Cloudbeds PMS vs. Sirvoy: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 September 7, 2026  ·  已分析 1,411 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 1,411 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:

Cloudbeds 表现出色 在 ease of use and fast staff adoption 方面 — 尤其适合 independent 类型的物业 (4.6/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Revenue management module and Mobile App.

Sirvoy 表现出色 在 customer support 方面 .

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Cloudbeds PMS 与 Sirvoy 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 1,411 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
100
90
推荐可能性
91%
94%
易用性
4.6/5
4.7/5
客户支持
4.4/5
4.9/5
性价比
4.3/5
4.5/5
起始价格 From $600/mo From $200/mo
经验证的评价 1,265 146

Cloudbeds PMS 与 Sirvoy 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 1,411 条经验证的评价后,Cloudbeds 用户最看重其 ease of use and fast staff adoption, reporting and analytics, reservations and calendar workflow,而 Sirvoy 用户则强调 客户支持和在线聊天, 易于使用且设置简单, booking and reservation management。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Sirvoy Sirvoy
优点
+ Ease of use and fast staff adoption
+ 客户支持和在线聊天
+ Reporting and analytics
+ 易于使用且设置简单
+ Reservations and calendar workflow
+ Booking and reservation management
+ Channel management and OTA synchronization
+ Channel manager and OTA connectivity
缺点
客户支持和真人客服
定制化和特定属性的灵活性
Payments, billing, and invoicing
定价、费率、折扣和收益管理
Housekeeping, room status, and operational workflow
账单、发票和付款

Cloudbeds 对比 Sirvoy:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Sirvoy Sirvoy
小型(10-24 间客房) #1 592 条评价 #22 36 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) #4 212 条评价 #48 3 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) #5 42 条评价 #46 1 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) #13 4 条评价 #27 1 条评价

按物业类型

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Sirvoy Sirvoy
精品酒店 #2 473 条评价 #29 21 条评价
豪华酒店 #4 228 条评价 #37 7 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 #6 116 条评价 #42 4 条评价
长住酒店 #2 93 条评价 #35 3 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Sirvoy Sirvoy
北美 #2 435 条评价 #23 16 条评价
欧洲 #7 163 条评价 #16 31 条评价
亚太 #3 226 条评价 #13 6 条评价
中东 #7 11 条评价 #27 0 条评价

The Decision

Choosing between Cloudbeds PMS and Sirvoy requires evaluating how each system addresses your hotel’s operational needs. Cloudbeds is a comprehensive platform that combines property management, channel management, and revenue tools, designed to serve ambitious properties seeking growth. Sirvoy, on the other hand, is an easier-to-use, budget-friendly solution aimed at small to medium-sized accommodation providers.

Both products aim to streamline your workflows, but Cloudbeds offers more extensive features and integrations, especially for larger or rapidly expanding properties. Do you prioritize a fully integrated experience with advanced tools, or is simplicity and affordability more important for your current stage?

Is Cloudbeds or Sirvoy Better for Hotels?

Cloudbeds and Sirvoy both aim to simplify hotel operations and improve guest management, but they diverge significantly in scope. Cloudbeds offers a unified platform with 21 features exclusive to its system, including revenue management, digital registration, and extensive integrations, while Sirvoy provides core property management, booking, and channel management features with a straightforward interface.

Cloudbeds’s reviews highlight its ability to connect operations, distribution, and revenue strategies effectively, with a 4.63/5 overall rating based on over 1,000 reviews, mostly recent. Sirvoy’s user base is smaller, with around 95 reviews, and it’s rated at 83.93, but it boasts a higher customer support score of 4.85/5. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s growth ambitions and technological complexity?

Cloudbeds vs Sirvoy: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel is a boutique property, hostel, or a small operation prioritizing ease of use and budget, Sirvoy’s simple interface, competitive price of $200/month, and excellent support make it a suitable choice. It’s especially handy if your team needs straightforward reservation and channel management without complex revenue tools.

Conversely, if your hotel is aiming to scale, innovate, and optimize revenue, Cloudbeds’s extensive feature set—such as revenue management, automated night audits, and a mobile app—justifies its $600/month cost. Its 190 verified partners and global reach also support larger or multi-property operations seeking advanced integrations.

In summary, choose Sirvoy for basic, cost-effective management; opt for Cloudbeds if you need a full-fledged platform that drives growth and efficiency.

Is Cloudbeds or Sirvoy Easier to Use?

Both platforms are highly rated for ease of use, with Cloudbeds at 4.61/5 and Sirvoy at 4.64/5. Cloudbeds’s onboarding score of 4.45/5 reflects its user-friendly interface, and many reviews praise its intuitive design for reservation workflows and daily operations.

Sirvoy’s support and setup are consistently described as excellent, with a focus on simplicity for new users. Users note that Sirvoy’s straightforward interface and dedicated support make onboarding smooth, especially for smaller teams unfamiliar with complex PMS systems.

Edge: Sirvoy.

Which Has Better Features: Cloudbeds or Sirvoy?

Cloudbeds clearly offers more features, with 43 shared plus 21 exclusive functionalities, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, inventory management, 2-way real-time integrations, and ancillary revenue tools. It also includes modules like digital registration, guest apps, shift planning, and spa/wellness management—features that Sirvoy does not provide.

Sirvoy focuses on core reservation and channel management, with limited extras, mainly handling booking, payment, and basic guest management. For hotels seeking advanced revenue tools, automation, and operational control, Cloudbeds is the superior choice.

Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Cloudbeds or Sirvoy?

Cloudbeds’s support rating is 4.41/5, with reviews mentioning responsive, helpful support but also some comments about setup complexity. Support responsiveness is generally good, especially during onboarding, but some users note that advanced customization can require support assistance.

Sirvoy outperforms with a 4.85/5 rating, with reviewers describing their support as “excellent,” “quick,” and “thorough.” Many users praise the prompt and friendly assistance, making it ideal for small teams or properties new to PMS systems.

Edge: Sirvoy.

Which Has More Integrations: Cloudbeds or Sirvoy?

Cloudbeds boasts 190 verified partners, including major platforms like TrustYou, SiteMinder, and TripAdvisor, along with exclusive integrations such as EPoS, revenue management, and digital registration. Its extensive marketplace supports scalable, customized setups.

Sirvoy has 21 verified integrations, primarily with major OTAs like Booking.com and Expedia, plus GDS and TripAdvisor. While sufficient for basic needs, it offers fewer options for advanced or niche integrations.

Edge: Cloudbeds.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Cloudbeds or Sirvoy?

Cloudbeds’s overall rating of 4.63/5 reflects broad satisfaction, especially among larger properties and those seeking growth tools. Recent reviews praise its ability to streamline operations, increase bookings, and support complex workflows.

Sirvoy’s rating of 83.93/100 is strong among small accommodation providers, with many recent support reviews praising its simplicity and affordability. Hoteliers with basic needs and limited budgets tend to rate Sirvoy highly but generally do not rate it on advanced features.

Edge: Cloudbeds.

How Much Do Cloudbeds and Sirvoy Cost?

Cloudbeds charges $600/month, with no free trial or freemium option. It offers an all-in-one platform with extensive features, making it more expensive but more comprehensive.

Sirvoy costs $200/month, with a 30-day trial. Its lower price appeals to small properties with limited budgets, but some users note that costs can increase as they add more channels or features.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Cloudbeds?

  • Hotels seeking a scalable, all-in-one platform that centralizes operations, revenue, and distribution.
  • Properties with growth ambitions, multiple locations, or complex operational needs.
  • Hotels wanting advanced automation such as night audits, guest apps, and revenue management.
  • Boutique hotels, hostels, and small chains aiming to streamline workflows with extensive integrations.

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel is very small, with minimal operational complexity.
  • You prefer a low-cost, straightforward booking system without advanced features.
  • Your team needs only basic reservation and channel management.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Sirvoy?

  • Small hotels, B&Bs, and hostels seeking an affordable, easy-to-use system.
  • Properties that prioritize booking automation, online presence, and simple guest management.
  • Teams with limited technical expertise needing excellent support and minimal setup.

Not ideal if:

  • You require advanced revenue management, analytics, or automation tools.
  • Your property is expanding rapidly and needs extensive integrations.
  • You seek a platform with built-in modules for wellness, spa, or complex inventory management.

Cloudbeds vs Sirvoy: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Cloudbeds is a comprehensive hotel management system designed for ambitious properties ready to scale. Its extensive features and integrations support growth, revenue optimization, and operational efficiency, making it ideal for larger or expanding hotels.

Sirvoy excels as a straightforward, cost-effective solution suited for small properties and hostels that need simple reservation and channel management. Its intuitive interface and high support ratings provide peace of mind for teams new to PMS software.

If your hotel aims to grow, automate, and maximize revenue, Cloudbeds is the clear choice. If affordability and ease of use are your priorities, Sirvoy is the practical option.

Cloudbeds PMS 和 Sirvoy 的价格是多少?

物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。

Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Sirvoy Sirvoy
Starting Price From $600/mo From $200/mo

功能对比:Cloudbeds PMS 与 Sirvoy

这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。

功能 Cloudbeds Cloudbeds Sirvoy Sirvoy
会计与金融
100%
80%
直接计费
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
多币种
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
自动夜间审计
营销与电子商务
100%
100%
访客通信(短信)
原生电子邮件营销
客人资料
客户关系管理
礼品卡
频道管理员
预订引擎
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
管理和配置
75%
75%
集中的用户和角色管理
多种语言
基于云
在前提
用户管理
100%
100%
访客通信(短信)
客人资料
集中消息传递
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
前台
92%
75%
移动设备笔记和任务(语音转文本)
移动应用
自动夜间审计
日历视图
多种语言
任务管理
自动提醒
客人资料
平板电脑/自助服务终端值机
付款请求
集中消息传递
自动空间优化
群组管理
100%
100%
组功能
自动空间优化
宾客体验
100%
56%
集成身份证和护照扫描仪
数字注册
访客应用
网上值机
在线结帐
来宾消息
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
身份证扫描和注册预填
大堂售货亭
家政
100%
75%
管家模块
家政移动应用程序
实时状态更新
自动分配
实时报告
轮班计划
员工信息
在线结帐
付款
100%
100%
集成支付终端和读卡器
直接计费
多币种
交付过程
付款请求
预订管理
100%
89%
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
礼品卡
频道管理员
综合 CRS
拖放磁带图
费率管理
自动空间优化
基于规则的房间分配
交易电子邮件(预订、作品集等)
收入管理
100%
60%
RevPaR 和 ADR 报告
自定义费率
辅助收入跟踪
收益管理模块
基本定价
税务与合规
100%
100%
符合 PCI 标准
符合 GDPR
SOC2 投诉
税务配置
支持与培训
100%
100%
在线 24/7 支持
食品与饮料
100%
0%
EPoS
温泉
100%
0%
水疗和健康模块

实际成果:Cloudbeds 对比 Sirvoy(按业务目标)

我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

增加收入和降低成本
Cloudbeds Himmapana Villas 中型
+ Growth in direct bookings: the combination of a strong social media presence and an effective online booking and payment system has led to a significant increase in direct bookings.
+ Operational efficiency: the adoption of a simple yet effective hotel management system has streamlined day-to-day operations, efficiently handling over 2,000 bookings annually, including special guest requests.
+ Remote management flexibility: the use of a cloud-based platform allows for the convenient remote management of the property, enabling operations to be handled effectively both on-site and during travel.

"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."

Thomas K. Petersen
Thomas K. Petersen
Managing Partner
Sirvoy Sirvoy

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

提高运营效率
Cloudbeds Flor Parks 小型
+ 17% increase in online reviews
+ 11% of monthly bookings from Google Free Listings
+ Fully integrated booking engine & channel manager

"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."

V
Victor Menor
Operations Manager
Sirvoy Sirvoy

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

改善宾客体验
Cloudbeds The Pad Silverthorne 小型
+ 60% direct bookings in year one
+ 95% guest rating with 1000+ reviews
+ High OTA click-through rates, with lower cancellation rates

"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."

Kevin Bowen
Kevin Bowen
Director of Operations
Sirvoy Sirvoy

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

Cloudbeds 对比 Sirvoy:总结

Cloudbeds
Cloudbeds
4.6/5 来自 1,265 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

Ease of use and fast staff adoption 89% 正面

Users consistently describe Cloudbeds as intuitive, simple to learn, and easy for front-desk teams to adopt quickly. Several reviews highlight that th... Users consistently describe Cloudbeds as intuitive, simple to learn, and easy for front-desk teams to adopt quickly. Several reviews highlight that the clean layout and low training burden help hotels save time and keep daily operations moving smoothly.

Reporting and analytics 62% 正面

Reviews often mention reporting as a core value, especially for occupancy, revenue, financials, and performance tracking. At the same time, many users... Reviews often mention reporting as a core value, especially for occupancy, revenue, financials, and performance tracking. At the same time, many users want more flexible filters, better customization, and easier export/visualization because the current reports can feel limited or too complex.

Reservations and calendar workflow 74% 正面

A major theme is how Cloudbeds helps teams manage bookings, room assignments, drag-and-drop changes, and availability from the calendar view. Reviewer... A major theme is how Cloudbeds helps teams manage bookings, room assignments, drag-and-drop changes, and availability from the calendar view. Reviewers say this streamlines front-desk work, speeds check-in/check-out, and helps prevent operational mistakes during busy periods.

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

客户支持和真人客服 41% 负面

客服支持是评论中最具争议的话题之一。许多用户称赞客服快速、专业且响应迅速,而另一些用户则批评工单处理速度慢、聊天机器人体验差,以及在遇到紧急酒店问题时... 客服支持是评论中最具争议的话题之一。许多用户称赞客服快速、专业且响应迅速,而另一些用户则批评工单处理速度慢、聊天机器人体验差,以及在遇到紧急酒店问题时缺乏可靠的电话支持。

Payments, billing, and invoicing 58% 负面

Cloudbeds is often credited with simplifying payments, reconciliation, and financial tracking, especially when integrated payments or pay-by-link are... Cloudbeds is often credited with simplifying payments, reconciliation, and financial tracking, especially when integrated payments or pay-by-link are used. However, users also request more gateway options, better invoice support, and smoother handling of local payment methods and long-stay billing.

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #5 vs #46
中型(25-74 间客房) #4 vs #48
小型(10-24 间客房) #1 vs #22
超大型(200+ 间客房) #13 vs #27

独特功能

PMS 连接性 分析仪表板 库存管理 2路实时集成 多种语言
4.6/5 易用性 4.4/5 客户支持 200 个集成
访问官网
Sirvoy
Sirvoy
4.7/5 来自 146 条评价

酒店从业者喜爱的方面

客户支持和在线聊天 94% 正面

Sirvoy 的客户支持是其最显著的优势之一,用户对其快速响应、专业客服人员和真人在线聊天服务赞不绝口。许多评论指出,这种支持服务帮助他们快速解决问题、熟悉... Sirvoy 的客户支持是其最显著的优势之一,用户对其快速响应、专业客服人员和真人在线聊天服务赞不绝口。许多评论指出,这种支持服务帮助他们快速解决问题、熟悉系统,并避免系统宕机或代价高昂的错误。

易于使用且设置简单 91% 正面

用户反复表示,Sirvoy 易于上手、配置快捷、日常管理也十分便捷,即使是缺乏技术经验的业主也能轻松使用。评论者尤其赞赏它能减少培训时间和操作繁琐步骤,对于... 用户反复表示,Sirvoy 易于上手、配置快捷、日常管理也十分便捷,即使是缺乏技术经验的业主也能轻松使用。评论者尤其赞赏它能减少培训时间和操作繁琐步骤,对于小型物业和初次使用物业管理系统 (PMS) 的用户来说更是如此。

Booking and reservation management 71% 正面

Reviewers consistently rely on Sirvoy to manage reservations, availability, and day-to-day booking workflows with less manual effort. They say it help... Reviewers consistently rely on Sirvoy to manage reservations, availability, and day-to-day booking workflows with less manual effort. They say it helps keep the calendar organized, simplifies handling room inventory, and makes it easier to run the property without double bookings or confusion.

酒店从业者提出异议的方面

定制化和特定属性的灵活性 47% 负面

用户喜欢 Sirvoy 能够适应不同的酒店类型和工作流程,但他们经常要求增加更多可配置的字段、颜色、房间类型和显示选项。他们反复提到,该产品在简单的操作中表现... 用户喜欢 Sirvoy 能够适应不同的酒店类型和工作流程,但他们经常要求增加更多可配置的字段、颜色、房间类型和显示选项。他们反复提到,该产品在简单的操作中表现出色,但更灵活的设置将有助于那些拥有特殊套餐、家庭套房或独特预订规则的酒店。

定价、费率、折扣和收益管理 72% 负面

大量评论都集中在定价控制方面,用户希望获得更好的工具来设置季节性价格、折扣、套餐和追加销售。虽然有些人欣赏这种灵活性,但也有人认为价格设置不够便捷或过... 大量评论都集中在定价控制方面,用户希望获得更好的工具来设置季节性价格、折扣、套餐和追加销售。虽然有些人欣赏这种灵活性,但也有人认为价格设置不够便捷或过于死板,这使得收益优化和附加产品销售比预期更加困难。

排名更高的方面

AT #10 vs #12
DK #2 vs #4
MT #2 vs #4
SE #2 vs #6
4.7/5 易用性 4.9/5 客户支持 21 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

综合评分 Cloudbeds 4.6 vs 0.0 (+4.6)
客户支持 Sirvoy 4.9 vs 4.4 (+0.5)

关于 Cloudbeds PMS 与 Sirvoy 的常见问题

Cloudbeds PMS 能否替代 Sirvoy?

这取决于您的需求。Cloudbeds PMS 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Cloudbeds PMS 提供 200 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Sirvoy 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Cloudbeds PMS 或 Sirvoy 是否提供免费方案?

Cloudbeds PMS:否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Cloudbeds PMS 和 Sirvoy?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Cloudbeds 的 HT Score 为 100,Sirvoy 的为 90。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取您的免费人工智能分析师报告

根据您的房产情况量身定制的推荐方案

Ghostel icon
值得信赖
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

让我们查找您的酒店信息