The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 217 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
roommaster 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile Checkin and Payments.
STAY 表现出色 在 customer support and ROI 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App.
基于 HTR 上 217 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $1,000/mo | From $300/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 2 | 215 |
在分析了 217 条经验证的评价后,roommaster 用户最看重其 ,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户体验优化
▾
|
|
|
+
移动和用户体验
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
支持和服务
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
CMS 和定制
▾
|
|
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
|
−
分析和报告
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #17 1 条评价 | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #16 0 条评价 | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #29 0 条评价 | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #28 0 条评价 | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #19 1 条评价 | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #34 0 条评价 | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #23 0 条评价 | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #18 0 条评价 | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 1 条评价 | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #31 0 条评价 | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | #12 0 条评价 | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing between roommaster Guest App and STAY Guest App hinges on your hotel’s priorities around features, user experience, and overall value. Both products aim to enhance guest engagement and operational efficiency, but they address different needs and customer segments.
roommaster has a long-standing presence with only two recent reviews, making it difficult to gauge current user satisfaction. Conversely, STAY boasts over 200 reviews, with recent feedback confirming its effectiveness, which makes it the more reliable choice for hoteliers today.
Both products serve the core purpose of improving guest experiences through digital solutions, but they diverge significantly in scope, user ratings, and feature sets. roommaster, founded in 1994 and with just two reviews, offers basic functionalities like mobile check-in and payments but struggles with limited recent feedback and a lower overall rating. STAY, founded in 2012, has a much larger and more recent review base, with a 3/5 overall rating and a 46.64/100 HTR score, indicating broader acceptance among modern hoteliers.
The primary difference is in their feature offerings: STAY provides a more extensive suite, including chatbots, automated replies, message routing, and multi-lingual support, unlike roommaster's limited features. STAY’s recent reviews emphasize its ease of use, operational efficiencies, and guest satisfaction improvements, while roommaster’s reviews are sparse and somewhat dated, making it harder to assess its current relevance.
Would you prefer a platform with proven, current reviews and a broad feature set? Or are you comfortable with a solution that is less documented and has a narrower focus?
If your hotel prioritizes a solution with a proven track record in North and South America and features like mobile check-in and digital keys, roommaster could be suitable — but be aware of its limited recent feedback. However, if you need a platform that’s used by over 1,000 hotels globally, offers comprehensive guest engagement features, and has strong recent reviews, STAY is clearly the safer bet.
Hotels seeking a solution to streamline operations, improve guest satisfaction, and implement a broad range of digital services should lean toward STAY. If your hotel is smaller, budget-conscious, or in regions where STAY's support network is limited, roommaster might still be worth considering, but its low review count makes this risky.
For hoteliers who want confidence backed by recent user experiences and extensive feature sets, STAY remains the more compelling choice.
roommaster’s usability is rated at 4.5/5, but reviews reveal that navigating the platform can be challenging without support guides, and users find the interface difficult to master. Customer support is noted as sometimes hard to reach, especially during critical check-in times.
In contrast, STAY’s interface is praised for its intuitiveness, with a 4.78/5 ease-of-use rating based on 206 reviews. Many users highlight its straightforward CMS and simple implementation process, with onboarding rated at 4.63/5. Support is consistently praised for responsiveness, even though some users note limited phone support.
Edge: STAY.
roommaster offers two exclusive features: mobile check-in and payments, which are valuable but standard. STAY, on the other hand, boasts nine features not available in roommaster, including chatbots, automated replies, message routing, web app, local recommendations, hotel directory, app download, and multi-lingual automatic translations.
This broader feature set in STAY enables more comprehensive guest interactions, automation, and personalization. Its capabilities facilitate smoother operations, better guest communication, and multilingual support, which are increasingly vital for international guests.
Edge: STAY.
roommaster’s customer support scores 4.5/5, but reviews indicate issues with availability and difficulty in contact during urgent situations. Support is described as knowledgeable but occasionally slow to respond, especially outside of normal business hours.
STAY’s customer support is rated slightly higher at 4.83/5, with reviews highlighting quick, helpful responses. Many users appreciate the proactive assistance and the support team’s ability to resolve issues efficiently, even if some note the absence of 24/7 phone support.
Edge: STAY.
roommaster’s platform integrates with 56 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and Amadeus. STAY integrates with 20 verified partners, including popular systems such as Mews, Hotelkit, and Civitfun.
While roommaster offers more total integrations, STAY’s focus on seamless internal system connections, especially with PMS and CRM, enhances its utility for modern hotels that prioritize streamlined data flow and automation.
Edge: roommaster.
Given the limited reviews for roommaster, with only two from the last six months, its ratings offer minimal confidence. The reviews are mostly positive but sparse, and the overall rating is 0/5, which could be outdated or unrepresentative.
STAY, with 206 reviews and a recent rating of 3/5, provides a clearer picture of user satisfaction. Most reviews praise its operational benefits, ease of use, and impact on guest satisfaction, making it the more reliable product for current hotel needs.
Edge: STAY.
roommaster’s base price starts at $1,000, with no freemium options or monthly per-room fees. The absence of detailed pricing tiers suggests a premium, possibly rigid model.
STAY charges $300 as a base price, with no ongoing fees or trial options, making it more accessible, especially for smaller or budget-conscious hotels. Its clear, transparent pricing offers easier budget planning.
Edge: STAY.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in scope: roommaster offers a straightforward, long-established mobile check-in solution, while STAY provides an all-encompassing Guest Experience OS that modern hotels increasingly demand.
If your hotel values a broad feature set, recent positive reviews, and ease of implementation, STAY is the clear choice. Its extensive integrations, superior user ratings, and active customer support make it the safer investment for your team.
Choose roommaster if your needs are limited to basic mobile check-in and digital keys, and if your hotel’s regional focus aligns with its strong presence in the Americas. Its lower cost and familiar brand might appeal to smaller or regional properties.
For most hotels aiming to improve guest engagement and operational efficiency with confidence, STAY delivers a more comprehensive, well-reviewed, and future-proof solution.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $300/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,roommaster Guest App 和 STAY Guest App 共享 5 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 付款 | ||
| 当地推荐 | ||
| 手机值机 | ||
| 消息路由 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 自动回复 |
我们分析了 9 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Beginning of each shift, our staff pulls up the dashboard which gives the arrivals, the checkouts, the list of who’s coming in, how many rooms we have as far as dirty, clean, out o..."
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。roommaster Guest App 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。roommaster Guest App 提供 56 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.5/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
roommaster Guest App:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。roommaster 的 HT Score 为 0,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问