The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #3 42 条评价 | #9 10 条评价 |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 51 条评价 | #4 83 条评价 |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #6 15 条评价 | #2 89 条评价 |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #13 2 条评价 | #2 24 条评价 |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #4 56 条评价 | #2 77 条评价 |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #4 74 条评价 | #2 88 条评价 |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #6 23 条评价 | #3 91 条评价 |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #5 11 条评价 | #6 7 条评价 |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #7 12 条评价 | #5 27 条评价 |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #4 88 条评价 | #3 112 条评价 |
| 亚太 | #14 1 条评价 | #6 3 条评价 |
| 中东 | #5 3 条评价 | #7 2 条评价 |
Choosing between Bowo - Guest App and STAY Guest App hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, existing infrastructure, and growth ambitions. Both solutions aim to elevate guest experiences and streamline operations, but they differ significantly in features, scale, and user feedback. Your decision should reflect which platform aligns better with your priorities—be it personalization, automation, or integration.
While Bowo has a smaller review base and fewer recent reviews, its higher overall ratings suggest a strong current user satisfaction. Conversely, STAY, with nearly double the reviews and more recent feedback, demonstrates broader market confidence. Which one will serve your property better?
Both Bowo and STAY serve as comprehensive guest engagement tools, but they approach this goal differently. Bowo emphasizes highly personalized support, digital upselling, and a centralized app experience, aiming to create memorable guest journeys. STAY, on the other hand, focuses on operational efficiency, reducing queues, and digitizing services across large hotel chains, making it suitable for properties seeking scalable solutions.
Where they diverge is their feature focus: Bowo offers mobile check-in and payments, while STAY provides chatbot, automated replies, and message routing. Both platforms integrate with PMS systems, but Bowo’s larger partner network suggests broader compatibility. Do you prioritize guest personalization or operational speed?
If your hotel needs to deliver a highly personalized guest experience with upselling and a digital directory, Bowo is your best choice. It’s ideal for boutique, luxury, or branded hotels that want to elevate guest engagement through tailored content and direct communication.
If your goal is to streamline operations, reduce front desk queues, and increase revenue through service automation, STAY is the better fit. It suits large hotel groups, resorts, or properties looking to digitize multiple services and improve internal workflows efficiently.
For small properties prioritizing guest experience, Bowo’s high customization might be better. Large chains seeking operational consistency and automation will benefit more from STAY.
Bowo scores a 4.87/5 for ease of use, thanks to its modern interface, customizable options, and straightforward onboarding process. Reviewers praise its intuitive design, with comments like, “The platform is fast and convenient to find consumption centers,” though some suggest larger fonts for better accessibility.
STAY also boasts high ease-of-use ratings at 4.78/5, with a user-friendly CMS and simple content management. Its onboarding is described as smooth, but some reviews mention that language options could be expanded for better international adoption.
Edge: Bowo.
Bowo features 11 unique features, including mobile check-in and payments, making it more versatile for guest engagement. Its comprehensive digital directory and upsell tools are highly valued by hoteliers.
STAY offers five exclusive features such as chatbot, automated replies, message routing, and app download, emphasizing automation and internal communication. It also provides a robust analytics module and integration capabilities.
While Bowo’s feature set caters to personalized guest interactions, STAY’s automation tools are more suited for large-scale, operational efficiency. Which feature set aligns better with your hotel’s strategic goals?
Edge: Bowo.
Both platforms are highly rated for customer support, with Bowo at 4.85/5 and STAY at 4.83/5. Bowo’s reviews highlight proactive, personalized assistance, with comments like “fully personalized support from A to Z,” reflecting a high level of dedicated service.
STAY benefits from a reputation for responsive support, though some reviews note the absence of phone support and limited regional availability. Both companies have strong customer satisfaction, but Bowo’s more recent reviews show a slight edge in support responsiveness.
Edge: Bowo.
Bowo boasts 31 verified partners, including integrations with HiJiffy, Quinta, RoomChecking, and Lightspeed, offering broad compatibility with PMS, CRM, and other hotel systems. Its extensive partner network supports complex, multi-system environments.
STAY has 20 verified partners, including industry leaders like SiteMinder, Amadeus, and Vingcard. Its integrations are robust but slightly fewer than Bowo’s, which may matter for hotels with specific technology ecosystems.
Edge: Bowo.
Bowo’s review count (99) and recent zero reviews suggest limited but current positive sentiment, with an overall rating of 0/5, which appears to be an anomaly. Its high NPS score (9.69/10) indicates strong satisfaction among existing users.
STAY, with 206 reviews and a 3/5 overall rating, demonstrates broader, more recent feedback, especially from large hotel chains. Its user base includes top brands like NH Hotels and Riu, and reviews consistently mention operational improvements and guest satisfaction.
Edge: STAY.
Bowo’s pricing starts at $600 monthly, with no free tier, trial, or implementation fees, indicating a premium positioning. STAY charges $300 monthly, also without trial or setup costs, making it more accessible for smaller properties or groups.
Both platforms operate on a subscription basis, but Bowo’s higher price reflects its extensive feature set and personalized support.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Bowo and STAY are tailored to different hotel operator needs. Bowo excels in personalized guest experience, upselling, and customization, supported by high satisfaction ratings and a global presence, especially in Europe and North America. Its higher price point and feature richness suit boutique and branded hotels that focus on brand experience.
STAY, with its higher review count and recent feedback, offers efficient service automation, operational insights, and broad integration. Its simplicity and scalability make it ideal for large hotel groups and resorts aiming to digitize services quickly and cost-effectively.
Choosing the right platform depends on whether your hotel values guest personalization or operational automation. Both are reputable; the best fit aligns with your strategic priorities and technological readiness.
我们分析了 10 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"The application helps me grow all the hotel's secondary points of sale, whether it's the SPA, catering, or even concierge activities. It also enables us to incorporate additional e..."
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
"We've managed to build a guest journey that's very intuitive and quite extraordinary."
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
许多评论强调了 Bowo 如何通过在一个地方提供有关酒店的所有信息来改善整体客人体验,使客人可以轻松地通过放置在房间中的平板电脑直接访问和预订服务。
Bowo 的客户支持因其响应迅速和乐于助人而受到高度赞誉。用户对特定的客户经理表示赞赏,他们随时准备帮助解决任何问题或进行定制。
评论提到该平台具有高度的定制性,允许酒店根据其品牌的外观和感觉定制应用程序,从而增强客人体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
排名更高的方面
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Bowo - Guest App 和 STAY Guest App 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。Bowo - Guest App 提供 31 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 STAY Guest App 提供 20 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Bowo - Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.9/5 对比 4.8/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Bowo - Guest App:否。STAY Guest App:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Bowo 的 HT Score 为 39,STAY 的为 47。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问