The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 支付处理软件 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 | AsiaPay |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | — | #2 27 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | — | #3 12 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | — | #3 2 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 | AsiaPay |
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | — | #3 17 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | — | #3 15 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | — | #3 25 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | — | #1 9 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 | AsiaPay |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | — | #3 51 条评价 |
| 亚太 | — | #3 0 条评价 |
| 中东 | — | #2 1 条评价 |
When evaluating payment processing software for your hotel, the core question is which platform offers better reliability, features, and support to meet your operational needs. AsiaPay by AsiaPay by AsiaPay aims to provide a comprehensive payment solution, but its lack of recent reviews and features limits its credibility. Zil Money, on the other hand, is actively reviewed, boasting a broad feature set and a strong user base, making it the more compelling choice for hoteliers seeking dependable payment management.
Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize recent performance data and an extensive feature catalog or are still weighing the basics. Given the current review landscape and feature availability, Zil Money emerges as the more trustworthy option.
AsiaPay has been around for years, but it has no recent reviews or user feedback, raising questions about ongoing support and product evolution. Conversely, Zil Money has zero ratings but 54 reviews, all within the last six months, with an 87% likelihood of recommendation—indicating lively, recent user validation.
Both aim to serve hotel payment needs, but AsiaPay’s absence of recent data makes it hard to evaluate its current performance. Zil Money’s active feedback and high satisfaction scores suggest it’s better aligned with modern hotel operations.
If your hotel requires a reliable, easy-to-use platform with extensive functionalities—such as multi-currency settlements, contactless payments, and integrations—Zil Money is the clear choice. Its strong reviews, ease of onboarding (4.16/5), and high customer support ratings (4.5/5) make it well-suited for hotels prioritizing efficiency and responsiveness.
If, however, your hotel seeks a traditional, possibly more established payment solution without immediate need for advanced features, AsiaPay might seem appealing. Still, with zero recent reviews or user validation, it’s hard to confirm whether it can meet your current demands.
Zil Money excels in usability, with a 4.5/5 ease of use rating based on recent reviews. Users find its interface intuitive, and onboarding is smooth, supported by a 4.16/5 onboarding score. Feedback emphasizes how quickly teams adapt to its platform, reducing setup time.
AsiaPay, on the other hand, has a zero/5 rating for ease of use, reflecting a lack of recent user feedback or evidence of a user-friendly experience. Its unclear interface and onboarding process make it less appealing.
Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money offers 15 unique features, including pay-by-link, recurring payments, multi-currency settlements, contactless payments, PayPal acceptance, and payment splitting—features that can significantly streamline hotel transactions. AsiaPay, in contrast, does not list any exclusive features, indicating a minimal feature set or limited public documentation.
The richness of Zil Money’s feature set makes it better suited for hotels that need flexible, modern payment options. AsiaPay’s lack of documented features leaves its capabilities uncertain.
Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money’s recent reviews highlight support rated 4.5/5, with comments praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Users mention that customer support is reliable and quick to resolve issues, which is critical for hotel operations.
AsiaPay has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge support quality. This lack of recent feedback suggests its support may be untested or less effective currently.
Edge: Zil Money.
AsiaPay has one verified partner—Yanolja Cloud Solution—limiting its integration options. Zil Money offers no verified partners but supports API access, allowing customization and potential third-party integrations.
While AsiaPay’s limited integrations could restrict your hotel’s connectivity, Zil Money’s open API offers future flexibility, making it more adaptable as your technology ecosystem grows.
Edge: Zil Money.
Zil Money’s recent reviews, with an 87% likelihood to recommend, indicate high satisfaction among users, including hotels across different segments. AsiaPay’s absence of recent reviews prevents meaningful comparison.
Given the active, positive feedback, Zil Money is clearly rated higher by the hotel industry.
Edge: Zil Money.
AsiaPay does not disclose its pricing model, leaving hotels uncertain about costs. Zil Money charges a $400 base price, with no hidden fees, and offers a 15-day free trial, giving you a chance to test its capabilities before committing.
This transparent pricing structure makes Zil Money more accessible for hotels evaluating total cost of ownership.
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that:
Not ideal if:
Zil Money is a modern, actively supported platform with a broad feature set, making it suitable for hotels seeking versatility and reliability. AsiaPay, while possibly established, lacks recent customer feedback and detailed features, raising doubts about its current effectiveness.
Choose Zil Money if you want a user-friendly, comprehensive payment solution proven by recent reviews and high hotel satisfaction. Opt for AsiaPay only if your hotel’s needs are minimal, and support or recent data is less critical.
In conclusion, Zil Money’s active reviews and extensive features position it as the more dependable option for hotels looking to upgrade or implement a new payment processing system today.
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
用户经常称赞 Zil Money 的直观界面,简化了发票、费用跟踪和其他财务任务。该平台的易用性缩短了入门时间并提高了运营效率。
一些评论表明,客户体验的一些细微改进,例如简化验证流程和减少设置时间,可以使平台更加高效和用户友好。
许多用户强调了 Zil Money 支付处理功能的速度和可靠性,这确保了及时交易并支持酒店的现金流管理。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
用户看重Zil Money与各种会计和财务软件无缝集成的能力,这有助于整合财务运营并提高效率。
用户建议扩大与更多第三方应用程序的集成,这将提供更多的灵活性和定制性,满足不同的业务需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。SiamPay by Asiapay 和 Zil Money 共享许多核心 Payments Processing Software 功能,但各有独特的能力。SiamPay by Asiapay 提供 1 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Zil Money 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Zil Money 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.5/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
SiamPay by Asiapay:否。Zil Money:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Payments Processing Software 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。AsiaPay 的 HT Score 为 0,Zil Money 的为 63。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问