项目面板是一款免费工具,仅向已认证的酒店从业者开放。它通过简化调研流程和沟通环节,让采用新技术变得更轻松。
在分析了 1,479 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 培训、易用性和入职, 支持响应能力和人工协助, 日历和预订可见性,而 Sirvoy 用户则强调 客户支持和在线聊天, 易于使用且设置简单, booking and reservation management。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
培训、易用性和入职
▾
|
+
客户支持和在线聊天
▾
|
|
+
支持响应能力和人工协助
▾
|
+
易于使用且设置简单
▾
|
|
+
日历和预订可见性
▾
|
+
Booking and reservation management
▾
|
|
+
报告与分析
▾
|
+
Channel manager and OTA connectivity
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
账单、发票和账单处理
▾
|
−
定制化和特定属性的灵活性
▾
|
|
−
移动应用限制
▾
|
−
定价、费率、折扣和收益管理
▾
|
|
−
账单、发票和付款
▾
|
|
各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店运营软件(PMS) 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #1 592 条评价 | #22 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 212 条评价 | #48 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #5 42 条评价 | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) | #13 4 条评价 | #27 1 条评价 |
按酒店类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 473 条评价 | #29 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 228 条评价 | #37 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 116 条评价 | #42 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #2 93 条评价 | #35 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #2 435 条评价 | #23 16 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #7 163 条评价 | #16 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #3 226 条评价 | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #7 11 条评价 | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and Sirvoy requires evaluating how each system addresses your hotel’s operational needs. Cloudbeds is a comprehensive platform that combines property management, channel management, and revenue tools, designed to serve ambitious properties seeking growth. Sirvoy, on the other hand, is an easier-to-use, budget-friendly solution aimed at small to medium-sized accommodation providers.
Both products aim to streamline your workflows, but Cloudbeds offers more extensive features and integrations, especially for larger or rapidly expanding properties. Do you prioritize a fully integrated experience with advanced tools, or is simplicity and affordability more important for your current stage?
Cloudbeds and Sirvoy both aim to simplify hotel operations and improve guest management, but they diverge significantly in scope. Cloudbeds offers a unified platform with 21 features exclusive to its system, including revenue management, digital registration, and extensive integrations, while Sirvoy provides core property management, booking, and channel management features with a straightforward interface.
Cloudbeds’s reviews highlight its ability to connect operations, distribution, and revenue strategies effectively, with a 4.63/5 overall rating based on over 1,000 reviews, mostly recent. Sirvoy’s user base is smaller, with around 95 reviews, and it’s rated at 83.93, but it boasts a higher customer support score of 4.85/5. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s growth ambitions and technological complexity?
If your hotel is a boutique property, hostel, or a small operation prioritizing ease of use and budget, Sirvoy’s simple interface, competitive price of $200/month, and excellent support make it a suitable choice. It’s especially handy if your team needs straightforward reservation and channel management without complex revenue tools.
Conversely, if your hotel is aiming to scale, innovate, and optimize revenue, Cloudbeds’s extensive feature set—such as revenue management, automated night audits, and a mobile app—justifies its $600/month cost. Its 190 verified partners and global reach also support larger or multi-property operations seeking advanced integrations.
In summary, choose Sirvoy for basic, cost-effective management; opt for Cloudbeds if you need a full-fledged platform that drives growth and efficiency.
Both platforms are highly rated for ease of use, with Cloudbeds at 4.61/5 and Sirvoy at 4.64/5. Cloudbeds’s onboarding score of 4.45/5 reflects its user-friendly interface, and many reviews praise its intuitive design for reservation workflows and daily operations.
Sirvoy’s support and setup are consistently described as excellent, with a focus on simplicity for new users. Users note that Sirvoy’s straightforward interface and dedicated support make onboarding smooth, especially for smaller teams unfamiliar with complex PMS systems.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Cloudbeds clearly offers more features, with 43 shared plus 21 exclusive functionalities, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, 2-way real-time integrations, and ancillary revenue tools. It also includes modules like digital registration, guest apps, shift planning, and spa/wellness management—features that Sirvoy does not provide.
Sirvoy focuses on core reservation and channel management, with limited extras, mainly handling booking, payment, and basic guest management. For hotels seeking advanced revenue tools, automation, and operational control, Cloudbeds is the superior choice.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s support rating is 4.41/5, with reviews mentioning responsive, helpful support but also some comments about setup complexity. Support responsiveness is generally good, especially during onboarding, but some users note that advanced customization can require support assistance.
Sirvoy outperforms with a 4.85/5 rating, with reviewers describing their support as “excellent,” “quick,” and “thorough.” Many users praise the prompt and friendly assistance, making it ideal for small teams or properties new to PMS systems.
Edge: Sirvoy.
Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major platforms like TrustYou, SiteMinder, and TripAdvisor, along with exclusive integrations such as EPoS, revenue management, and digital registration. Its extensive marketplace supports scalable, customized setups.
Sirvoy has 21 verified integrations, primarily with major OTAs like Booking.com and Expedia, plus GDS and TripAdvisor. While sufficient for basic needs, it offers fewer options for advanced or niche integrations.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds’s overall rating of 4.63/5 reflects broad satisfaction, especially among larger properties and those seeking growth tools. Recent reviews praise its ability to streamline operations, increase bookings, and support complex workflows.
Sirvoy’s rating of 83.93/100 is strong among small accommodation providers, with many recent support reviews praising its simplicity and affordability. Hoteliers with basic needs and limited budgets tend to rate Sirvoy highly but generally do not rate it on advanced features.
Edge: Cloudbeds.
Cloudbeds charges $600/month, with no free trial or freemium option. It offers an all-in-one platform with extensive features, making it more expensive but more comprehensive.
Sirvoy costs $200/month, with a 30-day trial. Its lower price appeals to small properties with limited budgets, but some users note that costs can increase as they add more channels or features.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds is a comprehensive hotel management system designed for ambitious properties ready to scale. Its extensive features and integrations support growth, revenue optimization, and operational efficiency, making it ideal for larger or expanding hotels.
Sirvoy excels as a straightforward, cost-effective solution suited for small properties and hostels that need simple reservation and channel management. Its intuitive interface and high support ratings provide peace of mind for teams new to PMS software.
If your hotel aims to grow, automate, and maximize revenue, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. If affordability and ease of use are your priorities, Sirvoy is the practical option.
这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
会计与金融
|
|
|
| 直接计费 | ||
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
|
▾
营销与电子商务
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 预订引擎 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
管理和配置
|
|
|
| 集中的用户和角色管理 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 基于云 | ||
| 在前提 | ||
|
▾
用户管理
|
|
|
| 访客通信(短信) | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
前台
|
|
|
| 移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本) | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动夜间审计 | ||
| 日历视图 | ||
| 多种语言 | ||
| 任务管理 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 客人资料 | ||
| 平板电脑/自助服务终端值机 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
| 集中消息传递 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
群组管理
|
|
|
| 组功能 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
|
▾
宾客体验
|
|
|
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 | ||
| 数字注册 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 网上值机 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 大堂售货亭 | ||
|
▾
家政
|
|
|
| 管家模块 | ||
| 家政移动应用程序 | ||
| 实时状态更新 | ||
| 自动分配 | ||
| 实时报告 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
|
▾
付款
|
|
|
| 集成支付终端和读卡器 | ||
| 直接计费 | ||
| 多币种 | ||
| 交付过程 | ||
| 付款请求 | ||
|
▾
预订管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 频道管理员 | ||
| 综合 CRS | ||
| 拖放磁带图 | ||
| 费率管理 | ||
| 自动空间优化 | ||
| 基于规则的房间分配 | ||
| 交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等) | ||
|
▾
收入管理
|
|
|
| RevPaR 和 ADR 报告 | ||
| 自定义费率 | ||
| 辅助收入跟踪 | ||
| 收益管理模块 | ||
| 基本定价 | ||
|
▾
税务与合规
|
|
|
| 符合 PCI 标准 | ||
| 符合 GDPR | ||
| SOC2 投诉 | ||
| 税务配置 | ||
|
▾
支持与培训
|
|
|
| 在线 24/7 支持 | ||
|
▾
食品与饮料
|
|
|
| EPoS | ||
|
▾
温泉
|
|
|
| 水疗和健康模块 |
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Cloudbeds 常被描述为直观且易于学习,这减少了新员工的培训时间,并帮助酒店快速采用系统。评论者也重视教程、大学资源和入职帮助,尽管一些人要求重新培训或获... Cloudbeds 常被描述为直观且易于学习,这减少了新员工的培训时间,并帮助酒店快速采用系统。评论者也重视教程、大学资源和入职帮助,尽管一些人要求重新培训或获得更深入的高级功能指导。
支持是一个主要主题,许多用户赞扬在能够联系到人工时获得的快速帮助和知识丰富的客服。最常见的抱怨是依赖聊天机器人/电子邮件工作流程以及缓慢的升级处理,这... 支持是一个主要主题,许多用户赞扬在能够联系到人工时获得的快速帮助和知识丰富的客服。最常见的抱怨是依赖聊天机器人/电子邮件工作流程以及缓慢的升级处理,这对于可能影响客人体验和收入的紧急前台问题来说是有问题的。
用户反复表示 Cloudbeds 的日历是产品中最清晰的部分,为前台团队提供快速查看入住情况、房型、预订状态和每日预订的功能。它帮助酒店更高效地管理入住、退房、... 用户反复表示 Cloudbeds 的日历是产品中最清晰的部分,为前台团队提供快速查看入住情况、房型、预订状态和每日预订的功能。它帮助酒店更高效地管理入住、退房、拆分住宿和房间变更,减少繁忙操作中的错误。
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
审阅者经常提到发票模板、收据、账单审核以及集中式客人账单对于日常运营和客人退房的帮助。同时,添加额外项目的账单流程可能操作繁琐,一些用户希望在Cloudbed... 审阅者经常提到发票模板、收据、账单审核以及集中式客人账单对于日常运营和客人退房的帮助。同时,添加额外项目的账单流程可能操作繁琐,一些用户希望在Cloudbeds中拥有更强的税务、货币和会计处理功能,而不是使用单独的系统。
一个常见的批评是移动应用缺乏足够的操作深度,无法满足移动工作人员的需求。评论者希望在应用中直接进行预订创建、可用性管理、通知、日历访问等操作,而无需切... 一个常见的批评是移动应用缺乏足够的操作深度,无法满足移动工作人员的需求。评论者希望在应用中直接进行预订创建、可用性管理、通知、日历访问等操作,而无需切换到电子邮件或桌面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店经营者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy 的客户支持是其最显著的优势之一,用户对其快速响应、专业客服人员和真人在线聊天服务赞不绝口。许多评论指出,这种支持服务帮助他们快速解决问题、熟悉... Sirvoy 的客户支持是其最显著的优势之一,用户对其快速响应、专业客服人员和真人在线聊天服务赞不绝口。许多评论指出,这种支持服务帮助他们快速解决问题、熟悉系统,并避免系统宕机或代价高昂的错误。
用户反复表示,Sirvoy 易于上手、配置快捷、日常管理也十分便捷,即使是缺乏技术经验的业主也能轻松使用。评论者尤其赞赏它能减少培训时间和操作繁琐步骤,对于... 用户反复表示,Sirvoy 易于上手、配置快捷、日常管理也十分便捷,即使是缺乏技术经验的业主也能轻松使用。评论者尤其赞赏它能减少培训时间和操作繁琐步骤,对于小型物业和初次使用物业管理系统 (PMS) 的用户来说更是如此。
Reviewers consistently rely on Sirvoy to manage reservations, availability, and day-to-day booking workflows with less manual effort. They say it help... Reviewers consistently rely on Sirvoy to manage reservations, availability, and day-to-day booking workflows with less manual effort. They say it helps keep the calendar organized, simplifies handling room inventory, and makes it easier to run the property without double bookings or confusion.
酒店经营者提出异议的方面
用户喜欢 Sirvoy 能够适应不同的酒店类型和工作流程,但他们经常要求增加更多可配置的字段、颜色、房间类型和显示选项。他们反复提到,该产品在简单的操作中表现... 用户喜欢 Sirvoy 能够适应不同的酒店类型和工作流程,但他们经常要求增加更多可配置的字段、颜色、房间类型和显示选项。他们反复提到,该产品在简单的操作中表现出色,但更灵活的设置将有助于那些拥有特殊套餐、家庭套房或独特预订规则的酒店。
大量评论都集中在定价控制方面,用户希望获得更好的工具来设置季节性价格、折扣、套餐和追加销售。虽然有些人欣赏这种灵活性,但也有人认为价格设置不够便捷或过... 大量评论都集中在定价控制方面,用户希望获得更好的工具来设置季节性价格、折扣、套餐和追加销售。虽然有些人欣赏这种灵活性,但也有人认为价格设置不够便捷或过于死板,这使得收益优化和附加产品销售比预期更加困难。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 200 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Cloudbeds PMS:否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Sirvoy 的为 90。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐