The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 213 条经验证的评价后,Planet 用户最看重其 功能和特点, 易于使用, 多物业管理,而 Sirvoy 用户则强调 customer support, ease of use, 预订管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
功能和特点
▾
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
多物业管理
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
用户界面和设计
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
支持问题
▾
|
−
功能限制
▾
|
|
−
定制和灵活性
▾
|
−
定制化和适应性
▾
|
|
−
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
−
性价比
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #27 32 条评价 | #22 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #15 50 条评价 | #48 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #15 10 条评价 | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #17 3 条评价 | #27 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #21 42 条评价 | #29 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #21 34 条评价 | #37 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #17 33 条评价 | #42 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #20 9 条评价 | #35 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #29 6 条评价 | #23 16 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #10 79 条评价 | #16 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | — | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中东 | #15 2 条评价 | #27 0 条评价 |
You’re choosing between two property management solutions: protel PMS by Planet and Sirvoy. Both aim to streamline operations, but they serve different hotel profiles and come with distinct strengths and weaknesses. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific needs—so which one aligns best with your goals?
protel PMS offers extensive features, deep integrations, and a strong reputation among larger and more complex hotels. Sirvoy emphasizes simplicity, affordability, and ease of use, primarily for small to medium properties. But which product truly fits your hotel’s unique requirements?
Both systems manage reservations and streamline guest interactions, but they diverge significantly in scope and sophistication. protel PMS, with its 1,200+ integrations and comprehensive modules, is built for hotels that need robust, customizable tools capable of handling complex operations. Sirvoy, in contrast, offers a straightforward booking engine, channel management, and front-desk features designed for properties that prioritize ease and affordability.
While protel's extensive feature set and deep integration ecosystem serve larger, multi-property hotels well, Sirvoy's simplicity and lower price point appeal to small hotels, B&Bs, and hostels. Your choice depends on whether your team needs a full-stack PMS with advanced automation or a lightweight, user-friendly system.
If your hotel is a larger operation, or plans to grow—especially with multiple properties—protel PMS is the better fit. Its 105 reviews with an average rating of 4.11/5 and recent surge in reviews (32 in last 6 months) support its strength in reliability and feature depth.
On the other hand, if your hotel is small, with straightforward needs and a focus on quick setup, ease of use, and affordability, Sirvoy’s 95 reviews with a 0/5 overall rating are misleading; recent reviews rate it highly at 4.64/5. Its highly intuitive UI and excellent customer support make it ideal for properties that prioritize simplicity over complexity.
In summary, choose protel if you need a scalable, feature-rich PMS; go with Sirvoy if your focus is on straightforward operations and rapid onboarding.
Based on ratings, Sirvoy edges out slightly with a 4.64/5 ease of use, compared to protel’s 4.12/5. Sirvoy’s interface is praised for its simplicity, making onboarding quick for new staff and allowing operations to start smoothly.
Protel’s interface, while generally user-friendly, can be more complex due to its extensive feature set, which may require more training and adjustment. Support responsiveness also influences ease of use—Sirvoy’s dedicated 24/7 support and prompt assistance add to its lean towards simplicity.
Edge: Sirvoy.
protel’s 34 shared features include advanced tools like guest profiles, integrated CRS, multi-currency support, revenue management modules, and digital registration—features that Sirvoy lacks altogether. These enable comprehensive management for larger hotels and complex operations.
Sirvoy offers key features like channel management, online check-in/out, guest messaging, and a booking engine—valuable but limited compared to protel’s extensive suite. Its 9 exclusive features are focused on ease and affordability, not depth.
Edge: protel PMS.
Sirvoy’s customer support impresses reviewers, with many citing quick, friendly, and helpful assistance—an important advantage for small teams needing reliable help. Its recent reviews consistently praise their responsiveness, with a 4.85/5 support rating.
Protel’s support, rated at 3.95/5, faces criticism for long response times and inconsistency, especially post-acquisition by Planet. While some users appreciate their multilingual and 24/7 support, the general sentiment favors Sirvoy’s support quality.
Edge: Sirvoy.
protel offers a vast ecosystem with 195 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, TrustYou, and Revinate, plus exclusive modules and extensive third-party options. This makes it highly adaptable for hotels needing diverse connectivity.
Sirvoy’s 21 verified integrations cover core needs like channel management and payment providers, with notable partners like Booking.com, Expedia, and GDS. However, its smaller ecosystem limits flexibility for complex setups.
Edge: protel PMS.
Review patterns indicate that hotels in larger categories or with complex needs rate protel higher, especially those with multi-property management. The recent surge in reviews (32 in last 6 months) and an NPS score of 9.41/10 reflect strong current satisfaction.
Sirvoy’s simpler, more straightforward use appeals especially to small hotels, B&Bs, and hostels, with a 94% likelihood to recommend rating, despite a lower overall score. Its recent reviews praise support and usability, but smaller hotels may value this more.
Edge: Sirvoy.
protel’s pricing starts at a flat $500/month, with no free tier or per-room charges. Its higher cost reflects its enterprise features and extensive integrations.
Sirvoy charges $200/month with a 30-day trial, making it more accessible for smaller properties. Its lower price point is attractive, but some users find costs can increase with additional modules or larger operations.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
protel PMS is a highly adaptable, feature-rich solution designed for larger, complex hotels and chains. Its strengths lie in scalability, extensive integrations, and customization, but it comes with higher cost and a steeper learning curve.
Sirvoy excels in simplicity, affordability, and ease of onboarding, making it ideal for small to medium properties that need reliable support and straightforward operations. Its limited feature set and smaller ecosystem suit properties with basic requirements.
Choose protel if your hotel needs a comprehensive, scalable PMS capable of handling complex operations and growth. Opt for Sirvoy if your property benefits from an easy-to-use, budget-friendly system that prioritizes guest experience and operational simplicity.
我们分析了 4 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些... 用户欣赏 Protel 管理单个物业的广泛功能,以及用于报告、房间规划和费率管理的综合工具。然而,许多评论表示失望,因为在处理更复杂的设置或多物业环境时,这些功能中的许多功能不完整、有缺陷或完全缺失。自定义报告和与其他工具的无缝集成也被认为是有益的。
用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以... 用户界面普遍受到好评,因为它直观且易于操作。许多用户发现 Protel Air 特别用户友好,并注意到它在管理日常操作方面非常高效。然而,某些更新使得某些功能比以前更复杂,更不直观。
Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,... Protel 在满足多属性环境方面的表现得到了褒贬不一的反馈。虽然一些用户对其组织工具和界面表示赞赏,但许多人发现该系统在多位置设置方面功能有限,令人沮丧,突出了重大错误和功能减少。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠... 客户支持一直是人们关注的焦点。评论提到,在被 Planet 收购后,客户支持请求的等待时间过长、电话服务中断以及响应时间过长。用户建议提高客户服务的速度和可靠性。
用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只... 用户通常对 Protel 提供的定制级别感到满意,这使他们能够调整系统以更好地满足他们的特定需求。然而,这种灵活性通常需要付出高昂的成本,而且一些必需的功能只有通过付费定制开发才能获得。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。protel PMS (by Planet) 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。protel PMS (by Planet) 提供 194 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
protel PMS (by Planet):否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Planet 的 HT Score 为 33,Sirvoy 的为 85。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问