The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 142 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Planet 表现出色 在 功能和特点 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 On premise and Revenue management module.
Shiji Group 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 142 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $500/mo | From $1,200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 108 | 34 |
在分析了 142 条经验证的评价后,Planet 用户最看重其 功能和特点, 多物业管理,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 支持团队, 执行, 培训材料。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
功能和特点
▾
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
+
多物业管理
▾
|
+
执行
▾
|
|
+
培训材料
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持问题
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
定制和灵活性
▾
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
−
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #27 32 条评价 | #53 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 50 条评价 | #31 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #15 10 条评价 | #11 13 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #17 3 条评价 | #22 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #21 42 条评价 | #33 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #21 34 条评价 | #24 25 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #17 33 条评价 | #22 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #20 9 条评价 | #45 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #29 6 条评价 | #33 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #10 79 条评价 | #30 8 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #14 5 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #15 2 条评价 | #5 14 条评价 |
Choosing between protel PMS by Planet and Shiji Daylight PMS hinges on your hotel's size, complexity, and strategic priorities. Both aim to streamline operations, but they approach this goal differently, with distinct strengths and weaknesses. Your decision should consider your current needs, future plans, and the specific features that matter most to your team.
Protel PMS has a longer history, extensive integrations, and a reputation for reliability, especially for single-property and mid-sized hotels. Meanwhile, Shiji Daylight PMS, with its modern interface and scalability, is often favored by larger hotel groups seeking robust automation and centralized guest data. But which product truly fits your hotel’s unique profile?
Protel PMS and Shiji Daylight both solve core hotel management problems: guest reservations, check-in/out, billing, and reporting. However, they diverge significantly in their approach and maturity.
Protel is a seasoned platform with over three decades of development, known for its deep integration ecosystem and customizable features—great for hotels needing tailored operations. Shiji, on the other hand, emphasizes ease of use and automation, with a sleek cloud-native design that supports fast deployment and property expansion.
The key question is whether your hotel needs a flexible, established platform that can handle complex environments or a modern, scalable system designed for growth and efficiency. Does your hotel prioritize extensive back-end customization or streamlined, user-friendly interfaces?
If your hotel operates a single property or a small chain that values proven reliability and vast integrations, go with protel PMS. Its rich feature set—including booking engine, guest CRM, and a large partner network—supports complex operations and provides high customization.
Conversely, if your hotel group requires a scalable solution with quick onboarding, automated workflows, and centralized guest profiles, Shiji Daylight PMS is the better pick. It excels in multi-property environments, offering real-time data and a modern interface that reduces training time and increases operational consistency.
Your choice should align with your hotel’s size and growth ambitions: for established, multi-location hotels seeking flexibility, protel is ideal, while for expanding groups focused on automation and guest personalization, Shiji fits better.
Protel PMS boasts a user satisfaction score of 4.12/5, with many users praising its intuitive layout and fast access to functions. However, some reviews mention that complex configurations and integrations can slow down staff onboarding, especially for larger, multi-property setups.
Shiji Daylight PMS scores slightly higher at 4.63/5, with reviewers highlighting its modern, clean interface and straightforward navigation. Its consistent positive feedback about ease of training—supported by comprehensive materials—makes onboarding smoother for new staff.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Protel offers 46 core features, including booking engine, guest profiles, and mobile notes, with seven unique modules such as revenue management and on-premise options. Its focus on flexible integration and detailed reporting appeals to hotels needing tailored operational tools.
Shiji provides 59 features, from integrated CRS and automation tools to digital registration, guest messaging, and advanced housekeeping modules. Its extensive feature library emphasizes automation, guest personalization, and multi-channel communication.
While Shiji has more features and unique modules, protel's strength lies in its deep integration ecosystem and customizable environment. For a hotel needing rich automation and guest engagement, shiji has the edge.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Protel’s support scores a 3.95/5, with many reviews citing slow response times and occasional unavailability during critical moments. Users appreciate the helpfulness when support is available but note that support delays can disrupt daily operations.
Shiji outperforms with a 4.53/5 rating, with reviews praising its 24/7 support, quick responses, and proactive onboarding. Hotels like Ruby Hotels emphasize the support team’s professionalism and technical expertise.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Protel boasts over 195 verified partners, including integrations with Innspire, Right Revenue, and RevControl, supporting extensive customization and tailored workflows. Its large ecosystem facilitates connecting with various revenue, CRM, and channel management tools.
Shiji has 64 verified partners, sharing 38 with protel, including Bookboost, Lighthouse, and FLYR Hospitality. Its focus on automation and centralized systems is supported by integrations with CRS, payment terminals, and guest apps.
Protel’s broader ecosystem gives it a slight lead, especially for hotels requiring complex, multi-system setups.
Edge: protel PMS.
Protel’s overall ratings stand at 4.11/5 based on 105 reviews, with independent hotels rating it slightly higher (4.5/5). Many smaller properties appreciate its reliability and customizable features, despite some support frustrations.
Shiji scores 74.99/100, with fewer reviews but higher recent favorability, especially among larger hotels and chains. Hotels emphasize its ease of use, automation, and support.
Given the more extensive and recent reviews, protel's rating is more representative of ongoing performance. Still, Shiji’s recent momentum indicates strong approval among larger hotel groups.
Edge: Shiji Daylight PMS.
Protel’s pricing starts at $500/month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its premium, feature-rich environment. Shiji’s base price is $1,200/month, also without a trial, aligning with its enterprise focus.
Both are subscription-based, with no implementation fees listed. Your selection may hinge on your budget and the value you perceive from their feature sets and support.
Not ideal if your hotel is a large, multi-property group with complex automation needs, as support and performance issues can arise in larger setups.
Not ideal if your hotel is small or prefers highly customizable back-end systems without a focus on rapid automation or if you have strict local compliance needs that require extensive regional adaptations.
Protel PMS by Planet and Shiji Daylight PMS are both capable solutions, but their target audiences differ markedly. Protel’s extensive integrations, customization capabilities, and reliability make it a solid choice for established, mid-sized hotels seeking a flexible platform with proven stability.
Shiji’s modern interface, automation features, and high user ratings make it ideal for larger hotel groups aiming for operational efficiency and guest personalization. It also supports rapid onboarding and scalability, which are critical for growing portfolios.
For hotels prioritizing reliability, extensive integrations, and proven stability, protel is the safer fallback. But if your hotel needs a scalable, intuitive system with automation and excellent support, Shiji offers compelling advantages. Given the recent reviews and higher overall rating, Shiji Daylight PMS is the stronger pick for most hotels today.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $1,200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,protel PMS (by Planet) 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享 39 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 任务管理 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 网上结账 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
| 预订引擎 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 54 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些... 用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些功能中的许多功能不完整、有缺陷或完全缺失。自定义报告和与其他工具的无缝集成也被认为是有益的。
用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以... 用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以前更复杂,更不直观。
Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,... Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,突出了重大错误和功能减少。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠... 客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠性。
用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只... 用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只有通过付费定制开发才能获得。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。
石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。
一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。
与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。protel PMS (by Planet) 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。protel PMS (by Planet) 提供 194 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Shiji Daylight PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.6/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
protel PMS (by Planet):否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Planet 的 HT Score 为 33,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问