The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
STAY 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Guest Messaging.
Tourismart 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 215 | 0 |
在分析了 215 条经验证的评价后,STAY 用户最看重其 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率,而 Tourismart 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
Tourismart
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户体验优化
▾
|
|
|
+
移动和用户体验
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
支持和服务
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
CMS 和定制
▾
|
|
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
|
−
分析和报告
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
Tourismart
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 10 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 83 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 89 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 24 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
Tourismart
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 77 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 88 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #3 91 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 7 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
Tourismart
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 27 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 112 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #6 3 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #7 2 条评价 | — |
When choosing a guest app for your hotel, two options stand out: STAY Guest App by STAY and Tourismart by Tourismart. Both platforms aim to digitize guest services and streamline hotel operations, but they differ significantly in features, user feedback, regional presence, and overall maturity.
STAY Guest App, with over 200 reviews and recent activity, has established itself as a trusted solution across multiple regions, delivering consistent updates and support. Tourismart, on the other hand, lacks recent reviews and regional presence, raising questions about its current usability and support infrastructure. How do these differences influence your decision?
STAY Guest App is designed specifically for hotels seeking a comprehensive guest experience platform, offering a suite of features like room service, chatbots, multilingual support, and detailed analytics. Tourismart presents itself as an all-in-one mobile platform for guest requests and hotel management, but its lack of recent reviews and limited regional presence make it difficult to assess its current performance.
While STAY boasts a track record with over 1,000 hotels in 67 countries, Tourismart’s market presence appears confined to its home region with no available recent reviews or verified partner data. Are you comfortable investing in a solution with proven global reach versus one with unverified market traction?
If your hotel needs a mature, well-supported platform with proven results in reducing queues, increasing operational efficiency, and enhancing guest satisfaction, STAY is the clear choice. Its extensive feature set, over 200 reviews, and positive recent feedback support this.
If, however, your hotel is a small operation seeking a flexible, tablet-based management interface without strong evidence of recent performance or broad regional support, Tourismart might appeal. But be aware: the lack of recent user feedback makes its long-term viability uncertain. For most hotels, especially those looking to optimize guest experience now, STAY’s proven track record makes it the superior option.
STAY receives a high ease-of-use rating of 4.78/5, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, simple implementation, and straightforward CMS. Customers highlight that staff find it easy to update content and manage guest requests, which accelerates onboarding and staff adoption.
Tourismart lacks recent review data, making it impossible to accurately gauge its user experience or onboarding process. Given the existing positive feedback on STAY’s user interface and the absence of comparable data for Tourismart, the edge goes to STAY for ease of use.
STAY offers 14 distinct features including guest messaging, chatbots, multilingual support, room service ordering, and a web app. Its feature set is specifically tailored for hotel environments, supporting guest engagement and operational tasks.
Tourismart does not list specific features or unique functionalities, making it difficult to compare directly. Without concrete feature data for Tourismart, STAY’s comprehensive suite and proven feature reliability give it a clear advantage. Edge: STAY Guest App.
STAY’s customer support ratings are exceptional, with a 4.83/5 score based on review feedback praising prompt, helpful service. Users mention that STAY’s support team is responsive, although some note limited regional support hours and language options.
Tourismart has no recent reviews or publicly available support ratings, leaving its support quality unverified. In the absence of recent data for Tourismart, STAY’s established support reputation makes it the safer choice. Edge: STAY Guest App.
STAY integrates with 20 verified partners, including major PMS and distribution systems like SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and Mews. These integrations facilitate a smooth data flow and operational consistency.
Tourismart offers no verified integration data, making it unclear whether it can connect with essential hotel systems. Given STAY’s extensive integration network, it provides a more connected and versatile platform. Edge: STAY Guest App.
STAY’s review score, rated 3/5 with over 200 reviews, reflects consistent user satisfaction across segments like luxury, boutique, and branded hotels. Recent reviews highlight its role in reducing queues, improving guest communication, and boosting operational efficiency.
Tourismart has no recent reviews or publicly available ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Based on current data, hoteliers favor STAY’s proven performance and positive feedback. Edge: STAY Guest App.
STAY charges a base price of $300 per month, with no freemium or trial options. Its pricing structure is transparent, with no implementation fees or hidden costs.
Tourismart’s pricing is not publicly available, and no trial or demo options are noted. Without clear pricing details, STAY’s transparent model offers better value clarity. Edge: STAY Guest App.
Not ideal if your hotel is very small or only exploring initial digital solutions without a need for extensive features.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a mature, well-supported platform with proven results and broad integrations, or if recent reviews are crucial for your decision.
The core difference: STAY is an established, highly-rated platform with proven results, while Tourismart lacks recent feedback and verified market presence. For hoteliers prioritizing reliability, extensive features, and support, STAY is the clear choice.
Choose STAY if your goal is to improve operational efficiency, guest satisfaction, and digital engagement through a trusted, mature platform. Its large user base, integrations, and positive reviews make it the more reliable option for most hotels today.
Opt for Tourismart only if you are prepared to accept the risks associated with limited recent validation and support data, and your hotel’s needs are modest or experimental. Given the current market, STAY’s track record and review backing put it ahead for hotel guest app solutions.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
Tourismart
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,STAY Guest App 和 Tourismart 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
Tourismart
|
|---|---|---|
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 消息路由 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 自动回复 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
Tourismart
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
Tourismart
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。STAY Guest App 和 Tourismart 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。STAY Guest App 提供 20 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 Tourismart 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
STAY Guest App:否。Tourismart:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。STAY 的 HT Score 为 47,Tourismart 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问