The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #16 3 条评价 | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #23 4 条评价 | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #17 4 条评价 | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #22 2 条评价 | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #4 5 条评价 | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #7 2 条评价 |
Your hotel is evaluating guest engagement platforms to enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Both Portier by Portier and STAY Guest App aim to digitize communication and service delivery, but they differ significantly in scope, reach, and maturity. While both products serve similar core functions, understanding their strengths and limitations will help you choose the right fit for your property.
Portier emphasizes guest engagement via hotel-branded smartphones and has a smaller but highly specialized user base, primarily in the Asia Pacific, Europe, and Middle East. Conversely, STAY boasts a broader market presence, with a proven track record across 67 countries and over 1,000 hotels, making it a more established choice for international brands and larger operations.
Which platform aligns best with your hotel’s size, regional needs, and digital ambitions?
Portier has a higher overall rating at 4.71/5 based on just 7 reviews, but its limited recent review activity weakens confidence in its current performance. STAY, with 206 reviews and a 3/5 overall rating, commands a stronger market presence with recent feedback from numerous hotels, making it the more reliable choice for most hoteliers.
Given the volume, recent reviews, and extensive integration options, STAY is the better option for hotels seeking a mature, scalable guest app. Portier might appeal if your hotel values a boutique, personalized engagement system, but its smaller ecosystem limits flexibility.
Edge: STAY.
Both Portier and STAY aim to improve guest communication and operational efficiency through digital means. Portier centers around hotel-branded smartphones, allowing staff to push messages, facilitate guest engagement, and improve ancillary revenues, especially in boutique or villa settings. STAY offers a full-featured mobile app and web interface, supporting a wide array of digital services, reservations, and integrations.
Where Portier excels is in creating an emotional bond through dedicated smartphones, fostering direct, personal communication. STAY, however, provides a more comprehensive, multi-channel experience, integrating with existing hotel systems and offering detailed analytics.
Are you prioritizing personalized guest touchpoints or broad operational digitization?
Edge: STAY.
If your hotel needs a guest engagement platform focused on direct, personal communication via hotel smartphones, Portier is a good fit. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, villas, or properties heavily invested in guest messaging and ancillary revenue through personal devices.
If, however, your hotel requires a scalable platform supporting multiple services—reservations, requests, notifications—and seamless integration with PMS, STAY is the better choice. Its extensive feature set, proven track record, and global presence make it suitable for branded hotels, resorts, and chains looking to digitize the entire guest journey.
For properties focused on digital transformation at scale, STAY's broader capabilities outweigh Portier’s personalized approach.
Edge: STAY.
Portier’s user experience has an average rating of 4.43/5, noted for its well-designed functions but some limitations in smartphone features at the front desk. Its onboarding is rated 4.7/5, indicating a smooth initial setup, but reviews mention technical issues like signal problems and battery drain.
STAY surpasses in ease of use with a 4.78/5 rating and an intuitive interface praised in over 200 recent reviews. Hotels highlight its straightforward CMS, fast setup, and minimal staff training needed, even in complex operations.
Edge: STAY.
Portier offers core features like guest messaging, push notifications, and basic engagement tools. It lacks dedicated modules like chatbot, request management, or message routing, limiting customization.
STAY provides 7 unique features not available in Portier, including a mobile app, chatbot, automated replies, message routing, web app, request management, and app download. These features enable more flexible, automated, and detailed guest interactions, catering to diverse operational needs.
In feature depth and variety, STAY’s broader suite gives your hotel much more control and automation.
Edge: STAY.
Portier’s support and onboarding ratings are 4.86/5 and 4.7/5 respectively, based on limited reviews. Users appreciate its dedicated assistance but note occasional technical glitches and limited functions at the front desk.
STAY’s customer support is similarly rated at 4.83/5, with reviews praising quick, helpful responses and ongoing support. Some feedback points to limited phone support and regional support hours, but overall, the support experience is highly regarded.
Given the larger user base and recent reviews, STAY’s support infrastructure is more robust and proven.
Edge: STAY.
Portier currently has zero verified integration partners, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel management systems. This restricts scalability and automation options for your hotel.
STAY boasts integrations with 20 verified partners, including Hotelkit, Apaleo, Mews, Oracle Hospitality, and SiteMinder, enabling smooth data flow and operational automation. Its open API allows for further customization, making it adaptable to your existing tech stack.
For hotel operations that rely on a variety of systems, STAY’s extensive integrations provide a significant advantage.
Edge: STAY.
Portier’s only 7 reviews—none recent—offer a limited snapshot. The high ratings from those reviews (all 5/5) reflect a niche appeal, mainly from boutique hotels and villas in Europe and Asia, with an overall rating of 4.71/5.
STAY, with over 200 reviews, has a more diverse property base, including luxury hotels, resorts, and chains across multiple continents. Its overall rating of 3/5 is lower but reflects recent, detailed feedback emphasizing operational benefits and areas for improvement.
Given the volume and recency, STAY’s ratings are more representative of current user experiences.
Edge: STAY.
Portier’s pricing details are not publicly available, and it does not offer a freemium or trial model. Its cost structure might be customized or unavailable, which could complicate budgeting.
STAY charges a straightforward $300 monthly fee, with no implementation or setup fees, and no free tier or trial. This transparent pricing makes it easier to evaluate ROI and compare with other solutions.
For budgeting clarity, STAY’s fixed monthly fee simplifies financial planning.
Edge: STAY.
Not ideal if your hotel needs wide system integrations, scalable digital services, or multi-channel communication.
Limited to boutique and smaller properties focused on personalized engagement.
Not ideal if your property prefers a simple, single-device engagement system or has very limited budgets.
Best suited for mid-sized to large hotels, brands, and resorts seeking extensive digital transformation.
Portier offers a niche, smartphone-based guest engagement system with a high satisfaction rating but limited recent activity and integrations. It’s suitable for boutique hotels prioritizing personalized communication and ancillary services.
STAY, on the other hand, has a proven, extensive feature set, strong global presence, and broad integration capabilities, with over 200 recent reviews supporting its reliability and scalability. It is the better choice for most hotels looking to digitize their guest experience at scale.
If your hotel requires a comprehensive, flexible platform with proven results, STAY is the clear winner. Portier might work if you prioritize personal touch and are comfortable with a smaller ecosystem.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Portier 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Portier 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.4/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Portier:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Portier 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问