The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
887件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、Citadelのユーザーはを最も評価し、Mewsのユーザーはease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibilityを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
| Citadel |
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
オンボーディングとサポート
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
レポート作成と分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の不動産管理システムベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | — | #3 329件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | — | #1 397件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | — | #3 45件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | — | #3 49件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | — | #1 483件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | — | #5 220件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | — | #2 170件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | — | #1 130件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント | Citadel |
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 ▾ | — | #8 106件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | — | #1 660件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 ▾ | — | #10 17件のレビュー |
| 中東 ▾ | — | #28 8件のレビュー |
Choosing between Citadel by Citadel and Mews PMS by Mews hinges on your hotel’s specific needs. Both aim to streamline operations, but Citadel’s limited review data and absence from recent feedback make it a less reliable choice. Conversely, Mews boasts over 750 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, extensive features, and strong support. Are you prepared to trust a platform backed by vibrant user confidence?
While Citadel claims to safeguard digital assets with AI-driven cybersecurity, it’s not a property management system in the traditional sense. Mews, with its cloud-based PMS, is built explicitly for hoteliers seeking operational and guest experience improvements. Which product aligns more with your core priorities?
Citadel’s core offering appears to focus on cybersecurity rather than hotel operations, with no recent reviews or user feedback to support its effectiveness for property management. Mews, however, is a mature, widely adopted PMS with over 750 reviews, 98 in the last six months, and a 9.12/5 NPS score, indicating high user satisfaction.
Mews’s recent reviews highlight its intuitive interface, automation, and extensive integrations, making it well-suited for modern hotels. Citadel’s lack of recent validation and absence of user feedback suggest it’s not a serious contender in the PMS space. Are you willing to risk choosing a platform without current user validation? Clearly, Mews stands out as the more credible and proven option.
If your hotel needs a flexible, feature-rich PMS with a broad partner ecosystem, go with Mews. It is ideal for boutique hotels, city center properties, hostels, and chains that want automation, integrations, and guest-centric tools. Citadel’s cybersecurity focus and lack of hotel-specific features make it unsuitable for daily hotel management.
If your priority is digital security and threat detection—perhaps for data protection—it’s worth exploring Citadel, but only as a complementary solution, not a PMS. For core property management, Mews’s proven track record, feature set, and positive recent reviews make it the clear choice for hotels wanting to improve operations and guest satisfaction.
Mews’s ease of use is highly praised, with a 4.7/5 rating and recent reviews emphasizing its modern, intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal training needs. Users describe Mews as “very user-friendly,” with “an intuitive setup” that simplifies complex tasks like reservations and payments.
Citadel, however, scores a 0/5 with no recent reviews or user feedback, making it impossible to assess usability or onboarding quality. Given the positive feedback and high usability ratings for Mews, it’s clear that Mews is the easier platform to adopt and operate daily. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers over 59 features, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, CRM, online check-in, integrated POS, and real-time reporting. Its extensive marketplace with over 1,000 integrations allows hotels to customize and extend functionality.
Citadel provides no publicly available features or integrations, rendering it unsuitable as a PMS. The sheer volume and quality of features in Mews, combined with its open API, give it a decisive advantage for hotels seeking comprehensive management tools. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings (4.27/5) and recent positive reviews highlight its responsive, knowledgeable support team that resolves issues efficiently. Hotelers praise Mews’s onboarding process and ongoing support, often citing support as a key factor in successful adoption.
Citadel has no recent reviews or support ratings available, making it impossible to evaluate support quality. Given Mews’s consistent praise in recent reviews, it clearly provides better support. Edge: Mews.
Mews boasts 336 verified partners, including shared integrations with Criton, Sage, and Orange Hotel Marketing, and offers over 1,000 integrations through its marketplace. Citadel has zero verified partners or integrations listed, limiting its flexibility and scalability.
For hotels looking to connect with channel managers, revenue tools, or guest engagement platforms, Mews’s extensive ecosystem is a significant advantage. Citadel’s lack of integrations disqualifies it from serious consideration in a modern hotel tech stack. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 and 93% likelihood to recommend are backed by recent reviews from diverse hotel segments, including boutique, city center, and hostels. Hoteliers consistently praise its user-friendliness, automation, and support.
Citadel has no recent reviews or ratings, so it cannot be compared. Based on current data, Mews is clearly the preferred choice among hotel operators. Edge: Mews.
Citadel’s pricing is not publicly available, but it appears to be a cybersecurity platform rather than a PMS, which likely involves custom quotes. Mews’s standard pricing is $900 per month, with no implementation fees or additional charges, making it transparent and predictable.
Given the lack of pricing transparency for Citadel, and considering Mews’s straightforward model, for hotel management needs, Mews’s value proposition is clearer and more accessible.
Citadel excels as a cybersecurity solution but does not serve as a PMS, making it unsuitable for hotel operations. Mews, with its proven, feature-rich platform and extensive recent positive reviews, is the clear choice for hotels seeking efficiency, guest satisfaction, and scalability.
If your hotel needs a management system that automates, integrates, and improves guest experiences, go with Mews. Citadel may be valuable for data security, but it does not replace the operational capabilities of a modern PMS—make your decision based on your core needs.
In summary, Mews’s recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive features make it the stronger choice for your hotel. Citadel’s lack of recent validation and absence from the hotel management space put it at a disadvantage.
8件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Mewsは優れたレポート機能と分析機能を提供しているものの、よりカスタマイズ可能で柔軟なレポート機能の必要性を指摘するレビューが複数ある。特に予約状況や収... Mewsは優れたレポート機能と分析機能を提供しているものの、よりカスタマイズ可能で柔軟なレポート機能の必要性を指摘するレビューが複数ある。特に予約状況や収益分析において、より詳細なデータ分析を求める声がユーザーから上がっている。
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。CitadelとMews PMSは多くの主要なProperty Management Systems機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。Citadelは0件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、Mews PMSは335件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。Mews PMSは使いやすさで4.7/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
Citadel:いいえ。Mews PMS:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのProperty Management Systemsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。CitadelのHT Scoreは0、Mewsは100です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー