The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 473 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
roommaster 表现出色 在 客户支持 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (5.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Revenue Management Module.
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Ancillary revenue tracking and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 473 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $500/mo | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 102 | 371 |
在分析了 473 条经验证的评价后,roommaster 用户最看重其 客户支持, 集中式数据管理, 云和移动访问,而 Stayntouch 用户则强调 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户支持
▾
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
+
集中式数据管理
▾
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
+
云和移动访问
▾
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
+
Ampliphi 的定价建议
▾
|
+
云和移动集成
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告生成
▾
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
−
用户界面体验
▾
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
−
团体预订功能
▾
|
−
费率和收益管理
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #30 26 条评价 | #18 51 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #13 54 条评价 | #5 208 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #31 3 条评价 | #7 29 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #32 1 条评价 | #2 58 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #22 35 条评价 | #6 220 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #34 8 条评价 | #6 180 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #24 15 条评价 | #3 152 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #27 6 条评价 | #14 17 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #10 62 条评价 | #4 262 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #29 11 条评价 | #12 64 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #21 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | #27 0 条评价 | — |
Choosing between Roommaster PMS by Roommaster and Stayntouch requires understanding their core strengths and differences. Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations, but they serve different hotel profiles and operational needs. With Roommaster’s longer history and larger user base, it’s seen as a traditional backbone for independent hotels. Stayntouch, on the other hand, is a modern, cloud-native platform that excels in scalability and ease of use. Which one aligns best with your hotel’s priorities?
Roommaster provides extensive features built for complex, multi-property management, but its user interface and recent reviews suggest it may lag behind Stayntouch in modern usability. Conversely, Stayntouch’s higher ratings, recent reviews, and focus on mobile and guest-centric features make it a compelling choice. Are you prioritizing deep operational features or seamless guest experiences?
Both systems serve the property management landscape but diverge significantly in approach and focus. Roommaster, established in 1994, offers a feature-rich, traditional platform with strong data integration, accounting, and operational modules, primarily targeting independent, boutique, and resort hotels. Its 83 reviews reflect a solid, long-term presence, but recent feedback indicates some users find the interface clunky and slow.
Stayntouch, founded in 2012, boasts over 317 reviews and a higher recent NPS score of 9.35/10, indicating strong current customer satisfaction. Its cloud-first design prioritizes ease of use, mobile accessibility, and guest engagement, with a 4.56/5 overall rating. Hoteliers favor Stayntouch’s modern workflow and rapid onboarding, yet it has fewer features than Roommaster, especially around native POS and detailed accounting.
Are you looking for a traditional system with extensive integrations or a modern platform designed for guest experience and scalability?
If your hotel operates across multiple properties, values mobile access, and wants rapid onboarding, Stayntouch is the clear choice. Its 91% likelihood to recommend and more recent reviews underscore its user-friendly nature and customer satisfaction, especially among boutique and branded hotels.
If your hotel needs comprehensive operational features, including native POS, revenue management, and extensive reporting, Roommaster’s 18 exclusive features and longstanding reputation make it suitable. It’s better suited for hotels with complex workflows, larger portfolios, or a preference for a traditional software approach. Hoteliers looking for quick adoption and modern guest features should favor Stayntouch, while those prioritizing operational depth and customization should consider Roommaster.
Which aligns better with your hotel’s strategic goals?
According to recent reviews, Stayntouch’s user interface scores a 4.7/5, with users calling it “intuitive,” “easy to learn,” and “mobile-friendly.” The onboarding process is also rated at 4.58/5, reflecting rapid staff adaptation and positive initial experience.
Roommaster’s ease of use scores 4.22/5, with users describing the platform as “easy to train staff on” but noting some interface clunkiness and slowness, especially in report generation and account management. Support access over the phone is limited, which can hinder quick issue resolution.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Roommaster offers 60+ features, including native email marketing, multi-currency management, channel management, booking engine, POS, revenue management, guest CRM, gift vouchers, and housekeeping modules. Its deep integration capabilities and modules like pricing intelligence and group booking engine are tailored for complex operations.
Stayntouch provides 49 features, with unique offerings like tablet/kiosk check-in, housekeeping mobile app, and multi-lingual support. Its open APIs and unlimited interfaces facilitate integrations, but it lacks some native modules like revenue management and advanced POS.
Edge: Roommaster.
Stayntouch’s support scores a 4.68/5, with reviews praising “excellent,” “supportive,” and “friendly” service. Many users highlight its quick response times, especially during onboarding and training, emphasizing the value of ongoing support.
Roommaster’s support is rated slightly lower at 4.25/5, with some reviews citing inconsistent responsiveness and limited help over the phone. While the platform’s support is generally positive, recent feedback indicates room for improvement in issue resolution speed.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Roommaster boasts 56 verified partners, including major systems like Sage, Volo, and Oracle Hospitality, offering extensive native and third-party integrations. It’s well-suited for hotels needing deep, tailored system connections.
Stayntouch has 188 verified partners, with notable integrations including RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and other global distribution and revenue tools, often at no extra cost. Its open API approach allows for flexible, extensive third-party connections, supporting modern tech stacks.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s reviews, totaling 317, are more recent, with a high overall rating of 4.56/5 and a 94% recommendation rate. Hoteliers consistently praise its ease of use, mobile capabilities, and onboarding support, with comments like “intuitive,” “supportive,” and “quick to adopt.”
Roommaster, with 83 reviews, has a slightly lower rating of 4.33/5. Feedback often focuses on its operational depth but notes that the interface can feel dated and less user-friendly compared to Stayntouch.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Roommaster’s pricing starts at $500 per month, with no freemium options, trial, or implementation fees. It’s a straightforward subscription for its extensive feature set, which may be more cost-effective for larger operations.
Stayntouch’s base price is $800 per month, also without freemium or trial options. Its higher cost reflects its modern features, cloud infrastructure, and extensive third-party integrations, making it a premium choice for scalable hotels.
Are you willing to pay more for mobility and ease of use, or prefer a lower-cost, feature-rich traditional system?
Roommaster offers a traditional, feature-rich system ideal for large, complex hotel operations needing deep customization. It excels in multi-property management, native modules, and data control, making it suitable for resorts, chains, and independent hotels with advanced operational needs.
Stayntouch, with its high user ratings and modern cloud architecture, serves hotels that value guest engagement, mobile flexibility, and quick staff onboarding. Its integrations and guest-centric features make it ideal for boutique hotels, branded properties, and hotels prioritizing modern guest experiences.
For operational depth and extensive integrations, choose Roommaster. For ease of use, scalability, and guest technology, opt for Stayntouch. Which fits your hotel’s strategic focus?
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,roommaster PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享 42 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 物业管理系统 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 13 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 9 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的... 虽然有些用户体验到了优质的客户支持,但也有一些用户反映服务存在不一致之处。他们认为,需要提升客服人员的专业水平和对用户问题的理解,才能提供更令人满意的服务体验。
预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配... 预订管理被认为是RoomMaster的一大优势,用户普遍认为它操作简便、高效,能够妥善管理包括团体预订在内的各种预订。然而,部分用户也指出,RoomMaster在房间分配列表和团体入住登记方面仍有改进空间。
RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全... RoomMaster从分散的人工操作方式转向集中式数据管理,因其减少错误、提高酒店运营可靠性而备受赞誉。用户非常欣赏将所有预订、宾客信息和财务数据集中在一个安全平台上的做法,这显著提升了工作流程效率。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
RoomMaster的报告生成功能虽然实用,但仍被认为有待改进。用户希望在创建和导出报告方面获得更高的效率和效果,这表明改进功能可以简化分析任务。
一些用户指出需要改进用户体验,尤其强调需要消除重复性任务,例如频繁登录,这会影响日常使用该软件的流畅性。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。roommaster PMS 和 Stayntouch 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。roommaster PMS 提供 56 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Stayntouch 提供 187 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Stayntouch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.1/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
roommaster PMS:否。Stayntouch:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。roommaster 的 HT Score 为 84,Stayntouch 的为 91。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问