The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 179 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Noovy 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Payment Requests and Online Check-in.
Visual Matrix PMS 表现出色 在 technical support challenges 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Feedback Management and Employee Messaging.
基于 HTR 上 179 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $600/mo | From $500/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 27 | 152 |
在分析了 179 条经验证的评价后,Noovy 用户最看重其 易于使用, 通道连通性, 一体化功能,而 Visual Matrix PMS 用户则强调 technical support challenges, 用户友好的界面, comprehensive reporting tools。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
+
通道连通性
▾
|
+
用户友好的界面
▾
|
|
+
一体化功能
▾
|
+
Comprehensive reporting tools
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
Streamlined operations
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
收益管理
▾
|
−
Technical support challenges
▾
|
|
−
翻译问题
▾
|
−
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
−
系统速度和功能可用性
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #27 13 条评价 | #18 23 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #19 11 条评价 | #2 117 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #11 5 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #15 1 条评价 | #16 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #21 17 条评价 | #12 38 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #34 2 条评价 | #16 17 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #33 2 条评价 | #1 124 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #28 1 条评价 | #4 44 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #7 141 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #12 25 条评价 | #32 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #18 2 条评价 |
| 中东 | #11 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Noovy by Noovy and Visual Matrix PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline operations, but they approach this differently: Noovy offers an all-in-one platform with extensive connectivity and automation, while Visual Matrix PMS emphasizes operational efficiency and staff management. Your decision depends on whether you prioritize integrated tools or robust daily management features.
Noovy’s recent surge in reviews and higher overall ratings give it a distinct advantage. Since it’s evaluated by more than 20 hotelier reviews in the last six months, its feedback is more current and reliable. Visual Matrix’s broader user base and older reviews make it less reflective of the latest product improvements.
Both products aim to simplify hotel management but tackle different pain points. Noovy consolidates property management, booking, channel, and revenue functions into a single platform, reducing the need for multiple tools. Visual Matrix, on the other hand, focuses on operational tasks such as housekeeping, maintenance, and staff scheduling, making it more suited for hotels with complex daily workflows.
Noovy’s high ratings (5/5 overall, 4.62/5 ease of use) from a small but recent review sample highlight its user-friendly nature. Visual Matrix’s 3.75/5 overall rating from over 140 reviews, with recent positive feedback, suggests a stable platform but one that could benefit from speed improvements. Do you need a unified system or targeted operational support?
If your hotel needs a single, easy-to-use solution that handles bookings, payments, channel management, and revenue tracking, Noovy is your best bet. Its all-in-one approach, combined with a highly satisfied user base, makes it ideal for modern hoteliers looking to reduce costs and simplify workflows.
If your hotel requires detailed operational tools like staff scheduling, housekeeping automation, or maintenance management, Visual Matrix PMS is better suited. Its focus on daily hotel operations and extensive integrations make it a strong choice for teams managing high volumes of operational tasks, especially in understaffed environments.
Noovy enjoys a higher user-rated ease of use (4.62/5) from recent reviews, with many describing it as intuitive and fast. Its straightforward interface and minimal training time make it ideal for teams with limited technical expertise. Review quotes praise Noovy’s user-friendliness and quick onboarding, with one hotelier calling it “the best of all PMS systems we have worked with.”
Visual Matrix’s ease of use is slightly lower (4.43/5), with some users noting it takes time to adapt and that system speed can hinder workflow. Its interface is generally friendly, but a few reviews mention sluggish performance and feature overload. Edge: Noovy.
Noovy offers 50 features, including unique ones like online check-in, online checkout, and payment requests—features that enhance automation and customer experience. Visual Matrix has 47 shared features with Noovy but excels in operational tools like guest feedback management, employee messaging, and mobile notes, totaling 8 unique features that support staff coordination.
While Noovy’s features are focused on automation and connectivity, Visual Matrix provides specialized tools for staff and operational management. If automation and online integrations are priorities, Noovy edges ahead. If operational oversight is key, Visual Matrix’s features are more targeted. Edge: Noovy.
Noovy scores a 4.71/5 in customer support, with reviews citing prompt, friendly, and knowledgeable assistance. Many users appreciate its quick onboarding and ongoing support, describing support staff as “very good” and “helpful,” which aligns with the high NPS score of 9.38/10.
Visual Matrix’s customer support (4.34/5) is generally rated as good but less consistent, with some users mentioning difficulties reaching support during critical moments. Its support quality is stable but less highly praised. Edge: Noovy.
Noovy boasts 40 verified partners, including Otelier, SiteMinder, and Revinate, providing extensive connectivity options. Visual Matrix has 23 verified integrations, shared with Noovy, but also includes niche partners like Hotel Investor Apps and SkyTouch Technology, giving it strong operational integrations.
If your hotel relies on numerous third-party tools, Noovy’s broader partner network offers more flexibility. Visual Matrix’s integrations are solid but fewer. Edge: Noovy.
Recent reviews show Noovy with a rating of 5/5 from 21 evaluations, primarily from boutique and city-center hotels, emphasizing ease of use and support quality. Its latest reviews indicate ongoing satisfaction and high likelihood to recommend (99%).
Visual Matrix has a 3.75/5 rating from 143 reviews, with mixed comments on speed and features, though recent feedback points to ongoing improvements. It’s more prevalent among branded hotels and properties with complex operational needs. Overall, Noovy’s recent feedback and higher ratings favor it. Edge: Noovy.
Noovy charges a flat fee of €£$5 per room per month, with no additional implementation or hidden charges, making it transparent and predictable. Visual Matrix costs $500 per month with no mention of extra fees, positioning it as slightly more expensive but comparable.
Pricing is straightforward for both, but Noovy’s transparent per-room fee may appeal to smaller hotels or those seeking predictable costs. Confirm your specific requirements with vendors for tailored quotes.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Noovy and Visual Matrix serve different core needs. Noovy consolidates many functions into a single, easy-to-use platform, making it ideal for hotels seeking automation and connectivity. Visual Matrix excels in operational management, especially for teams that need detailed staff and task oversight.
Choose Noovy if your goal is a simple, integrated system that reduces costs and onboarding time. Opt for Visual Matrix if your team’s main challenge is operational efficiency and staff coordination.
In conclusion, Noovy’s higher recent review count, better ratings, and broader integration support make it the stronger choice for most modern hoteliers. Its focus on user experience, automation, and connectivity aligns well with the demands of contemporary hospitality management.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | From $500/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Noovy 和 Visual Matrix PMS 共享 47 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款请求 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 轮班规划 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 |
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
人们经常提到该软件的用户友好界面和对新员工的易于培训的特点,这使得它甚至适合那些技术背景较少的员工。
HotelConnect 与 Booking.com 和 Expedia 等 OTA 的直接连接被视为一大优势,简化了分销并消除了渠道经理成本。
用户非常欣赏 HotelConnect 将 PMS、渠道管理器、预订引擎、收入管理和客户沟通整合到一个平台,减少了对多个系统的需求并降低了成本。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
与收入管理相关的功能,包括详细的报告工具和费率日历,因有助于优化酒店收入而受到赞赏。
其中提到了一些翻译问题,特别是英语以外的语言,造成了一些不便。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
Visual Matrix 的直观设计降低了学习难度,方便新员工使用。然而,一些用户提到,从其他系统过渡到 Visual Matrix 初期会遇到一些困难。
Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occu... Users find Visual Matrix's reporting tools robust and comprehensive, aiding in informed decision-making by allowing access to detailed metrics on occupancy, revenue, and forecasting.
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improveme... While support is generally quick and effective, some users report challenges in reaching tech support during critical situations, suggesting improvements in call center operations.
The software's seamless integration with booking channels minimizes overbooking and improves reservation accuracy, ultimately maximizing revenue.
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Noovy 和 Visual Matrix PMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Noovy 提供 40 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Visual Matrix PMS 提供 23 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Noovy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Noovy:否。Visual Matrix PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Noovy 的 HT Score 为 64,Visual Matrix PMS 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问