The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
STAY 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (0.0/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Guest Messaging.
TourX (arcade solutions ag) 表现出色 .
基于 HTR 上 215 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| 经验证的评价 | 215 | 0 |
在分析了 215 条经验证的评价后,STAY 用户最看重其 客户体验优化, 移动和用户体验, 运营效率,而 TourX (arcade solutions ag) 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
客户体验优化
▾
|
|
|
+
移动和用户体验
▾
|
|
|
+
运营效率
▾
|
|
|
+
支持和服务
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
CMS 和定制
▾
|
|
|
−
集成能力
▾
|
|
|
−
分析和报告
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 酒店客人应用程序 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #9 10 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #4 83 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #2 89 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 24 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #2 77 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #2 88 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #3 91 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #6 7 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #5 27 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #3 112 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #6 3 条评价 | — |
| 中东 | #7 2 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right hotel guest app can significantly influence your guest experience, operational efficiency, and overall revenue. Both STAY Guest App by STAY and TourX by TourX aim to digitize guest interactions, but they do so with different levels of maturity, features, and proven customer satisfaction. Your decision hinges on whether you prioritize a well-established platform with broad integration and proven impact or a less documented alternative.
STAY Guest App is a mature platform with over 200 reviews, a high NPS, and a proven track record across multiple regions and property types. TourX, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or documented case studies, which makes it difficult to assess its effectiveness and reliability at this stage.
Both platforms aim to improve guest communication, streamline service requests, and digitize hotel offerings. STAY's platform is comprehensive, with a broad feature set, proven success stories, and a global presence spanning North America, Europe, and Asia. TourX appears to be a less mature product, with little to no public reviews, regional coverage, or detailed feature documentation.
While STAY offers a mobile app, chatbots, request management, and integrations with over 20 partners, TourX's capabilities are not publicly detailed. The critical question is whether your hotel values a tested, supported solution with a track record or if you're willing to explore a less certain product.
If your hotel needs a tried-and-tested guest app that has boosted operational efficiency at large chains like NH Hotels and RIU, go with STAY. It’s ideal for properties seeking a reliable, integrated platform with a proven impact on guest satisfaction and sustainability.
If your hotel is open to experimenting with a less documented platform and perhaps looking for a vendor with a smaller footprint, TourX might be an option. However, without recent reviews or case studies, it’s riskier, especially if you prioritize stability and proven results.
STAY scores a 4.78 out of 5 for ease of use, with most reviews praising its intuitive design, straightforward onboarding, and mobile experience. Users highlight that staff and guests find it simple to navigate, update content, and manage requests, leading to faster adoption.
TourX offers no publicly available review data or user ratings, making it impossible to assess its usability directly. Given the lack of feedback, STAY has a clear edge here, especially if your team values a platform with proven user satisfaction.
STAY offers 14 features, including a mobile app, chatbot, request management, room service ordering, local recommendations, and automatic translations—features that directly enhance the guest experience. TourX has no publicly documented features, leaving its capabilities uncertain.
If your hotel aims to digitize multiple touchpoints—like service requests, guest messaging, and multilingual support—STAY’s feature set supports these goals robustly. TourX’s unproven features suggest it’s less suitable unless you’re in early-stage testing.
STAY boasts a 4.83 out of 5 for customer support, with reviews praising the team’s responsiveness and helpfulness. Guests and staff note the platform’s smooth onboarding process and ongoing support, although some mention limited phone support and regional hours.
TourX provides no publicly available support ratings or reviews, making it impossible to evaluate its customer service quality. Based on data, STAY clearly leads in support quality and reliability.
STAY integrates with 20 verified partners, including hotelkit, SiteMinder, Oracle Hospitality, and Mews, enabling your hotel to connect seamlessly with existing systems. TourX’s integration count is zero, indicating it’s either a standalone solution or still developing integration capabilities.
For hotels seeking a platform with extensive third-party support, STAY offers a significant advantage, reducing complexity and ensuring smoother operational workflows. TourX’s lack of integrations raises concerns about scalability and compatibility.
With over 200 recent reviews, STAY’s overall rating is 3/5, with a high NPS of 9.59/5 and a 96% likelihood to recommend. Property types like luxury hotels, resorts, and city-center hotels particularly praise STAY’s operational improvements and guest satisfaction.
TourX has no reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to determine user sentiment or satisfaction levels. Given the data, STAY is the preferred choice for hoteliers prioritizing validated ratings and proven performance.
STAY’s pricing is clear at $300 per month, with no additional implementation fees or freemium options, making costs predictable for your budgeting process. TourX’s pricing details are not publicly disclosed, which complicates direct comparisons and planning.
If budget transparency is critical, STAY’s straightforward pricing model offers peace of mind, especially given its proven ROI.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a very simple or minimal app or operates in regions not well covered by STAY.
Not ideal if your hotel requires a platform with a proven track record, extensive integrations, and high user ratings.
STAY Guest App by STAY is a mature, well-supported platform with extensive proven benefits. Its strong review base, wide integrations, and feature set make it a dependable choice for hotels looking to digitize their guest experience confidently.
TourX may appeal to hotels willing to take a chance on a less documented platform. However, without recent reviews, case studies, or clear feature details, you risk investing in a solution that’s unproven at scale.
If you prioritize reliability, proven results, and comprehensive integration, STAY is the clear choice. TourX offers no current evidence of effectiveness or support to suggest it matches the maturity and trustworthiness of STAY.
This article provides an honest, data-backed comparison to help your team make an informed decision that aligns with your property’s needs and growth ambitions.
酒店客人应用程序 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,STAY Guest App 和 TourX 共享 0 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 来宾消息 | ||
| 消息路由 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 网络应用 | ||
| 聊天机器人 | ||
| 自动回复 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 2 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 8 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Thanks to STAY, we offer our guests an interaction tool with our staff. We can make real-time decisions with it. This simplifies our staff's duties at the same time. The guest expe..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"Implementing STAY contributed to a significant increase in our revenue and customer satisfaction. The app pays for itself. We have seen significant increases in consumption for all..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便... 多项评论强调 STAY 如何通过为客人提供数字化和可持续的信息和服务获取方式,显著提升客人体验。实时更新、移动服务订购和餐厅预订等功能可减少等待时间并提供便利。
该应用的用户界面和移动体验因其直观和易于操作而广受好评。无论是酒店员工还是客人,用户都发现更新信息和管理内容非常简单。
STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现... STAY 有助于提高酒店运营效率,因为它可以更快地处理客人请求、优化内部流程并减少前台排队。该工具通过将传统的纸质服务数字化来促进可持续实践,帮助酒店实现可持续发展目标。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
CMS 的亮点在于它的易用性和定制功能,但用户也指出了一些需要改进的地方,特别是在设计和功能方面的灵活性。
用户对 STAY 与各种内部应用程序和系统(包括 PMS 和 CRM 系统)的强大集成功能表示赞赏。这些集成简化了数据管理,并有助于为员工和客人提供无缝体验。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。STAY Guest App 和 TourX 共享许多核心 Hotel Guest Apps 功能,但各有独特的能力。STAY Guest App 提供 20 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 TourX 提供 0 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。STAY Guest App 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.8/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
STAY Guest App:否。TourX:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Hotel Guest Apps 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。STAY 的 HT Score 为 47,TourX (arcade solutions ag) 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问