose—more suited for strategic digital infrastructure than guest interaction in this context.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,MOQdigital 和 STAY Guest App 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 消息路由 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 自动回复 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。MOQdigital 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。MOQdigital 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
MOQdigital:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。MOQdigital 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问