The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
887件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、GRANDのユーザーはを最も評価し、Mewsのユーザーはease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibilityを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
オンボーディングとサポート
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
レポート作成と分析
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の不動産管理システムベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | — | #3 329件のレビュー |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | — | #1 397件のレビュー |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | — | #3 45件のレビュー |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | — | #3 49件のレビュー |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | — | #1 483件のレビュー |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | — | #5 220件のレビュー |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | — | #2 170件のレビュー |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | — | #1 130件のレビュー |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 ▾ | — | #8 106件のレビュー |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | — | #1 660件のレビュー |
| アジア太平洋 ▾ | — | #10 17件のレビュー |
| 中東 ▾ | — | #28 8件のレビュー |
Choosing between GRAND PMS by GRAND and Mews PMS by Mews requires understanding how each addresses your hotel’s operational needs. Both systems aim to streamline property management, but their approaches and market presence differ significantly. GRAND promises a next-generation, AI-powered platform but lacks recent user feedback and reviews, casting doubt on its current reliability. Mews, on the other hand, boasts over 750 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its ease of use, extensive integrations, and high customer satisfaction. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s growth ambitions?
GRAND positions itself as a forward-thinking, cloud-based platform that unifies hotel and venue operations, emphasizing automation and collaboration. However, with zero recent reviews and a lack of user feedback, it remains an untested option in today’s competitive landscape. Mews, by contrast, benefits from a robust global user base and recent reviews that validate its claims through real-world experiences. The 98 recent reviews in the last six months underscore its ongoing development and responsiveness to user needs.
While GRAND aims to combine event management and proposals into an integrated platform, its current absence of user ratings and independent reviews makes it difficult to validate its performance. Mews’s high 4.62/5 rating and 93% likelihood to recommend reflect consistent user satisfaction. Are you willing to risk an unproven system, or do you prefer a platform already validated by hundreds of hoteliers?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, well-supported PMS with proven integrations, scalability, and a large community of active users, go with Mews. Its extensive features—over 45 exclusive modules like revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and integrated channel management—make it a versatile choice for properties of all sizes. Conversely, if your hotel seeks a futuristic, AI-driven platform with built-in event management and proposals, and if you’re comfortable with unverified claims, GRAND might appeal. But given the lack of recent validation, Mews’s proven track record makes it the safer bet.
For hotels prioritizing operational efficiency, seamless integrations, and customer support, Mews delivers a more mature ecosystem. If innovation and experimental features are your priority, GRAND’s promises are enticing, but the absence of recent user experience data makes it a risky choice. Would you rather rely on a platform with proven performance or gamble on an untested, emerging system?
Mews scores a near-perfect 4.7/5 for ease of use, with consistent user praise for its intuitive, modern interface and simple onboarding process. Its high ratings (98 recent reviews) indicate ongoing satisfaction, ease of adoption, and positive staff experiences. Conversely, GRAND provides no visible user ratings or recent reviews, making it impossible to evaluate its usability or onboarding experience. The lack of validation suggests potential usability issues or untested features.
Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a comprehensive suite of 45+ features exclusive to its platform, including multi-lingual support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated POS, real-time reporting, and a vast marketplace with over 1,000 integrations. GRAND, on the other hand, claims to unify bookings, housekeeping, billing, and event management but offers no detailed feature count or independent validation of its capabilities.
Given the extensive, proven features and active development, Mews clearly has a more mature and feature-rich ecosystem. Its dedicated modules support a wide range of hotel operations, surpassing GRAND’s unverified offerings. Which platform do you trust to provide a broad, reliable feature set?
Edge: Mews.
Mews maintains a strong reputation for customer support, with an average support rating of 4.27/5 based on recent reviews. Users describe its support team as quick, helpful, and proactive, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. GRAND’s support experience is unverified, with no recent reviews or independent feedback available, raising concerns about responsiveness and reliability.
Given Mews’s proven support track record and recent positive reviews, it’s the safer choice for hotels that value dependable assistance during implementation and daily operations. Without validation, GRAND’s support remains uncertain. Which support system would you prefer to rely on?
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent review count of 758 and a high 93% likelihood to recommend position it as the more trusted platform among hoteliers. Its reviews highlight consistent satisfaction, ease of use, and tangible operational gains across diverse property types. GRAND’s absence of recent reviews and user feedback means it lacks current validation or confidence from the hotel community.
For properties seeking proven stability and peer affirmation, Mews’s large, active user base and recent high ratings make it the clear leader. Are you comfortable adopting a system with no recent user validation, or do you prefer one endorsed by hundreds?
Edge: Mews.
Both GRAND and Mews are priced at a flat $900 monthly fee, with no mention of implementation fees or tiered pricing options. However, the lack of detailed pricing tiers or optional modules makes it difficult to assess long-term value, especially for smaller properties or those seeking flexible packages.
Since Mews is well-documented and includes a clear, comparable pricing structure, hoteliers can better forecast costs and ROI. GRAND’s pricing appears straightforward but lacks transparency about potential additional charges or scalable options. Which pricing approach aligns better with your budget planning?
Not ideal if:
Edge: Not recommended due to lack of recent validation.
Not ideal if:
Edge: Mews.
Grand’s promise of a next-generation, AI-driven platform is compelling but remains unvalidated for real-world hotel operations. Without recent reviews, its reliability, support, and feature set are uncertain, making it a risky choice for most hotels.
Mews, in contrast, is a mature, extensively reviewed platform trusted by hundreds of hoteliers worldwide. Its proven ease of use, broad feature set, and active support network make it a more dependable and scalable option for hotels ready to grow.
If your hotel values stability, proven performance, and extensive integration capabilities, choose Mews. If you’re an innovator willing to accept the risk of unproven technology, GRAND might appeal, but be prepared for potential pitfalls.
In conclusion, for most hotels, Mews’s recent validation and large user community make it the preferable choice.
8件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
Mewsは優れたレポート機能と分析機能を提供しているものの、よりカスタマイズ可能で柔軟なレポート機能の必要性を指摘するレビューが複数ある。特に予約状況や収... Mewsは優れたレポート機能と分析機能を提供しているものの、よりカスタマイズ可能で柔軟なレポート機能の必要性を指摘するレビューが複数ある。特に予約状況や収益分析において、より詳細なデータ分析を求める声がユーザーから上がっている。
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。GRAND PMSとMews PMSは多くの主要なProperty Management Systems機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。GRAND PMSは0件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、Mews PMSは335件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。Mews PMSは使いやすさで4.7/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
GRAND PMS:いいえ。Mews PMS:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのProperty Management Systemsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。GRANDのHT Scoreは0、Mewsは100です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー