The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
まとめ
251件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューを分析し、機能セット、料金、実際の導入事例を比較して、各プラットフォームの強みを明らかにしました。最適な選択は、施設の種類と優先事項によって異なります:
EMS Software 優れています .
Tripleseat 優れています ease of use and customer supportにおいて — 特にbrandの施設に (5.0/5) 、Contact Management/CRM and PCI Compliant Paymentsなどの独自機能を備えています.
HTRの251件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューに基づく並列評価。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推奨度 |
|
|
| 使いやすさ |
|
|
| カスタマーサポート |
|
|
| コストパフォーマンス |
|
|
| 開始価格 | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| 認証済みレビュー | 0 | 251 |
251件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、EMS Softwareのユーザーはを最も評価し、Tripleseatのユーザーはonboarding and support, event management efficiency, user-friendly interfaceを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Event Management Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Platform Customization
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Proposal and Communication Tools
▾
|
|
|
−
ドキュメント管理
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別のイベント管理ソフトウェアベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | — | #1 52件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | — | #2 152件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | — | #3 17件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | — | #2 9件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | — | #2 155件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | — | #2 93件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | — | #2 55件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | — | #2 12件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 ▾ | — | #1 224件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | — | #4 8件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 | — | #4 1件のレビュー |
Choosing between EMS Software’s Event Management platform and Tripleseat for Hotels depends heavily on your hotel’s specific needs. EMS offers a broad, all-encompassing solution designed for complex, large-scale event planning, while Tripleseat emphasizes ease of use, sales, and catering management. Both platforms aim to streamline your event operations, but they target different hotel profiles with distinct strengths and weaknesses.
EMS’s comprehensive functionality caters to organizations that manage a high volume of intricate meetings and conference spaces, but it lacks recent reviews and user ratings. Tripleseat, by contrast, boasts over 219 reviews, highly recent feedback, and a stellar score of 96.7, making it the clearer choice for hotels seeking a proven platform. Do you need a feature-rich enterprise system or a user-friendly, well-supported solution?
EMS Software’s Event Management system has been around since 1986, claiming to help millions create effective meetings. However, its review score is 0/5 with no recent feedback or user ratings, indicating a lack of active user engagement or updates. Tripleseat, on the other hand, has a 4.78/5 rating based on 219 reviews, with 62 recent reviews in the last six months, showcasing ongoing customer satisfaction.
The core difference is that EMS emphasizes complex space scheduling and resource management, often used by educational institutions and large enterprises. Tripleseat excels at simplifying sales, client communication, and catering workflows, making it ideal for boutique hotels and properties with high event volumes. Do you prioritize extensive functionality or ease of adoption and support?
If your hotel needs an intuitive platform focused on sales, client communication, and catering management, go with Tripleseat. Its strong review base, recent positive feedback, and 11 unique features—such as CRM, task management, and eSignatures—make it well-suited for properties seeking to boost revenue and streamline sales processes.
If your team requires detailed space planning, complex resource allocation, and large-scale event scheduling, EMS might seem appealing. But with no recent reviews and a stagnant rating of 0/5, its current user sentiment signals that it’s not the reliable option today. For most hotels, Tripleseat’s proven track record outweighs EMS’s extensive but unreviewed capabilities.
Tripleseat scores 4.53/5 in ease of use, based on user reviews praising its intuitive interface, straightforward workflows, and quick onboarding experience. Multiple reviewers mention how easy it is for their teams to adopt and navigate, with support teams actively assisting during setup.
EMS, lacking recent reviews and user ratings, offers no current data on usability. Its outdated score of 0/5 and absence of recent feedback suggest that it might be difficult to learn and adopt. Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat provides 11 features exclusive to its platform, including CRM, content management, client portals, task management, customizable BEOs, eSignatures, PCI payments, diagramming, and seating management. This breadth of features directly supports hotel sales, event planning, and operational efficiency.
EMS has no unique features listed and offers no shared functionalities with Tripleseat, indicating limited or outdated capabilities. Given Tripleseat’s richer feature set and active development, it holds a decisive edge here.
Tripleseat’s customer support scores 4.55/5, with reviews highlighting fast response times, helpful assistance, and ongoing support. Users describe the team as “quick to respond,” “educative,” and “responsive,” fostering smooth onboarding and issue resolution.
EMS’s support ratings are unavailable, and with no recent reviews, there’s no current evidence of support quality. Its lack of recent activity suggests that Tripleseat’s support is the more reliable choice. Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat integrates with 15 verified partners, including property management systems, online booking tools, and payment processors like Stripe. It supports seamless data flow across platforms, which helps streamline operations and reduce manual work.
EMS, with no verified partners listed, appears isolated or outdated in its integration capabilities. For a hotel looking to connect with existing systems, Tripleseat’s extensive partner network offers a critical advantage. Edge: Tripleseat.
Tripleseat’s reviews are recent, with a high overall rating of 4.78/5 and a 91% likelihood to recommend among users in various segments, including boutique hotels, resorts, and branded properties. Hotels consistently praise its ease of use, support, and features, especially in the last six months.
EMS has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge current user sentiment. The absence of feedback disqualifies it as a strong candidate, while Tripleseat’s active, positive reviews make it the clear leader. Edge: Tripleseat.
EMS does not publicly disclose its pricing, but it appears to lack a free trial or transparent fee structure. Tripleseat costs $400 monthly, with no free tier or setup fees, providing a predictable investment model.
For most hotels, transparent pricing and proven value matter more than theoretical capabilities. Tripleseat’s straightforward pricing combined with its active reviews supports better budget planning.
Hotels that manage multi-purpose conference centers, large educational institutions, or enterprise clients handling complex scheduling may consider EMS. The platform’s depth in space management and resource allocation aligns with large-scale event needs.
However, EMS is not ideal if your hotel is smaller or relies on quick, straightforward event sales and catering. Its outdated review status suggests it might not deliver the reliability needed for daily hotel operations.
Not ideal if:
Hotels that prioritize sales, catering, and event booking—especially boutique, conference, or city-center properties—should consider Tripleseat. Its ease of use, robust CRM, automation features, and recent positive reviews make it suitable for dynamic sales teams.
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Tripleseat is a proven, highly-rated platform currently supported by active user reviews, while EMS remains unreviewed for years and lacks recent feedback. For most hotels, Tripleseat offers a reliable, user-friendly, and feature-rich solution that drives better results.
Choose EMS only if your hotel manages highly complex, large-scale events and you have the resources to evaluate its older, less supported system. Otherwise, Tripleseat’s recent reviews, broad feature set, and positive customer feedback make it the better option.
If your hotel seeks a platform that enhances sales and simplifies event management, go with Tripleseat. Its active user base and extensive partner network give you confidence in its ongoing support and evolution.
For hotels requiring advanced space planning, resource management, or enterprise-grade scheduling, EMS may still appeal. But without recent reviews or active support, it’s a risky choice for today’s hotel environment.
In conclusion, Tripleseat’s proven track record, recent reviews, and feature set make it the clear, dependable choice for most hotels looking to optimize event operations today.
イベント管理ソフトウェア の料金はわかりにくいことが多いです。各ベンダーの公開料金データから判明している情報をまとめました。施設の規模に合わせたカスタム見積もりを必ずご依頼ください。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
HTRの製品データベースによると、EMS Event ManagementとTripleseatは0個の機能を共有しています。以下は主な違い — 一方にあって他方にない機能です。
| 機能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| カスタマイズ可能なBEO、提案書、契約書 | ||
| クライアントコミュニケーションポータル | ||
| コンテンツとファイルの管理 | ||
| タスク管理(タスクとリマインダー) | ||
| リードフォーム | ||
| 連絡先管理/CRM |
1件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"Tripleseat provides the best ROI of any system."
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
Despite some initial onboarding challenges, users commend the support team for their responsiveness and effectiveness in solving issues and providing... Despite some initial onboarding challenges, users commend the support team for their responsiveness and effectiveness in solving issues and providing assistance throughout the setup process.
Tripleseat is praised for streamlining event management, making it easier to handle communication, details, and coordination across teams, leading to... Tripleseat is praised for streamlining event management, making it easier to handle communication, details, and coordination across teams, leading to time savings and better team alignment.
Reviewers consistently mention the ease of use and intuitive design of Tripleseat, highlighting its capacity to simplify complex tasks and improve use... Reviewers consistently mention the ease of use and intuitive design of Tripleseat, highlighting its capacity to simplify complex tasks and improve user experience for both clients and staff.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
While users appreciate the platform's core features, they express a desire for better integration with other systems like revenue management tools and... While users appreciate the platform's core features, they express a desire for better integration with other systems like revenue management tools and billing to enhance overall workflow efficiency.
Tripleseat simplifies creating proposals and facilitates consistent client communication with features like integrated communication tools and real-ti... Tripleseat simplifies creating proposals and facilitates consistent client communication with features like integrated communication tools and real-time updates across platforms.
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。EMS Event ManagementとTripleseatは多くの主要なEvent Management Software機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。EMS Event Managementは0件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、Tripleseatは15件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。Tripleseatは使いやすさで4.5/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
EMS Event Management:いいえ。Tripleseat:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのEvent Management Softwareベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。EMS SoftwareのHT Scoreは0、Tripleseatは97です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー