The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 243 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
RoomRaccoon 表现出色 在 用户界面和体验 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.1/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Mobile App.
Shiji Group 表现出色 在 易于使用 方面 ,拥有独特功能如 Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
基于 HTR 上 243 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $1,000/mo | From $1,200/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 209 | 34 |
在分析了 243 条经验证的评价后,RoomRaccoon 用户最看重其 用户界面和体验, 一体化系统, 自动发送电子邮件和文档,而 Shiji Group 用户则强调 易于使用, 支持团队, 执行。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户界面和体验
▾
|
+
易于使用
▾
|
|
+
一体化系统
▾
|
+
支持团队
▾
|
|
+
自动发送电子邮件和文档
▾
|
+
执行
▾
|
|
+
培训材料
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
服务和支持
▾
|
−
系统速度
▾
|
|
−
集成限制
▾
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
−
系统错误和稳定性问题
▾
|
−
房间分配及状态
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #10 90 条评价 | #53 2 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #17 27 条评价 | #31 17 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #14 7 条评价 | #11 13 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #19 0 条评价 | #22 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #9 100 条评价 | #33 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #9 64 条评价 | #24 25 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #14 29 条评价 | #22 19 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #7 28 条评价 | #45 2 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #24 7 条评价 | #33 4 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #5 123 条评价 | #30 8 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #31 4 条评价 | #14 5 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #31 1 条评价 | #5 14 条评价 |
Choosing between RoomRaccoon PMS and Shiji Daylight PMS hinges on your hotel’s size, management style, and operational needs. Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations and improve guest experiences but do so through different approaches and feature sets. While RoomRaccoon is tailored primarily for small to boutique hotels with a focus on user-friendliness, Shiji's platform caters to a broader range, including larger hotel groups with complex needs. Do you need a straightforward, all-in-one solution, or a scalable, feature-rich platform?
RoomRaccoon offers an intuitive, all-in-one PMS, channel manager, and booking engine designed for small to independent hotels, with a focus on ease of use and quick onboarding. Shiji, on the other hand, provides a comprehensive, cloud-native solution that centralizes data across multiple properties, making it suitable for larger chains and hotels seeking extensive automation and integration options. Both systems aim to reduce manual work, but RoomRaccoon emphasizes simplicity and speed, while Shiji prioritizes scalability and detailed management.
Recent reviews heavily favor RoomRaccoon, with over 160 reviews in the last six months, compared to just 32 reviews for Shiji, indicating more current user feedback. This recent activity translates to more up-to-date insights into performance, support, and feature satisfaction, making RoomRaccoon’s evaluation more reliable. Are you prioritizing a platform backed by active, recent user feedback, or are you willing to consider a more complex, enterprise-oriented system?
If your hotel is an independent boutique or small property seeking a simple, integrated platform to manage reservations, automate guest communications, and boost direct bookings, go with RoomRaccoon. Its user-friendly interface, quick onboarding, and strong automation features are ideal for hotels with limited IT resources or staff. Conversely, if your hotel is part of a larger group, or you need a system capable of managing multiple properties with advanced automation, detailed reporting, and extensive integrations, Shiji is the better choice.
RoomRaccoon’s 4.88/5 overall rating and high user satisfaction reflect its suitability for smaller operators. Shiji’s broader feature set suits hotels requiring complex operations but comes with a steeper learning curve and less recent positive reviews, suggesting it’s better suited for larger, tech-savvy teams. Which profile best matches your hotel’s scale and sophistication?
RoomRaccoon boasts a 4.74/5 ease-of-use rating, with reviewers praising its intuitive interface, straightforward onboarding, and simple navigation that makes daily tasks faster. Shiji’s ease of use is slightly lower at 4.63/5 but remains highly rated, supported by comprehensive training materials and accessible interfaces that reduce the learning curve for new staff. Both platforms receive praise for their support teams, but RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews highlight quicker onboarding and fewer usability complaints.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers 17 features exclusive to its platform, including a built-in channel manager, revenue management, guest CRM, mobile app, and a booking engine—all designed for small hotels to operate efficiently. Shiji provides 64 features, including advanced modules like task management, digital registration, housekeeping, group booking, and more, catering to larger, multi-property portfolios needing detailed operational tools.
While Shiji’s feature set is more extensive, RoomRaccoon’s unique offerings are well-aligned with small hotel needs, promoting simplicity and automation. If you value a focused, easy-to-implement system, RoomRaccoon’s features are more relevant. For comprehensive multi-property management, Shiji’s broader capabilities are advantageous.
Edge: Shiji Group.
RoomRaccoon’s support ratings are slightly higher at 4.53/5, with recent reviews praising their responsiveness and helpfulness. Users mention that despite some delays, support agents are eager to assist, and onboarding materials are clear and effective.
Shiji also scores 4.53/5, with users appreciating their professional, knowledgeable support team and comprehensive training resources. However, given the higher volume of recent reviews for RoomRaccoon, the current user sentiment favors their support team.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon integrates with 88 verified partners, including key hospitality systems like SiteMinder, Sage, and Paxxio, with 19 shared partners with Shiji. It offers integrations with property systems, payment providers, and marketing tools, making it flexible for small to mid-sized hotels.
Shiji has 64 verified partners with many industry giants like Amadeus, Goki, and Onity, but fewer integrations overall. For hotels prioritizing a broad ecosystem of integrations and flexibility, RoomRaccoon’s larger partner network provides more options.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon enjoys a 4.88/5 overall rating from 169 reviews, with recent reviews highlighting its ease of use, strong automation, and revenue improvements. Smaller hotels and boutique operators particularly praise its simplicity and support, often noting that it exceeds expectations.
Shiji’s rating is approximately 75/100 based on limited data, with reviews emphasizing its versatility but also pointing out performance issues and a steeper learning curve. Given the volume and recency of reviews, RoomRaccoon’s user ratings are more representative of current satisfaction.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s pricing is $1,000/month with no additional implementation fees or trial options. Shiji’s platform costs $1,200/month, also without trial or implementation fees, making the pricing quite comparable.
Despite similar base costs, the value depends on features and scalability. For small hotels, RoomRaccoon’s lower complexity and proven ROI may offer better value; larger operations might find Shiji’s extensive features justify the higher investment.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
RoomRaccoon is a streamlined, all-in-one PMS designed for small hotels, boutique properties, and independent operators. Its recent review activity, high overall rating, and ease of use make it a reliable choice for those prioritizing simplicity and automation.
Shiji offers a broader, more customizable platform suitable for large hotel groups or properties with complex operational requirements. Its extensive feature set and robust integrations make it ideal for scaled operations but may overwhelm smaller teams.
Choose RoomRaccoon if your hotel values quick deployment, ease, and automation; opt for Shiji if your needs extend to multi-property management with detailed operational controls. For most small hotels and independents, RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews and higher overall rating tip the scales in its favor.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $1,200/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,RoomRaccoon PMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享 34 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 任务管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 宾客资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助值机 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 集中用户和角色管理 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 频道管理员 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 69 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 12 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用... 许多用户认为 RoomRaccoon 的用户界面直观易学,简化了日常操作和新员工入职培训。不过,也有改进建议,尤其是针对移动和平板电脑版本的系统,以进一步提高可用性。
RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强... RoomRaccoon 用户称赞该平台的一体化特性,它集成了预订引擎、渠道管理器、PMS 和会计功能。这种整合有助于简化操作并消除对多个软件解决方案的需求。许多评论强调此功能如何节省时间并使管理更加轻松。
酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞... 酒店经营者认为自动电子邮件和文档功能特别有价值,并指出它可以节省时间并增强与客人的沟通。自动发票和入住前/入住后电子邮件是经常被提及的好处。用户还称赞这些自动化功能的自定义选项。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉... 虽然有些用户赞赏个别客户支持代理的帮助,但许多评论都批评 RoomRaccoon 支持团队的可用性和响应能力。问题解决时间过长,尤其是在关键运营期间,是常见的投诉。
一些评论指出,RoomRaccoon 与其他系统(如支付网关(Stripe、会计软件)和 OTA)的集成存在局限性。用户表示希望实现更无缝的集成,以避免手动工作和额外费用。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞石基 PMS 的用户界面友好,简化了日常操作,降低了新用户的学习难度。评论中强调了其易用性,指出其培训材料易懂、设计直观、任务执行高效。
石基PMS支持团队的支持和响应能力一直受到好评。用户赞赏支持人员的专业性和乐于助人的精神,这对更顺利地运营有很大帮助。
一些评论者认为石基 PMS 的实施过程流畅高效,他们赞赏知识渊博、积极主动的实施团队。不过,一些用户建议缩短实施时间以进一步改善体验。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
尽管石基 PMS 的详细报告功能广受好评,但一些用户仍希望获得更先进、更快速的报告工具。具体要求包括增强的汇总报告、详细的账单和更快的报告生成流程。
与系统速度和一致性相关的性能问题是用户普遍关心的问题,一些用户指出在高峰操作期间响应时间很慢。用户敦促提高系统速度以提高整体效率。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。RoomRaccoon PMS 和 Shiji Daylight PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。RoomRaccoon PMS 提供 88 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Shiji Daylight PMS 提供 64 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。RoomRaccoon PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
RoomRaccoon PMS:否。Shiji Daylight PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。RoomRaccoon 的 HT Score 为 80,Shiji Group 的为 75。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问