The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
まとめ
549件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューを分析し、機能セット、料金、実際の導入事例を比較して、各プラットフォームの強みを明らかにしました。最適な選択は、施設の種類と優先事項によって異なります:
HOTELTIME 優れています ease of use and customer supportにおいて — 特にbrandの施設に (4.9/5) 、Payment processing and Guest CRMなどの独自機能を備えています.
Sphère Informatique 優れています .
HTRの549件の認証済みホテル経営者レビューに基づく並列評価。
| HTScore |
|
|
| 推奨度 |
|
|
| 使いやすさ |
|
|
| カスタマーサポート |
|
|
| コストパフォーマンス |
|
|
| 開始価格 | From $600/mo | Contact sales |
| 認証済みレビュー | 549 | 0 |
549件の認証済みレビューを分析した結果、HOTELTIMEのユーザーはuser interface and learning curve, テクニカルサポート, reporting and analyticsを最も評価し、Sphère Informatiqueのユーザーはを高く評価しています。各テーマをクリックすると、レビュー投稿者の声をご覧いただけます。
|
|
|
|---|---|
| 長所 | |
|
+
User Interface and Learning Curve
▾
|
|
|
+
テクニカルサポート
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
System Stability and Updates
▾
|
|
| 短所 | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Automation Features
▾
|
|
|
−
モバイル最適化
▾
|
|
各セグメントのホテル経営者による認証済みレビューに基づく、施設規模・タイプ・地域別の不動産管理システムベンダー内ランキング。
ホテル規模別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 小規模(10〜24室) ▾ | #5 219件のレビュー | — |
| 中規模(25〜74室) ▾ | #3 238件のレビュー | — |
| 大規模(75〜199室) ▾ | #2 46件のレビュー | — |
| 特大規模(200室以上) ▾ | #8 7件のレビュー | — |
施設タイプ別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| ブティック ▾ | #5 239件のレビュー | — |
| ラグジュアリー ▾ | #3 241件のレビュー | — |
| ブランド/チェーン ▾ | #4 143件のレビュー | — |
| 長期滞在型 ▾ | #4 49件のレビュー | — |
地域別
| セグメント |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 北米 | #52 4件のレビュー | — |
| ヨーロッパ ▾ | #2 384件のレビュー | — |
| アジア太平洋 ▾ | #5 111件のレビュー | — |
| 中東 ▾ | #1 21件のレビュー | — |
When choosing a property management system (PMS), your goal is to streamline operations, improve guest satisfaction, and maximize revenue. HotelTime PMS by HOTELTIME and Logiciel Chloe by Sphère Informatique both aim to solve these challenges, but they diverge significantly in features, user base, and market presence. HOTELTIME's extensive reviews and recent user feedback make it the more data-backed option, but understanding their differences will help you decide which aligns best with your hotel’s needs.
Are you looking for a well-established, feature-rich platform with a proven track record? Or do you need a specialized solution optimized for real estate management? Let’s compare both to see which suits your property best.
HotelTime PMS is a comprehensive cloud-based platform with over 650 properties across more than 20 countries, boasting a 4.83/5 overall rating from 433 reviews. It integrates reservations, housekeeping, POS, revenue management, guest CRM, and much more, making it suitable for properties of all sizes, including resorts, boutique hotels, and large chains.
Logiciel Chloe, on the other hand, is an AI-driven property management system mainly geared toward real estate operations. It lacks publicly available reviews and a significant user base, making it difficult to gauge its effectiveness or suitability for typical hospitality settings. While Chloe may excel in property performance analysis and tenant feedback, it’s not explicitly designed for hotel management.
Given the more recent reviews, higher ratings, and larger user base, HotelTime is clearly the more tested and reliable choice for hotel operators. Are you prioritizing a platform with proven hotel-specific features and support? If so, HotelTime is the clear front-runner.
If your hotel needs an all-in-one operational management system with extensive integrations, HotelTime PMS is the better fit. Its suite of 51 unique features—including integrated CRS, payment processing, guest CRM, automated night audit, and channel management—caters to properties seeking a unified platform that handles reservations, revenue, and guest engagement.
Conversely, if your focus is on real estate, tenant management, and property performance analytics, Chloe’s AI-driven insights could be advantageous. But for hospitality operations, HotelTime’s broad feature set and proven track record make it the more appropriate choice.
For hoteliers, HotelTime’s scalability and stability—especially given its recent 27 reviews in the past six months—offer confidence in ongoing support and feature development. Chloe’s niche appeal limits its relevance unless your property operates primarily as real estate or serviced apartments with a focus on performance analytics.
HotelTime PMS scores a 4.66/5 for ease of use from over 400 reviews, with many users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and user-friendly design. Support staff are frequently highlighted for their responsiveness, with a 4.73/5 support rating, making staff adoption smoother despite some complexity in module setups.
Chloe lacks publicly available user ratings, reviews, or detailed feedback, which suggests less user-facing information about usability. Its advanced AI features may imply a steeper learning curve, especially for hotel staff not familiar with AI-based management tools.
Edge: HotelTime. Its high ratings and extensive positive feedback confirm it’s easier for your team to adopt and operate effectively.
HotelTime PMS offers 51 unique features tailored for hotel operations, including EPoS, integrated CRS, payment processing, guest profiles, housekepingMobile, revenue management modules, booking engine, channel manager, digital registration, and automated reminders. These features directly support daily hotel management and guest experiences.
Chloe’s features focus on AI-driven analytics, property performance summaries, and tenant management tools. However, it lacks the extensive operational modules specific to hotels, such as housekeeping, booking engines, or POS integrations.
Edge: HotelTime. Its broad feature set is designed for hotel-specific needs, giving you more control and functionality in daily operations.
HotelTime’s support system scores a 4.73/5, with many reviewers noting prompt, knowledgeable, and helpful assistance. Clients appreciate the onboarding process, ongoing support, and proactive updates, which are critical for smooth hotel operations.
Chloe does not have publicly available reviews or ratings. Given its niche focus and smaller team, support quality cannot be confidently assessed, making HotelTime’s support reputation a significant advantage.
Edge: HotelTime. Its well-rated support services are a key factor in ensuring your team can maximize platform value with minimal disruptions.
HotelTime integrates with 58 verified partners, including major systems like SiteMinder, Profitroom, and STR, offering extensive options for channel management, booking engines, and revenue tools. Four shared partners with Chloe include customer alliance, onity, and D-Edge, but HotelTime’s larger ecosystem provides more flexibility.
Chloe’s 11 verified integrations are limited, with no evidence of extensive third-party connectivity tailored for hotel management. For a hotel aiming for a connected tech stack, HotelTime’s wider integration network is clearly advantageous.
Edge: HotelTime. Its broader, more verified integrations support a more interconnected property management environment.
HotelTime has a 4.83/5 overall rating based on 433 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, support, and feature richness. Its rating among luxury hotels, resorts, and city center properties remains high, with 93% likelihood to recommend.
Chloe lacks sufficient reviews or ratings from actual hotel users, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or property-specific performance. HotelTime’s strong, recent review data makes it the more reliable indicator of hotelier satisfaction.
Edge: HotelTime. Its high and recent ratings reflect consistent user approval and practical usefulness.
HotelTime’s pricing begins at $600 per month, with no free tier or implementation fee, offering a straightforward subscription model. Chloe’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, which suggests it may be tailored or on a quote basis, typical for niche enterprise solutions.
Given HotelTime’s transparent pricing, your hotel can better plan and allocate budget, while Chloe’s costs remain uncertain, potentially adding complexity to your decision-making.
Hotels that will benefit from HotelTime’s extensive features include:
Not ideal if your hotel is very small, independent, or primarily focused on real estate management without hospitality-specific functions.
Chloe may suit:
Not ideal if your hotel demands a comprehensive, front-to-back hospitality system with reservations, POS, housekeeping, and guest engagement modules.
The core difference is that HotelTime PMS is a comprehensive, hotel-specific platform with a proven track record, while Chloe specializes in AI-driven property analytics often geared toward real estate operations.
If your hotel requires a reliable, feature-rich PMS with extensive integrations and support, go with HotelTime. Its large user base, recent high ratings, and detailed reviews assure you of its suitability for most hotel operations.
Choose Chloe only if your needs are centered on property performance analytics, tenant management, or if your hotel operates more like a real estate asset than a traditional hospitality property. Its niche focus and lack of hotel-specific features make it less suitable for typical hotel management.
In conclusion, HotelTime PMS is the clear choice for hoteliers seeking a trusted, well-rated, feature-packed platform backed by recent positive reviews. Chloe’s AI capabilities are impressive but better suited for property owners focused on operational insights rather than daily hotel management.
Note: This comparison is based on current user reviews, feature sets, and market presence data. HotelTechReport strongly recommends testing both systems through demos or trials before finalizing your decision.
不動産管理システム の料金はわかりにくいことが多いです。各ベンダーの公開料金データから判明している情報をまとめました。施設の規模に合わせたカスタム見積もりを必ずご依頼ください。
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $600/mo | — |
HTRの製品データベースによると、HotelTime PMSとLogiciel Chloeは0個の機能を共有しています。以下は主な違い — 一方にあって他方にない機能です。
| 機能 |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| EPoS | ||
| カレンダービュー | ||
| ゲストCRM | ||
| 支払い手続き | ||
| 統合CRS | ||
| 補助的な収益の追跡 |
主な違いを表示しています。これらの製品間にはさらに39個の異なる機能があります。
8件の認証済みケーススタディを分析し、4つの主要ビジネス目標において各プラットフォームでホテルが実際に達成した成果を比較しました。
"We needed to change an on-site system we were using as we wanted to move our operation forward. We achieved that with HotelTime systems. They are reliable, and stable and offer fea..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
"In 2018 we were choosing a system for our first completely self-service ART and design hotel. We decided on HotelTime and after 4 years I have to say that the choice was the right..."
この目標に関するケーススタディはまだ公開されていません。
ホテル経営者が高く評価する点
While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of... While the system’s intuitive interface and ease of learning are generally appreciated, a few users mention initial challenges due to the complexity of features offered. Overall, once users become familiar with the system, it significantly enhances efficiency and simplifies hotel operations.
サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時... サポート チームの応答性と親切さは高く評価されていますが、一部のレビューでは、テクニカル サポートの時間を延長することで、特に海外のユーザーに対して常時サポートが提供され、ユーザー エクスペリエンスがさらに向上すると指摘されています。
HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users... HotelTime's robust reporting features are praised for providing comprehensive data insights into occupancy, revenue, and customer satisfaction. Users appreciate the variety of reports available for management, yet some desire more customization and advanced visualizations within the tool itself to better suit individual hotel needs.
ホテル経営者が指摘する課題
Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to... Some users voice a need for more customizable features, particularly in terms of reporting and interface personalization, which would allow hotels to better tailor the PMS to their specific operational strategies and guest services.
The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time... The automation capabilities in HotelTime, such as invoice processing and reservation management, are frequently mentioned for saving significant time for staff. Users highlight these features as reducing manual workload and minimizing the risk of human error, although they also express a desire for enhanced automation in guest communication and reporting.
独自の機能
評価が最も分かれる分野
お客様の要件次第です。HotelTime PMSとLogiciel Chloeは多くの主要なProperty Management Systems機能を共有していますが、それぞれに独自の機能があります。HotelTime PMSは58件の認証済み連携パートナーを持ち、Logiciel Chloeは11件を持っています。切り替え前に、上記の機能比較で違いをご確認ください。
小規模ホテルは使いやすさと迅速なオンボーディングを優先すべきです。HotelTime PMSは使いやすさで4.7/5対0.0/5とリードしています。透明性のある料金設定とトライアルまたはデモのオプションを探しましょう。各製品ページで施設規模別にレビューをフィルタリングして、同様のホテルからの声を確認してください。
HotelTime PMS:いいえ。Logiciel Chloe:いいえ。 どちらの製品も現在無料ティアを提供していません。ほとんどのProperty Management Systemsベンダーはデモまたはトライアルを提供しています — コミットする前に各社にご依頼ください。
HT Scoreは、ホテル経営者がホテルテクノロジー製品を客観的に比較できるよう、4個の基準グループと十数の変数を考慮した総合ランキングです。HOTELTIMEのHT Scoreは92、Sphère Informatiqueは0です。以下がスコアの算出方法です。
| 基準グループ | ウェイト | 測定内容 |
|---|---|---|
| 顧客評価とレビュー |
|
ユーザーはこの製品をどの程度推奨していますか? 評価スコア、レビュー数、シェアオブボイス、レビューの深さ、レビューの新しさ、成功事例 ▾ 最も重みの大きい要素です。平均満足度評価(推奨度、使いやすさ、サポート、ROI)、カテゴリー内の競合に対するレビュー総数、レビューの新しさ(直近6か月間に20件以上のレビュー)、固有のホテルクライアント全体のシェアオブボイスを分析して選択バイアスを検出します。 |
| パートナーエコシステム |
|
テクノロジーパートナーはこの企業をどの程度推奨していますか? パートナー推奨、連携数、連携品質 ▾ パートナー推奨を専門家の信頼票として評価し、認証済み連携の数、エコシステムの品質 — 連携パートナーの平均HT Scoreを評価します。より高品質な連携エコシステムを持つ製品は、接続されたテックスタックを提供する可能性が高くなります。 |
| 顧客中心主義 |
|
この組織はどの程度顧客中心ですか? 認定サポート、レビューの一貫性、プロフィールの完全性 ▾ 企業がHTRカスタマーサポート認定を取得しているか、長期にわたり一貫したレビュー収集を維持しているか(フィードバック主導の文化の指標)、機能、スクリーンショット、料金、特徴を含む完全な製品プロフィールを維持しているかを評価します。 |
| リーチ、継続性、リソース |
|
この企業のリーチとリソースはどの程度広範ですか? 地理的リーチ、継続性、企業リソース、トレンドスコア ▾ グローバルプレゼンス(対応国・地域)、安定性の指標としての事業年数、リソースの指標としてのチーム人数、直近12か月の購入者からの問い合わせ・レビュー・パートナー推奨・プレス活動に基づくトレンドスコアを測定します。 |
顧客評価とレビューは、HT Scoreアルゴリズムにおいて最も重要な要素です。HTRはランキング向上のための支払いを受け付けていません。すべてのレビューは認証済みです — 所属が確認されたホテル業界の実務者のみが評価を投稿できます。 HT Scoreの詳細な算出方法を見る →
製品推奨アドバイザー