Roomassistant vs. STAY Guest App: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 May 16, 2026  ·  已分析 215 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Roomassistant 表现出色 .

STAY 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Guest Messaging.

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Roomassistant 与 STAY Guest App 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
0
47
推荐可能性
0%
96%
易用性
0.0/5
4.8/5
客户支持
0.0/5
4.8/5
性价比
0.0/5
4.6/5
起始价格 Contact sales From $300/mo
经验证的评价 0 215

Roomassistant 与 STAY Guest App 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 215 条经验证的评价后,Roomassistant 用户最看重其 ,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Roomassistant Roomassistant STAY STAY
优点
+ 客户体验优化
+ 移动和用户体验
+ 运营效率
+ 支持和服务
缺点
CMS 和定制
集成能力
分析和报告

Roomassistant 对比 STAY:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Roomassistant Roomassistant STAY STAY
小型(10-24 间客房) #9 10 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #4 83 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #2 89 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #2 24 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Roomassistant Roomassistant STAY STAY
精品酒店 #2 77 条评价
豪华酒店 #2 88 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #3 91 条评价
长住酒店 #6 7 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Roomassistant Roomassistant STAY STAY
北美 #5 27 条评价
欧洲 #3 112 条评价
亚太 #6 3 条评价
中东 #7 2 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Roomassistant by Roomassistant and STAY Guest App hinges on understanding their core differences, target users, and recent performance. Both aim to elevate guest experience via mobile solutions, but they serve very different market needs and maturity levels. Your decision should align with your hotel’s size, technological readiness, and specific guest service goals. Are you looking for a mature, widely adopted platform or a more niche, yet promising solution?

Is Roomassistant or STAY Guest App Better for Hotels?

Roomassistant is a mobile app designed to bring hotel services directly to guests’ smartphones, focusing on consolidating internal processes and providing digital guest engagement. Its main strength lies in its simplicity and a focus on core mobile functionality, but it scores a 0/5 in overall rating due to extremely limited reviews, with no recent user feedback.

STAY Guest App, on the other hand, is a more comprehensive platform with 206 reviews in the last six months, resulting in a strong overall rating of 3/5 and a high NPS of 9.59/10. It offers an extensive suite of features like chatbots, request management, and integrations, making it a more mature, well-rounded guest experience platform.

While Roomassistant remains largely unreviewed and untested recently, STAY’s active review base and high customer satisfaction indicate a more reliable, scalable solution. Do you want a platform still in development or one with proven, recent success?

Roomassistant vs STAY Guest App: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel needs a straightforward mobile app to put essential services into guests’ hands without complex integrations or extensive features, Roomassistant might seem appealing. However, given its current lack of recent reviews and a 0/5 rating, it’s difficult to assess its effectiveness or reliability.

If you’re seeking a solution with proven, recent user feedback, a high adoption rate, and a broad feature set—including chat functions, request management, and multi-lingual support—STAY Guest App is the clear choice. Its strong reputation among large hotel chains and independent hotels alike makes it suitable for hotels aiming for operational digitization and guest satisfaction.

For hotels considering growth or digital transformation, STAY’s current market presence and detailed integration options strongly favor it over Roomassistant. Are you prioritizing a reliable platform with recent validation or exploring a less proven solution?

Is Roomassistant or STAY Guest App Easier to Use?

Roomassistant’s user interface and onboarding process are largely unreviewed, making it impossible to gauge ease of use or adoption success. Its lack of recent reviews suggests limited ongoing support or updates, which may impact staff training and guest experience.

STAY Guest App boasts a 4.78/5 ease of use rating based on 206 recent reviews, with comments praising its intuitive interface, simple content management, and straightforward implementation. Staff and guests find it easy to navigate, update information, and manage requests, reducing learning curves.

Edge: STAY Guest App.

Which Has Better Features: Roomassistant or STAY Guest App?

Roomassistant offers minimal features, with no exclusive capabilities highlighted in the data. Its core function appears to be mobile access to hotel services, but with no standout functionalities or recent updates.

STAY Guest App provides 14 distinct features, including guest messaging, chatbots, automated replies, room service ordering, local recommendations, multilingual support, mobile checkout, and detailed guest profiles. These features enable hotels to deliver a multi-channel, personalized guest experience and streamline operations.

Edge: STAY Guest App.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Roomassistant or STAY Guest App?

Roomassistant’s support and onboarding ratings are unavailable, and the lack of recent reviews indicates limited customer engagement or feedback channels currently.

STAY Guest App clearly outperforms here, with a 4.83/5 support rating based on recent reviews. Customers repeatedly praise the quick, helpful support team, although some mention limited phone support and regional hours. Overall, the positive feedback around customer service makes STAY a more dependable partner.

Edge: STAY Guest App.

Which Has More Integrations: Roomassistant or STAY Guest App?

Roomassistant has zero verified partners, implying limited or no integration options at this stage, which could hinder scalability.

STAY Guest App integrates with 20 verified partners, including major PMS, CRM, and distribution systems like Oracle Hospitality, SiteMinder, Mews, and hotelkit. Such integrations facilitate seamless data flow and operational efficiency, especially for larger or multi-system hotels.

Edge: STAY Guest App.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Roomassistant or STAY Guest App?

Roomassistant, with no recent reviews, cannot be rated by hoteliers presently, making comparison impossible.

STAY Guest App’s recent 206 reviews reflect a mixed but generally positive sentiment, with a 3/5 overall rating and a high NPS of 9.59/10. Hotels of various sizes, from boutique to large chains, praise its ability to improve guest engagement and operational efficiency, though some note room for interface improvements.

Edge: STAY Guest App.

How Much Do Roomassistant and STAY Guest App Cost?

Roomassistant’s pricing details are unavailable, and it does not offer a free trial or clear pricing model. This opacity makes budgeting and ROI calculations difficult.

STAY Guest App costs $300 per month, with no mention of setup fees or additional charges. Its transparent pricing and multiple case studies showing revenue and efficiency gains suggest a solid investment for hotels seeking a proven platform.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Roomassistant?

  • Hotels that want a simple, mobile-centric solution to provide basic digital services.
  • Small properties or those just starting their digital guest experience journey.
  • Hotels with limited IT resources and a need for straightforward deployment.
  • Teams focusing on internal guest engagement without extensive customization.
  • Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes comprehensive features, recent reviews, or scalable integrations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use STAY Guest App?

  • Large hotels or chains seeking a robust, feature-rich guest experience platform.
  • Hotels aiming to reduce front desk queues and improve service speed.
  • Properties that want seamless integrations with existing PMS, CRM, and distribution systems.
  • Hotels interested in detailed analytics, multilingual support, and mobile checkout.
  • Not ideal if your hotel has a very tight budget, prefers simple solutions, or needs extensive customization without support.

The Bottom Line for Hotels: Roomassistant or STAY Guest App?

Roomassistant offers a basic, mobile-focused solution, but its lack of recent reviews, features, and integrations makes it a risky choice for most hotels today. Its limited data suggests it’s more suitable for very small properties or early-stage digital initiatives.

STAY Guest App, with over 200 recent reviews, a 3/5 rating, and a suite of 14 features, is clearly more established and trusted. Its ability to streamline operations, improve guest satisfaction, and integrate with leading systems positions it as the more reliable, scalable, and versatile choice for hotels ready to digitize.

If you seek a proven platform with recent validation, choose STAY. If your hotel is experimenting or has minimal needs, Roomassistant might be worth exploring, but beware of its limited current support and review activity.

Roomassistant 和 STAY Guest App 的价格是多少?

酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Roomassistant Roomassistant STAY STAY
Starting Price From $300/mo

Roomassistant 有哪些 STAY Guest App 没有的功能(反之亦然)?

根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Roomassistant 和 STAY Guest App 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。

功能 Roomassistant Roomassistant STAY STAY
来宾消息
消息路由
移动应用
网络应用
聊天机器人
自动回复

显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。

实际成果:Roomassistant 对比 STAY(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
Roomassistant Roomassistant

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

STAY Barceló Hoteles 大型
+ Room Service is faster. It's more comfortable. For the guests. And for the staff too
+ Barceló can make better decisions in real time
+ Through live surveys, Barceló can detect pain points more easily and streamline processes

"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."

Álvaro Montalvo
Álvaro Montalvo
Project Manager Innovation
改善宾客体验
Roomassistant Roomassistant

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

STAY AMR Collection 中型
+ The app pays for itself according to AMR's Product Manager. "Spa services, gourmet dinners, wine sales, and other premium services have seen significant increases since we implemented the app.
+ The implementation of STAY skyrocketed the number of users of AMR's app. Increasing them by 50% was their goal. However, they "far exceeded that goal.
+ AMR's users rate the app 4.7 out of 5 on average. The app has been downloaded tens of thousands of times in 50 AMR hotels.

"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."

Yudy Mora
Yudy Mora
Product Owner Manager

Roomassistant 对比 STAY:总结

Roomassistant
Roomassistant
0.0/5 来自 0 条评价
0.0/5 易用性 0.0/5 客户支持 0 个集成
查看资料
STAY
STAY
4.8/5 来自 215 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

客户体验优化 97% 正面

多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。

移动和用户体验 90% 正面

该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。

运营效率 96% 正面

STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

CMS 和定制 41% 负面

CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。

集成能力 50% 负面

用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。

独特功能

移动应用 聊天机器人 自动回复 消息路由 来宾消息
4.8/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 20 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 STAY 3.0 vs 0.0 (+3)
易用性 STAY 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
客户支持 STAY 4.8 vs 0.0 (+4.8)
性价比 STAY 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
入职培训 STAY 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)

关于 Roomassistant 与 STAY Guest App 的常见问题

Roomassistant 能否替代 STAY Guest App?

这取决于您的需求。Roomassistant 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Roomassistant 提供 0 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Roomassistant 或 STAY Guest App 是否提供免费方案?

Roomassistant:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Roomassistant 和 STAY Guest App?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Roomassistant 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取个性化的产品推荐

产品推荐顾问

Ghostel icon

让我们查找您的酒店信息