The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
摘要
我们分析了 372 条经验证的酒店从业者评价,比较了功能集、定价和真实案例研究,以全面解析每个平台的优势。最佳选择取决于您的物业类型和优先事项:
Stayntouch 表现出色 在 ease of use and customer support 方面 — 尤其适合 brand 类型的物业 (4.9/5) ,拥有独特功能如 Mobile App and Guest App.
VIPS 表现出色 ,拥有独特功能如 Native Email Marketing and Guest CRM.
基于 HTR 上 372 条经验证的酒店从业者评价的并排评分。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推荐可能性 |
|
|
| 易用性 |
|
|
| 客户支持 |
|
|
| 性价比 |
|
|
| 起始价格 | From $800/mo | From $800/mo |
| 经验证的评价 | 372 | 0 |
在分析了 372 条经验证的评价后,Stayntouch 用户最看重其 用户友好界面, 整合与入职, 系统性能和可靠性,而 VIPS 用户则强调 。点击任意主题查看评价者的反馈。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 优点 | |
|
+
用户友好界面
▾
|
|
|
+
整合与入职
▾
|
|
|
+
系统性能和可靠性
▾
|
|
|
+
预订管理
▾
|
|
| 缺点 | |
|
−
报告和分析
▾
|
|
|
−
客房管理和客房服务
▾
|
|
|
−
预订管理
▾
|
|
各产品在不同物业规模、类型和区域的 物业管理系统 供应商中的排名——基于各细分市场中酒店从业者的经验证评价。
按酒店规模
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小型(10-24 间客房) ▾ | #18 51 条评价 | — |
| 中型(25-74 间客房) ▾ | #5 208 条评价 | — |
| 大型(75-199 间客房) ▾ | #7 29 条评价 | — |
| 超大型(200+ 间客房) ▾ | #2 58 条评价 | — |
按物业类型
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 精品酒店 ▾ | #6 220 条评价 | — |
| 豪华酒店 ▾ | #6 180 条评价 | — |
| 品牌/连锁酒店 ▾ | #3 152 条评价 | — |
| 长住酒店 ▾ | #14 17 条评价 | — |
按区域
| 细分市场 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北美 ▾ | #4 262 条评价 | — |
| 欧洲 ▾ | #12 64 条评价 | — |
| 亚太 | #21 3 条评价 | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations, guest satisfaction, and revenue. Both Stayntouch and VIPS PMS aim to simplify management tasks, but they differ in market presence, features, and user feedback. Stayntouch, with its extensive reviews and recent positive feedback, is often seen as a more proven option for hotels seeking a user-friendly, scalable solution. How do these two systems compare in key areas that matter to your team?
Stayntouch offers a cloud-based platform praised for its intuitive interface, ease of use, and robust integrations, especially popular among mid-size and boutique hotels. VIPS PMS, while feature-rich, is less widely reviewed and has limited market presence outside Europe, making its long-term reliability less documented. When it comes to recent user feedback, Stayntouch’s 317 reviews and a high NPS score suggest a more dependable choice for hotels needing proven support.
Both platforms aim to improve operational efficiency, but Stayntouch's recent updates and extensive third-party integrations give it an edge. How important is proven performance and recent user feedback in your decision?
If your hotel needs a flexible, mobile-friendly PMS with extensive third-party integrations, go with Stayntouch. It’s especially suited for boutique, independent, and branded hotels looking to enhance guest experiences and streamline operations.
If your hotel relies heavily on native marketing tools, CRM, and point-of-sale features, then VIPS PMS might appeal more, especially for properties in Europe with simpler operational needs. However, given the more extensive reviews and recent positive feedback, Stayntouch’s broader functionality and proven track record make it the safer choice for most hotels.
Stayntouch is rated 4.7/5 for ease of use, with many reviewers praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and mobile capabilities. Users consistently mention how new staff learn the system quickly and how the interface reduces operational confusion.
VIPS PMS has limited review data, with no recent ratings available, which makes it difficult to assess its usability. Based on available feedback, Stayntouch’s modern, cloud-based design and user-friendly screens give it a clear advantage.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch boasts 49 features, including mobile check-in, integrated ID scanner, online checkout, guest messaging, shift planning, and multi-currency support — many of which are absent in VIPS. VIPS offers native email marketing, guest CRM, gift vouchers, automated reminders, employee messaging, and EPoS, making it a strong option for properties needing marketing and POS features.
However, the sheer number of shared features (39) and Stayntouch’s additional unique functionalities make it more comprehensive for modern hotel operations.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s support is highly rated at 4.68/5, with reviewers highlighting its helpful onboarding, quick response times, and proactive support team. Many mention the ease of contacting support without ticketing delays and praise their ongoing upgrades.
VIPS has no recent or detailed review data on support quality, making a direct comparison difficult. Given the recent feedback and high ratings for Stayntouch, it maintains a strong support reputation.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch integrates with 188 verified partners, including popular systems like RoomPriceGenie, SiteMinder, and Unifocus, offering open API access. VIPS connects with just 11 verified partners, with only 7 overlapping with Stayntouch’s integrations.
This extensive integration ecosystem allows Stayntouch to serve as a central hub for various hotel systems, reducing manual work and siloed data.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s 317 reviews with a 4.56/5 rating, and a 94% likelihood to recommend, demonstrate strong user satisfaction. Hotels across segments, especially boutique and independent hotels, rate it highly; for example, Catbird Hotel experienced a 20-point increase in guest satisfaction after implementation.
VIPS scores no recent reviews, so its user ratings are unavailable. The recent, detailed feedback for Stayntouch suggests higher overall hotel satisfaction.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Both systems have a base price of $800, with no additional implementation fees or trial options disclosed. The pricing models are straightforward, but without clear details on licensing or potential add-ons, assessing value beyond the base price is challenging.
Since Stayntouch is more widely adopted and reviewed, its overall value is better supported by user feedback.
Not ideal if you operate a small hotel with minimal operational complexity or require deep native marketing features.
Not ideal if your hotel needs proven scalability, recent reviews, or extensive third-party integrations.
Stayntouch is a cloud-based PMS designed for hotels seeking a scalable, easy-to-use platform with strong support and integrations. Its recent reviews and high ratings confirm its effectiveness in improving operational efficiency and guest experiences.
VIPS offers an all-in-one management solution with native marketing and POS features, but its limited review data and regional focus make it less reliable for global or growing properties.
Choose Stayntouch if you want a proven, flexible system with recent positive hotel reviews. Opt for VIPS if your needs are primarily native marketing and POS features, and your hotel operates mainly in regions where VIPS has a strong presence.
In conclusion, for most hotels looking for a mature, well-supported PMS with extensive integrations and a user-friendly interface, Stayntouch stands out as the more dependable option based on recent data.
物业管理系统 的定价很少是简单明了的。以下是我们从各供应商公开定价数据中了解到的信息。请务必根据您的物业规模申请定制报价。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $800/mo | From $800/mo |
根据 HTR 的产品数据库,Stayntouch 和 VIPS PMS 共享 39 项功能。以下是关键差异——一方拥有而另一方缺少的功能。
| 功能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| 原生电子邮件营销 | ||
| 员工信息 | ||
| 在线结帐 | ||
| 客户关系管理 | ||
| 礼品卡 | ||
| 移动应用 | ||
| 自动提醒 | ||
| 访客应用 | ||
| 身份证扫描和注册预填 | ||
| 轮班计划 | ||
| 集成身份证和护照扫描仪 |
显示主要差异。这两款产品之间还有 4 项功能存在差异。
我们分析了 5 个经验证的案例研究,比较了酒店在四个关键业务目标上使用每个平台实际取得的成果。
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
该目标暂无已发布的案例研究。
酒店从业者喜爱的方面
该系统直观的设计便于操作,非常适合快速培训新员工。其醒目的视觉和组织元素有助于加快任务执行速度,提升员工能力,从而改善与顾客的互动体验。
Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设... Stayntouch 以其无缝集成和流畅的上手流程而著称,这得益于 David 和 Julia 等员工提供的个性化支持。这些员工提供的指导被认为非常宝贵,尤其是在系统过渡和设置方面。
Stayntouch 的服务总体可靠,很少出现重大故障,并通过云端提供持续支持。尽管总体评价良好,但一些用户也对公司快速发展背景下解决复杂问题的速度表示担忧。
酒店从业者提出异议的方面
虽然用户普遍称赞其易于访问且支持运营的报告,但他们也指出需要更具适应性的报告功能。一些报告缺乏细节或难以操作,凸显了可定制分析解决方案的必要性。
客房分配和客房服务功能因提升运营效率而获得积极反馈。然而,用户希望客房日志查看和任务安排功能能够得到改进,以满足特定的管理需求。
独特功能
评分差异最大的方面
这取决于您的需求。Stayntouch 和 VIPS PMS 共享许多核心 Property Management Systems 功能,但各有独特的能力。Stayntouch 提供 189 个经验证的集成合作伙伴,而 VIPS PMS 提供 11 个。在切换之前,请查看上方的功能对比以了解它们的差异。
小型酒店应优先考虑易用性和快速入职。Stayntouch 在易用性方面领先,评分为 4.7/5 对比 0.0/5。寻找透明定价以及试用或演示选项。在各产品页面上按物业规模筛选评价,了解与您类似的酒店的反馈。
Stayntouch:否。VIPS PMS:否。 两款产品目前均不提供免费版。大多数 Property Management Systems 供应商提供演示或试用——在做出承诺之前,请分别向各供应商申请体验。
HT Score 是一个综合排名,考虑 4 个标准组和十多个变量,帮助酒店从业者客观比较酒店科技产品。Stayntouch 的 HT Score 为 91,VIPS 的为 0。以下是评分的计算方式。
| 标准组 | 权重 | 衡量内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 客户评分与评价 |
|
用户对该产品的推荐度如何? 评分分数、评价数量、声量份额、评价深度、评价时效性、成功案例 ▾ 权重最高的因素。分析平均满意度评分(推荐可能性、易用性、支持、投资回报率)、相对于同类产品的评价总数、评价时效性(最近 6 个月内至少 20 条评价)以及跨独立酒店客户的声量份额以检测选择偏差。 |
| 合作伙伴生态系统 |
|
技术合作伙伴对该公司的推荐度如何? 合作伙伴推荐、集成数量、集成质量 ▾ 评估合作伙伴推荐作为专家信心投票、经验证集成的数量以及生态系统质量——集成合作伙伴的平均 HT Score。拥有更高质量集成生态系统的产品更有可能提供互联互通的技术栈。 |
| 以客户为中心 |
|
该组织以客户为中心的程度如何? 认证支持、评价一致性、资料完整性 ▾ 评估公司是否获得 HTR 客户支持认证、是否保持持续的评价收集(反馈驱动文化的指标)以及产品资料是否完整,包括功能、截图、定价和特性。 |
| 覆盖范围、持久力与资源 |
|
该公司的覆盖范围和资源有多广泛? 地理覆盖、持久力、公司资源、趋势评分 ▾ 衡量全球覆盖(服务的国家和区域)、经营年限作为稳定性指标、团队规模作为资源指标,以及基于近十二个月买家咨询、评价、合作伙伴推荐和媒体活动的趋势评分。 |
客户评分和评价是 HT Score 算法中最重要的因素。HTR 不接受付费以提高排名。所有评价均经过验证——只有经确认从属关系的酒店行业从业者才能提交评分。 查看完整 HT Score 评估方法 →
产品推荐顾问