项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
摘要
我们分析了 187 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:
Noovy 在客户支持以及性价比方面表现出色,尤其适合市中心住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有付款请求以及网上值机等独家功能。
Visual Matrix PMS 在支持响应能力和专业知识方面表现出色,尤其适合精品住宿设施(4.7/5),并拥有客人反馈管理以及员工信息等独家功能。
基于 HTR 上 187 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $600/月 | 起价 $500/月 |
| 经验证的评价 | 27 | 160 |
在分析了 187 条经验证的评价后,Noovy 用户最看重其 易于使用, 通道连通性, 一体化功能,而 Visual Matrix PMS 用户则强调 支持响应能力和专业知识, 新员工培训与入职, 客房状态、客房服务和故障管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
支持响应能力和专业知识
▾
|
|
+
通道连通性
▾
|
+
新员工培训与入职
▾
|
|
+
一体化功能
▾
|
+
客房状态、客房服务和故障管理
▾
|
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
收益管理
▾
|
−
导航和屏幕布局
▾
|
|
−
翻译问题
▾
|
−
账单、审计和支付集成问题
▾
|
|
−
报告和数据访问差距
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店管理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #28 11 条评价 | #19 23 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #19 13 条评价 | #2 126 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #9 10 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #16 1 条评价 | #18 1 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #22 17 条评价 | #12 40 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #35 2 条评价 | #18 17 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #35 2 条评价 | #1 137 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #30 1 条评价 | #4 49 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 153 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #12 25 条评价 | #31 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #12 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | #12 2 条评价 | — |
Noovy and Visual Matrix PMS both target hotels seeking comprehensive property management, yet they diverge in operational focus and user experience. Noovy excels as an all-in-one system combining PMS, channel management, booking engine, and revenue management, designed by former hoteliers to simplify operations and automate payment processes. It fits properties prioritizing streamlined digital guest journeys and integrated revenue tools. Visual Matrix PMS emphasizes optimizing guest experience with robust control over inventory, dynamic auto-tier pricing, and specialized staff coordination apps like MOP, suiting understaffed hotels needing detailed housekeeping and maintenance task management.
Both systems address core hotel management challenges: managing reservations, rates, guest communication, and staff workflows. They enable hotels to reduce reliance on multiple disconnected systems. However, Noovy’s integrated booking engine and payment request features lean toward properties valuing automation and guest self-service, whereas Visual Matrix’s ancillary revenue tracking and employee messaging tools support hotels with complex operational coordination requirements.
If you operate a boutique or city center hotel, or an airport/conference property, Noovy fits well: its 4.9 to 5/5 ratings from 17 boutique hotel reviews and 9 airport/conference hotel reviews confirm excellent fit. Noovy’s all-in-one approach with automated payments and online check-in/out simplifies front desk workflows and boosts guest convenience, critical for properties with high guest turnover and revenue management demands. Reviewers emphasize Noovy’s ease of training and intuitive interface for small to medium-sized hotels.
If you manage a branded hotel, motel, or limited-service/budget property, Visual Matrix PMS is the stronger option. Its 4.6/5 rating over 137 branded hotel reviews and 131 limited-service hotel reviews reflects broad adoption in these segments. Visual Matrix supports detailed housekeeping coordination via its MOP app, employee messaging, and shift planning features, which help understaffed teams handle complex operational needs. The dynamic auto-tier rate system and inventory control suit hotels needing granular rate optimization and group handling, despite some workflow friction.
Data for bed & breakfast inns favors Visual Matrix, with 74 reviews averaging 4.7/5, compared to Noovy’s 4.6/5 from only 4 reviews, suggesting Visual Matrix has more established presence there. However, Noovy’s high ratings for airport/conference hotels (5/5) and city center hotels (5/5, 17 reviews) indicate better traction in urban, business-oriented markets. Review volume differences limit conclusions for some segments, but these patterns guide product fit.
Noovy scores 4.7/5 ease of use and 4.5/5 onboarding, slightly ahead of Visual Matrix’s 4.5/5 ease and 4.3/5 onboarding. Reviewers praise Noovy’s intuitive, visual interface that new employees learn quickly, with streamlined workflows and few clicks needed for reservations. One user highlights how web-based check-in and payment automation reduce front desk workload, enabling faster guest processing.
Visual Matrix users note the system is functional but criticize cumbersome navigation and slower click-by-click workflows. Pop-up notifications and multiple alerts during reservation entry disrupt data entry speed. Training resources like VM University aid onboarding, but reviewers mention a cloud transition that introduced latency and slightly longer task completion times. Despite this, many find it easy enough for new staff with some ramp-up.
Both systems support straightforward staff training, but Noovy’s modern interface and fewer workflow interruptions provide a smoother user experience.
Edge: Even.
Visual Matrix includes eight unique hotel-relevant features that Noovy lacks: guest feedback management, employee messaging, mobile device notes and tasks with voice-to-text, guest app, shift planning, ancillary revenue tracking, gift vouchers, and SOC2 compliance. These features enhance operational coordination, staff communication, and revenue streams for hotels managing complex daily tasks or seeking compliance assurance. For example, the MOP app automates housekeeping and maintenance task assignments, improving real-time staff connectivity.
Noovy offers three exclusive features: payment requests, online check-in, and online checkout. These capabilities streamline guest arrival and departure processes, reducing front desk bottlenecks and improving cash flow via automated payment workflows. The system sends pre-arrival messages and payment links directly from reservation data, minimizing manual guest outreach.
While Visual Matrix supports broader staff communication and ancillary revenue functions, Noovy’s guest-facing automation improves operational efficiency at the front desk and accelerates guest self-service. The presence of these critical digital check-in/out features in Noovy reflects its modern approach to guest experience.
Edge: Visual Matrix PMS.
Noovy holds a customer support rating of 4.8/5 and onboarding rating of 4.5/5, outperforming Visual Matrix’s 4.4/5 support and 4.3/5 onboarding. Reviewers repeatedly commend Noovy’s fast, friendly, and reliable support team, highlighting timely resolutions for complex issues and accessible assistance even for less experienced users. One user specifically notes quick replies and useful training that boosted confidence on the front desk.
Visual Matrix’s support is generally described as responsive and knowledgeable when available, with live chat and remote assistance praised. However, some reviews report slow callbacks, ticket handoffs, and occasional unresolved issues, impacting operational continuity. Several users appreciate the ongoing training resources like VM University, but frustrations with support delays appear in negative reviews.
Overall, Noovy’s consistently higher ratings and reviewer comments indicate a superior support experience for hotels needing responsive help during busy operations.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy supports 41 verified integration partners, 64% more than Visual Matrix’s 25. Both share key connections with Otelier and SiteMinder for channel management and distribution. Noovy’s unique integrations include major players like Omnibees, Bookboost, RevControl, HOTELTIME, Customer Alliance, Bookassist, GuestRevu, Revinate, and Shiji Group. These partners facilitate enhanced revenue management, guest feedback, and distribution optimization.
Visual Matrix’s exclusive integrations focus on hotel investor apps, FLEXIPASS keyless access, SHR Group, Aavgo, Worldvue, Vertical Booking, LaaSie.ai, SkyTouch Technology, Aven Hospitality, and Actabl. These add value in specialized areas such as access control and industry-specific technologies.
Hotels relying heavily on OTA connectivity and revenue management will find Noovy’s broader integration ecosystem advantageous. Those with needs around keyless entry and niche hotel technologies might prefer Visual Matrix’s partners.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy’s overall rating stands at a perfect 5/5 from 27 reviews, compared to Visual Matrix’s 4.6/5 from 160 reviews. Rating volume favors Visual Matrix, but Noovy’s scores are consistently higher across key segments where review counts exceed five. For example, Noovy achieves 5/5 from 17 city center hotel reviews and 5/5 from 9 airport/conference hotel reviews. Visual Matrix’s strongest segment ratings include 4.7/5 from 40 boutique hotel reviews and 4.7/5 from 74 bed & breakfast reviews.
However, Visual Matrix’s review activity has dropped sharply recently, with only 5 reviews in the last 6 months versus a prior average of 14.8 per 6 months—a 66% decline. This suggests its all-time ratings may not reflect current product performance or support levels. Noovy has no recent reviews but historically maintains high ratings.
Likelihood to recommend is 99% for Noovy and 92% for Visual Matrix, underscoring stronger customer satisfaction for Noovy. Given the volume and recency, Noovy’s ratings carry strong weight in segments it serves well.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy charges a base price of $600 with no per-room fees or separate implementation costs. It does not offer a freemium or trial period. The pricing model is all-in-one, reflecting its bundled PMS, channel manager, and booking engine.
Visual Matrix PMS has a slightly lower base price of $500, also without per-room fees, implementation charges, or trials. Pricing details beyond base cost are not published.
Both systems use flat base fees rather than per-room or monthly subscriptions, simplifying pricing comparison. Noovy’s price includes integrated booking engine and payment automation, potentially reducing third-party costs. Visual Matrix’s lower base price may appeal to hotels focusing on core PMS features without needing bundled booking engines.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Noovy and Visual Matrix PMS differ mainly in operational focus and guest versus staff workflow automation. Noovy integrates PMS, channel management, booking engine, and payment automation in one package, elevating guest self-service and revenue management for boutique, city center, and airport/conference hotels. Visual Matrix offers deeper staff coordination tools, ancillary revenue features, and enterprise integrations suited for branded hotels, motels, and understaffed properties.
Choose Noovy if you value seamless online check-in/out, integrated payment requests, and a visually intuitive interface that reduces front desk workload. Noovy’s higher customer support ratings and broader OTA integrations support this choice. Its perfect 5/5 overall rating across key segments and 99% recommendation rate reinforce its operational reliability.
Choose Visual Matrix PMS if your hotel requires detailed housekeeping and maintenance coordination, employee messaging, and advanced ancillary revenue tracking. Its MOP app and compliance features cater to complex operational environments, especially in branded and budget hotel segments. However, the system’s slower workflows and recent sharp decline in review activity (5 recent reviews versus 14.8 previously) suggest caution; its historical performance may not fully represent current product quality.
Visual Matrix’s 4.6/5 overall rating with a large review base shows solid past satisfaction, but Noovy’s higher ratings and more modern guest-facing features make it the better fit for properties prioritizing operational efficiency and guest automation.
酒店管理软件 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 起始价格 | 起价 $600/月 | 起价 $500/月 |
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 团体预订引擎 | ||
| 网站开发 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客沟通(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 多种语言 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 家政 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 自动化夜间审计 | ||
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用程序 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 客人反馈管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用程序 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 宾客留言 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 家政 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 客房服务手机应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班规划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 多币种 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放式磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、账单等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| 评分购物模块 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 定价情报 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR 规定 | ||
| SOC2投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 全天候在线支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| 销售点 |
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
人们经常提到该软件的用户友好界面和对新员工的易于培训的特点,这使得它甚至适合那些技术背景较少的员工。
HotelConnect 与 Booking.com 和 Expedia 等 OTA 的直接连接被视为一大优势,简化了分销并消除了渠道经理成本。
用户非常欣赏 HotelConnect 将 PMS、渠道管理器、预订引擎、收入管理和客户沟通整合到一个平台,减少了对多个系统的需求并降低了成本。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
与收入管理相关的功能,包括详细的报告工具和费率日历,因有助于优化酒店收入而受到赞赏。
其中提到了一些翻译问题,特别是英语以外的语言,造成了一些不便。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
用户通常称赞 Visual Matrix 提供快速、礼貌且专业的支持,能够迅速解决问题,通常通过聊天或远程协助。许多人表示这减少了运营停机时间,并帮助管理人员和前台... 用户通常称赞 Visual Matrix 提供快速、礼貌且专业的支持,能够迅速解决问题,通常通过聊天或远程协助。许多人表示这减少了运营停机时间,并帮助管理人员和前台工作人员在繁忙班次中解决难题。
审稿人经常提到,Visual Matrix 易于新员工学习,提供入职支持和培训资源,帮助员工快速实现生产力。VM University 和知识库被认为在缩短适应期和支持持续学习方... 审稿人经常提到,Visual Matrix 易于新员工学习,提供入职支持和培训资源,帮助员工快速实现生产力。VM University 和知识库被认为在缩短适应期和支持持续学习方面尤其有用。
用户重视更好的客房状态和客房服务协调,但有人表示当前的工作流程有限或不便。请求包括更便捷的客房架状态访问、更好的未来日期故障控制,以及客房服务和维护任... 用户重视更好的客房状态和客房服务协调,但有人表示当前的工作流程有限或不便。请求包括更便捷的客房架状态访问、更好的未来日期故障控制,以及客房服务和维护任务的实时更新。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户通常表示系统功能齐全,但可能会觉得繁琐,因为关键任务需要过多的点击和菜单导航。有些用户希望有更直观的布局、固定的导航,以及更方便访问常用的屏幕和报... 用户通常表示系统功能齐全,但可能会觉得繁琐,因为关键任务需要过多的点击和菜单导航。有些用户希望有更直观的布局、固定的导航,以及更方便访问常用的屏幕和报告。
一小部分但重要的评论强调了夜间审计、信用卡批处理、密码键盘通信和结算错误等操作风险。这些问题可能导致账单混淆、可能的重复收费担忧,以及员工在核对付款时... 一小部分但重要的评论强调了夜间审计、信用卡批处理、密码键盘通信和结算错误等操作风险。这些问题可能导致账单混淆、可能的重复收费担忧,以及员工在核对付款时的额外工作。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Noovy 和 Visual Matrix PMS 共享许多核心 Hotel Management Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。Noovy 提供 41 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Visual Matrix PMS 提供 25 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Noovy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Noovy:否。Visual Matrix PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Management Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Noovy 的 HT Score 为 75,Visual Matrix PMS 的为 79。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐