Counter vs. CQR PMS:
あなたに最適なのはどちら？

The Decision

Choosing between Counter by Counter and CQR PMS by CQR comes down to your property’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but Counter offers a more feature-rich, widely adopted platform tailored for hostels and small hotels. CQR, with its limited reviews and regional absence, still presents some options but lacks the proven track record of Counter. So, which system aligns best with your hotel’s goals?

Counter is designed to serve busy hostels and small hotel teams seeking a highly functional, easy-to-use system with extensive integrations and support. CQR, meanwhile, remains a lower-profile option, possibly suitable if you value a local or niche provider but with less confidence in its support or features. Does your team prioritize proven reliability and features?

Is Counter or CQR Better for Hotels?

Counter is a property management system built specifically for hostels, boasting a 4.73/5 overall rating based on 54 reviews, most recent within the last six months. Its core strength lies in ease of use, customer support, and a rich set of features like channel management, booking engine, and automation tools. Conversely, CQR PMS has no publicly available reviews, no recent feedback, and zero verified integrations, making it difficult to gauge its effectiveness or user satisfaction.

Counter’s reviews highlight simplicity, quick onboarding, and responsive support as key benefits, especially appreciated by hostel operators managing high-volume bookings. CQR’s lack of active reviews and absence from regional markets suggest less confidence and proven performance. Given this, which platform do you trust to support your current and future growth?

Counter vs CQR: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel primarily operates as a hostel or small property requiring a flexible, easy-to-use system with integrated channel management, Counter is the clear choice. Its 16.5+ HTR Score and 4.73/5 overall rating from 54 recent reviews reflect strong satisfaction, especially in ease of use and support.

If your focus is on a less established provider or you’re operating outside Counter’s supported regions (Europe, North America, Middle East, South America, Asia Pacific, Africa), or if you prefer a system with fewer features for a more streamlined operation, CQR might be an option—but with less confidence. Keep in mind, Counter’s extensive integrations and proven track record make it more reliable for high-volume, guest-focused operations.

Is Counter or CQR Easier to Use?

Counter’s user interface is lauded for its simplicity, receiving a 4.6/5 ease of use rating. Users describe it as intuitive, with a clean layout that staff can learn quickly, often requiring minimal training. The onboarding experience is rated 4.7/5, with many reviews emphasizing fast, helpful support from dedicated agents like Evelyn and Max, who respond promptly to issues.

CQR lacks publicly available review data, so assessing its usability is speculative. Given Counter’s high user ratings and recent positive feedback, it’s clear that Counter provides a more user-friendly experience. Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Features: Counter or CQR?

Counter offers 19 features, including a channel manager, booking engine, automated night audit, POS integration, guest CRM, group booking, multi-currency, and multi-lingual support. These tools address key operational needs and are often cited as differentiators, especially the automated revenue and housekeeping modules.

CQR’s feature set isn’t detailed, with no unique features listed or verified integrations available. This limits its comparability and suggests Counter’s feature-rich environment is more suited for active property management. Edge: Counter.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Counter or CQR?

Counter’s support receives a 4.96/5 rating, with reviews praising its responsiveness, professionalism, and helpfulness. Specific mentions include quick responses from team members like Evelyn and Max, who assist with technical issues and onboarding.

There is no publicly available review data for CQR’s support, leaving its service quality unverified. Given Counter’s high satisfaction ratings and recent positive reviews, it clearly offers superior support. Edge: Counter.

Which Has More Integrations: Counter or CQR?

Counter integrates with 7 verified partners, including industry leaders like SiteMinder, Stripe, and Cloudbeds, offering flexibility for multi-platform operations. Its integrations support channel management, payments, and access control, simplifying daily tasks.

CQR has no verified partners or integrations listed, which significantly limits its utility in a multi-platform environment. For hotels seeking connectivity to multiple OTAs and payment solutions, Counter’s integrations are a strong advantage. Edge: Counter.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Counter or CQR?

Counter’s reviews, totaling 54 in recent months, show a high satisfaction rate with a 91% likelihood to recommend. Hotels of various sizes, especially hostels, rate it 4.75/5 for its ease of use, support, and features.

CQR’s lack of reviews or ratings prevents any meaningful comparison. Without a proven track record, Counter’s ratings serve as a more reliable indicator of user satisfaction. Edge: Counter.

How Much Do Counter and CQR Cost?

Neither Counter nor CQR publicly lists pricing details, which suggests they may customize quotes based on property size or requirements. Counter’s model emphasizes no implementation fee and no free tier, implying a paid service with possible variable costs based on features.

CQR’s pricing remains unconfirmed; therefore, your best approach is to request quotes from both providers. Given Counter’s transparency and established value, it likely offers better clarity on ROI.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Counter?

• Hotels that operate as hostels and need an easy-to-manage, intuitive PMS.
• Teams seeking automation for reservations, payments, and housekeeping.
• Hotels that require integrations with OTAs, POS systems, and access control.
• Properties looking for mobile-friendly management tools.
• Hotels wanting reliable support with recent positive reviews.

Not ideal if you:

• Require a highly customized, niche system outside Counter’s feature set.
• Operate at a scale that demands enterprise-level solutions.
• Are located in regions not supported by Counter’s current presence.

Edge: Counter.

What Type of Hotel Should Use CQR?

• Small hotels or properties in regions where CQR has a local presence.
• Hotels seeking a minimal, straightforward PMS with basic features.
• Teams comfortable with less proven, less reviewed software.
• Operators who prefer niche or boutique systems tailored to specific markets.

Not ideal if you:

• Need extensive integrations or automation features.
• Prioritize customer support and proven reliability.
• Require a system with a strong reputation or recent reviews.
• Operate in regions outside CQR’s current market presence.

Edge: CQR (tentative, due to lack of reviews).

The Bottom Line for Hotels

Counter by Counter stands out as the more trusted and feature-complete PMS, especially for hostels and small hotels. Its extensive integrations, high user ratings, and recent positive reviews confirm its position as a reliable choice for busy properties aiming to optimize operations.

CQR PMS remains an untested option with no recent feedback or verified integrations, limiting its appeal unless you have specific regional or niche needs. For most hoteliers seeking a proven, supported, and comprehensive system, Counter is the clear winner.

If your hotel values proven reliability, extensive features, and excellent support, Counter is the best fit. Choose CQR only if you are exploring niche solutions with niche markets and are willing to accept unverified support quality.

In summary, Counter’s proven track record and feature set make it the safer, more strategic investment for your hotel’s growth and operational efficiency.