The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
在分析了 987 条经验证的评价后,Mews 用户最看重其 customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, 入职和支持体验,而 Sirvoy 用户则强调 customer support, ease of use, 预订管理。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
+
入职和支持体验
▾
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
+
用户界面和设计
▾
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
计费复杂性和报告局限性
▾
|
−
功能限制
▾
|
|
−
收益管理
▾
|
−
定制化和适应性
▾
|
|
−
定价和费用
▾
|
−
性价比
▾
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 329 条评价 | #22 36 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #1 397 条评价 | #48 3 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #3 45 条评价 | #46 1 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #3 49 条评价 | #27 1 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #1 483 条评价 | #29 21 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #5 220 条评价 | #37 7 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #2 170 条评价 | #42 4 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #1 130 条评价 | #35 3 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #8 106 条评价 | #23 16 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #1 660 条评价 | #16 31 条评价 |
| 亚太 ▾ | #10 17 条评价 | #13 6 条评价 |
| 中东 ▾ | #28 8 条评价 | #27 0 条评价 |
Choosing between Mews PMS and Sirvoy hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and growth ambitions. Both aim to streamline operations and improve guest experiences, but they diverge significantly in scale, feature depth, and market presence. Mews, with its larger user base and more recent reviews, offers a broader, more versatile solution for mid-sized and larger hotels, whereas Sirvoy caters well to small properties seeking simplicity and affordability.
Are you ready to prioritize scalability and advanced automation, or do you prefer a straightforward, budget-friendly system? Let’s compare both to help you make an informed choice.
Mews and Sirvoy both address core property management needs like reservations, guest management, and channel connectivity. Mews, however, provides a much more extensive feature set, including revenue management, guest CRM, automation tools, and custom integrations, which are absent in Sirvoy. While Sirvoy prides itself on simplicity and ease of use, it suffers from fewer recent reviews and a lower overall score, implying less ongoing support and development.
Given that Mews has a notably higher number of reviews (758 vs. 95) and more recent feedback, it indicates stronger market confidence. Does your hotel require a platform that adapts as you grow? If so, Mews could be the better fit; if minimal features and low cost are paramount, Sirvoy might suffice.
If your hotel needs robust automation, extensive integrations, and scalable features to support multiple properties, go with Mews. Its broad ecosystem, advanced revenue tools, and open API make it ideal for medium to large hotels or boutique chains aiming for operational efficiency.
If your hotel is small, with straightforward needs and limited budget, Sirvoy is a solid choice. Its simple interface, strong customer support, and lower price point (starting at $200/month) make it suitable for independent B&Bs, hostels, or small hotels that prioritize ease over advanced functionality.
Mews scores 4.7/5 for ease of use, with positive reviews highlighting its modern, intuitive interface and quick onboarding. Some users report a learning curve due to its feature depth, but overall, staff adoption is rated highly.
Sirvoy also boasts a high usability score of 4.64/5, with users praising its straightforward system and quick setup, especially beneficial for those new to hotel management. Customer support in Sirvoy is frequently lauded for responsiveness and helpfulness, easing transitions for new users.
Edge: Mews, for its more comprehensive, modern interface that supports complex operations, despite a slightly steeper learning curve.
Mews offers 43 core features plus 16 exclusive features such as multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, integrated CRS, mobile app, and shift planning. These enable hotels to automate a wide range of operations and tailor workflows.
Sirvoy, while covering essential booking and channel management features, lacks advanced modules like revenue management and guest CRM, with no unique features beyond its core offerings. Its simplicity is an advantage for small hotels but limits scalability.
Edge: Mews, with its richer feature set and innovative tools that cater to diverse hotel needs.
Mews support ratings sit at 4.27/5, with some reviews praising their quick problem-solving but others noting occasional bugs. Support quality can vary, but overall, Mews maintains a good reputation for responsiveness.
Sirvoy outperforms slightly, with a customer support rating of 4.85/5, and reviews frequently mention prompt, helpful assistance that simplifies onboarding and issue resolution. Its smaller size allows for more personalized support.
Edge: Sirvoy, thanks to its consistently high support ratings and personalized service.
Mews boasts over 336 verified integrations, including popular partners like SiteMinder, Revinate, and Orange Hotel Marketing, with 18 shared partners with Sirvoy. Its open API and extensive marketplace facilitate deep customization and operational connectivity.
Sirvoy, with only 21 verified partners, covers essential integrations such as Booking.com, Expedia, and GDS, but lacks the breadth of Mews. Its ecosystem is suitable for smaller properties with fewer integration needs.
Edge: Mews, offering a wider array of integrations to scale and customize your tech environment.
Mews receives a 4.62/5 overall rating based on 758 reviews, with recent feedback of 98 reviews in the last six months, reflecting ongoing improvement. Hoteliers across boutique, city center, and hostel segments rate it highly for operational efficiency.
Sirvoy’s rating is 0/5, but this appears to be a reporting anomaly; its reviews are limited, and the few available praise its simplicity and support quality. Given the volume and recency of Mews reviews, it’s clearly the more trusted option among hoteliers.
Edge: Mews, with significantly more recent and numerous reviews affirming its value.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900/month, reflecting its enterprise-grade feature set and scalability. No free tier or trial information is listed, suggesting a premium pricing structure.
Sirvoy charges $200/month with a 30-day trial, positioning itself as a budget-friendly, easy-to-implement solution. Its lower cost suits smaller properties but may lack advanced features needed for growth.
Mews is a comprehensive, adaptable platform designed for hotels that want to grow and automate. Its extensive feature set, integrations, and recent reviews make it ideal for mid-sized and boutique hotels aiming for operational excellence.
Sirvoy offers a user-friendly, affordable solution best suited for small properties that prioritize simplicity and support over advanced capabilities. Its lower price point and ease of use make it attractive for independent hoteliers with minimal technology needs.
If your hotel is looking for a future-proof, scalable system, choose Mews; if you need straightforward management and budget control, Sirvoy will do the job.
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了... Mews 的用户引导体验并不稳定,一些用户称赞其亲力亲为的指导方式,而另一些用户则反映初始设置效率低下。随着时间的推移,支持团队的响应速度有所提升,提高了问题解决率和用户满意度。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然 Mews 可以自动计费,但用户反映其复杂性以及报告和分析方面的局限性造成了困扰。改进这些方面可以为管理财务运营的用户提供更深入的洞察和更大的灵活性。
Mews 凭借其集成功能为收益管理提供了强大的基础,但用户指出,动态定价工具和高级分析方面还有改进的空间,尤其是在多物业运营方面。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistanc... Sirvoy receives high praise for its excellent customer support, noted for being responsive, helpful, and timely. Users appreciate the prompt assistance, which facilitates problem resolution effectively.
Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplic... Most users find Sirvoy highly intuitive and easy to navigate, which is particularly beneficial for those new to the hospitality industry. This simplicity allows for a smooth onboarding process without the need for extensive training.
用户称赞该系统在管理预订和宾客信息方面的高效性。然而,某些功能,例如将房间组合成套房或提供套餐优惠,则被认为需要改进。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及... 部分用户对 Sirvoy 的报告功能不足表示不满,特别是缺少每日销售报告,以及财务和发票功能亟待改进。此外,还有用户反馈缺乏高级客户关系管理 (CRM) 选项,以及集成追加销售功能存在困难。
Sirvoy 提供一定程度的自定义功能,用户认为这有助于根据自身物业的具体需求调整系统。然而,部分用户希望在发票自定义和动态计费选项方面拥有更大的灵活性。
排名更高的方面
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Mews PMS 和 Sirvoy 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Mews PMS 提供 336 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Sirvoy 提供 21 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Mews PMS 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 4.7/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Mews PMS:否。Sirvoy:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Mews 的 HT Score 为 100,Sirvoy 的为 84。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问