The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing the right guest app is crucial to enhancing your hotel’s guest experience and operational efficiency. Both Nonius Mobile by Nonius and STAY Guest App aim to digitize guest interactions, but they differ significantly in terms of features, support, and market presence. Your decision should hinge on which product aligns best with your specific needs and strategic goals.
Nonius offers a comprehensive digital journey platform with advanced features like mobile check-in and payments, but it lacks recent reviews and an overall rating, raising questions about current user satisfaction. Meanwhile, STAY boasts a robust user base, recent positive reviews, and high satisfaction scores, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers today.
Both products aim to streamline guest communications and services through mobile technology, but their market presence and user feedback differ dramatically. Nonius has been around since 2005 and provides a suite of digital solutions, including online check-in, guest apps, and digital dining, yet it has no recent reviews or data on customer satisfaction. This absence raises concerns about its current usability and support.
STAY, founded in 2012, has a more recent and active presence, with over 200 reviews in the last six months alone and a 4/5 overall rating. Its high NPS score and 96% likelihood to recommend indicate strong recent user satisfaction. Given the current data, STAY’s reviews suggest your team will experience more reliable support and a better overall user experience.
Do these differences matter for your hotel’s needs and expectations?
If your property is seeking a user-friendly platform with proven impact on guest satisfaction, STAY is the clear choice. It’s trusted by over 1,000 hotels globally, with many reports highlighting improved operational efficiency, reduced queues, and increased revenue—like the case at VIVA Wyndham and NH Hotels.
Nonius may appeal if you require a broader suite of digital solutions beyond guest engagement, such as mobile check-in and payments, especially if you’re already familiar with Nonius’s ecosystem. However, without recent reviews or a high overall rating, it’s less certain that Nonius will meet your expectations in 2024.
For most hoteliers looking for a reliable, well-supported guest app, STAY offers a safer, more tested option.
Ease of use is a key factor, especially for staff adoption and guest engagement. STAY’s interface receives a high rating of 4.78/5, with reviews describing it as intuitive, simple to update, and straightforward for both staff and guests. Many users praise its quick onboarding process, with a support rating of 4.83/5.
Nonius, on the other hand, scores zero in ease of use and has no recent reviews to gauge current usability. Its lack of recent feedback indicates it may be outdated or less user-friendly today.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
STAY offers 10 shared features with Nonius, plus four unique ones—chatbot, message routing, automated replies, and mobile app—adding flexibility and automation. Nonius has only two unique features: payments and mobile check-in.
STAY’s advanced features, particularly its chatbot and messaging routing, improve guest communication and staff efficiency. Its feature set aligns well with hotels prioritizing guest engagement automation and real-time communication, giving it a clear edge.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Customer support is critical for smooth onboarding and ongoing success. STAY’s support ratings are high at 4.83/5, with reviews emphasizing helpful, responsive service that makes implementation easier. Its clients report quick resolutions and strong post-sales support.
Nonius, lacking recent reviews, offers no current data on support quality. Historically, its support ratings are unknown or unverified, which could pose a risk for hotels needing reliable assistance.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Nonius has an impressive 44 verified partners, including major systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and SiteMinder, offering extensive integration options. STAY has 20 verified partners, including key players like Hotelkit, Winhotel, and Civitfun, with 9 shared integrations.
While Nonius supports more integrations overall, STAY’s partnerships with leading PMS and channel managers are sufficient for most hotels. If extensive integrations with niche systems are crucial, Nonius may be preferable; otherwise, STAY’s core integrations are strong enough.
Edge: Nonius Mobile.
Since Nonius has no recent reviews or ratings, it cannot be reliably compared based on current user feedback. Conversely, STAY’s 206 reviews in the last six months with a 4/5 rating reflect current, positive sentiment.
Hoteliers across segments—especially those in the mid-market and chain hotels—favor STAY’s ease of use and support, making it the more trusted option today.
Edge: STAY Guest App.
Nonius does not provide publicly available pricing information, suggesting a customized quote process. STAY charges a base price of $300 per month, with no implementation or hidden fees, making costs transparent for decision-making.
If budget transparency is critical, STAY’s straightforward pricing simplifies comparison and planning. Without pricing details for Nonius, it’s hard to gauge ROI or affordability.
Not ideal if your hotel needs immediate support or recent user reviews, or if you prefer a simple, straightforward guest app.
Not ideal if your hotel has complex, niche operational needs beyond standard guest services, or if you require extensive third-party integrations.
The core difference lies in recent user feedback and overall market validation. STAY has a clear edge thanks to its high review count, strong recent ratings, and proven impact on guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
If your hotel prioritizes ease of use, support, and a product with current positive reviews, STAY is the better choice. It’s trusted by hundreds of hotels worldwide and delivers tangible benefits in guest experience and staff productivity.
Nonius, despite its broad feature set and extensive integrations, lacks recent reviews and high user satisfaction ratings, making it a riskier investment. It may suit larger, tech-savvy properties with existing Nonius systems, but for most hotels, STAY provides a safer, more reliable path forward.
In conclusion, for most hoteliers today, STAY Guest App is the recommended option, especially if recent reviews and high user satisfaction are your priorities.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Nonius Mobile 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Nonius Mobile 提供 44 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Nonius Mobile:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Nonius 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问