Gastfreund vs. STAY Guest App: 哪个更适合您?

更新于 2026年11月14日  ·  已分析 263 条经验证的评价

摘要

我们分析了 263 条经验证的酒店经营者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的酒店类型和优先事项:

Gastfreund 在支持、入职培训和响应能力方面表现出色,尤其适合度假租赁住宿设施(5.0/5),并拥有手机值机以及付款等独家功能。

STAY 在性价比方面表现出色,尤其适合经济型与有限服务住宿设施(4.9/5),并拥有移动应用等独家功能。

查看下方完整分析 ↓

Gastfreund 与 STAY Guest App 相比如何?

基于 HTR 上 263 条经验证的酒店经营者评价的并排评分。

HTScore
83
32
推荐可能性
95%
96%
易用性
4.6/5
4.8/5
客户支持
4.6/5
4.8/5
性价比
4.2/5
4.6/5
起始价格 起价 $100/月 起价 $300/月
经验证的评价 48 215

Gastfreund 与 STAY Guest App 的优缺点是什么?

在分析了 263 条经验证的评价后,Gastfreund 用户最看重其 支持、入职培训和响应能力, 访客应用程序的易用性和设置便捷性, 宾客信息和电子目录,而 STAY 用户则强调 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。

Gastfreund Gastfreund STAY STAY
优点
+ 支持、入职培训和响应能力 ▾
+ 客户体验优化 ▾
+ 访客应用程序的易用性和设置便捷性 ▾
+ 移动和用户体验 ▾
+ 宾客信息和电子目录 ▾
+ 运营效率 ▾
+ 减少接待工作量和自助服务沟通 ▾
+ 支持和服务 ▾
缺点
− 当地推荐、短途旅行和活动推广 ▾
− CMS 和定制 ▾
− 多语言支持和翻译质量 ▾
− 集成能力 ▾
− 分析和报告 ▾

Gastfreund 对比 STAY:按酒店细分市场排名

各产品在不同酒店规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店经营者的经验证评价。

按酒店规模

细分市场 Gastfreund Gastfreund STAY STAY
小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ #7 13 条评价 #11 10 条评价
中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ #9 18 条评价 #4 82 条评价
大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ #15 5 条评价 #2 91 条评价
超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ #22 1 条评价 #2 24 条评价

按酒店类型

细分市场 Gastfreund Gastfreund STAY STAY
精品酒店 ▾ #14 11 条评价 #2 78 条评价
豪华酒店 ▾ #17 6 条评价 #3 88 条评价
品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ #18 4 条评价 #3 91 条评价
长住酒店 ▾ #10 4 条评价 #6 7 条评价

按区域

细分市场 Gastfreund Gastfreund STAY STAY
北美 ▾ — #4 27 条评价
欧洲 ▾ #5 47 条评价 #3 112 条评价
亚太 — #6 3 条评价
中东 — #7 2 条评价

Is Gastfreund or STAY Guest App Better for Hotels?

Gastfreund and STAY Guest App both target hotel guest engagement and operational efficiency but diverge sharply in market presence, feature emphasis, and property fit. Gastfreund excels with modular guest experience tools and team communication, primarily serving small to midsize hotels and vacation rentals in Europe, especially German-speaking countries. STAY, meanwhile, offers a broader global footprint with a focus on large chains and resorts, emphasizing real-time updates, service digitization, and guest interaction.

Both platforms solve the core problem of reducing front desk workload by digitizing guest communication, service requests, and information delivery. They increase guest satisfaction by providing seamless mobile access to hotel services, reduce paper usage, and support upselling. The choice hinges on property size, geographic location, and specific operational priorities.

Gastfreund vs STAY Guest App: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If you operate a small to midsize property in Europe, particularly in Germany, Austria, or Switzerland, Gastfreund’s 4.8 overall rating across 48 reviews — including 35 in the past six months — shows it is a trusted choice with active support and continuous product improvements. Its modular design and native or progressive web app options suit hotels wanting tailored guest engagement and internal team communication. Vacation rentals and boutique hotels rate Gastfreund as high as 5/5, reflecting satisfaction in these segments.

If your property is part of a large chain or a resort in North America, Latin America, or multiple continents, STAY’s 4.8 rating across 215 reviews — albeit with no recent reviews in the last six months — demonstrates wide adoption and scalability. STAY’s features like chatbot, message routing, and automated replies support high-volume guest interaction and operational automation. Chains like NH Hotels and Barceló rely on STAY for real-time updates and streamlined service ordering.

Data for limited-service hotels and small independents is thin for STAY, given only 1% of its users fall in that segment, while Gastfreund’s limited-service hotels rate it at 4.2/5 over 7 reviews. Thus, smaller independent properties in Europe lean toward Gastfreund; large-scale international operations lean toward STAY.

Is Gastfreund or STAY Guest App Easier to Use?

Gastfreund scores 4.6/5 in ease of use and onboarding with 48 reviews, while STAY has a slightly higher 4.8/5 ease of use and the same 4.6/5 onboarding rating across 215 reviews but no recent feedback. Gastfreund reviewers describe the app as intuitive, straightforward, and immediately comprehensible for guests and staff, praising quick setup and ease of content updates. STAY users emphasize its intuitive interface and simple content management but note room for faster search and improved guest interaction workflows.

Both platforms have positive comments about staff adoption and simplicity, with no significant differences in onboarding experiences. The lack of recent STAY reviews slightly weakens confidence in its current usability.

Edge: Even.

Which Has Better Features: Gastfreund or STAY Guest App?

Gastfreund offers two unique features: Mobile Check-in and Payments, enabling guests to complete arrival formalities and settle bills digitally, reducing front desk contact and manual billing. This directly changes operations at guest arrival and departure, saving time for receptionists and increasing guest convenience.

STAY provides four distinct features not found in Gastfreund: Mobile App (likely a branded native app), Chatbot, Automated Replies, and Message Routing. The chatbot and automated responses handle routine guest inquiries without staff involvement, improving guest communication efficiency. Message routing ensures guest requests go to the correct department immediately, optimizing internal workflows. These features suit larger properties with higher guest volumes needing automation to reduce workload.

Both share 10 core guest app features like information delivery, news updates, and team communication. Gastfreund’s payment and check-in capabilities provide a tangible operational uplift at critical guest touchpoints. STAY’s automation features improve scalability and guest interaction management.

Edge: STAY.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Gastfreund or STAY Guest App?

Gastfreund’s customer support rating is 4.6/5, based on 48 reviews including 35 recent ones, with reviewers frequently praising fast, professional responses and helpful onboarding. Some mention inconsistent service quality and slow responses in isolated cases.

STAY holds a 4.8/5 support rating over 215 reviews but lacks recent data. User feedback highlights responsive and kind support, though a few note the absence of phone support and limited regional availability.

Both platforms have similar onboarding scores (4.6/5), indicating comparable implementation experiences. Gastfreund’s recent review activity strengthens confidence in ongoing support quality.

Edge: Even.

Which Has More Integrations: Gastfreund or STAY Guest App?

Gastfreund integrates with 17 verified partners, including major PMS systems like MEWS, protel, RoomRaccoon, and Casablanca, plus services like sharemagazines GmbH and HolidayCheck AG. STAY has 23 verified partners, covering MEWS, Oracle Hospitality, hotelkit, apaleo GmbH, and Onity, among others. They share four partners: Winhotel, SiteMinder, MEWS, and Planet.

STAY’s broader integration portfolio suits large hotels and chains needing connectivity with diverse systems, including CRM, property management, and guest services. Gastfreund’s integrations emphasize European market tools and specialist services for vacation rentals and campsites.

Edge: STAY.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Gastfreund or STAY Guest App?

Overall ratings are identical at 4.8/5. Gastfreund’s 48 reviews include 35 from the last six months, maintaining a stable 4.8/5 recent rating. STAY’s 215 reviews, although plentiful, show no reviews in the last six months, so current rating may not reflect recent product changes.

Segment ratings favor Gastfreund in Vacation Rentals & Villas (5/5 from 8 reviews) and Boutique Hotels (4.5/5 from 11 reviews), while STAY dominates large segments like Branded Hotels (4.8/5 from 91 reviews), Resorts (4.8/5 from 106 reviews), and Luxury Hotels (4.8/5 from 88 reviews). STAY’s deep penetration in branded and resort segments shows higher satisfaction in larger properties.

Gastfreund rates lower in Bed & Breakfast & Inns (2.8/5 from 2 reviews), while STAY has a strong 4.8/5 from 49 reviews, indicating better fit for smaller independent inns on STAY.

Edge: Even.

How Much Do Gastfreund and STAY Guest App Cost?

Gastfreund has a base price of $100.00 and no freemium, monthly flat, or per-room pricing. No implementation fee or trial is offered. STAY charges a base price of $300.00 with similar terms: no freemium, no monthly flat or per-room pricing, no implementation fee, and no trial.

Gastfreund’s lower base price makes it more accessible to smaller and midsize properties. STAY’s higher starting price may reflect its enterprise-grade features and global support infrastructure.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Gastfreund?

  • Hotels that value a modular guest experience platform combining a Guest App, Info Channel, and internal team communication.
  • Vacation rentals, boutique hotels, and resorts primarily in German-speaking Europe, given regional focus and user base.
  • Properties wanting integrated mobile check-in and payment features to reduce front desk workload.
  • Hotels seeking a no-download progressive web app option alongside native app availability.
  • Teams looking for a solution with active recent review feedback demonstrating ongoing support and product evolution.

Not ideal if:

  • Your hotel operates outside Europe, especially outside DACH countries, due to limited presence.
  • You require advanced chatbot, automated messaging, or message routing features for high-volume guest interaction.
  • Your property is a large hotel chain needing broad global integrations and multi-language support.

What Type of Hotel Should Use STAY Guest App?

  • Large branded hotels, resorts, and multi-property chains seeking a guest experience OS with real-time updates and service digitization.
  • Hotels aiming for automated guest communication via chatbot, message routing, and automated replies.
  • Properties requiring extensive integrations with PMS, CRM, and hospitality service vendors worldwide.
  • Teams focused on increasing operational efficiency and guest satisfaction through mobile app service ordering and digital information.
  • Hotels outside Europe or with global footprints, given STAY’s presence in 31 countries and multiple continents.

Not ideal if:

  • You operate a small independent hotel or vacation rental with limited budget for a higher base price.
  • You need a native check-in and payment solution integrated within the guest app.
  • Recent user feedback and support responsiveness data are critical, as STAY lacks recent reviews and some users report limited phone support.

Gastfreund vs STAY Guest App: The Bottom Line for Hotels

Gastfreund and STAY Guest App both deliver strong guest engagement and operational efficiency tools but cater to different hotel types and markets. Gastfreund’s modular platform with mobile check-in and payment serves smaller to midsize properties in Europe, especially German-speaking countries, focusing on reducing front desk workload and enhancing guest communication through a variety of channels. STAY targets large hotel chains and resorts worldwide, emphasizing automation, real-time updates, and extensive integration capabilities to support complex operations.

Choose Gastfreund if your property is a boutique hotel, vacation rental, or resort in the DACH region seeking a customizable guest app that integrates guest information, team communication, and digital check-in with a lower price point. Its active recent review volume and high ratings confirm ongoing product and support quality.

Choose STAY if you manage a branded hotel chain or large resort looking for a guest experience OS with chatbot automation, message routing, and a broad integration ecosystem across global markets. STAY’s feature set supports high guest volumes and operational scale, although its lack of recent reviews warrants direct inquiry into current support and updates.

Gastfreund 和 STAY Guest App 的价格是多少?

酒店客人应用 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的酒店规模申请定制报价。

Gastfreund Gastfreund STAY STAY
起始价格 起价 $100/月 起价 $300/月

功能对比:Gastfreund 与 STAY Guest App

这些是每个供应商配置的功能,按功能组进行整理——与供应商后台中显示的数据相同。展开任意功能组即可并排比较功能。

功能 Gastfreund Gastfreund STAY STAY
▾ Communication & Messaging
100%
100%
自动翻译(多语言)
请求管理
客房服务订购
来宾消息
应用下载
网络应用
▾ Content Management
100%
100%
酒店目录
客人资料
当地推荐
网络应用
▾ Upselling
100%
50%
付款
客房服务订购
▾ Request Management
100%
75%
请求管理
客房服务订购
移动结帐
手机值机

实际成果:Gastfreund 对比 STAY(按业务目标)

我们分析了 11 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。

提高运营效率
Gastfreund Gastfreund

该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。

STAY Barceló Hoteles 大型
+ Room Service is faster. It's more comfortable. For the guests. And for the staff too
+ Barceló can make better decisions in real time
+ Through live surveys, Barceló can detect pain points more easily and streamline processes

"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."

Álvaro Montalvo
Álvaro Montalvo
Project Manager Innovation
改善宾客体验
Gastfreund Holzleiten Bio Wellness Hotel 小型
+ 56 hours saved per month at reception through digital check-in, digital check-out and the integrated billing overview.
+ ��4,200 in costs saved per month
+ 62% fewer pre-arrival email enquiries, because the Journey Mail delivers the key information in advance.

"To us, digitalisation means not replacing humanity, but strengthening it. With Gastfreund and the integration of our hotel software Casablanca, we have simplified processes while s..."

Simon Wilhelm
Simon Wilhelm
Management
STAY AMR Collection 中型
+ The app pays for itself according to AMR's Product Manager. "Spa services, gourmet dinners, wine sales, and other premium services have seen significant increases since we implemented the app.
+ The implementation of STAY skyrocketed the number of users of AMR's app. Increasing them by 50% was their goal. However, they "far exceeded that goal.
+ AMR's users rate the app 4.7 out of 5 on average. The app has been downloaded tens of thousands of times in 50 AMR hotels.

"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."

Yudy Mora
Yudy Mora
Product Owner Manager

Gastfreund 对比 STAY:总结

Gastfreund
Gastfreund
4.8/5 来自 48 条评价

酒店经营者喜爱的方面

支持、入职培训和响应能力 75% 正面

好评如潮,Gastfreund 的入职流程、培训以及出现问题时的快速响应都备受赞誉。但与此同时,也有一条评论指出其响应速度极慢,且业务关系处理不当,由此可见,服... 好评如潮,Gastfreund 的入职流程、培训以及出现问题时的快速响应都备受赞誉。但与此同时,也有一条评论指出其响应速度极慢,且业务关系处理不当,由此可见,服务的一致性对买家而言至关重要。

访客应用程序的易用性和设置便捷性 92% 正面

评论者经常提到,Gastfreund 对客人和酒店团队来说都非常直观易用,设置、自定义和日常使用都很简单。易于管理这一点至关重要,因为它能降低内部工作量,并加快... 评论者经常提到,Gastfreund 对客人和酒店团队来说都非常直观易用,设置、自定义和日常使用都很简单。易于管理这一点至关重要,因为它能降低内部工作量,并加快客人应用程序的上线和维护速度。

宾客信息和电子目录 100% 正面

评论者普遍认为,Gastfreund 将酒店的重要信息集中起来,方便客人通过自己的设备即时查找 Wi-Fi、退房时间、酒店规则、设施和酒店详情。酒店方面也认为,这是一... 评论者普遍认为,Gastfreund 将酒店的重要信息集中起来,方便客人通过自己的设备即时查找 Wi-Fi、退房时间、酒店规则、设施和酒店详情。酒店方面也认为,这是一种切实可行的提升宾客体验的方式,同时还能减少前台工作人员重复询问的问题。

酒店经营者提出异议的方面

当地推荐、短途旅行和活动推广 50% 负面

许多酒店利用 Gastfreund 展示当地景点、短途旅行、徒步旅行建议和休闲活动,从而提升宾客参与度并有可能增加辅助收入。评论者喜欢这种在宾客入住前后激发他们旅... 许多酒店利用 Gastfreund 展示当地景点、短途旅行、徒步旅行建议和休闲活动,从而提升宾客参与度并有可能增加辅助收入。评论者喜欢这种在宾客入住前后激发他们旅行灵感的方式,但也有一些评论指出,他们需要手动创建很多此类内容。

多语言支持和翻译质量 50% 负面

多篇评论都提到多语言功能是关键需求,尤其对于国际游客或季节性游客而言。虽然提供多种语言服务被认为很有价值,但用户也反映存在翻译缺失、覆盖范围不全以及部... 多篇评论都提到多语言功能是关键需求,尤其对于国际游客或季节性游客而言。虽然提供多种语言服务被认为很有价值,但用户也反映存在翻译缺失、覆盖范围不全以及部分语言翻译质量较差等问题,这些问题可能会限制其实用性。

排名更高的方面

小型(10-24 间客房) #7 vs #11
超小型(少于 10 间客房) #4 vs #14
房车营地与露营地 #4 vs #8
AT #2 vs #8

独特功能

手机值机 付款
4.6/5 易用性 4.6/5 客户支持 17 个集成
查看资料
STAY
STAY
4.8/5 来自 215 条评价

酒店经营者喜爱的方面

客户体验优化 97% 正面

多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。

移动和用户体验 90% 正面

该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。

运营效率 96% 正面

STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。

酒店经营者提出异议的方面

CMS 和定制 41% 负面

CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。

集成能力 50% 负面

用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。

排名更高的方面

大型(75-199 间客房) #2 vs #15
中型(25-74 间客房) #4 vs #9
超大型(200+ 间客房) #2 vs #22
住宿加早餐与客栈 #3 vs #29

独特功能

移动应用 聊天机器人 自动回复 消息路由
4.8/5 易用性 4.8/5 客户支持 23 个集成
查看资料

评分差异最大的方面

性价比 STAY 4.6 vs 4.2 (+0.4)

关于 Gastfreund 与 STAY Guest App 的常见问题

Gastfreund 能否替代 STAY Guest App?

这取决于您的需求。Gastfreund 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Gastfreund 提供 17 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 23 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。

哪个更适合小型或独立酒店?

小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速上手。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 4.6/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按酒店规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。

Gastfreund 或 STAY Guest App 是否提供免费方案?

Gastfreund:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。

HTR 如何评估和排名 Gastfreund 和 STAY Guest App?

HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店经营者客观比较酒店科技产品。Gastfreund 的 HT Score 为 83,STAY 的为 32。以下是评分的计算方式。

标准组 权重 衡量内容
客户评分与评价

用户对该产品的推荐度如何?

评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾

权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。

合作伙伴生态系统

技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何?

合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾

评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。

以客户为中心

该组织以客户为中心的程度如何?

认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾

评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。

覆盖范围、持久力与资源

该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛?

地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾

衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。

客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →

获取您的免费人工智能分析师报告

根据您酒店的情况量身定制的推荐

Ghostel icon
受到以下企业信赖
footer image 1 footer image 2 footer image 3 footer image 4 footer image 5 footer image 6 footer image 7

让我们查找您的酒店信息