The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #39 11 条评价 | #48 5 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #38 12 条评价 | #67 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #38 14 条评价 | #54 3 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 | #54 2 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 | #52 2 条评价 | #62 1 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 | — | #49 0 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #22 23 条评价 | #48 1 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #15 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | #16 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Noovy PMS by Noovy and Prostay by Prostay hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and strategic goals. Both are property management systems designed to streamline hotel operations, but they diverge significantly in features, market presence, and user feedback. Noovy offers a well-rated, all-in-one platform with extensive integrations, while Prostay emphasizes multi-property support and proprietary tools, albeit with fewer reviews and integrations. Which aligns better with your hotel's current challenges?
Noovy and Prostay aim to simplify hotel management but approach this goal differently. Noovy provides an integrated system combining PMS, channel management, booking engine, and guest communication, with more than 40 verified partners and a user score of 71.3. Prostay, with only two verified integrations, focuses on centralizing operations through its proprietary tools, yet lacks recent review data to gauge current performance. Does your hotel prioritize broad integrations and proven customer satisfaction?
The core difference is in their market presence and review dynamics. Noovy has 19 reviews in the last six months, all highly recent, giving it a clear edge in current user experience insights and confidence. Prostay, with just 5 reviews, lacks recent feedback, making its performance less certain. Both products aim to reduce manual work, but Noovy’s reputation for ease of use and support makes it the more reliable choice based on recent data.
Do your hotel’s priorities lean toward a system with broad partner integrations and a solid reputation? Would you prefer a newer, less proven platform with potential for growth? The decision hinges on your confidence in recent user feedback and existing integrations.
If your hotel needs an all-in-one platform with extensive integrations, rapid onboarding, and proven customer satisfaction, go with Noovy. Its 19 recent reviews and high ratings across ease of use, support, and value demonstrate a reliable solution for independent hotels and city center properties.
If your hotel operates multiple resorts or requires a proprietary system with integrated POS and a focus on multi-property management, Prostay might be suitable. Its strengths lie in its embedded tools for reservations, billing, and guest messaging, but its limited verified integrations and lower review activity make it less certain for today’s needs.
For boutique hotels seeking simplicity and support, Noovy's more recent positive reviews and extensive integration network are decisive. Conversely, if you operate a large resort chain with complex property management needs, Prostay’s multi-property support and unique features could justify consideration, despite the limited recent feedback.
Noovy's UI has a rating of 4.84/5, with reviews highlighting its ease of navigation, speed, and friendly support, making onboarding quick and staff adoption straightforward. Its user feedback emphasizes a smooth learning curve, with many customers praising its intuitive design and minimal training requirements.
Prostay scores 4.8/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its user-friendly workflows and reliable operation. However, the limited number of recent reviews makes it harder to gauge ongoing usability and support quality.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy boasts 32 shared features plus 16 additional functionalities unique to its system, such as digital registration, integrated payment terminals, online check-in/out, and guest messaging. Its features cater to modern hotel needs, especially for independent properties seeking automation and connectivity.
Prostay offers 32 shared features and 5 unique functionalities, including a proprietary POS, gift vouchers, automated assignments, and a spa & wellness module. Its features are tailored for resorts and larger properties, but with fewer options for guest communication and digital check-in.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy’s customer support scores 4.89/5, with reviews describing their support as fast, friendly, and highly responsive. Customers praise their onboarding process and ongoing assistance, which contributes to high satisfaction.
Prostay has a perfect 5/5 rating for customer support, but with only five reviews, this figure is less conclusive. The limited recent feedback makes it difficult to assess the current level of support, although existing comments are positive.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy integrates with 40 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment providers, and channel managers like Stripe, SiteMinder, and GuestRevu. This extensive network simplifies operations and reduces third-party costs.
Prostay only has 2 verified integrations, including Stripe and STAAH. Its limited integration options may restrict flexibility for hotels relying on diverse channels or third-party tools.
Edge: Noovy.
Noovy’s reviews are recent, with a 5/5 overall rating and an impressive 99% likelihood to recommend. Its user base, primarily boutique and city-center hotels, praises its ease of use, support, and automation.
Prostay, despite a perfect 5/5 customer support rating, has only 5 reviews, with no recent feedback available. Its ratings are less reliable for current performance, and user sentiment is less established.
Edge: Noovy.
Both products are priced at a base of $600 per month, with no mention of additional implementation fees or tiered pricing. Their all-in-one model offers similar value, but Noovy emphasizes its affordability with a straightforward €£$5 per room per month for hotels.
Are there significant differences in cost structure? Not according to available data — they seem comparable, but Noovy might be more attractive for independent hotels due to its lower cost per room.
Noovy and Prostay serve different hotel segments with distinct strengths. Noovy’s comprehensive, well-reviewed platform suits independent hotels, city hotels, and boutique properties seeking reliability, extensive integrations, and quick onboarding.
Prostay’s focus on multi-property management, proprietary tools, and a smaller user base makes it more appropriate for resorts and larger chains, but the lack of recent reviews and limited integrations mean uncertain current performance.
If your hotel values proven customer satisfaction, extensive integrations, and ease of use, Noovy clearly leads. For large resorts with complex needs and a preference for proprietary tools, Prostay could be worth exploring, but the limited recent feedback favors Noovy as the safer choice.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论称赞该系统的易用性,指出其用户友好的设计和直观的界面可以快速培训新员工并减少操作错误。
优质的客户服务经常被提及,用户欣赏快速的响应和有效的解决方案,这有助于对产品的整体满意度。
该系统支持自动付款请求和处理,大大简化了计费流程并降低了错误率。此功能还因其在处理不可退款预订方面的效率而受到好评。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户很欣赏该软件的功能,但注意到其设计略显过时,但预计重新设计将解决这个问题。
该软件提供强大的报告工具,可以深入了解酒店运营的各个方面,帮助做出更好的管理决策。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Noovy PMS 和 Prostay 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Noovy PMS 提供 40 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Prostay 提供 2 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Noovy PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Noovy PMS:否。Prostay:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Noovy 的 HT Score 为 71,Prostay 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案