The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 209 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Resly 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Native Email Marketing.
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.1/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Guest profiles.
基于 HTR 上 209 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 0 | 209 |
在分析了 209 条经验证的评价后,Resly 用户最看重其 ,而 RoomRaccoon 用户则强调 用户界面和体验, 一体化系统, 自动发送电子邮件和文档。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和体验
▾
|
|
|
+
一体化系统
▾
|
|
|
+
自动发送电子邮件和文档
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
服务和支持
▾
|
|
|
−
集成限制
▾
|
|
|
−
系统错误和稳定性问题
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #10 90 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #17 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #14 7 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #19 0 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #9 100 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #9 64 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #14 29 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #7 28 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #24 7 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | — | #5 123 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #31 4 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #31 1 条评价 |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can be a daunting task, especially with two strong contenders: Resly PMS by Resly and RoomRaccoon PMS by RoomRaccoon. Both aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences, but they differ significantly in maturity, features, and regional presence. Resly, built specifically for management rights and short-term holiday letting, offers an intuitive platform, while RoomRaccoon, a more established system, provides extensive integrations and automation for independent hotels.
Ultimately, your decision should be based on your property type, operational needs, and the level of support you require. Are you seeking a niche system tailored for holiday management or a versatile, scalable platform for various hotel segments?
Resly PMS, despite its recent emergence, targets a niche market of holiday rentals and management rights, emphasizing simplicity and compliance. It integrates functions like trust accounting and guest communication within an easy-to-use interface, aiming to reduce administrative complexity.
RoomRaccoon, on the other hand, has been on the market since 2017 and boasts nearly 170 reviews in the past six months, with a 4.88/5 rating and a 94% likelihood to recommend. Its broader feature set, extensive integrations, and global presence make it a more mature choice for diverse hotel operations. Given the recency and volume of reviews, RoomRaccoon’s platform is more validated by user experience. Would you prefer a specialized solution or a proven, all-in-one management platform?
If your hotel primarily operates as an independent boutique or small property seeking a comprehensive, user-friendly system, RoomRaccoon is the better fit. It’s proven to increase revenue through dynamic pricing, automate guest communication, and streamline booking processes, especially for small to mid-sized hotels.
Resly is ideal if your focus is on management rights, short-term holiday lettings, and trust accounting within a simplified workflow. It offers 15 unique features tailored for holiday rentals, including guest messaging, digital registration, and GDPR compliance, making it suitable for management companies or operators in that niche.
In summary, choose RoomRaccoon if you want a mature, flexible platform with high user satisfaction and broad integrations. Opt for Resly if your hotel’s operations revolve around holiday lettings and trust accounting, and you prioritize simplicity over extensive features.
RoomRaccoon’s high ease-of-use rating (4.74/5 from over 169 reviews) reflects its intuitive design, onboarding support, and positive staff adoption experiences. Users frequently mention that the platform is "easy to learn" and "simplifies daily operations," even for those new to PMS technology.
Resly, with a 0/5 rating, offers no data on usability, but its targeted niche suggests a focus on simplified trust accounting and holiday management. However, the limited reviews and absence of recent user feedback make it difficult to assess its user-friendliness confidently.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers 21 features exclusive to its platform, including revenue management, automated night audits, multi-currency support, analytics dashboards, and integrated payment terminals—making it a comprehensive system for small hotels. Its total of 30 shared features also include automation, guest communication, and reporting tools.
Resly, with only 15 unique features, emphasizes guest communication via SMS, native email marketing, and tablet check-in—focused mainly on holiday rental management. While tailored for specific needs, it lacks advanced features like revenue management or multi-currency support.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s customer support, rated 4.53/5 with a robust review count, is praised for responsiveness and helpful onboarding. Users say, "Support is quick and eager to help," which ensures smoother implementation and problem resolution.
Resly, with no recent reviews or ratings, provides no concrete data on support quality. This absence suggests lesser validation for its customer service and could be a concern for hotels needing reliable assistance.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers 88 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment gateways, and software integrations like Sage, Paxxio, and RevControl, facilitating extensive connectivity. It supports two-way real-time data exchange, simplifying multi-channel management.
Resly, with just 2 verified partners, has limited integration options, which may hinder hotels that rely on a broad tech ecosystem. Its partnership network is minimal, reducing flexibility for future integrations.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s reviews, predominantly recent, reflect a high hotelier satisfaction rate, with a 4.88/5 overall rating and 94% likelihood to recommend. Small hotel segments, especially boutique properties, frequently praise its automation, ease of use, and revenue growth.
Resly lacks recent review data and ratings, making it difficult to assess hotel satisfaction. Its limited feedback suggests it’s not yet broadly tested or proven in the field.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Resly’s pricing details are not publicly available, indicating it may be customized or on a different model. RoomRaccoon charges a flat $1,000 base price with no ongoing monthly fees, making it straightforward for budgeting.
The absence of transparent pricing for Resly requires direct inquiry, which could complicate budgeting decisions. RoomRaccoon’s clear pricing structure offers better predictability.
Resly is best suited for niche operators within holiday rental markets, needing compliance and straightforward operations.
RoomRaccoon is suited for small to mid-sized hotels eager for automation, revenue growth, and operational simplicity.
RoomRaccoon offers a proven, feature-rich platform with high hotelier satisfaction, making it the safer choice for most hotels today. Its extensive integrations, automation, and support make it ideal for small and independent properties seeking growth and efficiency.
Resly provides a specialized solution for holiday rental operators and management rights, focusing on compliance and simplicity. It’s best if your hotel operates in that niche and does not require broad integrations or advanced revenue management.
Choose RoomRaccoon if you need a versatile, scalable system with a track record of user satisfaction. Opt for Resly if your property’s core needs revolve around holiday lettings, trust accounting, and simplified workflows.
This comparison highlights the strengths and limitations of each platform, enabling you to make an informed decision aligned with your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth ambitions.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Resly PMS 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享 30 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 任务管理 | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 集中消息传递 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 24 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用... 许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用性。
RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强... RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强调此功能如何节省时间并使管理更加轻松。
酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞... 酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞这些自动化功能的自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉... 虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉。
一些评论指出,RoomRaccoon 与其他系统(如支付网关(Stripe、会计软件)和 OTA)的集成存在局限性。用户表示希望实现更无缝的集成,以避免手动工作和额外费用。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Resly PMS 和 RoomRaccoon PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Resly PMS 提供 2 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 RoomRaccoon PMS 提供 88 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Resly PMS:否。RoomRaccoon PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Resly 的 HT Score 为 0,RoomRaccoon 的为 80。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问